Although the red pill is a broad concept with many ideas (many of which I believe), I think where they go wrong is their acceptance of the nonsense PUA belief that "game" is one of the factors that females assess when determining partner selection. By partner selection I mean who a girl actually wants to be with, so I am not talking about marriage and stuff which entails money and beta bucks and stuff.

They think that it works something like this: every guy has a score out of 100 and the highest score gets the female. So for example, physical attraction is worth 60%, and "game" is worth 40%. So a guy who is a 50/60 in looks and 20/40 in "game" is a total of 70/100 and will be beaten by a guy who is 40/60 in looks and 35/40 in game= 75/100 which is higher than 70/100. This is absolute horseshit. That is not how females choose.

How they choose is 100% based on physical attraction. So there is a score out of 100, and it is completely about physical attraction and whichever guy is closer to 100 will get the girl. The ONLY instance in which "game" comes into play is if 2 or more are tied on their /100 score of looks, OR if the best looking guy acts autistic. So for example, the average girl gets 800 matches a month on tinder. So she will pick like the top 3 most physically attractive guys to message, a 9.5/10, a 9.5/10, and a 9.5/10. Whichever of these 3 guys posts a funnier response, will get her pussy. If a guy is a 9.2/10 and messages her something 4 times funnier than all the 9.5s combined, that won't make ANY difference in terms of his chances, because she will not even CONSIDER him, so to her, he is simply INVISIBLE.

Yet the simps at redpill and PUA don't realize this. So I can't take either of them seriously as this is a fundamental flaw. Whereas MGTOW REALIZES that the game is rigged, and REALIZES that AWALT.