After hearing high praise among MGTOW brothers I gave the book a read and I am a bit astounded as to what was really worth reading in the book.

​

The entire premise is some mild form of 'hold frame, don't be nice' as in some PUA-style recommendation to men to have a relationship. Almost all examples of men used in the book are pushover, doormat type guys who claim their manhood by being less nice aka affirmative. One example was some guy married to a whore who stood up to his wife disrespecting him by 'being promiscuous', demeaning to the man, and selfish. So the author states that their marriage improved after the nice guy stood up to his wife. Like WTF? Dude is still married to a whore.

​

I guess for simps raised by single mothers it makes sense to not be a bitchboy, but I think the premise of the entire book revolves around getting pussy while being in the man's frame. No where in the book does it mention to be your own man - as if such a life independent of women is not worth living.

​

Time and again women are painted in the glorified brush of 'meh, them womenz' meanwhile the entire onus of having a working relationship is directed toward male attitude - and being nice is somehow like being broken. Nothing the author mentions is applicable to a thot, nor wall-stricken women. Fuck, they prey on nice guys for god's sake. And a disloyal close to wall woman will trap any guy who thinks reading the book as enabled him to pick a NAWALT.

​

As one has it in the gynocentric world the book aimed at men ingrains their servitude toward getting and keeping women in their lives happy. Which in turn supposedly make the man happy.

​

May be the MGTOW stratosphere is too high and noble that everything men related in the mainstream seems like a kowtowing to the rules set by women.

​

Anyone who read the book care to bring some points that I missed?

​