~ archived since 2018 ~

Thoughts on this video?

SelfMadeAlphaMale · 2017-09-09T12:52:34+00:00

Comment below your thoughts.The experiement was real. https://youtu.be/v3TbHhJg0XY...

SelfMadeAlphaMale

September 9, 2017

2 upvotes

/r/MGTOW

Archived from /r/MGTOW

r/MGTOW is a community for men going their own way by forging their own identities and paths to self-defined success; cutting through collective ideas of what a man is.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/MGTOW archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB

Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Post Information

Title	Thoughts on this video?
Author	SelfMadeAlphaMale
Upvotes	2
Comments	8
Date	September 9, 2017 12:52 PM UTC (8 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/6z1j1n/thoughts_on_this_video/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/thoughts-on-this-video.557733 https://theredarchive.com/post/557733

Comments

[+][deleted] 8 years ago* [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

Completely fucking retarded. The whole experiment is flawed in so many ways.

[–]SelfMadeAlphaMale[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]mrcandyman2 points 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

1: The number of games played is really too low to be statistically significant

2: The numbers are actually very close "Of the 163 games, 82 were in the female manipulation and 81were in the male manipulation and players only spoke within 102 of the games. A total of 189 players spoke in these 102 games; all of them were male. This is not to say that women did not play, just that they did not speak. This does, however, reinforce the fact that women are entering a very male dominated environment. Of these individuals, 147 individuals were teammates of the experimental player and 42 individuals were opponents. For our analyses, we focused on teammates as these individuals interact with the experimental player for the duration of the game. Opponents, in contrast, only interacted with the experimental player for a short period (less than 3 minutes) in the lobby after the game. Of the 147 teammates, 82 individuals were in the female manipulation and 65 were in the male manipulation. "

3: They didn't analyze the control condition, which the players played with no voice chat. " The control condition simply played in matches of Halo 3 as one normally would; however, this condition did not use the real-time voice channel to communicate with other players, and as a result, was not further analyzed here."

4: Read this statement. It specifically says the presence of sexist statements was not determined by skill level: "Since there were a greater number of negative statements within the female manipulation, we examined whether these statements could be considered hostile sexism [32]. Of the 82 players in the female manipulation playing on the same team as the experimental player, only 11 individuals (13%) uttered hostile sexist statements. As a result of this small sample size, we only examined whether the presence of hostile sexist statements was affected by individual performance relative to the experimental player. We found that the presence of sexist statements was not determined by differences in maximum skill achieved (χ2 = 1.70, p = 0.19), the number of deaths (χ2 = 0.57, p = 0.45) or the number of kills (χ2 = 2.25, p = 0.13) relative to the experimental player."

5: I would certainly like to know WHY these two women got a lot more negative comments. There has to be a reason. "For the examination of negative statements, there were two focal players in the female-voiced manipulation that made 10 more negative statements than the next highest individuals (greater than 5 standard deviations from the mean). As a result, we removed them from our analysis to ensure they did not skew our results towards significance."

6: So this is saying that players who did poorly praised BOTH manipulators who did well. Wait, doesn't this go against the entire "conclusion" of the research? "There was also a negative correlation between the relative difference in the number of kills and the number of positive statements (β = -0.17, χ2 = 9.05, p = 0.003) such that focal players that had relatively fewer kills than the experimental player made more positive statements. There was no effect of the manipulation or any of the other manipulation by performance interactions (Table 2)."

[+][deleted] 8 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]SelfMadeAlphaMale[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]throwawaypsycho801 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]SnapshillBot0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]wsuofd0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link