New Statesman: 'The only way for more women to succeed is for more men to fail'

lostapwbm · 2018-03-20T15:41:51+00:00

In Parliament, in the boardroom, on the airwaves – men still dominate positions of power and influence.

Feminism: Equality in the boardroom; Inequality in the courtroom.

Do we need a radical approach: quotas to promote women, compensation for unpaid care work and a cull of over-privileged ‘Great White Males’?

Thanks to the magic of Sociology this statement is neither racist nor sexist.

Or do we need to be more nuanced and less divisive? Perhaps there is plenty of room at the table, and men don’t need to ‘lean out’ to allow women to ‘lean in’.

Yes it's called get your own stuff. Stop trying to hijack male built things.

In 2018 we are celebrating the centenary of women’s suffrage, but this debate will address the elephant in the room: what more is needed before we achieve true gender equality?

Oh you'll need the same thing that the Soviet Union did to achieve "true gender equality": total control.

Hypogamy · 2018-03-20T16:28:28+00:00

Unintended consequences are a bitch

fcb98292 · 2018-03-20T17:09:22+00:00

Feminine guys, gays and sideliners HAVE failed.

2018-03-20T19:11:44+00:00

In Parliament, in the boardroom, on the airwaves – men still dominate positions of power and influence.

So what's "power"? Its such an abstract idea. In all the books on political science and philosophy I have ever read no two people have a true consensus of what "power" is. We as a species just don't understand what that even means.

Is the man with the spotlight the one in power, or is it is advisors that direct him from the sidelines? Is the "child the parent to the father", as the expression goes? Just because there is more men, doesn't necessarily mean that male influence is greater. That's only looking at the surface layer of things by focusing on appearances only.

That's the hypocrisy of feminism. They try to abstract "male" and "female" into something like an "idea", but then also try to ground it back into the concrete material world by associating them with the body. You can't have both. Either "maleness" is some abstract form that can describe qualities or attributes independent of its appearance, or it is something aligned with the material appearance only.

Title	New Statesman: 'The only way for more women to succeed is for more men to fail'
Author	lostapwbm
Upvotes	20
Comments	4
Date	March 20, 2018 3:32 PM UTC (8 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/85tls4/new_statesman_the_only_way_for_more_women_to/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/new-statesman-the-only-way-for-more-women-to.579427 https://theredarchive.com/post/579427

Comments