I really don't know how well this would be received, but it occurred to me this morning that with so many men rejecting the exploitation of men via social norms, legal processes, and other forms of pressure (religion, age, social status, wealth, etc.) there will come a time where men of MGTOW will pass and be interred.

My intuition told me the state/country in which you reside would decide what to do with the assets of the estates left behind, but I thought of how much wasted potential there was in that.

My imagination took me to a weird place. I thought that some of the more keenly-placed and experienced MGTOW could organize a non-profit to collect an redistribute those resources to the youngest (or oldest) of MGTOW in need. Now, I'm not talking UBI or otherwise irresponsible charity, I'm thinking that something like that would be an opportunity to invest in truly gifted members to enable them to achieve their goals. The goals don't even necessarily have to be academic, but they would require the applicant to do some civic good or realize an evident potential for a measurable good, but if there is an abundance of charity, then we should probably attempt to care for those who have been abused to make their final years less full of suffering.

Just a small number of ideas of what that would look like might be:

  • Qualified candidates for law school who pledge a time after graduation in years to represent fathers, pro bono, who are victims of false accusation, abuses of legal process in divorce, and other strange family matters of the court.

  • Donations to legislators who pledge to uphold men's rights.

  • Young men in poverty, or sons of single mothers, who need mentorship or skill training to become self-sustaining MGTOW, whether that means construction or computer science - nothing is off the table; give men the ability to do what they are best at.

  • Older men whose professions became automated, or their ex-spouse(s) stole their means to retire, inmates released on false accusations who do not receive proper restitution from the state, who may need end-of-life care, or a fresh start of sorts.

I think this organization would have to avoid taking health-care applications, due to the overly complex and predatory practices of the medical industries in the world, at present. There are enough charities outside of this imagined one to help those in that way.

Now, I would disqualify myself from any role in this, because I have no skills in finance, legal, or otherwise helpful knowledge or skill toward this end - I just hoped to start a conversation about what I could say, at least intuitively, is an interesting opportunity to avoid paying taxes to a society that exploits men so brazenly with impunity, and turn those monies into formerly impossible greatness among those who understand that men are being used and abused - the MGTOW.

What I imagine is that those who choose to donate a portion, if not all, of their remaining assets could do so with legal aid in a will, or just prior to passing if that was somehow more advantageous from a legal standpoint (again, I have no idea).

My only concern is that those entrusted to manage such an organization may be overtaken with greed. I would certainly need some ideas on how to avoid that - limited terms serving in each position? Strict limits on certain actions/rules; limiting what "donations" can be made with strict guidelines that have serious consequences? Stuff like that.

I dunno, it was just an hour I had before working a job that garnishes my wages from a lying, cheating, adulterous, thieving cunt who on more than one occasion would physically strike me. I think all men should be alleviated from suffering like this, and the MGTOW philosophy seems to be ripe for changing things for the better.

All that being said, I really do think it's enough what has already been done. The Red Pill has been shared and passed around; there is no real call to action in that message except to walk away. I'm not trying to complicate things. Freedom has been given to those by way of understanding the exploitation and abuse of men, and that is enough. But, for those who think there is a capacity for more good when the word "we" is spoken instead of "I", then I think we should talk about it.