Anger can be justifiable. If vandals raided your town, destroying everything in their path, robbing, looting, raping, and assaulting, the inhabitants would be fully justified in their anger. By the same token, it's totally justifiable and understandable that men get angry when they realize their whole world view of love and marriage was a lie shoved down their throats all their lives. MGTOW is the only thing that has any chance of offering protection. It's perfectly normal to get pissed off when you realize your dreams of a great life with a woman who loves you for who you are and not your bank account are pipe dreams. Women don't love men like that. They value assets and prestige, but not a man's inherent value as a human being. AWALT. When you first figure that out, you'll be pissed off. How could you not be?
Feminists think men have no right to be angry. They believe absurd brainwashing that says that men have easy lives at women's expense. It's the so-called "male privilege" lie. They have the attitude of "STFU and man up; you have no right to be angry." You have no right to react in anger to the absurd injustices created by feminism, according to them.

I do think it's best to get over the anger and move on to build a great life. However, you can't do that without first experiencing the anger and expressing it. If you just did the STFU thing that feminists demand, you would stay bitter forever. If you object to specific atrocious transgressions committed by women against men, you're branded a misogynist. If a woman sets out to find a rich man to marry and divorce and you think that's a shitty way to behave, someone your objections make you a misogynist.

I would like the feminists to try to explain why women are allowed to be angry and men aren't.