" MUUUUUHHH FEEEEEEEEEEELINGSSSSS >>>> > >> GAAAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWDDDDDD ! ! !1 ! 1! 1 !1 !2 22 $ 78( ( 57 ( 5 (78~` ~~` ~0` ~}[~:.{~ `]"> ~" ~~}~'~~_~)_(~_+~`*~+~~()~`&^~$~~^$~ ^%#!@1@!6!%^!%&!(!^#(!)_!()>}:|>!}">"}~?~>}" !! ! 11 ! "" " " ' "

Zenly · 2018-01-09T04:11:08+00:00

Now THAT's a shitpost

ThePanther99 · 2018-01-09T04:29:01+00:00

Unnecessary post title but interesting video. She must of been on her period.

_Alasdair · 2018-01-09T06:14:57+00:00

The Christian God is a just and righteous God.

He doesn't care about feelings like so many want to believe.

trouble_with_trilbys · 2018-01-09T21:03:25+00:00

Responding seriously to the issue of preachers "saying-mean-things-about-hell-and-that-doesn't-feel-right":

.

Men understand the idea of risk. So men understand the idea of loss. The theological concept of hell is a concept of absolute loss. Which means that religious faith is the idea of absolute risk, with the corresponding notion of maximum gain (e.g. heaven). It's a male risk-reward cost-analysis.

This is similar to Pascal's Wager (but not really the same, because the Wager was more of an argument from personal perspective, rather than a statistical argument).

You'll often see similar arguments by atheists: "there are thousands of gods you don't believe in, what are you losing by not believing in one more?"

People's understanding of the idea of hell is a good litmus test for their ability to deal with risk.

.

What you see in this video is a woman arguing that "lifestyle evangelism" (living as if you are a Christian, which is works-based not faith-based) is preferable to the alternative "knowledge evangelism" (which is arguably gnostic-cultic, and fails contextual arguments):

and I agree that the preacher is presenting a clear (but very simplistic and intellectually vapid) argument for Christian salvation.

.

This shows how feminism has corrupted church doctrine with "feeling-theology" over "thinking-theology." There are historical reasons for this.

IMO, it started with the Roman Catholic notion of the sinless birth of Mary, and progressed into her pseudo-goddessness.

This also progressed through German liberal Protestant theologians like Schliermacher who based God upon an emotive connection.

Liberal theology tends to presuppose that the Bible is fundamentally a book of facts or fictions, similar to conservative theologians (but not necessarily Eastern or Roman theologians). For example, "WWJD" ("What Would Jesus Do" campaign) touted by conservatives originates in liberal social-justice ideas.

But ultimately, how you feel in both types of theology is more important than whether you are right or wrong.

.

Feminism is a fertility cult that blindly worships the notion of abundance (e.g. Marxist utopianism), instead of understanding the idea of economic scarcity (which modern economics is based upon).

Failure is not allowed in feminism. It is a taboo.

So the idea that eventually everyone will just get along (in heaven) leads to the slippery-slope idea that everything is god (pantheism). Why would we need heaven if everything on earth can never fail but just get better and better? Women become worshiped animistically or polytheistically as examples of Gaia (Earth-ecology feminism).

.

It's important to remember that the original doctrine of Mary's perpetual virginity meant that the ideal female was to be kept pure and non-sexually active except in a strictly-defined way. This turns the idea of fertility cults on its head. Fertility cults would argue that the ideal female was one that perpetually copulated. And because women are an idealization of fertility, they never make mistakes (thus reproductive and divorce law off-loading costs onto men).

.

Thus, the battle for "sexual liberation" and "free love" and reproductive totalitarianism.

This is a battle between fertility cultists and male concepts of monotheism.

.

Progressive liberals now argue for magical thinking ("the marvels of science and society!" as wish-fulfillment without understanding how science or society works). Classical liberal concepts would argue for process (scientific method) and fixing problems (modernism, objective truth), rather than just finding things to complain about (post-modernism, semiotics).

.

IMO, "Death of God" theology from the 1960s is the place to start if you want to know where the inflection-point was between modern feminism and masculinism. Both evangelical conservatives and liberals are guilty of this.

So conservatives are cheap car-salesmen for God (thrilled by imaginary risks), and liberals are shills for inclusive theology that is womb-like (everyone belongs automatically, rigidly enforced).

This is gynocentric. Tradcons and fems are really two sides of the same coin.

Sub-Sero · 2018-01-09T12:20:18+00:00

Muh religion. It's a great control system when it can wake the flame of believers to slaughter the unbelievers and degenerates who decay society. It did not do this in the 50s and onwards so now we are surrounded by the cancer that it allowed to fester. For this reason religion in terms of society control has lost it's power and will never come back.

Title	" MUUUUUHHH FEEEEEEEEEEELINGSSSSS >>>> > >> GAAAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWDDDDDD ! ! !1 ! 1! 1 !1 !2 22 $ 78( ( 57 ( 5 (78~` ~~` ~0` ~}[~:.{~ `]"> ~" ~~}~'~~_~)_(~_+~`*~+~~()~`&^~$~~^$~ ^%#!@1@!6!%^!%&!(!^#(!)_!()>}:\|>!}">"}~?~>}" !! ! 11 ! "" " " ' "
Author	Teen-Ninja-Turtle
Upvotes	1
Comments	9
Date	January 9, 2018 4:09 AM UTC (8 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/7p4jhc/muuuuuhhh_feeeeeeeeeeelingsssss/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/muuuuuhhh-feeeeeeeeeeelingsssss.610316 https://theredarchive.com/post/610316

Comments