This is the basic meaning of "alpha fux beta bux" and it's true. People must understand that even if RedPill can't make you an alpha player, it can protect you against being destroyed. Feminism, liberalism and modern egalitarian delusion means that you've been brainwashed and that eternal truths about women, formerly known to men and taught to them by their fathers or by friends, are now hidden. This is why you must take "red pill." The modern totalitarianism depends on you being dominated and scammed by women.

I will never trust women. Let others do so, I concede I may be wrong on this one and my opinions warped by my own perversions and bisexual impulses, but a good part of my opinion is based on personal observation.

In Africa men used to lock up women during ovulation. That's in pagan village society. When Christianity and Islam come along and give women more freedom, false paternity rates shoot up in these places. This begs the question, why do men in primitive society work so hard to lock women up? Is it because they're evil sadists, or because they know, from experience, what will happen if women are given ANY quarter, even the freedom they have under traditional Islam and Christianity? I'd say it's because they know women are fuck-crazy and will cheat on their husbands. Even the very limited freedom that Christianity and Islam give women in villages is (compared to African animism) a great danger to men who then risk resources and their labor to support the seed of another man. And keep in mind that this is in a village, where everyone is watching and there are fewer opportunities than in large cities; yet even in villages, under strict Islam, women find a way to cheat.

Ancient Greeks knew women were "fuck-crazy"; for example, Medea killed her own children because she was fuck-crazy for Jason. On this point I don't agree with the writers like heartiste, who say that women have a lower sex drive and so on. I will side with mankind's ancient knowledge about women.

I read another speculation on cuckoldry rates. Normally they range from 3%-30% for false paternity, the latter corresponding to men who already suspect something may be up. But in the general population, cuckoldry rates are said to be a "low" 3%-17%, this supposedly proving that most men have nothing to worry about. I think this is misleading, and the way I heard it explained was like this:

Studies are done on STD transmission rates. Not every copulation leads to a successful transmission of disease. A transmission rate of around 17% in a population of women indicates that close to 100% of the women have engaged in intercourse with infected men. A cuckoldry rate of 17% would mean that close to 100% of women cheat. A rate of 3% even is very high if you consider that: not all intercourse results in pregnancy, this doesn't count the times a man shoots inside and there's no result, doesn't count the times he shoots outside or blowjobs, etc.; it doesn't take into account condoms, and it doesn't take into account abortion or morning after pill, and so on, and so on. I believe a 3% rate indicates something like close to 100% of women are fucking outside a marriage or relationship.

Is this a result of my dirty imagination, maybe so, but I've seen too many things myself, girlfriends inviting you to fuck them in their boyfriend's bed, etc., that I'm not really going to trust a woman not to be a sloot. Plan accordingly.

Women are evil, but nature is evil, so I don't blame them so much. Like Schopenhauer said,

Nature has made it the calling of the young, strong, and handsome men to look after the propagation of the human race; so that the species may not degenerate. This is the firm will of Nature, and it finds its expression in the passions of women. This law surpasses all others in both age and power. Woe then to the man who sets up rights and interests in such a way as to make them stand in the way of it; for whatever he may do or say, they will, at the first significant onset, be unmercifully annihilated. For the secret, unformulated, nay, unconscious but innate moral of woman is: We are justified in deceiving those who, because they care a little for us,—that is to say for the individual,—imagine they have obtained rights over the species. The constitution, and consequently the welfare of the species, have been put into our hands and entrusted to our care through the medium of the next generation which proceeds from us; let us fulfil our duties conscientiously.

But women are by no means conscious of this leading principle in abstracto, they are only conscious of it in concreto, and have no other way of expressing it than in the manner in which they act when the opportunity arrives. So that their conscience does not trouble them so much as we imagine, for in the darkest depths of their hearts they are conscious that in violating their duty towards the individual they have all the better fulfilled it towards the species, whose claim upon them is infinitely greater. (A fuller explanation of this matter may be found in vol. ii., ch. 44, in my chief work, Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung.)

Because women in truth exist entirely for the propagation of the race, and their destiny ends here, they live more for the species than for the individual, and in their hearts take the affairs of the species more seriously than those of the individual. This gives to their whole being and character a certain frivolousness, and altogether a certain tendency which is fundamentally different from that of man; and this it is which develops that discord in married life which is so prevalent and almost the normal state.