~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
nonchalantfool
[–]Muh-So-Gin-Knee14 points15 points16 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Why did they bother with using both pronouns throughout to create a patently transparent gender neutrality when they then include "Using Male Privilege?" Laughable.
[–]nonchalantfool[S] 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
exactly
[–]DangZagnut9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Oh the power wheel, my favorite feminist invention.
Even feminists make fun of it quite a bit.
[–]Juxtapointer8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
These are all things that women do more than men.
[–]toerrisbadsyntax2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Not when we include the male privlidge pie slice! Now its a male problem!
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Actually, if you look at what's under "Using Male Privilege" it's all stuff women do.
Treating him/her like a servant (i.e. nagging)
Making all the big decisions (i.e. secretly going off birth control)
Acting like the "master of the castle" ("put the toilet seat down", "pick up your socks")
Being the one to define men and women's roles ("He should pay on the first date", "He must be 6' 3" tall")
[–]Juxtapointer6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
The projection is unreal
This is no longer called the Duluth model. I am appropriating this under the Patriarchy and renaming it 'The Hamster Wheel'.
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Awesome. Change "Male" to "Female" and "master of the castle" to "princess of the castle".
[–]toerrisbadsyntax2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Label it male
Its now a male problem
[–]mgtow5980501 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
i don't think there's anything inherently wrong with women seeking to help only women by making models like this to help identify abusers, but it loses all credibility with the "male privilege" concept. this is similar to some religious organizations that refuse to help vulnerable people unless they can indoctrinate them into their beliefs, except women don't see "male privilege" as having any whiff of a fairy tale
without the "male privilege" part this could actually help BP cucks, too, realize they're in abusive relationships; b/c of the that part and the associated myth, they only see this as a checklist for keeping their instincts (which they've lost) in check for m'lady
but why would women want to help BP cucks get out of their slave-master relationship?
[–]GoneMYway1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I don't think most men would have an issue with it either, IF they said that. If they stopped with this BS about equality for all.
If it were truly about equality for all, it wouldn't be called feminism. Feminism has been about women's issues, but at least back then, they didn't deny it, and it was quite clearly all about that. I think it would have more credibility if they did it that way, than the way they currently pretend like feminism is for everybody and how feminism is there to bring light to female and male issues etc.
It's called FEMinism, it's quite clearly about female issues. And I have no problem with people fighting for legitimately female issues, like Islam archaic and I'd say barbaric oppression of women (but then actual feminists support this, by defending the wearing of the burqa and niqab, which is in it's origin an (ACTUALLY) misogynistic act forced onto women by Muslim men, who want to treat women as their property and they're scared that other men are going to look and take it if it get's shown off.
Maybe the Burqa is the equivalent to locking your car doors when you drive through the hood/cross the tracks onto the bad side of town?
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]Muh-So-Gin-Knee14 points15 points16 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]nonchalantfool[S] 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DangZagnut9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Juxtapointer8 points9 points10 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]toerrisbadsyntax2 points3 points4 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Juxtapointer6 points7 points8 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]toerrisbadsyntax2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]mgtow5980501 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]GoneMYway1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link