~ archived since 2018 ~

The Drug of Female Companionship

[deleted]

September 26, 2013

14 upvotes

/r/MGTOW

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdKTm8-RMEU

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB

Post Information

Title	The Drug of Female Companionship
Author	[deleted]
Upvotes	14
Comments	16
Date	September 26, 2013 3:13 AM UTC (12 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/1n5igs/the_drug_of_female_companionship/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/the-drug-of-female-companionship.633314 https://theredarchive.com/post/633314

Comments

[–]TheSliceman1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 12 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

[–]TheSliceman2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

[–]TheSliceman4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

[–]thrownaway_MGTOW1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

MGTOW is about doing anything you want and not being held back by society and females, but the very instance of not being held back by females (male-mother need) directly correlates to biological apostasy (again, male-mother need --> watch some of star-dusks videos (linked) on this). This is why I abstain from sex/porn/masturbation, but it's your choice.

Females have complete sexual power, and through the state (false-rape accusations), also can disallow and allow sex. You do have your individual opinion, but your male-mother need is preventing you from abstaining from them (what we're talking about). On a base biological level, the very act of having all the power in sex (domination) is a demonization of the male (watch barbarossaaaa's video (linked)).

Barbarossaaaa: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LWE-0zGH54g

Stardusk: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGuXPu4CnQo

[–]TheSliceman0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]thrownaway_MGTOW0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]TheSliceman0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Brain over dick. Logic and reason and long term happiness over and above the temporary, short term (endorphin release) known as orgasm.

Working out and browsing reddit and everything else is also a short term endorphin release, no matter how much you try to downplay it.

Ya what Im getting out of this is that MGTOW is about denying your body and genetics and stuff and just purely embracing your frontal lobe.

I guess this stuff isnt for me.

I like fucking. I like fighting. I like working out. I like being a man. These are my base instincts. I also use my frontal lobe to get a high paying engineering job, but my genetics is what tells me what to do to be happy. My genetics is what determines that fact that I get happy when I go outside and climb a mountain with the wind in my face.

You saying that me choosing to go out and fuck a hooker because thats simply what I choose to do = me being controlled by sex is basically the same as the fucking feminists who claim that women having consensual sex with a man is still rape.

According to you, then yes, I am a slave to sex. I am also a slave to working out. Im a slave to breathing. Im a slave to thinking. ect..

How can MGTOW be against it if it is 100% voluntary and it is simply what the man chooses to do as long is it is 100% under my own rules on my own time?

This movement now seems less about embracing what it is to be a man and more about changing men into androgynous genderless robots. Change the name to AGTOW (Assexual humans going thier own way)

[–]thrownaway_MGTOW2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Ya what Im getting out of this is that MGTOW is about denying your body and genetics and stuff and just purely embracing your frontal lobe.

Nah. It's keeping your frontal lobe in the driver's seat.

And NOT shutting it off and handing the keys over to your dick -- i.e. your "genetics and stuff".

I like fucking. I like fighting. I like working out. I like being a man. These are my base instincts.

So does my dog. He's had his nuts cut off, but he still wants to hump everything in sight (not to mention sniff & rim every butthole he can). Plus he likes to get in "fights" and wrassle around... and he likes to "work out" by running and playing fetch.

Does that make my dog a "man"? Those are all HIS "base instincts" too.

My genetics is what determines that fact that I get happy when I go outside and climb a mountain with the wind in my face.

LOL. Dude, 100 or 200 years ago you wouldn't even have known the term/concept of "genetics".

You saying that me choosing to go out and fuck a hooker because thats simply what I choose to do = me being controlled by sex is basically the same as the fucking feminists who claim that women having consensual sex with a man is still rape.

Wow... again, you really AREN'T getting the distinction.

If you are feeling DRIVEN to have sex with hookers (i.e. to satisfy what you are calling your "genetics and stuff") THEN you are not in control.

That is significantly different than if you are consciously CHOOSING to have sex with hookers (with full awareness that you are temporarily "scratching an itch").

How can MGTOW be against it if it is 100% voluntary and it is simply what the man chooses to do as long is it is 100% under my own rules on my own time?

MGTOW isn't against that. Not if it is TRULY 100% voluntary (again conscious choice, rather than impulsively giving over to urges).

This movement now seems less about embracing what it is to be a man and more about changing men into androgynous genderless robots

Nope. It is about being a REAL MAN, one who is in control of himself... (and not controlled by women "granting" him access to pussy).

Not a dog that chases after and humps bitches because they are in heat and his hormones take over.

It's the distinction between being a HUMAN and being a base animal.

[–]thrownaway_MGTOW1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]TheSliceman0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]thrownaway_MGTOW2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

This is absurd.

No, it's not. There is a whole range of answers to that question.

Im talking literally no time wasted and you are saying that is giving up control of my life.

Nope. I'm emphatically NOT saying that.

Its literally the same thing that happens in the brain from playing pool.

Are you obsessed with playing pool? Is it controlling your life? Exhausting your finances? Keeping you from doing other activities that you enjoy?

If not... then no playing pool is not a problem.

but watching porn is bad.

And I'm not saying that either.

What I am saying (again) is: how much control over your life are you willing to give up to (occasionally) get your itch scratched?

I would say that engaging in the use of porn (or hookers, or even occasional hookups) is essentially a means of MAXIMIZING your control over your life -- and MINIMIZING the amount of control that you are handing over to others.

Let me clarify what I mean by creating another analogy: instead of "sex" let's talk about "getting a haircut"; unless you have gone bald, you will probably have to "deal with" this inherent physical need -- BUT you have a whole range of options:

You can let your hair grow and only occasionally get it cut -- I have known several people who do this -- basically "shearing" their head down to a minimal crew-cut or even stubble, and then allowing it to grow significantly longer. This really minimizes the money/time you need to spend on your hair.
You can regularly visit a barber and pay them a set fee to cut your hair as a service.
You can learn to cut your own hair -- and will probably get "good" at it when you engage in it more frequently (this CAN cover an entire spectrum, either involving MORE time/effort than visiting a barber, OR... if you cut it yourself in the manner of #1, the skill/time will probably be LESS than visiting a barber).
You can get married (or cohabit) and have your "partner" cut your hair -- but while you may save money on the specific "hair cutting" you will undoubtedly incur significantly higher costs (and risks, and loss of control) due to being married/cohabiting.

Now seriously -- who in their right mind would choose #4? Especially in the era of Marriage 2.0 (or is it the era of Divorce 2.0?) when the female partner can choose to not only control your access to "hair cuts" (by her), but she can also arbitrarily decide that the deal is OFF, and yet walk away with fully half (or more) of your entire net worth.

Is a home hair-cut worth that risk?

This is why MGTOW's will pick #1, #2, #3... but never #4 (because #4 is just an INSANE price to pay for a haircut... or an orgasm).

Do you get my point yet?

The problem isn't seeking an orgasm, the problem is if you let your "itch" for that orgasm lead you into a "marriage trap".

Because then (these days) you're SOL.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link