~ archived since 2018 ~

White Gay Christian Male here. If we removed the killing of the nonbelievers from the Muslim ideology, who would choose Islam over Feminism?

Just-Incase- · 2018-08-09T07:20:33+00:00

As I said countless of times, I dont agree with Islam and and I think unless it is reformed, removing all verses calling for the killing of peoples, it will...

Just-Incase-

August 9, 2018

0 upvotes

/r/MGTOW

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB

Post Information

Title	White Gay Christian Male here. If we removed the killing of the nonbelievers from the Muslim ideology, who would choose Islam over Feminism?
Author	Just-Incase-
Upvotes	0
Comments	34
Date	August 9, 2018 7:20 AM UTC (7 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/95uact/white_gay_christian_male_here_if_we_removed_the/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/white-gay-christian-male-here-if-we-removed-the.512988 https://theredarchive.com/post/512988

Comments

[–]Shimakaze46 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

[–]Just-Incase-[S] -2 points-1 points0 points 7 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

This stands in contrast to reported rape rate of 1.2 per 100,000 in Japan, 1.8 per 100,000 in India, 4.6 rapes per 100,000 in Bahrain, 12.3 per 100,000 in Mexico, 24.1 per 100,000 in United Kingdom, 28.6 per 100,000 in ...

Rape in Saudi Arabia has been researched by various observers and entities. In 2002, sexual offences stood at 0.3 rapes per 100,000 population. Under Sharia law, a law generally enforced by the Islamic states

Sharia law protects females from sexual assault. Why would we not cheery pic Islamic dress for females to keep both men and woman safe from sexual assault? We want to protect women don't we? They demand we protect them, don't they? Let them dress like prostitutes if they want. But the must cover it up in public if they do not want Comments on their appearance. Why should men have to shut up because women don't want ugly men to speak to them? That's what it's all about. Unwanted attention from ugly guys.

It's time we forced women into safety.

[–]TheCripplingDevice5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]Just-Incase-[S] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]TheCripplingDevice2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

How do we know only 3% of the reported cases are authentic? Don't get me wrong, I've been on this sub for long enough to understand the pervasiveness of false accusations but that doesn't convince me to only allow eye-witness testimony where other means of proof such as video evidence would give a better picture of what happened. Either way rape is hard to prove. Killing someone for lying seems over the top for me and punishing a guy for having sex with another mans wife seems like an overreach of the state. Maybe she didn't tell him. The reason why sweden no longer records the background of perpetrators was that the last years they did over 90% of sexual assaults were comitted by muslim men. Since they didn't want to fan the flames they stopped recording the background of the perpetrators. Tadaa! Problem solved.

You can't enforce modesty. These veiled women still pimp themselves up with makeup and high heels. I also don't feel comfortable with giving the state the authority to moderate anyone's clothing style. Also safety is an illusion to take away your rights.

[–]Just-Incase-[S] -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]TheCripplingDevice0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I agree that just because a report doesn't finish in conviction doesn't mean the rapist got away. It could very well be that the female is making a false accusation but it could also mean the evidence was inconclusive to Judge one way or the other. So why limit the possible evidence like a Sharia Court does?

As for your second paragraph I only understood parts of it but i think I got the gist. I disagree with the idea that no man should be subjected to provocative clothing. It supposes men are too weak willed to resist provocation. They can run around naked for all I care and I still wouldn't want to give them my time or attention. But yes you also have the right to comment on what they are wearing without being punished. Also you're not responsible for who's attracted to you. Ask any Chad who's been stalked by an ugly chick.

[–]Just-Incase-[S] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]jkarovskaya0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Just-Incase-[S] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]Judah_Earl0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Just-Incase-[S] -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]The0therS0N2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]Just-Incase-[S] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Feminism isn't going anywhere unless society collapsed. Even in war women would take to the streets to protest how 'real men should be out fighting the war' like the white feather girls.

As for modesty. We had modesty and it didn't change shit. Just like marriage doesnt. Women still cheated in a time were they was killed for it.

As for your idea of cherry picking. You are giving religion too much credit. They took traditions of their time and spun their own version of it. Again, anything worth having is part of the human experience just as anything not worth having.

MGTOWs don't want to change shit. We aren't MRAs. History has proven that female behavior is coded into their DNA.

So go your own way. Develop your own lifestyle. Feminists aren't going away anytime soon. We aren't going to restructure society. It's not going to happen. But you always have control over your own lifestyle and your own ability to choose a better path.

[–]Just-Incase-[S] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]jkarovskaya0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Just-Incase-[S] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree in liberty for individuals. But I also believe in the responsibility that comes with those liberties. If females want to avoid unwanted attention, they should not draw it to themselves. If they do draw it to themselves, then they should be held responsible for not keeping themselves safe. Our police are here to solve crimes, not protect scantily clothed women who only want attention from a certain type of man. If they want to be safe, let them spend their own money on private security rather than say all men must never comment on a females appearance.

If a certain culture has a manner in which to avoid sexual harassment and their stats back it up, I say enforce it for the safety of women, whether they like it or not.

Men pay 60% of the tax coffer. Ho's use up too much of our tax dollar on the safety rather than just modifying their behaviour to keep themselves safe, which is not only way cheaper, but actually free!!!!

It's not rocket science... Duh

[–]nonchalantfool1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Just-Incase-[S] -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]Just-Incase-[S] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Just-Incase-[S] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Ohboohoolittlegirl0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]Just-Incase-[S] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]Just-Incase-[S] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Judah_Earl-1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link