A message I've received on WhatsApp. Worth a read

Men want sex more than quarrel

Men want sex. That’s no secret.

But men want sex so much they’re even willing to live together with a woman who quarrels, bitches around, makes snide remarks, refuses to cook, refuses to raise children correctly and who represents a constant danger to sue him, accuse him of rape or kidnap his children.

For men in such relationships sex is the main reason to continue.

Thus realistic fembots are a viable alternative for these men.

This is the thought that these men will have: “Looking at my current wife/girl-friend should I drop her for a fembot that looks the same (or better)?” -and- “Looking at my current wife/girl-friend should I additionally get a fembot?”

And should men in the future EVER MISS dissing, quarreling, shouting it will be rather easy to program some “bitch algorithms”.

On the other hand women want to talk and (and sometimes want to hurt) more than sex. Thus for women malebots (mandroids) are a far less viable alternative. Especially since intelligent conversations are far more complicated to implement than mere body functions (sex).

Result: Fembots > Malebots

Women want to marry up

Women HATE to marry down. Women LOVE to marry up (richer-than-self guys, taller-than-self guys, more-intelligent-than-self guys).

Men marry the secretary or the millionaire. Men are far more willing to accept what a woman has to offer financial-wise or achievement-wise.

Thus fembots (who naturally would look up to the man) are satisfactory for men. Women on the other hand will have a hard time to find

  • a malebot they can look up to
  • who will take them convincingly in the arms when they cry
  • who will offer protection when they walk in empty streets at night
  • who will do things the woman can complain about (leaving socks around)

Result: Fembots > Malebots

Men could be happy with a 1- or 2-function fembot

I think it’s enough for men to have a fembot that does 1 or 2 things really well.

Women on the other hand need a partner who could take care of car repairs, tax returns (if there is such thing in 50 years), sudden problems, carrying heavy things etc..

Women also need somebody they can hurt psychologically or whom they can please by doing typically female things (cooking, wearing sexy negligees,…). This also would be far less possible with malebots.

It’s common experience that women often don’t know what they want. Again, a malebot is far less capable to tell the woman what she wants.

Result: Fembots > Malebots

Women want more children than men

Since women usually want more children than men, and since there are more men than women who don’t want to have any children at all, fembots will be competitors of nearly all women, while malebots will only be useful to those women, who want to be with a man who doesn’t want children.

Result: Fembots > Malebots

Fembots are cheaper than malebots

Since malebots are far less useful to women (than fembots to men) fembots will be sold in higher numbers. Therefore they will be cheaper than malebots and thus less available to women (who additionally naturally earn less money than men).

Result : Fembots > Malebots

Women copy other women

Additionally I believe that women copy very much the behavior of other women (newest fashions, acceptable behavior, values etc). Thus if the standards are more and more set by fembots, women will fembot’ize their behavioral patterns, too.

Women will have to compete like never before in the history of humanity

Since suddenly millions of men have fembots the number of available men shrinks and thus women have to compete not only with fembots but also with other women for the available men left.

The main reasons for a relationship with human women are sex, child birth and partnership. But sex will be replaceable by fembots and birth by artificial uteruses.

Women will not be able to compete in the body area (sex, looks, staying forever young, health issues), nor in the easiness area (divorce, alimony, turn off switch) therefore “partnership value” will be the main asset of future women.

Thus women will naturally be forced to get as close to “the perfect wife” as possible in the following areas where fembots cannot compete against humans:

  • affection/love
  • cooking (although cooking itself could be replaced by fembots, trying out new things that taste good for the husband is hardly possible)
  • artfully styling the house embracing the preferences of the husband and the children
  • motherhood
  • intelligent conversations
  • partnership, warmth
  • being a team-mate, love-mate, soul-mate
  • being helpful and non-dangerous

These are EXACTLY all things that feminism tries to eradicate so much.

Fembots will kill feminism and lead to a renaissance of womanhood and feminism will be replaced by feminine-ism.

The 2 types of women in the future

So how will the future of womanhood look like?

One part of female humanity will start to emphasize typical female features that fembots cannot offer (affection, fairness, motherhood, …).

The other females will be incapable of competing with fembots (or with other women) thus they will die out (childless, husbandless) or will compete with men, thus become more like men, thus will become unnecessary, because the world doesn’t need imitators of men (“hyenas”).

Won’t governments or religions stop fembots or artificial wombs?

I doubt that it’s possible to stop the advance of fembots.

After all it’s a multi-billion dollar industry (actually multi-trillion dollars like the car industry, especially if you consider that men may have several fembots, and even married men may have several fembots).

A feministic government may try to force fembot producers to implement special behavioral patterns (“feministic fembots”) but that’s a rather unlikely scenario.

Feminists may claim that fembots are furthering the objectifying of women but that’s also true for dildos, androids at the working place and Barbie dolls. Additionally you may always counter-argue that fembots reduce prostitution, thus are actually helpful to further female issues.

Fembots are not only useful in the area of personal recreation but also in shops (cleaning personnel, presenter), in hotels (simple receptionist) and for other simple tasks.

Religious leaders won’t stop fembots because fembots allow to do all kinds of things (sexual and non-sexual) without the limitati0ns of religious rules.

Feminist governments also won’t stop artificial uteri. Because it is the long feministic dream to separate children from women. Feminists would want to have artificial uteri right now (if they could) thus artificial uteri is the last thing feminists would reject.

And EVEN IF governments decide to stop artificial uteri: It doesn’t change the fact that women will have to compete with fembots thus will diminish the disgusting evil influence of feminism.

Another possible scenario the planned reduction of the supply of women (e.g. by restricting female embryos). However that is an utterly unfeministic idea (some feminists would love to see abortions of male embryos only) because it reduces female visibility in society even more.

Summary

As I see it, the shock waves created by fembots will be greater than by the anti-baby pill and feminism combined. And there won’t be anything that feminist could do about it.

Thus even if you will not be among the men who will buy a fembot, fembots will benefit you, too.