The Sandberg Big Lie

All_Ads_Deceive · 2017-01-31T01:51:30+00:00

Who's Sandburg? And that is hilarious. Fuck every different type of scumbag then find a nice pussy to coddle and fund your lifestyle.

She didn't mention still getting plowed by these guys on the DL because that's the elephant in the room for their perfect love story

exit_sandman · 2017-01-31T14:02:56+00:00

I have seen the "Sandberg AF/BB strategy" discussed in TRP, but if I am not mistaken, noone has ever pointed out, explicitly, that the final sentence of that statement is quite simply not true.

You are mistaken.

In fact, there's even a TRM blogpost about it that goes into detail about that last statement:

With regards to men, I believe the most salient part of Sandberg’s admission is found at the end:

These men exist and, trust me, over time, nothing is sexier.

For the better half of the time since the sexual revolution it was necessary for the Feminine Imperative to convince a majority of men that their eventual Beta providership for women was not only their duty, but also a prime aspect of feminine attraction. As I mentioned last week, under the (pre-sexual revolution) old-order attraction model this may have been the case to a large degree. However after the revolution, and as women’s hypergamy prioritized towards ‘Good Genes’ short-term sexual partners, the ‘Good Dad’ (Beta Bucks) men needed an ever increasing ‘sell’ of their own attractiveness by women.

This persistent sell was a necessary element of ensuring a future long-term security for women while pursuing increasingly more short-term breeding opportunities as feminine-primacy expanded into society. The future ‘Good Dads’ would need to be patiently waiting out women’s “indiscretion years” during their SMV peak, so the sell became an ever-evolving definition of what women found attractive in men based on that old-order model of dependability, patience, industriousness, and every other characteristic that defined a good provider.

[...]

The Beta investment sell was necessary because it ensured male parental investment at a later (usually just-pre-Wall) time in a woman’s life. Thus, Sandberg’s praise of men “who think women should be smart, opinionated and ambitious. [Men] who value fairness and expect or, even better, want to do his share in the home” will eventually be sexier than the Alpha “bad boys, the cool boys, the commitment-phobic boys, the crazy boys” she encourages women to fuck earlier in life is an excellent example of this sell.

Ironically it’s exactly with this sell that women encourage the very transactional nature of sexual relations with men they’re screeching about recently. It’s the Choreplay fallacy on a meta scale – do more around the house, play into the equalitarian schema women think they need in a provider, support her ambitiousness and opinionatedness and you’ll be considered “sexier” and get her Best Sex she’s been saving just for a guy like this.

Title	The Sandberg Big Lie
Author	throwitasaynow
Upvotes	2
Comments	7
Date	January 30, 2017 11:51 PM UTC (9 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/askTRP
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/asktrp/comments/5r4jsd/the_sandberg_big_lie/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/askTRP/the-sandberg-big-lie.81666 https://theredarchive.com/post/81666

Comments