Intelligence squared debate: "Courts, not campuses, should decide sexual assault cases. 1:39:20

Wallaby-wacker · 2015-09-24T13:02:19+00:00

The hamster wheel of lies and justifications begins fast and runs hard all the way through.

mushybees · 2015-09-24T20:43:59+00:00

an hour and a half is really not enough time, and the quality of the debaters was abysmal on both sides. i guess we know why these people are law teachers and not lawyers. if they were any good at making a convincing argument they'd be partners in law firms instead.

DavidByron2 · 2015-09-24T16:51:35+00:00

Well duh. The real question ought to be, "Why do feminists oppose taking rape cases to the courts?" and the answer is to encourage false rape accusations and lynching of male victims.

Needless to say they also have the unintended effect of encouraging real rape of women, not that that happens very often.

melniav0 · 2015-09-24T17:11:40+00:00

I found debate interesting. Feminists had a great points of how do u address cases where victim doesn't want to report to police but needs a remedy. I think they argued better and had convincing examples. I wish side arguing for the motion used more examples and pointed out that you can't remedy a situation in which you don't know who is right.

Title	Intelligence squared debate: "Courts, not campuses, should decide sexual assault cases. 1:39:20
Author	Wallaby-wacker
Upvotes	32
Comments	5
Date	September 24, 2015 12:53 PM UTC (10 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3m6z9t/intelligence_squared_debate_courts_not_campuses/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/intelligence-squared-debate-courts-not-campuses.970742 https://theredarchive.com/post/970742

Comments