Vox shows us how Dr. Bouman was all by herself on the project!

oirectine00 · 2019-04-17T14:56:04+00:00

Media: posts articles falsely attributing all of the work to a single woman

Men: call the article out for being bullshit

Media: "THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN WOMEN ARE PRESENTED AS LONE GENIUSES. WE WERE JUST PRETENDING TO BE RETARDED. THIS IS A SOCIAL EXPERIMENT."

Men: "That's dishonest and hurts women more by creating unrealistic standards for women in STEM"

Media: "THAT'S WHAT WE WERE SAYING ALL ALONG. STOP MANSPLAINING"

Men: "You're just manufacturing controversy to keep your sham of a media company going"

Media: "WOW, WHO HURT YOU?"

DWShimoda · 2019-04-17T13:17:39+00:00

Key paragraph hidden in the midst of the (*yawn*) ignorant NPC bullshitfest of an "article" there:

There’s a lot of nonsense tied up in this episode — and we wouldn’t even be talking about it if platforms like Twitter, Reddit, and YouTube didn’t allow trollish thinking to fester and spread virally.

Translation: Vox wants MOAR "thought policing."

How DARE platforms like Twitter, Reddit, and YouTube "allow" people to make statements -- or indeed even HAVE, much less "spread" thoughts (tsk, tsk, such things are by definition "trollish") -- particularly any that are critical of, or in any way disagree with, the [current year's] "narrative" and the media's consensus propagandistic agenda.

Ergo ONLY "select/official/important" peoples -- apparently including Herr Brian Resnick -- located in important places (like Washington D.C.; NYC, etc), and working for authoritative entities (like "Vox" LOL)... should be allowed to engage in "thinking"... or at least what passes for such (so long as it continues to adhere to the [current year's] "narrative" -- whatever that might be).

DangZagnut · 2019-04-18T03:06:15+00:00

Once again, this wasn't a sexist "backlash" against the scientist, it was a backlash against agendized media bullshit.

But they have to call it "sexism" because it's not like SJW rags will ever admit to their stupidity. Nope, must be those nerds on social media.

Also, was I the only one unimpressed by this accomplishment?

Oh look, a vaguely Eye of Sauron looking gif or a stained napkin some orange juice glass had been on.

They made it sound like we landed on the moon again (or for the first time if you know it was fake). It by definition can't exist. Black holes pull in light so it is impossible to see visually anyway. The picture is 100% fabricated.

So they took some radiation readings and said, well, here's a visualization of the radiation readings if those were colors.

I'm not impressed at all. It doesn't actually do anything. It doesn't help anything. It would be posted on /r/mildlyinteresting and that's about it. It's literally a picture of nothing.

Here's a picture of a black hole: .

A period. There you go, no light is reflected. I just did the work of 199 highly educated scientists and one media blowtard. It's as useful as the shit they did.

I don't see how this in anyway changes anything. What's the use of making fake pictures of things? It's not like they invented the x-ray imagine or MRI imaging that actually is useful. It's about as good as a not-too-spicy meme.

"How orange do you want your black hole to be sir?"

"Same color as this Screwdriver I'm about to drink."

Title	Vox shows us how Dr. Bouman was all by herself on the project!
Author	verideth_01
Upvotes	16
Comments	5
Date	April 17, 2019 12:36 PM UTC (7 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/be79y4/vox_shows_us_how_dr_bouman_was_all_by_herself_on/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/vox-shows-us-how-dr-bouman-was-all-by-herself-on.481117 https://theredarchive.com/post/481117

Comments

Translation: Vox wants MOAR "thought policing."