"In the 2020s, conservative activists, including Steven Crowder, Matt Walsh, Michael Knowles and Tim Pool, as well as some state Republican parties have advocated for the abolition or restriction of no-fault divorce."

That is all it says, currently, in the article in defense of the men's rights position. Which I think is a shame Mind you, the article has approximately 100 times the amount of text dedicated to explaining the history of divorce in the US. It goes on at length about the arguments in favor of NF divorce, which contributed to the passage of the current divorce laws.

While I feel like quite a bit more can be said in favor of our opposition, I know that I am not qualified to edit the article myself. The reason is because I know controversial topics in Wikipedia can turn into long drawn out editorial battles and, quite frankly, I know that I don't know how to win such a battle against the inevitable editorial fight which is sure to come from one or more of the non-MRAs who monitor our subreddit.

So it is my only hope in posting this, that someone with more Wikipedia experience can take a crack at it.

Thank you for reading.