The tweet series of a man whose ex-wife came to the alimony raise lawsuit with her fiancé.

 

The interview with the man about the tweet series, goes deeper into the situation.

 

 

Sorry about both of these sources not being in English, you can read for yourself with the aid of the translators. The gist of these are:   * In the tweets he is saying that ex-wife and her fiancé haven't been able to marry because their financial situations aren't great, so they have to increase the alimony.  

  * The interview explains that he and her were in same neighbourhood, started flirting, became married with her after he became sergeant (bound by contract, paid) and sent to eastern part of the country, without knowing each other very well.

 

  • In the first years of marriage problem started, she was flying back to her hometown whenever possible. Says I can't make it here, let's divorce. They divorce with agreement (no alimony from this).

 

  • One month after the divorce, he was called by ex-wife to be informed that she was pregnant. He wanted to help his ex-wife and the child, so he doesn't renew the contract and uses his assingment to go back to his hometown and starts to work as an civil servant. They face some health problems during and after the birth of the child, he uses everything he has including his compensation from his sergeant contract, takes credit and it still doesn't cut it. He remarries her to get his child into his helathcare.

 

  • Ex-wife leaves to her parents house and opens divorce lawsuit. He asks her why, she responds with: "First time I left you, I took nothing from you; I had problems. Now, I'll take from you."

 

  • He is paying for both child and poverty alimonies, material and spiritual compensations, lawyer prices, trial prices and his credit debt with minimum wage. Alimonies are going for 7 years, he is disgruntled with the poverty alimony.

 

  • He and ex-wife are living in same district, so he knew that she had someone else in her life. Ex-wife went with her new fiancé for first time to alimony raise lawsuit, new fiancé waits outside the court room. After the lawsuit, new fiancé cuts their way (Yes, he married again) and says something like "You're going to work, we're going to spend it.". Walks up to the new wife when she tries to record this.

 

  • She says to judge "You need to raise the alimony for us (ex-wife & new fiancé) to be able to marry.". Reason being, both him and his new wife are civil servants, so their income is great, there is no problem about raising the alimony. The kicker is that the ex-wife is working with insurance and her new fiancé is a store owner. Meaning, they can easily marry if tthey so desire.

 

 

Note: Poverty alimony is unlimted in time, while child alimony usually lasts until the child is 18 or until the study of the child finishes.

 

This reassured me again that everything here can be applied to women all around the world.