Creating Attraction for your Opposite versus Being Attracted by Self Love

NeoreactionSafe · 2017-09-01T12:56:38+00:00

Wrong... To a degree

Females first choice - Yes, women have a capacity to lie, bolster the male ego to get what she desires. We've all seen this. But some women can be swept by awe over a great man.

Females other choice - To claim lesbians aren't attracted to beauty is false. Lipstick Lesbians are a great example. I'd venture the causes for lesbianism are; father issues, higher testosterone levels, a hatred for the boisterous male. Or you may be right with their capacity for narcissism.

Male first choice - Same as the female first choice, we can bolster their egos but this is a game many men are playing, so the intelligent will attempt a different game e.g comedy, dominance, psychology/psychopathy, sheer looks.

Male other choice - I throw at you Rollo's theory on "The Pill" and their cyclic nature. With a reduced desire for masculinity, the pretty boy will do better (Long as he's of the feminine dandy variety) OR i repeat my agreement about the female capacity for narcissism. 50/50 atm

aanarchist · 2017-09-01T22:27:40+00:00

i wanna argue for the opposite and say the weaker partner imitates the other. think of how the betas on trp are imitating the women and thus becoming little more than the male version of feminists, 666 psychopathic servants who savor their scraps as if it was a feast. they can't get pussy by just living life on their terms as free men and so they change themselves to suit the whores of babylon so that they can get a taste of loose pussy that's been used by a hundred other men, then bragging about it as if fucking a whore is some sort of life accomplishment. in a free world man is the container, woman is the liquid that fits in the container, not the other way around. strong frame means love of self, means following your own path, think your own thoughts and therefor take your own actions as a free man who makes his own decisions. the woman is attracted to this and molds herself to fit what he wants her to be or else he will be totally indifferent towards her. you make give into self love sound bad the way you described it like you're supposed to love yourself, your higher Self, embrace that you are an embodiment of the sacred masculine and that it represents truth, order and beauty. the problem with oneitis happens when you take your love of self and give it over to someone else, it becomes love of someone outside of self because you believe them to be a greater embodiment of Self than you are. a woman with stronger frame than her man is basically her love of self beating out his, and he surrenders himself to her because he believes she is better than he is, which means he is lacking in understanding of what masculine and feminine energy is and how they are supposed to be complimentary. whenever i've had oneitis it's been when she had me believing that she was capable of loving a person the way i am, and it was through her actions that she had me believing this, she quickly proves it wrong because keeping up the illusion of the high standards i will hold her to that she does not want to hold herself to will leave her drained very quickly unless she internally embodies the things she's doing, which is essentially her cessation of her self, her total submission to the sacred masculine, and her ego will not allow her to do that because thanks feminism. she can't fit in the container i provide for her because it would mean her total subjugation, which ironically is the true path to her freedom. the man chooses to mold his container to what he believes she is or is not capable of so as to keep her around and not be too hard on her in his expectations, which is fancy language for moving the goal post, a feminist tactic. there's a lot of women that when you get them into a submissive mindset, all they want is for you to push them further and further, to show you how far she's willing to go for you, how low she's willing to go. she doesn't want a beta submissive posing as an alpha who's gonna try to match her, she wants the divine masculine energy that will be like gravity, who says here is how it is going to be, here is the law, you're going to do this because we both know that this is who you are, because i am the master and i decide what you are and what you are not. the whole punishments and rewards and congruence with them is basically you being the embodiment of natural law. society's pedestalization of women excludes her from natural law and protects her from the consequences of her actions, at least in the short term when she's still pretty. they love being degraded because on a fundamental logical level, she understands she's a disgusting piece of shit and that without the masculine to keep her in check she'll hurt herself and others, but people act like she's not. feminism encouraged males to project themselves onto women, and women's attempt to absorb their essence didn't make them any more like men, they didn't develop any sacred masculine virtues, they just went deeper and deeper into the extremes of female nature. the male should practice self love understanding the nature of the masculine, and the female should practice love of others or more specifically love of her male understanding the nature of the feminine. the only relationship success i've had was in a dynamic like this, it required no manipulation or cruelty or ruthlessness on my part, it was as simple as understanding right and wrong. my issue was they never gave me enough reason to want to keep the relationship going the way it was because she was not committed to adapting herself to me and her ego attachments to who she was and who she thought she was supposed to be got in her way. as patient as i am when you move the goal posts it's her trying to change the rules of the game, and when you try to change the rules for me without my consent i will quit and find a new game to play that i will enjoy and that will be orderly and beautiful. there's simply no reason to indulge in senseless chaos least of all in a relationship.

tldr the woman is the weaker sex, and she will rightfully worship the masculine virtues of her male counterpart instead of her self, lower case s. the man will see the beauty in the woman, and he will understand and accept and appreciate that it is man that made her that made her that way. he is the creative force of the universe, she is his creation. you can appreciate your creation but you don't praise it for something that you did. she is the way she is because you made her that way, and her nature of being clay to be molded is to be appreciated in its own way. the sculptor has a degree of appreciation and respect for the quality material he uses to create his works of art. it's not the kind of respect he has for another fellow artist and his technique, but rather an appreciation for the earth which provides him the material with which to make his art, which is basically what the sacred feminine is, the earth and all its bounty. when i think about it from that perspective the psychopathic controller is the kind of person who has an emotional breakdown and takes offense over a tree falling down or a flood or hurricane or something.

midgetpooooo · 2017-09-01T17:41:06+00:00

"When a male practices self love he makes himself beautiful (which mirrors his ordered mind) and this creates no attraction in women."

What? Are you saying that it's gay to workout, look good, chill out and smoke, meditate, etc? I don't understand what you're saying here or with the other male choice.

tinkerer13 · 2017-09-07T06:43:26+00:00

Which is going to make you better with women, thinking or feeling?

Title	Creating Attraction for your Opposite versus Being Attracted by Self Love
Author	NeoreactionSafe
Upvotes	3
Comments	16
Date	September 1, 2017 12:17 PM UTC (6 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/6xe51l/creating_attraction_for_your_opposite_versus/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/creating-attraction-for-your-opposite-versus-being.45710 https://theredarchive.com/post/45710