I’m not sure why this has become such a persistent response. It is obviously just another deflection meant to derail the conversation rather than engage in honest debate, but nevertheless it seems to appear anytime a man complains about dating or women’s pr!vilege.

The narrative suggests that men are proposing that women resolve the issues of excessive hipurg4my and modern dating by “fugging phat ogly guys.” This is obviously nonsense, but also implies that all TRP men are ogly or undesirable, which is obviously untrue and an extension of the tired conflation of TRP/8Iack pill.

This can be easily disproven by visiting any of a number of Facebook TRP groups. The vast majority of the men in there are above average in terms of attractiveness, very few of them for the “n3kb3ard” stereotype. In fact, you are far more likely to come across these types in fem!n!st/men shaming groups pining for crumb. It is ironic that women suggest this physical description matches the m!s0gynistic, b4sement dwelling bogeyman they’ve dreamt up.

Most “terpers” are simply above average men who have moderate success with women but acknowledge the insane delusion even the most average women have. NO ONE is suggesting that girls phug f4t ugly guys, that is as I said a deflection. What is suggested is that average women come back down to earth and realize that just because a hot guy would secretly use them as a kum dvmpster does not mean they can land them for an LTR, and that they should instead date men in their league.

As it is now, the vast majority of men struggle even to get women below their level of attractiveness. It is absolutely ridiculous, and only seems to be getting worse. That is why men are “bitter” not because they are vgly and no one wants to fug them.