The same UN that says that when women fall below the poverty line for reasons related to COVID it's due to a 'millennia of patriarchy' and completely ignores the fact that even more men than women fell below that line aswell as evidenced in their own study.
It got removed, here it is again, written by the best bot in the world: The United Nations is responsible for the biggest massacre of men in Europe since World War 2 (Srebrenica)
Women, children and the elderly had been allowed to flee through the UN convoys; adult men from the civilian population had been left back in the city – despite the people in charge have been fully aware that, in such cases, it was almost always the male population murdered en masse. Men between the ages of 15 and 60, who had tried to hide among the throngs of refugees, were removed by the people in charge at the UNHCR, who refused to take responsibility for their protection.
Four years after the massacre, in 1999, the United Nations Security Council met in order to discuss the protection of the civilian population in war zones. While once again primarily male, civilians were being massacred in Kosovo, the delegates agreed that women and children have a special right to humanitarian support. A study by the human rights organization Human Rights Watch of 3,453 executions in the context of the Kosovo-conflict found that 92 percent of all victims, whose sex was known, were male. Among other human rights violations, that largely and predominantly affected men, were capture and severe torture. This was also confirmed by reports on the human rights situation in Kosovo by other organizations. An aid who had stayed back in the villages spoke of a “planet without men”, a world of only women and children. The men had been displaced or murdered.
When the gendercide expert, Professor Adam Jones, contacted the president of the human rights center of the United Nations to share his worries about the men who were facing death during the Kosovo conflict, the reply he received consisted of three sentences from an assistant, who thanked Jones but explained that these kinds of questions were not part of the UN-mandate. The women were brought to safety but were visibly distressed about having to leave their men behind in a situation of certain death. “It was not easy to watch, women and children being led away from their menfolk”, Adam Jones cites the reaction of a Dutch member of the UN-peacekeeping forces in Kosovo and adds: “This statement serves well to summarize the predominant attitude.” Sympathy was directed at the distressed women, not at the men awaiting impending mass murder. Eight months later the massacre of Srebrenica took place. One year later, the UN institution, that Jones had contacted, founded an international coalition for the protection of the human rights of women in situations of conflict.
The international relations expert, Paula Drummond, for her article “invisible men”, examined in particular the Gender-Mainstreaming-policies of the United Nations in the context of the genocide in the Congo, that cost the lives of such a high number of men that in some regions 80 percent of survivors consist of women and children. The result of Drummond‘s analysis: the foundation of the UN policies is the adoption of the so-called Gender-Mainstreaming-principle, which, according to the official definition, should address the needs of both genders, but is de facto only applied to benefit women. Despite the United Nations witnessing, again and again, that gender-specific violence was mainly directed against men and boys, e.g. in Ruanda and the former Yugoslavia, the “Gender Politics” consists of protecting women and girls.
If the en masse slaughter of men is at all included in a UN report, then it is only because the “resulting scarcity of men leads to more insecurity for households that consist of only adult women” – meaning that dead men impair the life of women. Contrary to all existing findings, it is emphasized again and again, that women and children were particularly at risk in the conflicts mentioned. Generally, the engagement with the conflict in the Congo is dominated by a feminist perspective, which Drummond views as short-sighted since the marginalization of male victims reinforces the cliché of women as vulnerable.
In pretty much life or death cases like then I wonder why aren't reports of cases when soldiers, who separated men, and denied them passing through got violently attacked for it. Did those men just accepted the denial and went back to the city?
Imagine you are a man sneaking out of this besieged city. Someone notices you are a man and explicitly steps in, separates you and denies you to go there. Forcing you to go back to the city.
oh no they didn't prevent men from leaving, they just blocked all the roads and only took the women and children out. if you want to walk miles and miles without food or water, they'll let you do that.
I was talking more about the media coverage part of it. not to be a conspiracy theorist.
Yeah, that women and children first bullshit has to stop. All lives are equal and I don't see why someone's life is more important just because she is a female or a younger person than me.
i remember on the news, a woman told about seeing this all fleeing. it is horrible. the worst thing is that i am bosnian myself and if i was there, i would die no matter of my age.
[–][deleted] 16 points17 points18 points (1 child) | Copy Link
The same UN that denies men food in times of crises
[–]iamablackbaby 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
The same UN that says that when women fall below the poverty line for reasons related to COVID it's due to a 'millennia of patriarchy' and completely ignores the fact that even more men than women fell below that line aswell as evidenced in their own study.
[–]Ok-Rush-5486 8 points9 points10 points (7 children) | Copy Link
It got removed, here it is again, written by the best bot in the world: The United Nations is responsible for the biggest massacre of men in Europe since World War 2 (Srebrenica)
In June 1995 the Serbian army attacked the city Srebrenica, in the East of Bosnia-Herzegovina, and systematically slaughtered almost 8,000 men and older boys and thus became responsible for the worst massacre since the end of WW II. Two years before this massacre, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees had evacuated several thousand civilians from the besieged city.
Women, children and the elderly had been allowed to flee through the UN convoys; adult men from the civilian population had been left back in the city – despite the people in charge have been fully aware that, in such cases, it was almost always the male population murdered en masse. Men between the ages of 15 and 60, who had tried to hide among the throngs of refugees, were removed by the people in charge at the UNHCR, who refused to take responsibility for their protection.
^ https://www.jstor.org/stable/3594843?seq=1 ^
Four years after the massacre, in 1999, the United Nations Security Council met in order to discuss the protection of the civilian population in war zones. While once again primarily male, civilians were being massacred in Kosovo, the delegates agreed that women and children have a special right to humanitarian support. A study by the human rights organization Human Rights Watch of 3,453 executions in the context of the Kosovo-conflict found that 92 percent of all victims, whose sex was known, were male. Among other human rights violations, that largely and predominantly affected men, were capture and severe torture. This was also confirmed by reports on the human rights situation in Kosovo by other organizations. An aid who had stayed back in the villages spoke of a “planet without men”, a world of only women and children. The men had been displaced or murdered.
^ https://www.un.org/press/en/1999/19990916.sc6728.doc.html ^
When the gendercide expert, Professor Adam Jones, contacted the president of the human rights center of the United Nations to share his worries about the men who were facing death during the Kosovo conflict, the reply he received consisted of three sentences from an assistant, who thanked Jones but explained that these kinds of questions were not part of the UN-mandate. The women were brought to safety but were visibly distressed about having to leave their men behind in a situation of certain death. “It was not easy to watch, women and children being led away from their menfolk”, Adam Jones cites the reaction of a Dutch member of the UN-peacekeeping forces in Kosovo and adds: “This statement serves well to summarize the predominant attitude.” Sympathy was directed at the distressed women, not at the men awaiting impending mass murder. Eight months later the massacre of Srebrenica took place. One year later, the UN institution, that Jones had contacted, founded an international coalition for the protection of the human rights of women in situations of conflict.
^ https://web.archive.org/web/20000816221116/http://www.gendercide.org/case_srebrenica.html ^
The international relations expert, Paula Drummond, for her article “invisible men”, examined in particular the Gender-Mainstreaming-policies of the United Nations in the context of the genocide in the Congo, that cost the lives of such a high number of men that in some regions 80 percent of survivors consist of women and children. The result of Drummond‘s analysis: the foundation of the UN policies is the adoption of the so-called Gender-Mainstreaming-principle, which, according to the official definition, should address the needs of both genders, but is de facto only applied to benefit women. Despite the United Nations witnessing, again and again, that gender-specific violence was mainly directed against men and boys, e.g. in Ruanda and the former Yugoslavia, the “Gender Politics” consists of protecting women and girls.
If the en masse slaughter of men is at all included in a UN report, then it is only because the “resulting scarcity of men leads to more insecurity for households that consist of only adult women” – meaning that dead men impair the life of women. Contrary to all existing findings, it is emphasized again and again, that women and children were particularly at risk in the conflicts mentioned. Generally, the engagement with the conflict in the Congo is dominated by a feminist perspective, which Drummond views as short-sighted since the marginalization of male victims reinforces the cliché of women as vulnerable.
[–]-Cyber_Renaissance 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Thank you for the support :)
[–]DebateAI 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
In pretty much life or death cases like then I wonder why aren't reports of cases when soldiers, who separated men, and denied them passing through got violently attacked for it. Did those men just accepted the denial and went back to the city?
[–]Ok-Rush-5486 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
The UN has a lot of connections with everything that runs in the world. Just saying.
[–]DebateAI 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
I don't get what this comment wants to say.
Imagine you are a man sneaking out of this besieged city. Someone notices you are a man and explicitly steps in, separates you and denies you to go there. Forcing you to go back to the city.
What do you do?
[–]Ok-Rush-5486 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
oh no they didn't prevent men from leaving, they just blocked all the roads and only took the women and children out. if you want to walk miles and miles without food or water, they'll let you do that.
I was talking more about the media coverage part of it. not to be a conspiracy theorist.
[–]DebateAI 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Oh I get it now.
Yeah, that women and children first bullshit has to stop. All lives are equal and I don't see why someone's life is more important just because she is a female or a younger person than me.
[–]babybabybabybabyblue 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
i remember on the news, a woman told about seeing this all fleeing. it is horrible. the worst thing is that i am bosnian myself and if i was there, i would die no matter of my age.