Dear oppressive tyrants, potential abusers, and willful Y chromosome possessors, let's talk babies.

Feminism is, based on its record, all about the hatred of men. Not even in a personal sense, I am sure there are many happily married feminist women who love and support and value their husbands and sons, but ideologically they will generally advocate change that harms men or block change that helps men. And they are so good at it - after all, they've been getting everything they want for 50 years, they must feel like they are really on a roll. And boy are they.

Now one of the best ways to harm men is to break down their connection to their family. It's hard/impossible to break down pre-existing family connections - a la family of origin - but the feminists have mastered destroying (most) men's capacity to to have and to have good relations with offspring.

For the feminist ideology - which I consider similar in no-God-required religious extremism to Bolshevism, and of course they share common roots - women must ascend over and at the expense of men in all spheres. It is not enough that now most college spaces are taken by women - and despite this many places are reserved for women, while none for men. It's not enough that girls from the earliest ages of elementary school and throughout school, on average, prosper relative to boys, or that the most disturbed and troubled and unsuccessful students are boys. (And of course, to the feminist, the education system isn't helping girls ENOUGH, hence the need for more propoganda and privileges for female students).

It's not enough that in the workplace, numerous - especially academic - workplaces are overwhelmingly female dominated, to the point that all senior positions are female held. It's not enough that we need board seats, directorship seats, partnership seats, parliamentary quotas, public service quotas to give jobs to women. It's not enough that in many industries now if you're male and want to rise to the top you'd better forget it and go into private commerce. It's not enough that a male boss is terrified to discipline a wayward female employee, but a female boss can run the most abusive and unfair reign without anyone daring to challenge her.

It's not enough that men are portrayed in the media as inherently evil/untruthful, while women are portrayed as inherently virtuous/truthful, and it's not even enough that this is extended to college investigations, and even into the criminal justice system, where men are routinely convicted of assaults of women on her say-so alone notwithstanding enormous countervailing evidence.

It's not enough that young boys are ignored and miss out on college. It's not enough that those who men who make it through college have their career advancement blocked in many industries. It's not enough that they could go to prison for years if they get down and dirty with the wrong type of girl who is more than willing for some sex and fun today, but tomorrow may want a target for all the rage and angst she feels (a hardly surprising feeling given her crazy mother and the sexual revolution that falsely told her she can slut around without consequence). It's not enough a man might go to jail for another's rage that bears no relation to him.

Because even a man whose promotion is capped can earn a steady income, in fact even a man who didn't complete college can pull himself up a bit by his bootstraps into financial security. Even a man who has been falsely accused - and less so, but even a man who has been falsely convicted can build a good family. He can put his family first, he can avoid vices and wastage of his earnings, and focus his emotional and financial attention on the betterment of his children. Now in a normal human system, this would mean he had a lot of good to look forward to over the years. The feminists can't allow this. They can't allow any man to fall through their net.

So the system (1) encourages women to sleep around before commitment (to weaken commitment) (2) financially rewards women for unfaithfulness - sexual or just vanilla desertion - by using (a) her husband's or (b) the taxpayer's money to fund her lifestyle should she choose to leave her husband. Hey hubby, you better not make too much of a fuss of your wife's couple of little adultery adventures if you know what is good for you.

Which leads me to the point of, what is a man to do if he wants to reproduce without being under the unfair thumb of a woman who knows the whole setup is exceedingly tilted to her advantage? Let me suggest options:

  1. Be a young person from the top 30% of families (money and non-craziness wise) AND be aware of the feminist gameplan - if you are both of these find another teen girl your own age and play your cards right. By the time you're in mid-20s if this is done she'll have so much to lose by ending it she wouldn't dream of it. Go ahead and enjoy your normal life as the maybe 10-20% of men in society who will be able to do this. When you're established financially, your kids grown, put a lot of effort into helping rearrange the system so men who weren't so lucky as you don't get screwed as much.
  2. If you're from a less good family or you started the relationship with women game later (ie. from early 20s onwards) sorry you're not going to be so lucky. You could marry, but the girl is going to have the upper hand and know it, and she's going to be likely a used tart with a bad attitude. Therefore although finding the right girl isn't out of the question, statistically its unlikely. In these circumstances I see two options

(a) Surrogacy. Feminists are trying like crazy to shut it down as they realise how it changes power dynamics, ie. they can't use the family to terrorise and destroy men who go this route anymore. Two options here. 1. Do a self-planned surrogacy in California. There are basic costs you can't avoid for this - it will go up over time - but say $20,000 for eggs, $45,000 for surrogate, $20,000 for IVF (you can get guaranteed birth deals at some clinics). That's $85,000. I'd say it's theoretically possible to get a surrogate whose insurance covers pregnancy and labour medicals, and if you spent $15,000 by shopping around on legal costs, you could have it done for $100,000. I think this is an absolute minimum in Califronia, but likewise I'd think you were a fool to pay over $150,000 at today's prices. 2. Do surrogacy in a cheaper foreign jurisdiction, this could be done for $50,000 or conceivably even less. Colombia is a current popular cheaper destination, although its a bit like whack-a-mole with old jurisdictions closing and new ones opening as the feminists are forever trying to shut down this ungodly avenue for male joy. Note that nothing about taking this route would preclude you from either being a fag or marrying a woman later on, although you might want to wait til your child's a teen to avoid a woman making some false allegation, a risk to consider.

(b) Impregnate an 'iffy' girl because it's the cheapest way to reproduce. You go in knowing she's a crazy, bit of a slut, etc., but she's the best of a bad bunch. If you do this, do it while you're relatively young, late teens early 20s say. She might block you from seeing the kid, ever. She might make the kid hate you so much, even grown the kid wants nothing to do with you. She might fuck up the kid big time - this happens all the time and is the thing I hate most about feminism,because no matter how much better dad is he won't get custody. But at least you've reproduced. You could consider going overseas for a while and impregnating a woman who wants to keep the baby. This makes it much harder for them to use you as an involuntary meal ticket, as its hard for them to claim alimony when you live abroad. One option would be to have a baby with some Asian from the third world - whatever you do, refuse to acknowledge paternity, her hand is stronger if your paternity is recorded on the birth certificate, you can privately admit it while not signing anything - and later once the kid is a teen many countries allow rectifications of birth certificate, or DNA evidence could be used. Now you can have a nice normal arrangement where you pay her what for you is a minimal and manageable amount, what for her is enough for a (barely) lower middle-class lifestyle, and in return she gives you complete access to your kids when you come to visit on holidays. Just make sure she can't use her fornication and bastardry to try and claim residence in your rich country and whatever you do don't marry her - you can check your jurisdiction, not that many countries allow a woman residency just because she's bred in her home country with a man who is a citizen of the richer country, but I wouldn't be surprised if some Scandinavian countries or whatever would have allowed that. This can be successful but you must be tough but fair.

That's it guys. All these options suggest you've got your head screwed on properly, and your psyche in order. If you go into the kids/family thing without clarity about your goals and forethought, the 'poor victim angels' are going to bite your face off and the society will clap while it happens. Cheapest option: 1. have a baby with a not-so-innocent Asian women. She'll put the hard sell on you to marry her, help her migrate etc, don't buy it for a second, you're limited to seeing your kids for several weeks holiday per year under this model. That's while they're little - once they're teens, you could bring them over sans-mother, a lot of moms will go 'no way' on this, but I've seen many who genuinely care for their kids go 'great' and allow it despite them being lonely without the kid. Tried and tested option - surrogacy California. Cheapest option where you get full custody: surrogacy in a cheaper jurisdiction, I named Colombia, there are others. If you're not American, expect your government with its feminist orders to try to fuck you up around getting citizenship and passports for your kids from surrogacy. See a lawyer if you need to.