~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
StormyTroopers
[–]tunathelobstrosity186 points187 points188 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
I totally thought you made this up until I tried it myself just now. Bless you for spreading uncomfortable truths, the world needs more of them
[–]justanotherdude11267 points68 points69 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Tried it and it’s true. Holy fuck google. Use duck duck go instead
[–]Wolfy3117 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Use duck duck go instead
Duckduckgo uses Google servers (along with Bing and Yahoo's as well).
[–]justanotherdude11241 points42 points43 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Yeah but at least it gives search suggestions for “are fat girls ____.”
The problem is google is filtering their suggestions to fit their political/social agenda. Using duck duck go allows you to access googles servers while getting more relevant results
[+]QueMiles-7 points-6 points-5 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
If this comment doesn’t make readers stop and think, “hey maybe this is actually a really silly thing to be upset over” I guess nothing will, eh?
[–]ClemsonPoker5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Said someone with zero understanding of social conditioning.
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It works with all synonyms as well, hot sluts, hot babe, and hot chick only gives hot chicken suggestions.
[+][deleted] 7 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]PM__ME__STEAM_CODES16 points17 points18 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
A site like that wouldn't pop up on Google search that's for sure.
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Have you ever gotten steam codes this way?
[–]PM__ME__STEAM_CODES5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I've gotten 2 hentai games from the same dude and that's about it.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Nice. When I make my new Reddit account next year I’m gonna do something like that.
[–]StormyTroopers[S] 96 points97 points98 points 7 years ago* (8 children) | Copy Link
According to the libtards over at Google, it is A-OK to talk about men and how their physical traits (height) affect their attractiveness and personality. To the extent that they can call men '' undateable ''. But you can't talk about a woman's physical traits anymore. (Because women are all perfect, remember? No such thing as a fat girl anymore....they're all '' curvy '', '' confident '', and '' brave ''. Lol)
Not only that, but they think it's politically incorrect to even talk about '' hot girls ''.....which is why they have no suggestions popping up for that. But apparently it's fine to talk about '' hot guys ''.
I really wonder what they're trying to do here. They're trying to '' school '' us and tell us how to think
Try this search out for yourself.
[–][deleted] 42 points43 points44 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
It's a return to the most primitive, pre-historical religion the world has ever known: mother/female goddess worship. The women deify themselves (exempt from critique, must be worshipped) and use their deity-status to get men to serve them.
[–]PolukranosEatsWords21 points22 points23 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Definitely is something to this.
Remember a paragraph from "The Manipulated Man" that said men, in the time of the waning influence of religion, have sought to re-create religion by deifying women. Pop songs singing about love have replaced those religious hymnals. A god has to not only be loving but also terrifying and destructive, and so we have given women power in society to play out our need for a god that inspires fear. And we tolerate this abuse because it fills that "god-fearing" need in us. The much pushed "feminine mystique" replaced an unknowable mysterious god working in "mysterious ways".
There's a lot of interesting assumptions being built upon here.
Humans have a natural disposition for religious thinking. In the absence of religion, they will attempt to create one.
The creation of a new religion will follow similar templates as the previous one.
There is some relationship between music and spirituality.
Humans aren't content with love alone, and need suffering to have meaning. (similar to what Dostoevsky said about us going mad in a Utopia - we can't handle paradise)
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Interesting. Do you have more material on that subject?
[–]Quarky_Neutrino0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Pinterest does this too. Search "hot girls" and they will soft signal you that it's not a proper search term. Search "sexy girls" and you will get no results.
The world is becoming so dictatorial. It's sad!
[–]UsedCommunication72 points73 points74 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Try duckduckgo
[–]throwaway468199 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
And startpage if you have a hard time finding things. Yeah, it uses Google, but at least you're not tracked.
Not suggesting to default to it, but if you're about to use Google, try Startpage first.
[–]mutageno6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
It's backed by Bing with a lot of stuff added to it.
[–]throwaway468194 points5 points6 points 7 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
IIRC Duckduckgo also uses Bing (through Yahoo, which by the way, has been known to work hand-in-hand with the government).
I'm curious though, why was the comment downvoted? Not even upset, I'm genuinely curious what people have against Startpage, as I've been trying to find a good search engine that doesn't track you, and from what I've found, Startpage seems to be pretty good, with the advantage of not being governed by American laws like DDG is. So I'd be curious to hear what the problem is with it, and if there's any better alternatives.
[–]mutageno1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Duh I misread. You are right.
[–]blaizken_4201 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Or ecosia
[–]80173534 points35 points36 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Hmm interdasting. Thought crime.
Makes me wonder how much of pure gold in wisdom and knowledge is being shadow banned in real time asap REEEEEEE.
[–][deleted] 40 points41 points42 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Google is cancer. I wish they didn’t own YouTube. Use DuckDuckGo.
[–]john212329 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
DuckDuckGo is definitely better. I personally don’t care for the name, but every time I use it, I get way more and better results.
[–]Deus_Vultan20 points21 points22 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Are girls <--- no suggestion either
[–]CreativeThought8818 points19 points20 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Google is trash that is obviously censored. Use bing.
[–]void_magic18 points19 points20 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Google search is becoming worse and worse every single year. Not sure why they are willingly making their core business less usable.
[–]legend_kda14 points15 points16 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
“Are short guys smarter”
Yes because my height is totally linked to my intelligence
[–]User_704013 points14 points15 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Wonder how many useful info is being kept in the shadows cuz this bullshit.
[–]Onlymgtow8813 points14 points15 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I really don’t understand how google can show such blatant bias and never get taken to task. Too big to fail I guess?
[–]john212327 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Because there are no male versions of feminazis.
[–]Adiaphoron9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This is ridiculous! Fuck this creepy feminazistic censorship! I switched to DuckDuckGo. What’s next? Men not allowed in shops anymore?
[–]U-948 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
I just typed "Are fat guys..." and nothing came up.
[–]StormyTroopers[S] 14 points15 points16 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That's because it's become politically incorrect to even say the word '' fat '' now thanks to the body-positivity movement and plus-size bullshit that's being pushed by feminists.
They've completely outlawed that topic.
[–]bous421 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
that's not true
[–]the_cooler_spez3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
That's impossible
[–]john212323 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Search your feelings; you know it to be true.
[–]Digifox030 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
same here
[–]EUPHORICANIMAL8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
A fat guy is fat but a fat woman is curvy lol
[–]TheTastelessBatman4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Right then. Was looking for a good reason to change to duckduckgo. This is it.
[–]PorkBomber2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
Isn't it obvious at this point? And Google isn't alone. Every kind of media and social media is promoting matriarchy.
I'll use this post to recall an incident that happened with me few days ago. I happened to be on Quora and saw an answer that was vehemently sexist against men. The writer wrote things like 'men are assholes', 'men are rapists' etc. So, I replied in the comments, "wow its funny how you are complaining about sexism against women by being a sexist moron against men". Guess what happened next? My comment got removed while the answer wasn't touched.
Social media and media are men's enemies. Don't get involved in them too much.
[–]Sneakybobo1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
crickets
[–]Petrograd_Pyromaniac1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
The world is already a matriarchy, the whole reason men stopped being hunter-gatherers was to please women. Men would rather have just stayed hunter-gatherers. Third wave feminism is actually paving the way for a true oppressive patriarchy to take hold, by letting the top 5% of men have control of human reproduction. Feminists are literally making Handmaiden's Tale a reality.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Gynocracy.^
[–]lextragon1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
also the male wage gap
[–]ruifaf1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'll help Google with that
Are fat girls fat
Are fat girls hideous
Are fat girls related to whales
Are fat girls better than thin girls
Are fat girls not feminists
Are fat girls not hipergamic
Are fat girls hot girls
Hot girls temperature
Hot girls scoville
Hot girls are sluts
Hot girls are gold diggers
Hot girls are not fat
Hot girls and fat girls are almost the same and there is no unicorns in the universe
[–]djmonster011 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
This is a bad comparison it says short guys then fat girls not short girls if you type fat guys nothing comes up as well
[–]Ineednurses0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I got fat guys in the wood, with abs, in suit, running, on mopeds, pizza, and at the movies.
[–]Ineednurses1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Wow, I tested the searches and got the same results. That is so pathetic. I tried “are short girl..” I got these results: Are short girlfriends the best Are short girls cute
wtf, i just tried it. this is REAL. WTF! just utter blatant censorship and information control. fuck.
Type "slut" in and you'll get a number of Slytherin suggestions. Go figure.
[–]x6x6x619821 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Holy fuckin shit, I was thinking OP is trolling, I tried it, and yup it happened
[–]Jabronskyi1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Google is a woman then
[–]massy5251 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Try typing "White Couple" in google image search. Misandry isnt the only agenda they have.
[–]tempslut1231 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
"hot ladies" autoguess works though. I think "hot girls" got nixed becuase of the pedo implications. "Hot chicks" and "Hot women" also has autoguess
[–]Vergil3871 point2 points3 points 7 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
not saying I disagree nor am I defending them but maybe they think that searching for anything that relates to "girls" or "women" will eventually end up being porn related.
I mean lets be honest, what else are women worth searching for?
[–]TURBOHEKTIK1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
cuck algorithms and the soyboy employees
[–]mgtowliberdade1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Look at this, I did it myself...
https://i.imgur.com/Pdj1l5R.png
https://i.imgur.com/zYKyH3N.png
[–]Garo1170 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Dude thats fucking crazy
Yep
I work in the SEO industry.
Google prunes the Autocomplete results a lot.
Most prominently, they remove naughty words like "fuck"
I don't think it's much of a conspiracy though. They've just added an anti-fat-shaming rule. None of these words have results:
They also have an anti-racism rule. These words don't have results either
There are probably several thousand alterations like that in there.
If you type "are fat girls" in over at https://www.yahoo.com/ then you can see why Google was getting complaints from the femizazis.
haaaaah
[–]I_Only_Compliment0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Excellent find!
[–]atixieo0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Also no results for "Are short girls"...
[–]sirtrixxxalot0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
DuckDuckGo is the way
[–]Djwilims0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Its because women dont use incognito mode
[–]walrusescapades0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
'are fat girls' yields no results. 'are fat guys' also yields no results. 'are short guys' shows what you got. 'are short girls' only shows 'cute'.
[–]The_Angry_Fish0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
There isnt a suggestion for fat guys either
[–]klukianets0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Switch to DuckDuckGo, it’s that simple
[–]EntropicTribe0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I see the evidence, I hear you conclusion, but how does you analysis bring you from the evidence to the conclusion?
[–]Chad_Thundacock0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Huxley was right.
even worse, i googled "are fat girls" and this is the second article i got.
https://nohoartsdistrict.com/all-life/a-fat-girl-s-guide/item/5629-why-you-should-date-a-fat-girl
Cool. Nice to see this plain as day
[–]no1123580 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
A smart person disables suggestions and searches exactly what HE wants, not what Google pishes down your throat. Also use DuckDuckGo!
[–]thejunesun0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Holy shit, this is actually true.
[–]forgetful_funktor70 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Fucking hell that's true. I tried it.
Bye Google, I'm off to DuckDuckGo
[–]EntireOperation330 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Don't blame google for it. It is just a site which runs algo to show you results. Feminist have hack their algo to spread their agenda. You can do this too. It's pretty straight forward. And for that reason I use Bing as an alternative.
Can confirm, same case in Spanish version.
Fuck Goolag.
[–]Lvit-1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
testing this on DuckDuckgo yielded an inversed result. not really sure what to make of all of these results, but anyway I don't think any of those suggestions should be censored. Mind you, I consider myself a male feminist (or an equalist, if that's still a thing?).
[–]SiliconeSeasxn1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
“A male feminist”
Do you even think before you speak?
[+][deleted] -7 points-6 points-5 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Yeah, let's all stop using Google because one schmuck's clearly photoshopped images made it onto Reddit.
This is pathetic. Stop whining and grow the fuck up. All of you.
[–]Samuraidweeb1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Ironic. That coming from someone who hates this sub yet comments on it. Lol
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]tunathelobstrosity186 points187 points188 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]justanotherdude11267 points68 points69 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Wolfy3117 points8 points9 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]justanotherdude11241 points42 points43 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+]QueMiles-7 points-6 points-5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ClemsonPoker5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (4 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]PM__ME__STEAM_CODES16 points17 points18 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]PM__ME__STEAM_CODES5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]StormyTroopers[S] 96 points97 points98 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 42 points43 points44 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]PolukranosEatsWords21 points22 points23 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Quarky_Neutrino0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]UsedCommunication72 points73 points74 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]throwaway468199 points10 points11 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]mutageno6 points7 points8 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]throwaway468194 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]mutageno1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]blaizken_4201 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]80173534 points35 points36 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 40 points41 points42 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]john212329 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Deus_Vultan20 points21 points22 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CreativeThought8818 points19 points20 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]void_magic18 points19 points20 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]legend_kda14 points15 points16 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]User_704013 points14 points15 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Onlymgtow8813 points14 points15 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]john212327 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Adiaphoron9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]U-948 points9 points10 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]StormyTroopers[S] 14 points15 points16 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]bous421 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]the_cooler_spez3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]john212323 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Digifox030 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]EUPHORICANIMAL8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheTastelessBatman4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PorkBomber2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Sneakybobo1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Petrograd_Pyromaniac1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]lextragon1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ruifaf1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]djmonster011 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Ineednurses0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ineednurses1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]x6x6x619821 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Jabronskyi1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]massy5251 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]tempslut1231 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Vergil3871 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TURBOHEKTIK1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]mgtowliberdade1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Garo1170 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]I_Only_Compliment0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]atixieo0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]sirtrixxxalot0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Djwilims0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]walrusescapades0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]The_Angry_Fish0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]klukianets0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]EntropicTribe0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Chad_Thundacock0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]no1123580 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]thejunesun0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]forgetful_funktor70 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]EntireOperation330 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lvit-1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]SiliconeSeasxn1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] -7 points-6 points-5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Samuraidweeb1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link