Of course we women don't want a male pill - it would end those happy little 'accidents'

nbennett2q5 · 2016-08-31T17:14:34+00:00

[deleted]

T0000009 · 2016-08-31T16:59:25+00:00

A male pill takes nothing away from women controlling their rights.

It only gives men control over their rights.

If the women don't trust the men, they should still use the the pill, no problem.

methylotroph · 2016-08-31T17:03:46+00:00

"Can men be trusted to take contraceptive pills like women do?"

What a silly argument. Why not both people taking it? and how are women any more trustworthy?

Isn't that sexual discrimination btw? Suppose it said women couldn't be trusted, the feminists would be losing their shit.

Heliothis · 2016-08-31T18:58:41+00:00

The attitude of the woman who wrote this article is one with which I'm very familiar by now, but somehow it remains chilling. As misogynistic as mgtow are sometimes taken to be for how we describe the nature and motives of women vis-à-vis men, I've never run across mgtow literature that describes more starkly the icy practicality and lack of sentiment with which women regard the men in their lives than women do themselves.

Zombocom1911 · 2016-08-31T17:44:59+00:00

Vasectomy. Child free for life, no accidents.

I-am-the-lul · 2016-08-31T23:24:01+00:00

I want to see the reactions for when vasalgel gets released. I'm fucking drooling at the mere thought of the inevitable schadenboner that will ensue.

exit-stage-right2 · 2016-09-01T02:46:27+00:00

Of course, there is the ‘would you trust him to take it?’ issue.

Good lord, my fucking sides!!

Because, let’s face it, if all women had to wait for men to feel broody (and for this to coincide with his jab wearing off), the birth rate would drop like a stone.

The birth rate is dropping like a stone, love. Thank your feminism for that. Telling women that they're pretty no matter how fat they are doesn't magically make men attracted to fatties. Having a litter of kids from multiple former partners does not a marriageable woman make. Also, openly talking about 'happy little accidents' and 'one bottle of wine too many babies' makes us guys run a mile from baby-hungry, money-hungry man-eaters like you.

‘If not, having a baby later in life is an especially good idea: you will get alimony pretty much until your pension kicks in.’

Wow, so empowered, so independent, definitely not a greedy, self-serving cunt, oh no.

we don’t really like our men making unilateral decisions, whether that’s about curtains or babies.

And the penny drops! Rights for women, responsibilities for men. Free agency for women, subservience for men. The 'yes dear' generation indeed.

Let me scream this one into the void so that even Big Red hears it: Nobody is forcing men into relationships with women and women can not force men into relationships; therefore it is up to women to make relationships worth it for men, otherwise WE WILL SIMPLY NOT ASSOCIATE WITH WOMEN.

blackierobinsun2 · 2016-09-01T00:01:57+00:00

We need a pill that can mute a woman's voice

cynicalsimon · 2016-09-01T04:10:08+00:00

Article removed YET AGAIN by, oh I wonder who? Guys, this is nazy style propaganda. At least 6 articles from this very site have been pulled by feminists, in the last week..

feedmecarrots · 2016-08-31T23:22:51+00:00

The arrogance iof the writer is truly lofty.

Fivethousand20 · 2016-08-31T16:57:02+00:00

Thanks for the six year old article.

Glocks10mike · 2016-09-01T02:01:56+00:00

Holy shit this is awesome. I would pay a significant amount of money for reliable, reversible male contraception.

raven982 · 2016-09-01T04:09:35+00:00

Alteast she's willing to put words to things we already know to be true.

IUnse3n · 2016-09-01T07:12:23+00:00

I'm still waiting for Vasalgel. Its like a vasectomy, but instead of cutting the vas, they inject a polymer that clogs it. It last for something like 10 years, and you can have it reversed anytime you want. Also, it will be cheaper than the cost of the doctors visit, and no side effects apart from minor swelling for a few days after. The only thing is how long it will take for this to be available, hopefully in the next 3 years.

Edit: Since this isn't as big of a money maker as regularly taking pills or shots, no big companies are funding this. It has been relying on mostly small donations to do their clinical trials. So if you are interested in seeing this become available donate whatever you can and spread the word!

Arse_101 · 2016-09-01T07:36:58+00:00

Can men be trusted to take a pill? HELL YES they can! Finally, men can choose if they want kids. I can see the headline now though..Women demanding that access to jizz is a human right. Court orders man to Creampie his wife or face jail time.

SnapshillBot · 2016-08-31T16:54:23+00:00

Archived for your convenience

Snapshots:

This Post - 1, 2, Error

^{I am a bot.} ^(Info ^/ ^Contact)

646546456456 · 2016-08-31T20:29:08+00:00

Someone yesterday made the extremely cogent point that with all of this technology, women are somehow becoming less accountable.

Either she's manipulative, a statistical anomaly, or she's going to make a terrible fucking mom when she forgets to give her kids their meds.

exit-stage-right2 · 2016-09-01T03:36:37+00:00

Basically, woman want to control their own fertility and control a man's as well. In other words, women don't want men to make decisions about pregnancy, even when it's his own fertility. That's not fucked up thinking at all. Women want own rights to my body now eh. Try and stop me from taking pills bitches.

BruceJennerTesticles · 2016-09-01T05:07:14+00:00

More than that, it would essentially END women's ability to be "in control" of pregnancy/birth in EVERY circumstance and context.

It would likely cause:

A massive/dramatic decrease in the birth rates.
An even more dramatic decrease in the number of abortions.

And that last for two different reasons:

Firstly because the number of literal/actual "accidental" (i.e. unwanted and unplanned BY THE MAN) pregnancies would dramatically decrease; and
Secondly because abortion will probably decrease as well.

Why would abortion decrease? Well, because in the few instances where a chick DOES get (for reals) "accidentally" pregnant, they rarity of it will mean they will be very UNLIKELY to be willingly abort/kill the child, because it might be their only chance (outside of expensive IVF & sperm banks) to actually get pregnant/become a mother/have a child.

BTW governments (especially "socialistic" nanny states) will absolutely go into a sort of "contortionistic panic" over this state of things: on the one hand, it will dramatically reduce the "welfare mom" & "impoverished children" problems (and all of the "costs to society" that result, cf "Freakanomics of abortion vs crime"); but while that has many positives, it also (at least in terms of the bureaucratic/political view) has major negatives in that the need for all of the vast array of "social services" (and thus government employees, aka "people who support/vote for more/bigger government") will disappear or become an entirely impossible to justify "liability" (i.e. it is one thing to falsely portray that "social workers" and "teachers" are needed when the ratio of such bureaucrats to those being "helped" is a one to many; i.e. one social worker for every 5 welfare moms, or one teacher for every 10 kids -- but it is patently absurd to even attempt to justify the inverse: a "many to one" scenario of five social workers for every "welfare mom", or 10 full time teachers for each child.)

End result is that the entire societal basis/justification for most taxation (to pay for those "services," and various graft-laden things like 'new/bigger' schools and etc) will be dramatically undermined (almost impossible to argue the need to build [yet another] massive new school gymnasium when the local enrollment quickly drops from 5,000 to 1,000... and the birth rates show that instead of 1,000 kids in a year, future 'class years' will be only 500... or 250 or even under 100 kids).

And if you don't believe that kind of scenario is possible, you just need to do a bit more reading about what's already been happening in places like rural Japan (even W/O male-controlled BC).

Ultramegasaurus · 2016-09-01T07:19:48+00:00

Would you trust him to take?

Why does it fucking matter? If he "forgets" the pill women can still have a unilateral abortion or put the child up for adoption.

Arse_101 · 2016-09-01T09:37:59+00:00

The power that women have is their ability to give birth. Just wait and see what happens when men can decide if and when they want kids and so, when women can give birth. The male contraceptive pill and oh boy what a hilarious shit show it's gonna be.. Women will no longer be able to have an "oops" pregnancy. Holy shit, I can only imagine the level of hysteria that will ensue. Imagine it..that women have make a case for a baby, have to actually get a man's consent before he turns on the Jesus juice and ALLOWS (through the goodness of his heart) the women to get pregnant. haha Ladies better get making those sandwiches.

I-am-the-lul · 2016-09-01T11:07:06+00:00

The real question is "Can men be trusted NOT to take contraceptive pills when the women want them to stop taking it?"

archaic-wisp · 2016-09-01T11:52:36+00:00

"useless men" fuck her

FoxIslander · 2016-09-01T20:41:22+00:00

....the pregnancies of cheating women would come under more scrutiny if men too control of their own fertility.

"... and married to useless men"....nice.

Fat_Akuma · 2016-09-01T20:48:40+00:00

I cant wait for male birth control pills. :)

Title	Of course we women don't want a male pill - it would end those happy little 'accidents'
Author	unterseeboote
Upvotes	102
Comments	41
Date	August 31, 2016 4:53 PM UTC (9 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/50i72r/of_course_we_women_dont_want_a_male_pill_it_would/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/of-course-we-women-dont-want-a-male-pill-it-would.624034 https://theredarchive.com/post/624034

Comments