Shared parenting legislation 'not in the interests of children'

VoidPointer2005 · 2011-06-17T11:53:42+00:00

"There is no empirical evidence that increasing the amount of time spent with a non-resident parent improves outcomes for children. It is the quality of the relationship between parents and between parents and children[...] that are important for children’s well-being, not equal or near equal parenting time."

Yes, because people are known for having great relationships with people they never see.

Eogan · 2011-06-17T13:30:33+00:00

Shared parenting as a presumption doesn't mean mandatory shared parenting, its just a starting point from which arrangements can be made.

These problems are mostly caused by high conflict women using the child and access as a means to hurt their ex's which is not in the best interests of the child. Shared parenting as a starting point would limit the females ability to exploit the child and the system in that way.

Michaelquerty · 2011-06-17T10:55:00+00:00

The status quo is the way to go, when the biggest victim group has innate privileges in the matter.

docodine · 2011-06-17T17:11:45+00:00

i've never seen a post get this many comments with absolutely no downvotes :o

pcarvious · 2011-06-17T19:33:05+00:00

They looked at shared parenting and not access to a consistent father figure. It's also missing research on the effect of dating on a child.

Eogan · 2011-06-17T11:39:07+00:00

Fuck the children. They get entirely too much attention.

Title	Shared parenting legislation 'not in the interests of children'
Author	Michaelquerty
Upvotes	17
Comments	13
Date	June 17, 2011 10:52 AM UTC (15 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/i2196/shared_parenting_legislation_not_in_the_interests/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/shared-parenting-legislation-not-in-the-interests.1038530 https://theredarchive.com/post/1038530

Comments