~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
Adamjensen2030
[–]nocivo21 points22 points23 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
In a serious tone, the catholic excuse help me to dodge many situations. Thanks god.
[–]baulrog75 14 points15 points16 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Remember when the jesus memes were popular here for a while
[–]PrinceRaj538 points9 points10 points 7 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
His "Loooord" will be laughing his ass off while the guy will be stuck trying to "fix" his relationship by doing favours for his woman because his "lord" told him to do so, while being "respecctable" just to get a crumb of that vag.
And after that, "r/ deadbedroom I am comminnnggg!!!!"
[–]BrainBoy0004 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
TLDR at the bottom..........................Religious Conservative cucks are coming into Mgtow community because they want woman to be feminine and submissive again....OPEN you fucking eyes, female nature will never change!!!..... OKAY Let's say that a war broke up and after the war, Females became feminine and submissive again but after a while, They started asking for more freedom and Simps, Cucks, and White Knights, will give these freedom to woman Because let's be honest, Simps, Cucks, and white knights will never go extinct no matter how many times we shame them.... and the Female nature will always want MORE......BUT we have Solution, A solution that the roman empire NEVER had and This SOLUTION is under development, OKAY let's cut the bullshit, I'm talking about SEX robots and Artificial Wombs........You religious fucks should accept that we're just a fucking accident and we Never had a soul, We are just biological MACHINES, Just think about it, War, Famine, Poverty, Disease, Starvation, Genetic Defects, and Natural disasters, A LOVING FATHER WOULD NEVER PUT HES BELOVED CHILDREN INTO THIS SHITHOLE..........And for those conservative Fuckers, Good luck competing with robots when automation arises.......................................................TLDR, this is just a small rant from a drunk mother fucker, I'll go sleep now.
[–]erise901 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Cheers glass cling
[–]Givemeanamedamn0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I dunno, Islam seems to have much more tolerable women, for example. Nature may not change but social norms can make a big difference, our psycological wiring can be influenced by upbringing and environment. I'm not even religious...
[–]jkarovskaya0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
Interesting rant.
Never occurs to most religious peoplle that the the major religions on planet earth all preach something diametrically opposite to the rest of the pack.
They obviously can't all be right, ergo.......
[–]Willinator30004 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Thots are strong, Jesus is stronger.
[–]gprime2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Oh good, more tradcon bullshit. 😒
It's perfectly reasonable to eschew sex, as many do here, because under current conditions it would often fail a cost-benefit analysis. But the framing established in this is that the problem is premarital promiscuity, and thus the solution is marriage. And marriage is as antithetical to MGTOW as it gets; it is a losing proposition for men. If you're some religious nutter and value Christian teachings over your personal welfare, so be it. But that's just tradcuckery, not MGTOW.
[–]Inkfyuk1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Have you met my friend 1 Corinthians chapter 7
[–]jkarovskaya0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link
There are some Christians who do not consider the letters of Paul to be inspired scripture at all.
[–]Inkfyuk0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Those are silly people, and they are also in the minority.
[–]jkarovskaya0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Paul was a raging Pharisee who spewed all kinds of crap & bullsh*t that Jesus never mentioned once.
Women covering their heads, slaves must obey masters, gays deserve death, all of it is pure Hebrew culture and mythology of the time.
The letters were arbitrarily "decided" to be "inspired" by a few conclaves in the 3rd and 4th century, so now every sheeple has to believe every raving nonsensical mandate in Ephesians, Romans, and Corinithians
[–]Inkfyuk0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Women covering their heads was a image of the individual and Jesus. Without a covering you are being shameful.
He said that not just homosexuals but fornicators, idolaters and several other things. However to the church in corinth he said' "and such were some of you." So if he wanted people like that killed why would he accept them into the church after repenting. Also Peter said Paul's letters were hard to understand without the spirit. This also means that apostles who walked with Jesus agreed that Paul's work was inspired by God. So if those people who walked with Jesus felt Paul was right with God. Who are people 2000 years removed to pick on him. It says more about a person who has a huge problem with Paul's letters than it does about paul for that very reason.
[–]RIPOldAccountF-1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
real shit
[+][deleted] 7 years ago [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
I just do quckies with a few girls and bullshit them I am interested in more, good thing about it is pretty much no strings attached sex with girls in there best years, I highly recommend it.
[–]Givemeanamedamn0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Asshole thing to do.
[–]HiredNote0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Yeah, because we all know women never bullshit men that their interested in order to get money.
Doesn't mean you have to drop to their level, unless they truly are thots in which case crack on ha.
[–]jacketguy0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
amen brother
[+]boisdevie -6 points-5 points-4 points 7 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link
The irony here is delicious. We go out own way because we weigh up the evidence and act accordingly. Religious people act as they do even though there is no evidence to proof that there is any validity to their claims that there is a god or some guy called jesus.
[–]AlbertCohol9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
The existence of Jesus is a topic that’s not even up for debate. The “Christ myth theory” is universally rejected among historians.
“Today, nearly all historians, whether Christians or not, accept that Jesus existed and that the gospels contain plenty of valuable evidence which has to be weighed and assessed critically. There is general agreement that, with the possible exception of Paul, we know far more about Jesus of Nazareth than about any first or second century Jewish or pagan religious teacher.” Graham Stanton, The Gospels and Jesus
“Even the most critical historian can confidently assert that a Jew named Jesus worked as a teacher and wonder-worker in Palestine during the reign of Tiberius, was executed by crucifixion under the prefect Pontius Pilate, and continued to have followers after his death.” Luke Timothy Johnson, The Real Jesus
[–]WikiTextBot0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Historicity of Jesus
The historicity of Jesus is the question if Jesus of Nazareth can be regarded as a historical figure. Nearly all New Testament scholars and Near East historians, applying the standard criteria of historical-critical investigation, find that the historicity of Jesus is effectively certain, although they differ about the beliefs and teachings of Jesus as well as the accuracy of the details of his life that have been described in the gospels.The question of the historicity of Jesus is part of the study of the historical Jesus as undertaken in the quest for the historical Jesus and the scholarly reconstructions of the life of Jesus, based primarily on critical analysis of the gospel texts and applying the standard criteria of critical-historical investigation, and methodologies for analyzing the reliability of primary sources and other historical evidence.While scholars have criticized Jesus scholarship for religious bias and lack of methodological soundness, with very few exceptions such critics generally do support the historicity of Jesus and reject the Christ myth theory that Jesus never existed.
[ PM | Exclude me | Exclude from subreddit | FAQ / Information | Source ] Downvote to remove | v0.28
[–]boisdevie 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
If this Jesus actually existed give me solid proof of him being the son of some deity that you call 'god'.
[–]AlbertCohol1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Whether he is divine or not is a whole other issue that has no bearing on the fact that he existed.
Ignorance is excusable, but from now on you know that he existed and can’t in good conscience claim otherwise.
[–]jkarovskaya0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
In the 21st century, tens of millions of Americans, and billions more human beings around the globe, still attempt to mold their own lives - and to impose on the lives of others - anachronistic, maladaptive and self-destructive codes of conduct based on primitive superstition, fairy tales and imaginary creatures supposedly living and speaking to them from on high
[–]Inkfyuk1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Give me solid proof that George Washington was the first president of the united states.
Edit: beyond someone's testimony, or a historical document.
[–]jkarovskaya0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
You're in the wrong sub.
There is zero scientific proof any gods exist
[–]AlbertCohol0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
That’s not the issue. I’m guessing your reading comprehension is bad?
[–]jkarovskaya0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
It's the absolute foundational issue, obviously, because basing your life on ancient mythology with zero scientific evidence is solipsistic delusion
[–]AlbertCohol0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The issue is: “Did Jesus exist?”
And the fact is: “Yes.”
What you do with that information is up to you.
[–]PrinceRaj533 points4 points5 points 7 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link
True.
Although, I dont know about jesus or someone else, but most of the religious guys are frustrated tradcons who dwell in their "moral values with a great sense of morality" and pat themselves on their back while "feeling superior". They think there is some invisible skydaddy in the clouds who is keeping some kind of score.
Ah and don't forget the married mgtows : "you just gotta find the right one who is xyz and earns more than you! See! Problem solved!! Yaaayy!"
For example, just a few days ago I saw a few comments from a guy called "chakra" on this sub who equated "having sex with friend's ex" with murdering someone and stealing a car, while saying how "laws are made out of principles and moral values and moral high ground".
For example, here you go, for a good laugh : /r/MGTOW/comments/caadhz/comment/et7bv10
[–]erise901 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Check Romans 2:14-15. Basically means that people who do not “know” God still can do good things because of conscience.
I used to be religious AF but now I think it’s just a tool to easily steer people.
Whole “Having sex with friends ex is bad” is so stupid, invented by BP cucks who are so emotionally attached to hoes...
[–]PrinceRaj530 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Religion was, is and always will be the tool of gynocentrism.
You should read the replies to my comments in the link. Damn the blue pill is so strong with those guys (specially the chakra guy). He literally equated having sex with a friend's ex-gf with "stealing a car" and "murder", while saying laws are made out of common grounds and moral values and such. Oof.
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]nocivo21 points22 points23 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]baulrog75 14 points15 points16 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PrinceRaj538 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BrainBoy0004 points5 points6 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]erise901 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Givemeanamedamn0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]jkarovskaya0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Willinator30004 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]gprime2 points3 points4 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Inkfyuk1 point2 points3 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]jkarovskaya0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Inkfyuk0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]jkarovskaya0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Inkfyuk0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]RIPOldAccountF-1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
I just do quckies with a few girls and bullshit them I am interested in more, good thing about it is pretty much no strings attached sex with girls in there best years, I highly recommend it.
[–]Givemeanamedamn0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]HiredNote0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Givemeanamedamn0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]jacketguy0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]boisdevie -6 points-5 points-4 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[–]AlbertCohol9 points10 points11 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]WikiTextBot0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]boisdevie 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]AlbertCohol1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]jkarovskaya0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Inkfyuk1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]jkarovskaya0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]AlbertCohol0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]jkarovskaya0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]AlbertCohol0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PrinceRaj533 points4 points5 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]erise901 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]PrinceRaj530 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link