The other day someone had a post criticizing the number of feminist related blogs that are posted to this sub and how it probably gives them ad revenue. Since I have run a blogger blog before, I will say that it is probably a minimal amount of money even if all ~20k subscribers clicked on the link. I mainly do this so that new subscribers will know what the enemy, feminists, actually say. I don't need to make up what they are about, I can simply quote them or point to their own ideas, arguments, and quotes.

Either way though, I am somewhat bad about this and figure that instead of linking 10 crazy feminut blog posts that I will put them together in a text format with a tl;dr. So, here ya go.

hey, straight geek boys, wanna get laid?

This is about the elevator gate. She basically uses the higher value of female sexuality in our culture to utilize what feminism really is, a sexual trade union.

The first quote is from a link titled The Pussy Supply.

Note: I will link this link as the second link.

And she quotes:

And then again, imagine a party house where sexually free women were welcomed with open arms, where women were respected and felt safe, and where they were safe. Imagine how many sluts would show up to their parties, and how much sluttier they might get.

I appeal to you, dudebros, to think not of women’s rights–that can be such an abstract concept–but of your own pussy supply. What you and your bros are doing right now is scaring all the pussy away. If you like pussy so much, treat pussy owners nicely, and you just might get a whole lot more of it.

She then goes onto explain that we should replace house party with atheist conferences. She then goes on a hysterical rant that makes no real sense to me...I dunno, I guess I lost my feminist decoder ring.

To quote:

This mind set annoys me a lot, because I am having stupid arguments with geek boys I would much rather be having sex with, but I can’t have sex with them, because they demonstrate to me that safety and consent are not their problem and that makes it a very big problem for me. And to fall-stall the replies have reason to believe I will get, yes I am fat ugly gender trash you wouldn’t touch with a 10 foot dick on a poll, but I promise you that women who are of your type probably don’t feel differently from me, so take this a some friendly advice from fat ugly gendertrash.

I like kinky sex, you know that stuff that apparently men want that means consent is harder than yes/no, well actually it is always harder than yes no, but when sex has a much larger set of possibilities than piv/oral/manual then you have to start negotiating about those.I need to be able to say, anal, but only with safe lube, restraint but not legs apart because my hip over extends and I can’t trust you to understand this if you cant understand the power inherent in being a women alone is a hotel at 4am with no means of escape.

Hmm. Here is some info from the first hyperlink in the above post link

The pussy supply (TK edit: it really is about controlling men through sex. Feminism is about expanding female sexual advantage and reproductive and resource advantage while minimalizing male advantages)

To quote:

An open letter to the dudebros, brodudes, and I Tappa Kegga brothers of the world.

Dudes. Bros. You are facing a crisis of bromongous proportions. At a moment in history when you might have unprecedented access to that most valued commodity of the Bromantic Era--willing, accessible, uncomplicated poontang--your own brother bros are shooting you in the foot.

It works like this: you throw a party, with lots of booze and annoying music and you invite lots of ladies. Ladies whom you hope will be eager to get in bed with you and total freaks in the sack. That would be the optimal party, right? Tons and tons of uninhibited women who dress and act sexy, like sex, are good at sex, and don't think it means you have to get married or be all weird in the morning or anything.

And then the foot-shooting. It comes in two forms. The first is slut-shaming. When guys talk bad about women for sleeping with a lot of guys, they're signing away their chance of sleeping with those women themselves--and your chance as well. When a woman is laughed at or insulted for being a "slut," there's a very good chance she'll respond by having less casual sex, even if she likes the sex itself. Other women see this happening and don't let themselves have any casual sex in the first place. And when that happens, dudebros, everyone loses.

The second is rape. Some frathouses and other guy-thrown parties have such bad reputations that the "she should have known better" victim-blaming comes into play for any woman who even goes there. Imagine how many women aren't showing at up at all because of this. Imagine how many of the women who do show up won't go upstairs with you because of this.

[...this part already quoted in first article...]

Sincerely, Holly Pervocracy

P.S. No guarantees. Sometimes you act like a decent human being and don't get laid. Your odds are better, but still, it happens. The only solace I can offer is that at least you were a decent human being. That's something, y'know?

Interesting huh? So much could be said about these two articles alone and how they view men and manipulate men, but I will let you guys talk about that in the comments.

In this third article she basically blames da patriarchy for Casey Anthony killing her daughter.

American Medea: coming soon to a black box no where near you

Some choice quotes:

I’m gearing up to do another staged reading/mini-workshop of my play American Medea. Just when I thought the stories of mothers who kill their children and the media circus that surrounds them might no longer be so relevant to public discourse, Casey Anthony enters, as if on cue. Turns out not much has changed since 2001, when Andrea Yates drowned her five children in a bathtub, and 1995, when Susan Smith allowed her car to roll into a lake with her two sons in it. Every time this happens, people gasp in horror, “How could it be? How could a woman kill her own children?” And every time we all watch breathlessly as the details of the woman’s painful and particular sufferings are laid bare in front of us. We meet their Jasons (fathers who take no responsibility for raising their children but are honored upon their deaths for surviving the loss), their Creons (older male authority figures who have tried to teach her how to submit), and their Aegeuses (friends who offer escape from real world demands but no help in actually meeting them). The biggest difference with Casey Anthony’s story is that Jason, rather than being a mere asshole who uses his children as pawns, is absent from the scene altogether.

I do not attempt to excuse these women or the murders they commit. But I don’t know how many times we can see this same story told again and again without beginning to pick up on some of the commonalities between them and therefore come to a better understanding of what are very flawed cultural conceptions of how motherhood works. [...]

What we see in our American Medeas again and again is not just mothers who make really really bad choices, but also the failure of fathers, communities, and civic institutions to meet their needs. We need no further proof that many mothers feel they do not have anyone on their side than their initial excitement over Sarah Palin. Even though her support has faded, their immediate affection for her clearly came from their sense that for the first time they might have a voice on the national scene. She advocates no specific governing policy that would help mothers, nor does she spend any of her time actively supporting their causes, and yet many mothers feel she speaks for them in a way that feminist institutions don’t. (The feminist community, by the way, really needs to register this, needs to recognize that her popularity means that we are not fully representing the concerns or serving the needs of a significant number of mothers, and we need to find a way to reach these women.) And it’s no wonder, with summer blockbusters like Super 8 that routinely diminish the importance of mothers, that they feel disrespected by American culture at large.

American Medea, which follows Euripides’ structure but substitutes the texts and stories of Susan Smith, Andrea Yates, Darlie Routier, and Deborah Green, attempts to show the structural impacts on mothers of patriarchal religion, deadbeat dads, a psychiatric establishment that is fundamentally incapable of addressing women’s issues, and feminist institutions that fail to reach women in need. (That last aspect did not go over well with the boomer women in the audience at my last reading of this play, but I’m keeping it for now.)

I like how she disparages one of the few movies that shows a supportive single father in recent memory, Super 8.

Here is a strange article about new economic regulations and how they promote feminism, not sure what to make of it. Doesn't seem to have a point, atleast one that isn't contradictory.

That's all for now, I will post more later.