The main problem in understanding the Alpha - Beta dynamics in manosphere world is the assumption that a lack of Alpha traits somehow means a person is more Beta. And vice versa. Alpha and Beta are completely different sets of personality traits. One is independent from another. Alpha-Beta is not like happy-sad. It’s like happy-rested. You can be unhappy but rested. You can be happy but unrested. Or you can be rested and happy. Being beta is not bad. Being only alpha is not good. You can be fully alpha and beta. Or lack both. See the image:

Alpha-Beta

Alpha traits: dominance, leadership, strength, muscles, IDGF mentality, assertiveness, social status, aggressive, confidence

Beta traits: career, money, compassion, IQ, good father, good provider, also social status, reliable, productive, etc

Omega lacks both. He is unreliable, weak, unsocial, unproductive...

.

What Alpha gives to women: it creates a spark, tingles, sexual attraction, excitement.

What Beta gives to women: comfort, security, feeling loved.

Women want both. They find a drug dealer sexually attractive, because he can give all the alpha traits. They find a MD worthy of commitment, because he can give beta traits. But the CEO that takes care of himself is a leader and a provider with power and reliability. He is the real chad with A and B qualities.

Most men today lack alpha traits, so they do not get laid, hence TRP. But beta is not bad. Lack of alpha traits are bad, if you want to get your dick wet. Being beta does not mean someone is alpha.