Trump get's the Jews to admit they lie about WWII death tolls to manipulate goyim?
God, I miss this Trump. He got the JTA to admit to lying or using flimsy evidence to support the offical death-camp story. With one press release nonetheless.
That's the archive.org link, the original link (the page is still up on JTA) is below but broken. So unbreak the link if you want to view it that way. But the hyperlink above will be just fine.
h t t p : / / www.jta.org/2017/01/31/news-opinion/united-states/remember-the-11-million-why-an-inflated-victims-tally-irks-holocaust-historians
That's an archived link too. Here's a broken original h t t p : //www.nytimes.com/1992/06/17/world/poland-agrees-to-change-auschwitz-tablets.html
It's about the Auschwitz Death toll. Around the time of the Nuremberg trials it was said 4 million died at that camp, in 1991 the death toll was changed to 1.5 million. A non-trivial reduction and some historians estimate it might have been a lot lower than that. Yet the 6 million Jews number has not really changed since the 1940s when it was first proclaimed. Some countries will jail you for saying the death toll might have been lower than 6 million. But the official figures have changed. History changes as new information becomes available. But for some reason, any questioning of the official narrative is deemed denial of the holocaust even if someone just questions parts of it.
The International Jew by Henry Ford is a good start to why white people have issues with Jewish culture and Jewish people.
If I had to boil it down to a simple phrase it's "Identity for me and not for thee"
Essentially a pattern you will see repeated across multiple different countries and time periods is Jews will promote zionism and the right to preserve their genetic lineage and culture whilst at the same time promoting things that degrade the white society's culture and genetic lineage.
At the same time you'll see Jews fight to preserve Israel as a Jewish state, with strict laws on immigration and the general refusal of migrants.
And you see the same thing, in virtually every white country with a Jewish minority. Hungary is a good example. Prime Minister Victor Orban has been fighting to keep Hungary ethnically Hungarian and many Jewish activists such as George Soros have been trying to force Hungary to accept more immigrants.
To me it seems that Jews don't want any country to just be white. And I understand there could be some arguments made about the USA never being fully white (it was 90% for most of it's history, until the Hart-Celler act of 1965, which was done in part to allow more Jews into the country from Eastern Europe, but had the affect of removing all limits on immigration, meaning the USA is slated to become majority non-white by the 2040s, even though proponents of the act in the 1960s said that wouldn't happen).
This isn't just a right or left issue either, you'll see Jews from Soros on the left to Bill Kristol on the right advocate for mass immigration. It's a common enough thing that it goes beyond coincidence, it's a large element of Jewish culture.
For me personally, I just want the option of having white countries. Look at it this way: if a Korean man living in the USA decides he wants to live in a country with just people like him, he can go back to Korea. If a Pakistani living in London decides he wants to live in a majority Pakistani country, he can go to Pakistani. But where would a Anglo-Saxon go, when Britain is majority non-white by the 2060s, where would a Frenchman go when France is majority non-white by a similar time?
If someone wants to live in a multiracial society I suppose they should have that option, but if someone doesn't shouldn't they also have that option? The thing that bugs me about this the most is if present trend continue there will be a majority Black African Continent, a China and a Japan with a largely uniform population (~90% or more the same race) but Western Europe, Australia, North America would be radically different, no longer majority white.
[–]random6000[S] 10 points11 points12 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[+]Non-Throwaway14 points [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link
Trump get's the Jews to admit they lie about WWII death tolls to manipulate goyim?
God, I miss this Trump. He got the JTA to admit to lying or using flimsy evidence to support the offical death-camp story. With one press release nonetheless.
[–]NOGS42 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[+]Non-Throwaway14 points [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
Yes.
Here you are.
That's the archive.org link, the original link (the page is still up on JTA) is below but broken. So unbreak the link if you want to view it that way. But the hyperlink above will be just fine.
h t t p : / / www.jta.org/2017/01/31/news-opinion/united-states/remember-the-11-million-why-an-inflated-victims-tally-irks-holocaust-historians
Here's a different link too, from the New York Times (a well known extremist fringe publication that loves to cater to the far-right).
That's an archived link too. Here's a broken original h t t p : //www.nytimes.com/1992/06/17/world/poland-agrees-to-change-auschwitz-tablets.html
It's about the Auschwitz Death toll. Around the time of the Nuremberg trials it was said 4 million died at that camp, in 1991 the death toll was changed to 1.5 million. A non-trivial reduction and some historians estimate it might have been a lot lower than that. Yet the 6 million Jews number has not really changed since the 1940s when it was first proclaimed. Some countries will jail you for saying the death toll might have been lower than 6 million. But the official figures have changed. History changes as new information becomes available. But for some reason, any questioning of the official narrative is deemed denial of the holocaust even if someone just questions parts of it.
[–]NOGS42 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NOGS42 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NOGS42 -4 points-3 points-2 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheMomentWeChewSoap 8 points9 points10 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]NOGS42 -1 points0 points1 point (7 children) | Copy Link
[+]Non-Throwaway14 points [recovered] (6 children) | Copy Link
The International Jew by Henry Ford is a good start to why white people have issues with Jewish culture and Jewish people.
If I had to boil it down to a simple phrase it's "Identity for me and not for thee"
Essentially a pattern you will see repeated across multiple different countries and time periods is Jews will promote zionism and the right to preserve their genetic lineage and culture whilst at the same time promoting things that degrade the white society's culture and genetic lineage.
You see Jews at the forefront of promoting non-white immigration to the USA, Canada and Europe, among other places. Here's one example
At the same time you'll see Jews fight to preserve Israel as a Jewish state, with strict laws on immigration and the general refusal of migrants.
And you see the same thing, in virtually every white country with a Jewish minority. Hungary is a good example. Prime Minister Victor Orban has been fighting to keep Hungary ethnically Hungarian and many Jewish activists such as George Soros have been trying to force Hungary to accept more immigrants.
To me it seems that Jews don't want any country to just be white. And I understand there could be some arguments made about the USA never being fully white (it was 90% for most of it's history, until the Hart-Celler act of 1965, which was done in part to allow more Jews into the country from Eastern Europe, but had the affect of removing all limits on immigration, meaning the USA is slated to become majority non-white by the 2040s, even though proponents of the act in the 1960s said that wouldn't happen).
This isn't just a right or left issue either, you'll see Jews from Soros on the left to Bill Kristol on the right advocate for mass immigration. It's a common enough thing that it goes beyond coincidence, it's a large element of Jewish culture.
For me personally, I just want the option of having white countries. Look at it this way: if a Korean man living in the USA decides he wants to live in a country with just people like him, he can go back to Korea. If a Pakistani living in London decides he wants to live in a majority Pakistani country, he can go to Pakistani. But where would a Anglo-Saxon go, when Britain is majority non-white by the 2060s, where would a Frenchman go when France is majority non-white by a similar time?
If someone wants to live in a multiracial society I suppose they should have that option, but if someone doesn't shouldn't they also have that option? The thing that bugs me about this the most is if present trend continue there will be a majority Black African Continent, a China and a Japan with a largely uniform population (~90% or more the same race) but Western Europe, Australia, North America would be radically different, no longer majority white.
Those are my thoughts on the issue.
[–]NOGS42 0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheMomentWeChewSoap 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]NOGS42 -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link