~ archived since 2018 ~

It is getting about that time if year

squidracer

August 31, 2017

101 upvotes

/r/MGTOW

Archived from /r/MGTOW

r/MGTOW is a community for men going their own way by forging their own identities and paths to self-defined success; cutting through collective ideas of what a man is.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/MGTOW archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB

Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Post Information

Title	It is getting about that time if year
Author	squidracer
Upvotes	101
Comments	63
Date	August 31, 2017 2:33 PM UTC (8 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/6x77qa/it_is_getting_about_that_time_if_year/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/it-is-getting-about-that-time-if-year.560075 https://theredarchive.com/post/560075

Comments

[–]knightwhosaysneet 76 points77 points78 points 8 years ago (53 children) | Copy Link

[–]ManIsWalking38 points39 points40 points 8 years ago (50 children) | Copy Link

[–]knightwhosaysneet 31 points32 points33 points 8 years ago (33 children) | Copy Link

[–]ManIsWalking13 points14 points15 points 8 years ago (32 children) | Copy Link

[–]knightwhosaysneet 14 points15 points16 points 8 years ago (31 children) | Copy Link

Here, I'll sum it up for you.

In order to inact a true communist state, you have to destroy every establishment that will cause the population to fight against the Communist State. These establishments are God, Family, Country. They have all but destroyed God by making the Pope out to be a Pedo, allowing Christian TV churches to exist, and shaming terms like "Merry Christmas". Top that with pushing an unproven theory like the "Big Bang" and man evolving from monkeys as an actual fact. They have destroyed the family with feminism and the "strong, independent womyn" BS along with funding this lifestyle via taxes. And they call any nationalist a Nazi and flood sovereign states with foreigners who have no loyalty to any country.

And people are wondering why we are seeing a rise in groups like Antifa within the younger generations?

[–]SekaiNoHeipo5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link

[–]The_Law_of_the_Land1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]knightwhosaysneet -5 points-4 points-3 points 8 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link

[–]Freeze9510 points11 points12 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]knightwhosaysneet -2 points-1 points0 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Human beings and contemporary chimpanzees share a common ancestor

No. Our genetic makeup is very similar. This doesn't mean we came from a common ancestor. That is call a hypothesis. (I read your article and many others before. I have even taken an historical evolutionary theory class in college). They present facts about our genetics being "close" to monkeys with a 1.6% difference. Well, guess what? That 1.6% gives us higher intelligence, higher reasoning, different body makeup and looks. Then, they make the reach of "we might have evolved from the same monkey". Fuck that. That is a guess. A maybe. There is no proof of this. You all just lack reasoning skills and are lead to a conclusion by "scientists".

Face it. Your religion is science. Mine is God. Maybe this is why the west is going to shit. Because you worship men instead of God like you should.

[–]Freeze952 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

My intention was only to correct a fundamentally incorrect statement in your argument. You're not going to convince anyone if you make it appear you don't understand what you are debating. Evolutionary theory at no point has ever claimed we came from monkeys. That is a fact. You calling the common ancestor a monkey doesn't change the fact that it wasn't a monkey but an entirely different species, and using the correct terminology does not require you to accept the theory.

My reasoning skills are fine. I study science. I've looked at the evidence myself. I've been to labs where the fossils are studied. Accepting the Bible literally is not a demonstration of better reasoning skills, especially when Christians are extremely fractured as far as interpreting the origin of humanity.

My religion is not science. My career is science, but I have no problem as a Catholic reconciling scientific evidence with the existence of God.

[–]plutosheen4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]EbolaCheerios3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]knightwhosaysneet -2 points-1 points0 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]expinafre 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

[–]knightwhosaysneet 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

[–]expinafre 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

[–]knightwhosaysneet1 point 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]expinafre1 point 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]knightwhosaysneet1 point 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]expinafre1 point 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]knightwhosaysneet1 point 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]expinafre1 point 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]The_Law_of_the_Land1 point 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]expinafre1 point 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]The_Law_of_the_Land1 point 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Just stating things without saying why they're incorrect isn't becoming of a good argument. Let me demonstrate one flaw that Darwin himself inadvertently reported in his observations.

Natural Selection is conservative, not creative.

The concept of natural selection was originally developed by natural theologians, who thought that it worked to preserve distinct created types. Darwin argued that natural selection, if given enough time, could actually create new types. However, field and laboratory observations of natural selection in action confirm that it only changes the relative abundance of certain already-existing characteristics, and doesn’t create new ones. For example, Darwin observed that the average beak size of finches increased in dry years, but later observers noted that this trend reversed in wet years. This is very different than the kind of changes that would be required to transform a finch beak into some other structure or a finch into a completely different kind of animal. In other words, scientific studies of natural selection demonstrate, without exception, that Darwin was wrong.

[–]expinafre1 point 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Ok, I'm sorry I'm not making things clearer, but english is not my mother tongue, and as you may know, some words have subtle meaning changes over different languages, even more academical terms. I know exactly where your line of thought come from, but maybe I'll be unable to explain in a good way in english... But I'll try. Feel free to correct me. Evolution is a term for the gradient of speciation, being it phenoptic or not(i don't know how to spell it, but you know what I'm talking about). Darwin was wrong on many things, but lucky us science have advanced 100+ years from his initial thoughts. When you say it's conservative, you talk about a irredutible design, and that's simply not true. There' a famous bacteria experiment in which the "evolved" bacteria created a new way to absorb nutrients. The eye is another great example. I know it's hard to try to understand the process, but give it a chance with good will and you may be amazed.

[–]The_Law_of_the_Land1 point 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]expinafre1 point 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 8 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]knightwhosaysneet 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]s0ma_ 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 8 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]fungo_mungo0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

If a god exists, what function does it serve? If it didn't create all life and all matter and all energy, isn't it a worthless god?

To answer this, we would first have to agree on what a god is. And then, we would have to agree on what it means to exist ...e.g. you could say pain exists yet it is not something you can actually touch or see.

As for gods, some people believe in a 'man in the sky' type of thing which to me is on the same level as santa claus. For something more sophisticated, I would suggest the (Jung) archetype model. This sees the stories being retold and refined over thousands of years as metaphors for the real world. They literally evolved over time as many of the stories are from much older cultures.

For the record, I'm an atheist. Just putting this out as something to think about. Edited for clarity.

[–]mr_perfect14 points 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]s0ma_ 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago* (15 children) | Copy Link

[–]Onkel_Adolf0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

[–]s0ma_ 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

[–]Onkel_Adolf0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

[–]s0ma_ 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago* (11 children) | Copy Link

[–]Onkel_Adolf0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

[–]s0ma_ 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

[–]Onkel_Adolf0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

[–]s0ma_0 points 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]Onkel_Adolf1 point 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]s0ma_0 points 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]Onkel_Adolf1 point 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]s0ma_1 point 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]Onkel_Adolf1 point 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]s0ma_1 point 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]Onkel_Adolf1 point 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]ThatOtherTallerDude 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 8 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

she'll steal your hoodies

top kek

[–]GWJ_DanyBoy 13 points14 points15 points 8 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]UglyPrince2000 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]squidracer 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]TheArtOfTheKek 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]shellbroth 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]liftweights1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]pooshhMao 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]eaeulis3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]SnapshillBot2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]WhistlingAlong 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link