TL DR; Woman created Femism to fight patriarchy through man made democracy, will result in population decrease. Nature and natural selection still wins.
Ive recently discovered MGTOW and can see myself going my own way. My reasons are the risk of marriage and raising kids seem to be too great to consider, and I believe I will be far worse of if I was to go down this route.
My decision has made me ponder why a community such as MGTOW or even The Red Pill has had to come about and what the future of the world truly looks like.
If feminism has turned the west to a gynocentric world and women are the truly powerful ones in todays society where does that leave men. Since men do make up half the worlds population.
**Please note that the below is not a very well put together post and there are many holes which im sure you will find. I am not a great writer and have decided to write this to see what others think about my ideas about the future. I hope this can start a debate amongst MGTOW and perhaps come up with a better solution to combat my outlook on the future. Also I make a statement about MGTOW men falling within the unattractive men category which im sure will cause an upset amongst the community, what I mean by unattractive is genetically and the resources a man provides, but if a good looking man doesn’t provide his resources to women he is therefore not an attractive option to woman (I hope that makes sense) i.e he only provides alpha fucks and no beta bucks.
My theory will be based on a few assumptions.
- 1 Women only find 20% (1 in 5) of men genetically attractive. Based only on looks i.e alpha fucks
- 2 The rest of men that have procreated throughout history have done so based on the resources they were able to provide i.e beta bucks. Therefore, men have had to work harder and had to acquire more skills and resources to attract females.
- 3 Women are the more valuable gender because they have wombs and wombs are needed to procreate. Sperm is cheap and eggs are expensive. It is easier for the average women to get laid than the average male because men are programed to have sex with as many women as possible as long as she shows signs of fertility (pretty, not obese, not too old and decent skin condition) , whereas women are programmed to have sex with only the best available option to her (alpha of the group, best looking, strongest or smartest/most resourceful so that these attractive qualities can be passed to her offspring).
- 4 Feminism is anti-men, however only the weakest men in society are affected by this. By weak I mean men that are not genetically desirable (not good looking, not athletic and not tall) and those men that are not resourceful (no skills, no high paying job, no status in society, no assets, no connections). However, I do believe feminism (just like patriarchy) is a natural occurrence as it is used by women to politically push their best interest as it helps natural selection weed out the weak. However, a consequence of this is also that the weakest women (unattractive females) will also lose out. The only people that benefit from feminism are the most attractive females and the most attractive males (both genetically and resourceful). Mother nature and father time always win.
- 5 Women’s claim that they have been repressed does hold some merit when you look at history in terms of education and forced marriages. However, the majority of men were also repressed as lower-class men also weren’t allowed access to education and had only menial jobs to choose from. The forced marriage claim also weakens when you consider that most marriages before the 18th century where arranged for both men and women. Forced marriages in this case was a necessity for humans to progress and reach the benefits we now enjoy within modern society.
- 6 Patriarchy had to exist to push along human civilisations. It was patriarchy that organised and united the labour of people, sent men to war to conquer more lands so future generations can benefit. Feminism was not able to occur during this time as the world was too volatile and needed the skills and strength of men to make society better. Women still played their part by taking care of children and the household. People did what they were best at. If I had the choice to fight in a war or look after the children, I know which one I would choose.
- 7 Patriarchy having conquered the world and created modern society (the safest time in history) is no longer needed as the world doesn’t need the same level of man power. Technology can now do the work of what men did, and both men and women are only needed to supervise. Once AI becomes more advanced more jobs will become obsolete and those men that are not needed any more will not be deemed desirable. For example, once driverless vehicles become mainstream a lot of men will be out of work.
- 8 Femism will continue to grow and eventually influence the arab world, african nations, india and china. the whole world will become gynocentric.
My believe is that women will continue to push the feminist agenda to the point where it will be illegal for a man to make the first move on a woman. Men will be too scared to ask women out on dates from fear of sexual harassment laws and will therefore have to wait until a woman approaches the man first. Women will only approach the best-looking males and the most resourceful (top 20% of males)
Feminism will push a more socialist society, where AI do most the work and all races have equal opportunity.
Women will therefore only have sex with 20% of men. The consequence of this will be, those men will be able to fuck all the attractive women. Those women who are deemed unattractive will not fuck anyone and not bare children (taking out unattractive women from the gene pool) or can buy superior genetic sperm with government money.
The 80% of men who are not deemed attractive will therefore not pass on their genes to the next generation unless they are picked by one of the unattractive females or they pay a female to have a child with them.
Homosexuality among unattractive men and unattractive females will rise (as can be seen in the growing number of people that identify with LGBT of the last decade). It will be the norm for women to be in relationships with each other and have a man (one of the 20%) to sleep with during ovulation. There could be a scenario where 1 male is sleeping with 6 women giving them all kids living in a matriarchy. Most women will only have 1 child as they will probably be having fun, adventure sex and building careers in their 20’s and only having kids in their late 30’s.
The 80% of men whom are deemed unattractive to women will either become white knights to get in the good books of women, turn gay or become MGTOW. Either way these men will not reproduce and if each female that is attractive enough to reproduce the global population would fall by 50% (80% of unattractive males and 20% of unattractive females will not reproduce).
I think this cycle of the most unattractive people not reproducing will happen a few times until the global population is around 3 to 4 billion. However, these people that are left are going to be highly attractive and physically taller and stronger then today’s society. Also, due to feminism pushing socialism, ethnically this future population will be majority of mixed ethnic backgrounds. This society will be much more hedonistic as AI will take care of a lot of the work. Working hours will be less and general wellbeing will be a lot greater.
This is what I believe will happen in the future. What do you guys think will happen? I personally feel a bit sad about not passing on my genes to the next generation but in today’s gynocentric society marriage and kids aren’t worth it for me. I personally haven’t found yet what MGTOW means to me, I have no idea what I should do with myself now kids aren’t a viable goal. Perhaps I’m hoping that the MGTOW community can actually come together and do something productive to combat feminism instead of letting women walk all over us as a gender. I know MGTOW don’t deal with women on a personal level, however by saying we don’t care were only worried about our own happiness we allow feminism to shape our lives and the future.
there doesn't seem to be anything here