So articles like this (http://reductress.com/post/i-finished-all-10-of-my-monthly-nyt-articles-before-he-could-make-me-cum/) are being pumped out left and right to basically totally shit on men. The article is a parody article coming off of the recent Aziz Ansari stuff and it basically shitting on men because apparently so many men in general are incapable or inept at sex and can't get women to orgasm.

Now man-hating in today's society is nothing new but I can't help but ask myself: what value are women providing to men? Are so many women in general are just these angels in the bedroom themselves? Are they blowing men's minds with amazing blowjobs whenever they decide to? The Aziz story is being used to put down men holistically and I can't believe the balance is so tilted that: the responsibility of initiating and getting a "yes" for sex is on men, men have to mind read women to see any hint of hesitation to interpret that as a "no" for the woman, men are expected to be complete studs in the bedroom because making a woman "uncomfortable" is now in the grey area of leaning towards being sexual assault especially if she regrets the sex, and so on.

Idk it's just the irony of articles like that overtly shitting on men are really getting to me because there is NO discussion about any responsibilities or problems with how women treat men. So many of them have become so entitled and want men to meet these checklists but never ask themselves "what do I have to offer in return?". This stuff should be a two-way street not a one-sided bossing around.