I posted this over on another subreddit that was discussing feminism vs misandry. my reply was removed within a minute.

I dont know if you have heard of her or not but there is the feminist who recently was named one of the most influential people on the internet? Anita Sarkeesian. Im sure you have. While kill all men and I bath in male tears may be different statements they both come from the same place, and meant to have the same effect on their targets. Would you not agree? If you want futher evidence of her misandry point of view, then there’s that twisted fantasy Antia posted on femfraq where she violently murdered a guy. It goes into gruesome details of her shooting him a number of times while he begged her for his life. She liked and endorsed that story btw - what a wonderful feminist role model for future generations. I can see in 50 years, the propaganda poster of we can do it will be replaced with Anita I bath in male tears. Over the last year, feminism has been attacking men on a completely new level. Shaming men has been a main weapon of feminism lately. Manterrupting and Mansplaning. These aren’t feminist issues, they are rude Human Being issues. Feminists think only men speak over someone? Pfft. Woman aren’t afraid of interrupting someone either, but feminism just sees it at a mens issue and paints females as victims. Feminism is attacking every man with this. You don’t have to be a man to be rude. Females are just the same.

Then there the open attack on any man sitting with their legs open by more the 5cms. Its completely fine to ignore hundreds of thousands of years of evolution in respects to physical differences between men and women. Its also fine to completely ignore woman doing the same thing with their legs or even just taking up another seat with their handbag is exceptable. But men, how dare they sit there with their legs open.

Then there was shirt-gate saga. Shaming someone due to the clothing they wore? Really? What happened to its wrong to shame anyone for the clothing they choose to put on? Seems fine when directed at men but no one can say anything about how woman dress. Even to the point of feminists complaining about not getting a job due to what she was wearing, even though it was inappropriate for the company being applied for. Shaming a man who shirt was a gift from a female clothing designer for a special occasion is wrong. Right? One rule for females, another for men? Then there is removing woman responsibilities. If two tipsy people had sex. The male automatically rapist and female automatically the victim. If two teachers rape students the same age, men go to jail and woman offenders doent even get recorded on sex offenders lists. If your drunk and drive and you kill a person, you are responsible for your actions, but when it comes to sex woman choices don’t matter? Again, what the fuck? Feminism loves to point out male privileges but also ignore their own.

And the concent topic. Consent I understand. Continuous positive consent is going a little too far. Im not allowed to old my wife’s hand without seeking her consent first? My wife cant wake me up with a blowjob cause I was asleep before it started? Men need to get consent for every action these days to touch a female. No wonder the Dean of Columbia didn’t want to shake Sulkowiczs hand, he may have ended up being sued harassment given her history.

Then there was gaming gate which isn’t about sexism in games, it was about someone sleeping around to get good reviews and be in a better position to have her game made and then she got called on it and then she decided to change the narrative of the story to a feminist issue and Anita rolled with it and turned it into something it wasn’t. Then there are the high profile false rape claims were the so called victims have been proven to be liars and when they are, the topic changes from rape happened to the claim may be false, but the topic was worth all the lies and the male vicitims life being destroyed. Feminism seems fine with all this. Why isn’t feminism standing up for mens rights? Why is it a man can be banned from university just because he reminds a girl about the man who supposedly raped her? The real victim there was the guy who had nothing to do with the situation in the first place but ended up losing his education cause some girl thought he reminded her of someone else?

Then there is the mattress girl, following her ex around screaming the he raped her but the real reason, she was upset about walking in on him having sex with another girl. Even the uni investigated with title IX and found that she was full of shit (really hard to do as accused isn’t allowed to defend themselves and all due process is removed. The police investigated and found her to be a spiteful young woman who was full of shit. What was her defense? You cant hold her slanderous actions against her as it was a piece of performance art. Seriously, what the fuck? Feminism supports her and ignores the male victim, because in some alternate string theory universe, the rape may of happened but it certainly didnt happening this one. Then there was Jackie. Oh jackie, what a little liar you are. Nothing of what she said was true. Nothing. Not one bit. Jackie had even tried this before to a lesser extent. But feminism supports her completely to the point of advocating for fraternities to be closed even though they there members had done NOTHING wrong. Jackie was full of shit. Feminism supported her over the real victims. How is it feminism supports liars and demonises victims?