Is it true that the elites want men and women to fight because then we will be easier to control?

ilikerelish · 2018-12-09T22:50:27+00:00

Divide and conquer - Sun Tzu

It's not just men/women, but also left/right, pro-life/pro-choice etc...... politicians, big business, traditional media prefer to rattle the cage and polarizing masses since:

It's easier to control people who are unhappy.
Divide and conquer. Less to manage.

rtmlex · 2018-12-09T22:13:22+00:00

Nah it’s the women. They are trash.

Men with families are actually easier to control and extort.

escapetovictory · 2018-12-10T00:15:56+00:00

you can research, henry makow would say feminism was engineered for the purpose of family breakdown. Being a tin foil head I would say that nothing it as it seems and I doubt these feminist groups, and many others, would flourish without some serious cash and management. Yes, there is an agenda.

lonewolfsigma8917 · 2018-12-09T23:05:56+00:00

This theory of DIVIDE AND RULE (basically) stems from the rule of british era in India. In India at a point of time there were only 900 britishers and officials (including viceroys). Everyone else was an indian working as a sepoy for them. How did they manage to rule india for 200 years ?? They made them fight each other in the name of religion,skin colour, dialect,feminism, culture, etc. They kept tribal war and clash of clans kind of thing going on. Only when after WWII , when 2.5 million indians were in british military, which was the sword arm without which they could not hold on to india, they realised they had to leave india, so what did they do ?? DECLARE VICTORY AND GET THE HELL OUT. For any powerful nation in any difficult position this is the safest option. Declare victory and get the hell out. And since then, britishers have been a LAPDOG of US deep state, since they do not have a colony like india anymore.

[deleted] · 2018-12-10T00:35:53+00:00

I did PR work for an globalist who was high up in the food chain in changing the direction of Playboy and several media outlets to adhere and take in feminist ideology. And not even she could have crafted and predicted such a major shift in identity politics.

The world is run on clickbait which emphasises and promotes extreme female nature. Women are solipsistic in nature but more so their love for victimhood. And being so privileged, they literally have to invent ways to claim that victimhood. And therein lies the problem.

But the biggest issue of all is women in positions of power. For now men have took women seriously and sold their souls for a whiff of pussy. And when men hand women the keys, they will always fuck it up.

It's always been there. It's always been slightly like this. The internet and ease of access has shone a light and expanded it dramatically. When women have privilege society will always suffer. Which is why you have to take their rights away. And I don't mean basic human rights. I mean the right to be in a position of power and influence. Because they have proven historically they are not fit for it and only cause destruction.

Men build. Women destroy.

Men say, "For the greater good!" Women say, "What's in it for me?"

Is it a wonder why we are on the brink of a dystopian society?

[deleted] · 2018-12-09T22:39:04+00:00

No, they simply want to destroy men. A few good men is all that is needed to overthrow a tyranny.

TowerOfMG · 2018-12-09T22:16:31+00:00

If they divide men and women, you get free men with actual free will. You'll get desperate women who find problems where there are none. That's not control for the "elite"

flee_market · 2018-12-10T02:40:13+00:00

Literally any conflict serves the purposes of the wealthy, EXCEPT the class warfare of poor vs rich.

But anything else? Man vs woman, black vs white vs whatever other color, all of that is good for the wealthy.

The more attention we're devoting to fighting with each other the less attention we're paying to the wealthy robbing all of us.

KneeDeepThought · 2018-12-10T03:08:02+00:00

Since there has been an upper class they have always hired half of the lower classes to fight the other half (conscriptions, union busters, etc.) Along with keeping us anesthetized (alcohol) and distracted (sports) this lets them walk away with all the financial gains of the lower class' efforts over and over again.

Now they've got us fighting each other and they don't have to pay much to keep the fight going, just keep stirring the "wahmen" up with cheap biased "journalism" to get them angry and keep their eyeballs on the advertisements while they twist themselves up and radiate shockwaves of manufactured fury to their families, friends, coworkers, etc through society.

Voila! Enemies divided and repeatedly conquered. See you after the quarterly earnings report for cognac and cigars.

[deleted] · 2018-12-10T07:14:47+00:00

Yes. This was explained by Aaron Russo before he was murdered for exposing the truth.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1I6vZ3OCk0

801735 · 2018-12-09T22:16:35+00:00

Who is in control of the reptilians who control the elites, tho!

Is there a rabbit at the end of the rabbit hole? ]=)

But sure there are "control groups". Would be such a waste of tech if there weren't. Not sure which is worse.

ShadowIsCorrect · 2018-12-09T22:32:18+00:00

It is true. The Elites would be happy for men and women to fight so they would be easier to control. They also have no problems with Blacks fighting Whites, Catholics fighting Protestants, Middle Class fighting less than Middle Class, hell they could even get behind Pepsi vs Coke if enough people would waste their time and not pay attention to who is really responsible for fucking them in the ass.

Non-PC-Guy · 2018-12-10T00:31:28+00:00

Yes it is true, but it’s also true they have succeeded and women have been made degenerate by them. Catch 22. You don’t want the powers that be to win, but if you go with a women you’ll likely get screwed over by her because of the powers that be. It’s a twofold truth. If the Elites weren’t involved there would be less to no gynocentric laws. Women would not have the power they have now and wouldn’t be able to screw men over in divorce court.

NotMyWomen · 2018-12-10T01:04:49+00:00

What makes you think single men living off grid are easier to control?

It’s not really a coincidence that the biggest peddlers of marriage are the Catholic Church.

People literally lined up to give the Pope’s their money.

That’s how stupid the human animal is.

[deleted] · 2018-12-10T04:23:05+00:00

Yes. This is with any group. Infighting will weaken the group, making it easier to take them on.

Going Your Own Way is dangerous to controllers because you decide not to play the game.

wasthereadogwithyou · 2018-12-10T05:55:22+00:00

Oh, probably.

ld2gj · 2018-12-10T06:16:38+00:00

Yes and no; depends on how far down the conspiracy hole you want to go. A people divided are easy to conquer and control, and it is best done with multiple fronts. If you can divide people using different aspects, then you weaken them even more. Look at how politics are broken down; Liberal/Conservative, Atheist/Religious, White/Non-White, Male/Female, Pro/Anti-Abortion, and so many others. The more you segment people, the more they are divided and easier to catalog, control/deal with, and even shape as needed.

DangZagnut · 2018-12-09T22:26:07+00:00

No, conspiracy retards and alt-stormfront pushes that.

There’s no “war” between men and women. There’s just people bitching on the internet and others bitching back at them. A few rich people got sparked for being mean to women, and a few women lied about what happened. Virtually nothing has actually changed for (in the U.S.) for 300 million people or so other than some minor social changes. The relationship surface has changed, so you adapt to it.

First, you have to be convinced that their are elites in the first place, their aren’t. It’s shows a complete lack of exposure to rich people, how business operates, etc. by people in trailer parks with an internet connection.

Second, you have to be convinced who the (((elites))) are, so that you’re somehow being manipulated by satellites signals into your life changing. It hasn’t. Your life is progressing just as you allowed it to.

Third, that sets up an ethnostate agenda and babbling about kalergi plans and protocols of Zion and introduced to hating people you already fear, people from somewhere else with strange ways of speaking your language. You’ll be convinced that there’s some mass conspiracy of replacing native people with some mystical stupid workforce, who magically are all retards who will work in the factories that are supposed to be replaced by robots of course. Of course they never explain how importing people will work out well, showing a certain stupidity on the parts of the elites, that had a centuries old plan with no flaws apparently.

Fourth, you have to buy into all your problems being everyone’s fault but yours.

Fifth, you’ll do as you’re told and vote how they want you to vote.

Women do stupid things in society against their best interests, that’s true, but that’s their problem.

There’s no brand conspiracy, just changes based on individuaul choices causing a delta in the play surface of life. In virtually no cases will it actually affect you.

Perrero · 2018-12-09T22:36:40+00:00

Don't fall too much into conspiracies. Even one percenters can be some of the biggest cucks

Im_Talking · 2018-12-10T00:35:07+00:00

It's not the elites (I don't even know what the word means), it's the rich. And yes, the rich pit one sub-group against another because they know human nature. The people who are oppressed don't want to fix their oppression because that's too hard, they want the easy way out which is to oppress and feel how that feels.

The true racism in society is rich vs poor.

[deleted] · 2018-12-10T02:36:09+00:00

Nailed it

metalsympathizer · 2018-12-10T02:53:28+00:00

Insert divide and conquer here

It's just to sow general chaos in society. A unified, thinking population is very dangerous to the elite.

Men vs women, white vs black, Republican vs Democrat, christian vs other group, straight vs gay, poor vs rich

Anyway that humans are different, the elite can spin it to create hatred. It's not even just one set of elite either. Different groups are fighting each other.

Ex: during the american revolution. Our biggest ally was France. The French monarchy wasn't doing it because they wanted to help free a oppressed people. It was to fuck over the british monarchy. Without the 13 colonies, the Brits lost a lot of resources (tax money, trading, land, people, etc). Its ironic too! Only 10 years later, our revolution and constitution was a huge influence and motivator for the French revolution. So in part, the monarchy backing us also got them killed.

Tl;dr: the puppet masters pit us against each other using any differences we have with other people

[deleted] · 2018-12-10T04:31:23+00:00

Nature selects.

Gn0meRat · 2018-12-10T04:55:03+00:00

If you're a dynasty power, other dynasties are a threat. Destroy family, destroy dynasty.

ABrokenBeing · 2018-12-10T09:57:16+00:00

Nope, it’s the opposite.

Men are withdrawing and women are given the shovel to clean up as they are now ‘stronk and independent’

The armies are weakening and the labourers are dwindling

lonelydewd · 2018-12-10T11:44:24+00:00

[deleted] · 2018-12-10T15:42:54+00:00

I'm not so sure. They want us to keep breeding children to work as slaves in their meat grinders.

everythangspeachie · 2018-12-10T16:55:28+00:00

I think its mostly to keep birth rates low

Title	Is it true that the elites want men and women to fight because then we will be easier to control?
Author	IRespekWombats
Upvotes	47
Comments	47
Date	December 9, 2018 10:08 PM UTC (7 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/a4pbyh/is_it_true_that_the_elites_want_men_and_women_to/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/is-it-true-that-the-elites-want-men-and-women-to.445517 https://theredarchive.com/post/445517

Comments