A nice summary of how press cover child abduction when it's a mom compared to when it's a dad.

From the [Fathers4Justice website[(http://www.fathers-4-justice.org/2015/06/patron-saint-of-stolen-children/) and inspired by the press coverage of the Roger Williams/Rebecca Minnock case in Britain, written by Matt O'Connor, quote:

The lexicon of double standards in such cases now runs as follows:

Where a dad is said to be ‘calculating’, a mum is said be ‘vulnerable’.

Where a dad is said to be ‘unstable’, a mum is said to be ‘emotional’.

Where a dad is said to have ‘abducted’ his child, a mum is said to be ‘on the run’.

Where a dad is ‘hunted’ by Police, a mum is ‘sought’ by Police.

Where a dad is caught and ‘arrested’, a mum is interviewed and ‘supported’.

Where a dad is ‘jailed’, a mum will inevitably be paid for her story by a national newspaper.

And you thought sex discrimination was illegal.