Just found this very interesting feminist website explaining the history of feminist protesting and activism during the Vietnam war.

https://www.solidarity-us.org/node/1681

The article explains that feminists were never really against the war in general, simply against the way women and non-americans were affected.

The Vietnamese women are out there fighting with their brothers, fighting against American imperialism, with its advanced technology. They can shoot. They're out there with their babies on their backs ... and they're participating in the revolution wholeheartedly, just as the Vietnamese men are participating in the revolution, in the national liberation struggle. The success of their national liberation struggle is just as much dependent upon the women continuing in the struggle as it is dependent on the Vietnamese men.

So here, she's basically supporting the Vietnamese, especially Vietnamese women.

Part of being a woman was this psychology of proving I was such a good radical, ”better than the men.” We felt we were motivated by something higher because we didn't have to go to war ourselves.

More or less gloating their draft exemption and mocking their male peers for having to risk death. She seems to display no sense of gratitude, or awareness of how fortunate draft exemption was. No awareness that what she did was only possible BECAUSE of draft exemption. Especially how they she felt MOTIVATED by draft exemption.

New York's Radical Women, not content to accept a traditional role in protesting the killing of the men in their lives, sought to transform the event into a call for women power.

So basically, they didn't care that men were dying and had to make it about themselves. Is that a violation of safe space, or womansplaining? I forget.

the problem of participation by women is a special problem—one that reflects not only inadequacies within SDS but one that also reflects greater societal problems, namely the problem of the role of women in American society.

In other words, we don't like protesting the war because no women are dying. So let's make it about something else.

In March, she asserted that most women's groups were ”bourgeois, unconscious, or unconcerned with class struggle and the exploitation of working class women . . .”13 The rift was becoming pronounced for many women activists, as the very movement that had espoused freedom and creativity, especially in individual expression and sexuality, now trivialized their concerns as less than central to the real issue of class struggle and stopping the war.

Like feminists and SJWs today- selfish, arrogant, ignorant, and bigoted.

For example, in February of 1966, women at Berkeley held a rally and protest at the Army induction center in Oakland four days after two army nurses were killed in a helicopter crash in Vietnam.

Because literally, they didn't care about the hundreds of men dying a day, they only care about women.