This is something that's been on my mind for a couple hours now. Let's look at some of the basics.

1) When a woman claims rape (even when the claim is false), feminists always go out to say believe the victim.

2) when a woman rapes a man, feminists go spin it so the rapist is the "true victim". In fact in their world view, there is no such thing as a female rapist. Even when a female rapist gets a guilty verdict, she basically gets a slap on the wrist and she does not have to register as a sex offender.

Obviously these two things conflict. So who would win when a woman accuses another woman of rape?

Somebody earlier on this subreddit linked to an article about a woman who raped 3 girls several years ago and yet is still legally allowed to work in a school.

With that I think that if a woman was raped by a woman in 2017, the rapist would obviously get away with it. The feminists would try to argue that the rapist is the "true victim", and they would say that the woman that filed the accusation is someone who has "internalized-misogyny" working for the MRAs.