~ archived since 2018 ~

God is supposed to have made women as companion for men... strange how the kind of qualities women have counters this theory

mugen_is_here

June 4, 2016

15 upvotes

/r/MGTOW

http://womanitely.com/womens-habits-rob-men-manliness/

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB

Post Information

Title	God is supposed to have made women as companion for men... strange how the kind of qualities women have counters this theory
Author	mugen_is_here
Upvotes	15
Comments	22
Date	June 4, 2016 2:21 AM UTC (10 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/4mgcqr/god_is_supposed_to_have_made_women_as_companion/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/god-is-supposed-to-have-made-women-as-companion.633545 https://theredarchive.com/post/633545

Comments

[–]NameOfAction7 points8 points9 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Teflon08191 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]FreeNClear326 points7 points8 points 10 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

[+]FanofLemmy-6 points-5 points-4 points 10 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

[–]cynicalsimon6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

[–]FanofLemmy-3 points-2 points-1 points 10 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Lol relax, hombre. Both sides don't have all the answers. They never will. People who believe that religion has all the answers and is the be all end all of things are so brainwashed by their church or pastor, while on the other side of things, you have the atheists who believe a rock collided with another rock and created sentient life. Neither of those do anyone any good, especially if they want to actually learn and understand about things. The universe had to be created, there's no way everything is at the perfect point (biology) like the sun's distance from the earth. You realize if it was any closer we'd burn to a crisp, and any further and we'd freeze, right? Science definitely helps us learn about and understand how things work and function, but there are too many variables that are unanswered as to the creation of all living things. No one knows, and I doubt anyone will in a long time.

FYI, I'm not part of any religion. I'm not part of a cult. I also don't follow evidenceless science that can't explain things and yet has theories about everything. Theories are just ideas, I hope you know that.

[–]FreeNClear323 points4 points5 points 10 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

You're not part of any religion, but you echo the exact same empty arguments of the religious.

" The universe had to be created, there's no way everything is at the perfect point (biology) like the sun's distance from the earth. You realize if it was any closer we'd burn to a crisp, and any further and we'd freeze, right?"

That is because you think the universe revolves around us(humans), and that we were its intended outcome(which isn't the case at all). We are here because the Earth is the exact distance away from the Sun to support life and you are you trying to put some kind of supernatural meaning behind that outcome. It'd be like you needing to scratch your back, and coming across a tree and having the belief that the tree was put there specifically so you could scratch your back. That is self centered thinking and isn't evidence for any kind of creator.

Not to mention, there are many places on this planet where it is either too hot or too cold for humans to survive and it is estimated that our species was close to being extinct at one point. It is only because of scientific discovery that we have thrived as much as we have.

It's also a cowards answer to say "Both sides don't have all of the answers" because there is only one side(science) that actually searches for answers and will change their thinking if the evidence points to something else while the other side(religion) claims to have all of the answers(if you talk to any devout person of faith) and will refuse to change their mind no matter what evidence is presented to them(that's why they call it faith)

[–]FanofLemmy-2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

If, and it's a big if, science has all the answers, or the ability to get the answers, than why are they unable to come to a conclusion and end it once and for all? The simple fact is they don't know.

There are more universes than just ours, but there is a reason ours is set up a certain way, with the resources set up.

If you're going to talk about a creator, then you have to understand this ; of God created the heavens and the earth and all living beings, why would he not centers our universe around it?

If a businessman creates a company, and wants to see it grow and develop, does he not put all his effort into that business to ensure it develops and succeeds?

And the problem with people of faith is they are brainwashed to believe a certain way. They are taught to act and think in accordance with political thinking (which religion is) that has been skewed, incorrectly translated, and in many cases, funded by the state or government. It's an indoctrination or beliefs, and it's unfortunate. Then again, so are certain theories in science. For example, during my years in high school, we learned about evolution and how the world came to be by the accidental collision of two rocks, which created all sentient life, which then evolved into different creatures and species. I'm not knocking science, I think it's great and has helped many people learn and understand many different areas, but some of them aren't concrete. And during any if the lectures, when questions were asked about opposing views, like creation, instead of randomness, the professor would quickly shut any of the students down. The same in colleges and universities. In some cases, the professors would actually make fun of the student, openly ridiculing them in front of the class.

Now, as I've stated before, no one is going to know in any of our life times how the world, the universe, and the species came to be. There's no records, just theories and religion to guide us, but when used objectively, and why wouldn't you use all the information at your disposal, we can try to gain insight into what is the actual causation of all life.

If you feel so inclined to, go take a couple of rocks and bang them together until you create life. I'd like to see how that works for you.

[–]FreeNClear322 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

"If, and it's a big if, science has all the answers, or the ability to get the answers, than why are they unable to come to a conclusion and end it once and for all?"

I never said Science has all of the answers, but I did say Science is the only way to potentially find answers. Religion is inherently dogmatic and already claims to have the answers, but you didn't even address this point(because you know it's true).

"There are more universes than just ours"

I assume you mean galaxies

"but there is a reason ours is set up a certain way, with the resources set up."

You are making a baseless claim that you can't possibly provide a single shred of evidence for.

"If you're going to talk about a creator, then you have to understand this ; of God created the heavens and the earth and all living beings, why would he not centers our universe around it?"

Again, I think you mean galaxies and once again, we are not the center of anything. Hell, Earth isn't even the center of our own solar system, the Sun(aka Stars) is.

" And during any if the lectures, when questions were asked about opposing views, like creation, instead of randomness, the professor would quickly shut any of the students down."

Because creationism isn't science and there is no way to prove creationism because it invariably turns into "God did it."

It would like being in an astronomy class, and a student starts asking questions about astrology. Should the teacher waste time talking about mumbo jumbo which has no basis in reality?

"There's no records, just theories and religion to guide us,

Actually, there are records, they are called the fossil records which continually disprove the nonsense spread in religious books. Also, look up the word "theory" when it's applied to a scientific theory. It means that there is an overwhelming abundance of evidence. You do know that gravity is a "theory" right?

"but when used objectively, and why wouldn't you use all the information at your disposal, we can try to gain insight into what is the actual causation of all life.""

Because there is no way to actually test evidence against a religious holy book that claims a supernatural being magically popped two people(in our present form) into existence.

Look, i don't wanna be mean, but you are either very young, or very scientific illiterate. I use to be an Evangelical Christian and once I started asking questions, I came to the realization that there is no way to ever actually find what is actually true when you have to have "faith" in something.

Maybe if your classmates spent less time asking questions about creationism, and more time listening to the teacher, you'd have a better understanding of basic scientific principles.

[–]FanofLemmy0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

You don't have to worry about being mean. I'm not gonna falsely accuse you of rape, I'm not a feminist lol

I rather enjoy debates about topics like this, to be quite honest. I appreciate you taking the time to engage in one with me, too. While I understand where you're coming from, personally, I cannot believe that science created everything. I've studied the Bible, been involved in a few different religions and none of them have given me the answered to the questions I've been asking. They either beat around the bush or or simply avoid answering entirely.

There's no use debating this, though, as neither of us are going to change our stance on the subject. I like to look at things objectively, and you can cross reference with the Bible, depending on which Bible you use. A lot of them have content that was removed or altered. Either way, it still leaves much in the way for 100% concrete proof.

I am young, 23, and I don't have any post secondary education, I'd rather not get cut in the face by a razor for having opposing views, so I avoid it. And I also don't hate science, I find it very interesting

[–]pawsahf0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]WikipediaPoster0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]FreeNClear32-1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]mugen_is_here[S] 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]mugen_is_here[S] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]mugen_is_here[S] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Brokemgtow0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]cynicalsimon0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]SnapshillBot-1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link