~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
Jaja_Aureolin
[–]totallyreal2621711153 points54 points55 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It's a Jim Jeffries joke.
[–]cant-stand_ya31 points32 points33 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
This has been known to the mankind since the dawn of time. A copypasta bio on a tinder thot isn't the right place to learn anything.
Sorry, but no tinder (or any such platform, for that matter) screenshot strikes any interest to me.
[–]reddituser28853 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Probably a guy with a fake female photo.
[–]TheLastMgtow0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Flooding tinder with mgtows, that swipe right everything while on the wc to troll and waste the time of all thots. Its not a bad thing. Destruction is a form of creation.
[–]aquaticscrotum696920 points21 points22 points 6 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Her argument is flawed. There are fat and ugly studs out there. They are rich and their money trumps everything else.
[–]eduardkoopman11 points12 points13 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
To add, aboutthe stud definition. I think paying women (directly or indirectly) to sleep with you, is not making a dude a stud (in the yes of others). But u sex buyer. Whereas a STud, attracts sex without having to pay for it, but due to his looks, cool, etc.... (anything but money).
[–]simplisticallysimple4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
In fact, using money as a crutch, either directly or indirectly to bed women, makes you the exact opposite of a stud.
That's just thirst and desperation when you have to bribe a woman to even be halfway interested in you sexually.
[–]DreadPirateRosco4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
All that stud shit is for the birds. Who gives a shit if dumb thots will allow you to fuck them. Every moment in their presence you grow dumber.
[–]likwid2k0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Agree. Don’t let pussy dictate who you are. Let them baby daddy it up.
[+][deleted] 6 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]aquaticscrotum69690 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
But not looks.
[–]AdrenalineJunkySloth7 points8 points9 points 6 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
It's also biological and mathematical. It doesn't matter what you think, it's not society, it's not social conditioning, it's not sexism.
I'll try to keep it simple and make the premise very clear. You can do your own research if you want details, evidence, articles, and facts. For the same exact behavior it's WAY more risky and dangerous for females. Scientifically some things include: higher STD rate, more dangerous since STD symptoms are harder to identify, STD my transfer to baby, becoming pregnant, carrying baby changes physical and mental state, etc.
Mathematically and biologically females are more valuable than males. One male can produce TEN babies with ten females in a year. One female can produce ONE baby with ten males in a year. Because of this men will have to fight HARDER for that female while in the meantime the female will have to be smarter and more choosy in which one of those males to mate with... because she can only mate with one. Not only can she only produce a baby with one male she will also be "locked down" and unavailable to mate for at least a year so she has to choose wisely. Ideally she would want a healthy, strong, smart, rich or higher quality man. To ignore all of this and mate with ANY male as a "first-cum-first-serve" basis (pun intended) is purely idiotic and pathetic.
Therefore a female MUST be more careful, more reserved, more choosy, less promiscuous, and smarter. This shows that she cares about herself and more importantly, her baby. And a woman that can respect and care for herself and her baby is a very attractive thing. Because her cards are different she need to adjust her game accordingly.
What would you think if Superman walks into traffic? Well... he's Superman.
What would you think if a man/woman walks into traffic? He/she is an idiot.
Oh? What's with the discrimination?! Simple, the man/woman is NOT Superman, act accordingly. Conversely, a woman acting like a man sexually IS a slut/whore. Accept the facts and move on.
[–]Natsume242 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Agreed. Be mad all you want but this is the name of the game.
You can either play to win or not play at all.
[–]DreadPirateRosco1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
It's really a disgusting thing when a dumb woman realizes she can get all of her superficial needs immediately met by giving up the pussy and does it constantly. "Don't slut shame me." It's just facts. You're a slut. Nothing to be proud and everyone knows deep down its true.
[–]AdrenalineJunkySloth0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Exactly. I think we need to educate more men and young boys how female nature really is and how the dating game really is so we can reduce the number of SIMPS, Incels, and White Knights out there. Using my example above, ten males to one female, if five males were smart and alpha enough to reject her because she's a low-quality, shitty female who will produce horrible kids and be a horrible parent, the other five guys will gladly step in and fight for her against the five other guys... which is sad and pathetic.
It's okay. We have MGTOW and it's growing and growing each and every day. Pretty soon we will have many good quality men off of the market. I'm under the impression that most realy MGTOW men are actually of high-quality top-tier guys. The market will soon be filled with only white knights, incels, and simps trying to fight over an increasing number of females that refuse to sleep with them. This will lead them to becoming a better version of themselves to hopefully gain the attention of higher quality MGTOW guys. If not, they'll just die sad and alone with their 24 cats. I don't really see females lowering their standards to allow incels, simps, and white knights in. They're too hypergamous and picky by nature and would rather die alone in my opinion lol
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I would argue that some women are not more value able since so many of them don’t want to be mothers.
[–]AdrenalineJunkySloth2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
It depends how you want to look at it. You'd be right but in an economical standpoint, not biological like I described. I was trying to describe male and female nature in the mathematical and biological nature, ignoring economical factors.
The problem when considering economical factors is that our biological factor is still predominantly the controlling and deciding factor in mating and sex regardless of her economical factor. Sure, you can bring out degrees, earnings, status, job title, etc but at the end of the day it doesn't matter. This is precisely why soo many "high-earning" and "well-educated" females are soo unhappy and stressed out. They think increasing their economical value will increase their biological value when it doesn't. Guys don't really care about females economical value, we care about their biological value. Are they good quality females? are they a healthy female? will they make good, caring, nurturing mothers? Will they provide healthy babies?
Females nowadays are putting a LOT of effort in their economical value and ignoring their biological values but at the same time using their economical values to compare with other males, thinking that it will affect or increase their desirability, it doesn't. What we have is a lot of older, lower quality, 2/10 females thinking they deserve a 9/10 male simply because they have a degree or have a decent paying job. Congratulations! You have some economical value! Sadly, to the sex and dating world, it doesn't really matter.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You make an excellent point.
[–][deleted]1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Still bait.
[–]Bye_Felatio3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
eh, it's probably a dude catfishing to make some point anyway, so no more bait than r/mgtow really
[–]Cojure1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Fat ugly “studs” with money (even if you lie about it) exist so the quote is flawed.
[–]MegaBanditX0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
True tho
We also call them Chads and its no compliment.
[–]thehedgehawg0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Well... there is Ron Jeremy...
[–]cenaluc0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
See you soon on the other side of the wall
[–]Takakazu_Kinashi0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
If a woman sleeps with a lot of women she is a stud as well.
[–]jonathino0010 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I know it's a Jim Jeffries bit, but it actually goes deeper than that. It's all about hypergamy. As a man, having sex with a lot of women is a strong evolutionary strategy. You can spread your seed as far as possible that way. But as a woman it is a weak strategy. She can only get pregnant once every nine months, and there's no shortage of men giving up the D. So it's in her best interest to fuck the man with the best genes. Hence hypergamy.
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]totallyreal2621711153 points54 points55 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]cant-stand_ya31 points32 points33 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]reddituser28853 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheLastMgtow0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]aquaticscrotum696920 points21 points22 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]eduardkoopman11 points12 points13 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]simplisticallysimple4 points5 points6 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]DreadPirateRosco4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]likwid2k0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]aquaticscrotum69690 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AdrenalineJunkySloth7 points8 points9 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Natsume242 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DreadPirateRosco1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]AdrenalineJunkySloth0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]AdrenalineJunkySloth2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted]1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Bye_Felatio3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Cojure1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MegaBanditX0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]thehedgehawg0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]cenaluc0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Takakazu_Kinashi0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]jonathino0010 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link