http://aaronsleazy.blogspot.com/2013/02/roosh-vs-weak-ego-case-study.html

Disclaimer: I don't know much about Aaron Sleazy. I have read lots of Roosh articles, and bits and pieces of Bang, and picked up a few things here and there. But I'm not really a big fan of the indirect game that Roosh seems (based on my limited reading) to teach, and prefer to move more quickly. In any case, I have nothing against the guy, and value a number the posts of his that I've read.

So, what's up with Aaron? I don't think I've ever seen anyone writing "red pill material" openly criticize another writer. I'm sure that they don't all agree with each other, in spite of the support they show, but in my short time reading the 'sphere, I've never seen any kind of drama or hostility with the other writers.

Anyway, what do y'all think of this guy? Does he make some plausible points (some look like they are, a few are just "er, okaaay, moving on...") or is he talking out of his ass?

Edit:

So, on some further reading, in another post about an "(RSD Survivor)[http://aaronsleazy.blogspot.com/2012/09/an-rsd-escape-story.html]", it appears that he is quite big on "the outcome is predetermined: if she is attracted to you, you will be successful", which while true, is not the only variable involved. I haven't seen him talk about what makes one more or less attractive (needy v/s aloof, strong v/s weak/wimpy, etc) yet, so maybe he does talk about that.

I don't really get all the RSD hate, but I've never taken a boot camp and I found some of their videos helpful. For e.g: the hardcase newbie or the how to be 1000% more interesting. They ramble a lot...and on that note, that's one thing I like about Roosh is that he cuts to through the bullshit and lays it out as it is.