If Chad is a beta she'll dump him too

Shimakaze4 · 2018-04-03T07:20:43+00:00

Basically she was a nagging, neurotic, over controlling bitch while her husband just wanted to relax and have fun without making everything a fucking power struggle. Yeh, good like finding a man who wants to put up with shit like that hunny, you're just not pretty enough.

DankJaeger · 2018-04-03T08:20:13+00:00

So hang on, he showed beta traits and let her walk all over him then he left her for another woman? She still wants him because he left her and found someone else before she had a chance to. Suffer that, bitch.

Redemption888 · 2018-04-03T09:46:58+00:00

[deleted]

kattis112 · 2018-04-03T12:05:31+00:00

A woman will dump a man as soon as she has something to gain, or think her life will be more prosperous without him than with him. This with no regards to the man or other people it might effect. In this way women are very logical in a psychopathic sense. No loyalty, "always looking out for #1" as my ex wife put it.

I-am-the-lul · 2018-04-03T15:25:18+00:00

You see, if there’s a void of power, I will fill it or exist in a total state of panic and unease…but in having to fill it, I lost trust and respect in him.

Realizing that women are like this helped me greatly. If you don't use your pimp hand to keep them in their place, they feel lost and start destroying everything out of fear.

balancedben · 2018-04-03T19:54:24+00:00

She was overly domineering and he wasn't up for that so they split up and went their separate ways. Too bad he foolishly jumped into a new relationship and is engaged to be married AGAIN. Some guys don't learn. Fuck em. He's a weak deballed man.

Title	If Chad is a beta she'll dump him too
Author	Redemption888
Upvotes	15
Comments	10
Date	April 3, 2018 7:02 AM UTC (8 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/89ay87/if_chad_is_a_beta_shell_dump_him_too/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/if-chad-is-a-beta-shell-dump-him-too.574045 https://theredarchive.com/post/574045

Comments