Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.
It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.
I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.
Support the archive
[–]DaneWhitman 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]RapeAnalyst [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link
Yes. What Mr. Whitman said. But in addition to that, you should be advised that this is a debate you can't win. Just the fact that you are in college means that, by definition, you are surrounded by, and outnumbered by, people who are insane. You'll lose the debate; you'll lose friends; you'll lose GPA; you'll lose job prospects; and you'll lose the ability to safely date women. And, in addition to having pissed off the people who handle your food, you'll be sitting alone in the cafeteria.
STILL going all in? OK. Then you deserve my support. I want you to win. Follow Dane's links for the resources that cover the Constitutional parts of the issue. But when the debate swerves away from The Constitution--as it must, because they can't win if it doesn't--here's an essay I threw together long ago, that you can reference (Unfortunately, it contains some uncited sources, so you can't just turn it in as a paper. But the info it contains is extremely valuable.)
I'll post it below, as reply to this post (in 9 minutes)
[+]RapeAnalyst [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link
Dear Colleges: YOU are not the police.
Here are 3 reasons why you MUST NOT handle any rape cases:
You do not have the necessary resources. Do you know how to process evidence? No. You don’t.
Basically, there are two main kinds of evidence: Physical evidence, and sworn statements. Because you are a college, you do not have the power to obtain warrants to search for and seize physical evidence, and you wouldn’t know a thing about processing it if you could obtain it. You also don’t have the power to subpoena witnesses and compel them to testify. At best, you have voluntary statements from people who are willing to talk to you.
Now, real investigators sometimes have to deal with a lack of evidence, too. But they have hundreds of hours of training, and hundreds of hours of experience interviewing suspects and witnesses. This is important, because what they realize, and what you don’t realize, is that EVERYBODY LIES. Everybody. Good people, bad people, people who have no stake in the outcome of the investigation. Everybody wants their story to be the one that gets believed, and almost nobody can resist at least embellishing their story just a bit, as well as leaving out details that don’t suit them.
Like it or not (and I know, you’re not gonna like it) but the fact is, FALSE ACCUSATIONS HAPPEN. Ok. Take a minute. Take a breath. Take a drink. See your shrink. Then, scream at me at the top of your lungs the figure that you are comfortable with using as being the lowest possible percentage of accusations that turn out to be false. I’ll work with that number. As long as you’re willing to concede that it’s going to be a little bit higher in a college setting, where no punishment awaits a false-accuser; as opposed to a courtroom where they at least MIGHT be charged with perjury and sent to jail (at least in theory, if not in practice.)
Whatever number we come up with, as long as it’s greater than zero, we’re faced with having to deal with the fact that the very next investigation COULD be of a false accusation. And to someone who isn’t trained, and doesn’t have years of experience, you have NO CHANCE of telling truth from fiction just by interviewing someone.
Plus, lying is not the only form of deception. People often misremember things with great certainty. Remember when Humphry Bogart said “Play it again, Sam” in Casablanca? Remember seeing the knife plunge into Janet Leigh’s chest in Psycho? Remember seeing the guy get his ear cut off in Reservoir Dogs? Well, I hate to be the one to have to break this to you, but you never saw ANY of those things. They didn’t happen on film, only in your mind’s eye. Yet millions of people remember them vividly.
Have your kids ever claimed to “remember” something that happened, and you know it happened before they were born? The reason for this is simple: They’ve heard you tell a story a few times, and it becomes real enough for them that they “remember” it as if they were there with you at the time.
People also have a powerful ability to simply forget parts of a story that they don’t want to remember.
So even in the event that everyone you speak to is acting in good faith and attempting to be 100% honest with you, there is almost no chance that you can piece together what actually happened.
Only physical evidence tells the whole truth. And you have no way to get it and process it correctly.
The victim may have enough faith in your lame-assed investigation to prevent them from going to the real police in the first place.
You’re obviously going to tip off the suspect. He’ll have time to rehearse his story; destroy evidence; confirm false alibis with his friends and family. Maybe even do things to try to intimidate or threaten the victim.
You ARE “witness tampering”. Questions you ask in a leading way will poison their answers. And you may reveal to them information that they wouldn’t and shouldn’t otherwise know.
Now YOU—and all of your fellow “investigators”—are now witnesses in the Real case. And all of your notes? Those are now evidence in the REAL case. Any competent defense attorney can now bring all of you, and all of that in to court, and use it all to poke holes in the prosecution’s case.
This is all ammo for the defense. The defense can comb through it all. If there’s one tiny phrase or word that appears contrary to what the victim claims happened, even if it’s your mistake, hell, even if it’s just a typo, the jury is going to hear about it 100 times during the course of the trial. Can you say “Reasonable Doubt”?
That’s if it even makes it to trial. Now that you’ve screwed up the case enough that a prosecutor doesn’t think he can win, he’s forced to either drop what should have been an airtight case, or try to plead it down to jaywalking, so that at least he can get some sort of conviction.
Finally, if you find the defendant “guilty” in your little mock trial, and impose even the mildest punishment, you’ve given him grounds to sue you, and a good chance of either winning or compelling you to offer him a good “go away” settlement. And—are you ready for the punchline? You’ve CLEARLY violated HIS rights under—you guessed it—Title IX.
So congratulations! Even if there never before was a “rape culture” on college campuses before, you've created one now. College, in 2015, is UNSAFE. For MEN!
[+]RapeAnalyst [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
Formatting note: Rather than trying to edit to correct Reddit's annoying habit of insisting that all things listed must be in this order: 1, 1, 1,
....I'll just point out here that OBVIOUSLY, for people who, unlike Reddit's code writers, can count higher than 1, the above list should read 1, 2, 3,
[–]Alchemist27ish[S] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+]RapeAnalyst [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
To answer that, I'll defer to bertreapot's response below, and to the Harvard Letter, linked above.
[–]Alchemist27ish[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]bertreapot 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ee4m[🍰] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link