~ archived since 2018 ~

Another Father hurt by an Ignroant Family Court Judge

fox8xof

June 8, 2014

3 upvotes

/r/MensRights

http://www.reviewjournal.com/news/las-vegas/dad-appeals-high-court-custody-case

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB

Post Information

Title	Another Father hurt by an Ignroant Family Court Judge
Author	fox8xof
Upvotes	3
Comments	7
Date	June 8, 2014 8:16 PM UTC (12 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/27n3fq/another_father_hurt_by_an_ignroant_family_court/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/another-father-hurt-by-an-ignroant-family-court.999503 https://theredarchive.com/post/999503

Comments

[–]Karissa36 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 12 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Karissa36 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 12 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Karissa36 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Karissa36 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Well obviously her job was not as a licensed attorney. Just as obviously, neither one of them were making much money if they couldn't afford attorneys. She clearly needed a better job, and family support is important for children of single parents. No, you and your children should not be forced to live in the same place with lousy employment opportunities for the rest of your life. The father had the chance to prove it was better for the children to remain in the same place. He didn't do that. Which strongly suggests she could offer the kids a much better life in Sweden. Primary custody ALONE would not have allowed her to move. That's just the father's smoke screen and it's not particularly legally significant. She still had to prove the move was better for the children. There is nothing, once again, in this article that states how remaining in the same place was better for the children.