Dating is Dead

thrownaway_MGTOW · 2013-10-11T07:37:36+00:00

You can date a woman for a month or two and she can come to your place, start hollering and smashing dishes and the neighbors can call the police and you will go to jail. That’s not a risk of being rejected or a risk of feeling unloved. It’s a risk of incarceration.

This. Very much THIS.

I've known several men -- including some "macho" types, who got essentially neutered via VAWA and the police default of "someone is going to jail" on domestic calls (and that someone is ALWAYS the male, no matter how much of a shrieking insane banshee the female is being) -- ended up losing jobs and then as an inevitable result losing homes, etc. And the biotch just moves onto the next pony on the cock carousel.

Also, I've noted this:

First, men have been successfully removed from households. Even when there is a man in the home, he's not likely the father, or he's not in a role of being a man but, instead, just his wife's bitch (because it's a 50/50 marriage, after all).

Even in the homes/households that appear to be "stable" the men are essentially neutered... slaves to rude/bitchy wives (or live in girlfriends).

I've had these men's wives/GF's try the same shit with me; and without really even trying I can "smack em down" & "shut 'em up" with just a word or two.

The women then try to have their "men" come to the rescue and the guys then (in the women's presence) all give at least the appearance of a half-hearted try to upbraid me for being rude, but slapping THEM down in turn then is just too easy... they're nearly all like beat dogs.

Of course afterwards they often privately thank me... which is even just more pathetic.

One can almost pity them (the "men" in those households) because they are such pathetic/pitiable shells of their former selves...

But at the same time, I don't pity them... instead I really rather find them to be disgusting.

After all they chose to enter into, and daily choose to remain in such traps, living as cowed slaves or dogs or drone-slaves serving their queen bee and surviving on whatever scraps she deigns to toss them.

Personally, I can't imagine EVER actually living like that.

Pussy is just NOT that valuable... and you can rent it by the hour, so WTF.

EDIT: Having looked at the original thread being referenced...

One thing that few there really seems to have the GUTS to mention one of the most obvious problems with many of these so called "Christian" women: the sluttery & hypergamy.

The one guy DID hit the point:

These men are essentially being told that their sole reason for existence is to provide themselves as boyfriends for church girls, husbands for Christian women; fathers for their children, and stepfathers for the thugspawn of “reformed sluts”.

But only in a round-about way. Even two decades ago already and in a fairly "conservative" midwestern area, I noted that the many if not most of the women coming to the "Christian Singles" groups were pretty heavily "used"...

The vast majority of them fit into one of several "slut" categories: Either you eventually learned that they came with at least one (and in many cases multiple) "thugspawn" as baggage, and/or with one or more marriages/divorces (or the equivalent in a semi-marriage prior shackup) and in many cases had an "abortion" or two during their late high school and/or college years...

But since they invariably started to see "the Wall" approaching (and their "superwoman" feminist career & life plans had not exactly worked out like they had believed), all of a sudden they decided they better "find God" (i.e. seek some sucker-sap Beta-bucks dude, the kind they either rejected previously during their alpha-cock-carousel days, or alternately who would have nothing to do with them while they were being openly "slutty") -- but nearly always if you scratched beneath the surface you would find that the whole "seeking salvation & repentance" was little more than a superficial act, like a form of cosplay in order to entrap a "provider" (for their spawn and their whims).

Some of them succeeded... and I know a couple of men who fell into those traps. Only to find themselves kicked to the curb a decade later (once the spawn were grown, and they no longer felt "haaaapppy", and when they could also lay claim to the house). And a couple of the men kicked themselves out when they found out they'd been cuckolded, the "slutty" ways never ever actually having been abandoned or their women playing hypergamy with some "higher up" in terms of money/status (in one case the damned "pastor" of the church).

I can only imagine how much worse it has gotten in recent years (because back then the "scare" of HIV/AIDS was still palpable, and even THAT didn't curb their sluttiness).

thrownaway_MGTOW · 2013-10-11T08:06:59+00:00

THIS ONE was ironically really funny to me:

If you want to know why Christian women can’t find any Christian men to date, it’s because most of those Christian men aren’t attractive to you. And they aren’t attractive to you because they listen to people like Mark Driscoll, Dr. James Dobson, Dennis Rainey, and Glenn Stanton. These unfortunate men are hearing everyone around them say that their sexual desires are violent, predatory, criminal and evil. They are getting hammered every day with the message that they need to “Man Up and Marry the first slut who shows them any interest at all” and “single moms are heroes; single men are selfish jerks”. Their interests are decidedly secondary to those of Christian women, according to the Church. These men are essentially being told that their sole reason for existence is to provide themselves as boyfriends for church girls, husbands for Christian women; fathers for their children, and stepfathers for the thugspawn of “reformed sluts”.

This modern "Christian manhood" -- looks NOTHING like the Christ recorded in the Bible, who openly rebuked women (including his mother on more than one occasion when she attempted to order him around).

But if course these modern psycho-babble, feminist-arse-kissing, wannabe-priest-eunuchs have to attempt to emasculate Christ as well. (They are probably better labeled "Prissytians" and may as well become Catholic Mary-worshippers, as they know nothing of Christ, and have essentially tossed "God the FATHER" entirely overboard -- virtually erased him from their theology {because zOMG! Patriarchy!} and instead they've turned "God" into some type of wish-fulfilling warm-fuzzy Motherly Nature/Gaia womb-entity.)

And they basically erase everything the Apostle Paul instructed about women in the church -- not to mention the definition of "elders" and the requirements of church leadership, and his warnings against "ear-ticklers" and false leaders -- since all of those reveal that THESE MEN (who generally seek to be "rulers" if the church when they are still wet-behind the ears, and barely weaned from their mother's teats... often only to have latched onto their wives instead) are not worthy of any such respect.

No wonder these "christian" men have become panty-waists -- heck even the purportedly "macho" men have been leading them into becoming pussy-whipped little eunuch boys -- via crap like the "Promise Keepers" and all of the recent (so called "christian") divorce-porn movies like "FireProof"... blech.

MRMRising · 2013-10-12T22:39:05+00:00

Giving the manosphere a friendly Christian sidehug since 2010

Who said the manosphere needs a Christian hug? Religious Conservatives are no better than misandric feminism, both believe in male utility to fund there world view.

Title	Dating is Dead
Author	ss_camaro
Upvotes	15
Comments	15
Date	October 11, 2013 4:23 AM UTC (12 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/1o761i/dating_is_dead/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/dating-is-dead.633246 https://theredarchive.com/post/633246

Comments