Figuring out stuff is hard

I stumbled across this FDS (Female Dating Strategy)on reddit while wandering around and since then I occasionally look at it's forum for masochistic entertainment. It's an extremely toxic place with some of the worst kind of toxic, majority of the members are would easily be diagnosed with narcissistic personality disorder. Both commentors and posters often practice the common traits of narcissism, but putting it briefly it has every element of a cult. Although, to be fair and more accurate, there are a small handful of people there that do not fit the quota and are most likely oblivious to the vipers nest they stumbled into. I might even assume the people at the top, the producers of FDS might not have intentioned themselves to become the beacon for narcissists. Regardless, it's basically a hate group.

I would have to point out that in all identity groups the general masses overtake the theme of the people's who start the trends and always end up in servitude of the lowest common denominator, which is the dumbest people of the group. One psychologist had a term called Mary Antoinette syndrome where MA was depicted as a blood thirsty war goddess by the distraught masses who projected their own need for violence on top of her, whereas she was instead mild mannered and generally sweet. The term however was never fully coined and isn't available on wiki or anywhere else.

I didn't want to explain the backround situation to much, instead I thought I'd share a question I ask myself since it makes me kind of chuckle. Which is among the common tropes of the gender war, he vs she, which side has a harder job at self correction and warding off the transformation of a movement by the lowest common denominator of their group? In FDS, they are swarmed by narcissists, in some male oriented group protesting women it's in the very least misogynistic.

You could ask the same question for any group type dichotomies. Alex Jones for example is everything the establishment could hope for. Leftists generally cannabalise their own. Christians don't read their bibles while identities like atheism has become a hotbed for people like pedophiles and trendy hipster religious Satanists. Self correcting principles seem to not be inherent to any identity group.

As a man who generally has distain for all groups and not essentially being misanthropic I find myself in opposition to most "pro male" groups, only identifying loosely with some of the more respectable figure heads. I often find that men on average are both dumb and melodramatic. Their intentions on attacking perverse and backward societal traditions and beliefs pertaining to female culture is usually motivated by something less noble then pointing out something wrong. While generally being in a pursuant state of being perturbed, I find many men have a strong inability to recognize or identify with their emotions and not as the feminazis depict the issue. They intellectualise petty upsets and get irrationally defensive, due to a lack of personal awareness and the indefensible, vulnerable of that position and the feelings it evokes. While I find men to be the gentler and more kind sex on average, that is female collective hostility towards men makes any misogyny look tame, their is the problem that they poorly socialize. Either they hypersocialize, such as becoming simps under feminine social structures, racist as in prison styled race gangs, or they practice anti socialization to the point of delusion, isolation or general retardation. It kinda seems they are easier to heal and treat, since they are more kind and more gentle but in contrast to women there are alot more of them and require special attention.

Women on the other hand have tyrannical and draconian social pyramids whereas conformity reigns Supreme. Women are not allowed to identify outside of the popular group. They hyper socialise, usually destroying personal autonomy and actualization to a irreparable state, their individuality is replaced with narcissism, personally identifying as and within a cult. They have often infatuated with delusions of grandeur, basic megalomania, and are easily captivated by the power of illusions and strongly motivated by them, which in some way benefits them in chasing after righteous idealism if they possess the intelligence to tell absurdity from reality. A women is typically dependant too, despite their inseccant projections of being independent, while they may not be stereotypically dependant of a man as a provider, their family and their friends set the foundations for their sense of security which stifles their ability to act indifferently to either. I find that men become retarded as in totally detached and lifeless in trauma and in anti socialization, women on the other hand become generally maniacal, her feelings of self importance, entitlement and privelege, which are not inherently her own and act contrary to her feelings of self worth but is the hubris of the group identity, allow her to self righteously attack anything and everything that amuses her frustrations while still desperately holding onto the clique identity of the cult, womanhood. Like a soldier in war, she gives her life in service of upholding the honor of the forsaking and treacherous motherland.

To correct that type of mindset is much more difficult, women can't seem to exist without a consolidating group identity and rely upon infatuation with illusion for group cohesion. In otherwords, they need both an idealism and a group identity, this leaves them vulnerable to usurpation from the dumbest psychopaths of their group, especially since sociopaths specialise in manipulating infatuation with illusions. Even if a women manages to mature outside of her infantalised sensibilities and learns how to identify without dependency on a group identity, she may be ostracized, basterdized, and/or most likely her character on public image hijacked.

I'm stop there though.

Edit: sorry about any misspellings or poor grammar or whatever. I'm not much of a spell check kinda guy.

Lol, somebody got me banned from FDS comments after posting this. I never have commented there and neither will I ever. Not with those people, not unless they're sane.