What follows is my TRP post. TRP might complain that this is a MGTOW problem, and they'd be right. We're men, so we should handle our shit before whining to others to help. So, MGTOWs, I present a paradigm shift. MGTOWs have a reason to learn game and frame, and it's not for pussy, it's to fight against female imperative and make room for going our own way in society.

I previously discussed how MGTOW and PUA/TRP have a common ground in the face of #metoo and "dangerous times". The summary is this: that even a man who has given up pussy chase has to adopt frame, and that even a man who has frame just for pussy chase, has to also commit to using frame even when no pussy is involved.

I will present what this frame would look like, as a socio-cultural attitude. The purpose of this frame is to counter feminism. First, I will explain the internal justification for the frame, then I will explain how the frame is applied externally.

In a primitive tribal environment, the only thing that mattered was #warforresources. Female imperative was pure hypoagency. That means that men battled each other for dominance, and women simply accepted the results. That men would then dominate women and "check" the female imperative was taken for granted. Hypergamy was evolution's adaptation to help women fit into the #warforresources.

In a modern civilization, the #warforresources isn't quite the same. Sure, there is still a benefit from being a dominant male. Sure, there is still satisfaction and pleasure from winning competition. However, there is not a need to always win, and to dominate all. In fact, even dominant Alphas, if intelligent, can choose to cooperate for greater net benefit, in many cases.

In modern society, there are enough resources that men can "fail" and still feed themselves, and afford to be involved in activities that "simulate" the #warforresources, such as sports. Thus, men can get almost everything they need without having to play a constant zero-sum game of subsistence against each other.

Men can now achieve their happiness and satisfaction, and fulfill their imperatives, through a system of property boundaries and market competition. Technology filling in the gaps of unmet demand for preference fulfillment. Defending this system: civilization, better serves the male imperative than a constant war of all against all.

Even so, in a good market environment, there is still competition and rank. There is no strict need for male solidarity.

Consider, however, how civilization changes the nature of the female imperative. Women have no strict commitment to property and market, to law and logic, the way men do. The male imperative is fulfilled through resource acquisition. Civilization serves this. The female imperative is fulfilled by conquering high-status men. Civilization makes no changes relative to female behavior, in this regards.

This means that women are accessories to civilization, not active members of it. This means that "those who make civilization" (men) are responsible for integrating females and their prerogatives into this system which we have built.

In pre-civilization, female imperative was checked by male dominance, and this still must be the case. However, civilization has short-circuited the tribal male dominance hierarchies, and broken women. As a result, women are breaking civilization by following their biological programming.

The only "fix" is male solidarity as a collective "check" against female imperative. Normally, this is against everything men are about (competition). However, with property and markets, men have channeled their competition and created a more optimal system for pursuing the acquisition of resources, where competition (for "fun") can occur at lower collective cost.

Thus, in the very limited vein of checking female imperative, male solidarity within the context of civilization is an expression of the male imperative. Rather, it's a defense of the male imperative.

Thus, it is appropriate for men - naturally against each other - to cooperate on a collective basis. The Frame

The way to frame male solidarity vis-a-vis feminism is very clear, and simple. Consider this dialogue:

Girl: "I support feminism."

Man: "I don't."

"How can you say that?"

"Because I'm a man, and female rights vs male rights are mutually exclusive. One must take precedence over the other. As a man, I prefer my side."

"But don't you believe in fairness?"

"Of course. However, fairness is impossible between men and women. One side has to be on top, so it's going to be my side."

"But don't you have empathy? Don't you feel sorry for poor, pitiful us? Don't you think we deserve to assert our rights?"

"Of course. Women have as much of a right to assert their preferences as men. Both men and women are morally correct to assert their side. However, since only one side can win, and since I am a man, I pick my side."

"Well I disagree."

"You should disagree. But, I'm more powerful then you, so my side wins. Bye."

Do you understand the frame? We concede the absolute reality of the female imperative, we concede that women are right to pursue it. We simply insist that we, as men, are more powerful. Therefore, right or wrong, our rights are going to prevail.

I would never use this kind of moral logic against another man. It's full of tautologies, and game theoretic problems (wasteful competition).

However, the whole point is that feminism is not the assertion of female "equal rights". It's an expression of biological programming meant to help women survive in an environment where men are dominating and killing each other for resources, an environment women are not mentally or physically equipped to "play" in.

Feminism seeks to manage men. It doesn't care about actual resource provision, actual social organization, or actual moral paradigms of fairness.

Thus, to counter it, men must manage women. By not allowing ourselves to be managed by them.

When we say "we are more powerful so we win", all we mean is: "sweetheart, you're not going to get away with this, so give up."

It's actually PATHETIC that we men have allowed this frame to drop at all, in the first place.

In any event, feminist cultural forces (the vectors for which are elements of the female subconscious) can't stand up against this. Men saying, "I'm not a feminist because I prefer myself, and I'm powerful enough to get away with saying so," makes sense to the female subconscious.

So, again, I recommend all TRP: PUA, MGTOW, incel, MRA, whatever start a deeper commitment to game and frame. Not for pussy chasing alone, but to defend this thing that serves us so well, which we call civilization.