6 RULES TO TOUCH MY PENIS

[–]eccentricrealist 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]sammac 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]Acksiom[S] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Funfact: there's never been an actual communist state, so in a sense you're right.

Morefunhatequote: "Socialism, communism, and other collectivist beliefs. . . ."

The goalposts aren't moving.

Wtf are politics being dragged up in TRP for anyway?

Why are you asking us when you're the one dragging it down there from the original metaphysical level?

If you people want to talk about liberal and conservative behaviors then have at it, but at least know that the terms are not synonymous with democrat and republican. #themoreyouknow

There are no other people here using those terms ITFP; you're the only person here engaging in the very behavior about which you're whining.

Again, admitting when you're wrong and doing something to fix it is the single greatest cheat code to success in life that I know.

I suggest you #stopbeatingyourselfovertheheadwithyourownfailstick now.

[–][deleted] 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 12 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

[–]Acksiom[S] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

[–]Geocan001 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]Acksiom[S] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

These rules appear very old world to me.

'Old world' appears uselessly unclear to most everybody.

There's a lot of these that I can argue against, but it comes down to personal preference.

Except, of course, for how it doesn't, as shown by the explicit benefits identified in the UFY sections.

For one, tattoos don't carry the same meaning they used to (except the specific gang affiliation, military, sailor, etc.)

Except, of course, for how their fundamental nature is still the signaling of the willing acceptance of masculine self-devaluation.

Also, if a woman wants to brag about how good I am, go ahead. Preselection.

Except, of course, for how preselection works even better when the woman's relevant FSM circle can tell she's getting the good sex through her behavioral and attitudinal signaling, but she won't share the details with them; the mystery revs their hamsters up all the more.

The particular points you cherry-pick and the vanity posting characteristics of your reply suggest to me that your disagreement is more the result of a comparable lack of abundance in your own mentality than from subjective personal preferences in my own.

[–]Geocan001 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

EDIT: Wow, congratulations. I re-read this and yep, here be butthurt. Troll is successful.

If a woman isn't openly bragging to her grooming circle about you, you aren't good enough. If you think getting a tattoo is a sign of masculinity AND de-valuing of the self, then you are too old to appreciate a good tattoo. If you are looking to date women half your age +/- a few years, then you've got to be at least in your forties. The anti-socialism comments suggest cold war old.

The thing is these are your views. I wasn't judging you but you are clearly judging me. I was discussing how your views mismatch my own. I think chicks with ink are HOT. Most women I know have a tattoo. Nobody I know who has a tattoo regrets it, myself included.

I think you really need to reassess your attitude, bro. Because if you're looking to date half your age +/- a few years, and you're under 60, there's a good chance that when you get her clothes off, you'll find a tattoo.

[–]Acksiom[S] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

If a woman isn't openly bragging to her grooming circle about you, you aren't good enough.

[sigh]

"Don't talk about what we do intimately outside of your own closest Grooming Circle. . . ."

Do you understand that you just agreed with me while apparently believing you weren't?

My 6 Rules aren't a prospective list describing where I eventually want to be in life. They're an existing list describing where I actually have gotten.

If you think getting a tattoo is a sign of masculinity AND de-valuing of the self, then you are too old to appreciate a good tattoo.

No, it's not my greater age; it's my greater education. Tattoos are a primary cultural signal of male self-sacrificing willingness to subject oneself to violence. That's why both historically and today you see more and most of them on combat hardasses, from civilized professional military to barbarian tribal thugs. Combat hardass wannabes are not allowed to touch my penis.

If you are looking to date women half your age +/- a few years,

And now you're not only displaying your relatively greater scarcity mindset again, but adding supplication to it.

I don't 'look' to do my thing; I actually do it, and what I do with my women is far beyond mere 'dating', which is for guys still at the Average Chump level. Merely getting your dick wet only changes the F in AFC to an S for Satiated.

I could eat crap fast food and be satiated, but for me, good enough isn't. So I eat BlSl chicken breast, rice, and cruciferous veggies and drink ice water and fresh-juiced greens with ginger.

I could hump cheap fast slores and be satiated, but for me, good enough isn't. So I hump keyboards and bottled mimosa and gourmet desserts out into the wilderness and blow girls' minds with sexed up piano bar Sinatra and Cole by the riverside. And then they fuck me like they're virgins facing the end of the world.

The anti-socialism comments suggest cold war old.

But nowhere near as much as they do Red Pill truthful. It doesn't matter how old I am; what matters is how accurate I am.

The thing is these are your views.

And a more important thing is still how they're backed up by the explicit benefits identified in the UFY sections.

I wasn't judging you but you are clearly judging me.

And it makes me better than you.

I was discussing how your views mismatch my own.

And ignoring how the UFY sections support mine while invalidating yours.

I think chicks with ink are HOT.

And they often are. . .with INFECTIOUS INFLAMMATION.

Most women I know have a tattoo.

Do you understand why most women in the elite social classes don't?

Do you understand why most top models don't?

It's a very simple algorithm. The higher the girl is on the decimal scale, the less likely it is that she's tattooed and BMed.

And the less likely that she's infected with something. And the less likely that she's prone to violence, and so forth, and so on. Do you know why?

It's because the higher status guys that she is trying to get with won't put up with it.

So. . .which would you rather fuck; a 6 with tattoos, or an 8 without?

Boom; headshot.

Nobody I know who has a tattoo regrets it, myself included.

[sigh]

"TATTOOS ON WOMEN ARE DISGUSTING"

Calm down and stop taking everything so personally so you can read for comprehension better and stop projecting.

I think you really need to reassess your attitude, bro.

I think your blatant projection is laughable.

Because if you're looking to date half your age +/- a few years,

There you go with that scarcity and supplication mindset again.

and you're under 60, there's a good chance that when you get her clothes off, you'll find a tattoo.

Except, of course, for how there isn't, because it keeps not happening.

And, of course, for how they're the ones who have to get my clothes off. . .because I'm the higher status guy that they are trying to get with.

[–]Geocan001 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

First off, you're right. I got emotional, I got caught up. I mentioned that in my last post. I can see we do agree on things a little bit.

So. . .which would you rather fuck; a 6 with tattoos, or an 8 without?

Well, the 8, obviously. But an 8 with tattoos would get preferential treatment again. So really that's an argument of false equivalence.

As an aside, you've given me an interesting insight into my own attraction. This, to me, is supremely attractive. Hell yeah she's geeky, she's punky, she's inked and pierced. The haircut, too. Maybe it's that "masculine self-devaluation" you're talking about. That wannabe combat badassery that I perceive as giving me a challenge.

I reckon the half your age thing really wigs me out at the moment, because technically that would be illegal for me to do. Haha. I'd be chasing 12 and 13 year olds. Not happening.

It could also be that, where I live, the "elite" social classes are either diplomats or blue collar families that really hit it with their construction business or music company and married a nurse. In fact, one of those examples was the most vulgar white-trashy person I've ever met. TBH, the husband was extremely BP. Anyway, I digress.

I also dated the daughter of a Microbiology professor. She had tatts, self-harmed, got pierced and didn't last long. I just don't see it. I'm in university now, and it's still pretty wildly prevalent.

Women have culturally extensively modified their bodies throughout history. Look up neck rings, foot binding, and corsetry as examples of things the women in the upper echelons of society did to unnaturally modify their bodies. Another culturally specific BM is tooth sharpening. That's considered attractive in...I htink the culture is South American.

My point is that no matter which way you look at it. Body modification is culturally relevant. You'r not going to see and agree with my side, I'm not going to see and agree with yours. Not that either is wrong, just that we've had different experiences and exist under different social expectations.

That said, if a woman tattoos my name on her body anywhere, I'm leaving the country.

[–]Acksiom[S] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

First off, you're right. I got emotional, I got caught up. I mentioned that in my last post. I can see we do agree on things a little bit.

Oh, that's what your edit meant. I couldn't figure out WTH you were talking about so I ignored it.

Well, the 8, obviously. But an 8 with tattoos would get preferential treatment again. So really that's an argument of false equivalence.

Except, of course, for how it isn't, since 8s with tattoos are rarer than 6s, which is in turn critically relevant because of how you're ignoring the positioning, windage estimation, training, etc. for setting up that headshot ITFP.

And that would be the reason I gave you for why most top models and women in the elite social classes don't have tattoos; the very simple algorithm that the higher the girl is on the decimal scale, the less likely it is that she's tattooed and BMed.

It's also the reason why she's less likely that she's infected with something, and she's less likely that she's prone to violence, and so forth, and so on.

Again, it's because the higher status guys that she is trying to get with won't put up with it.

It's not a false equivalence at all; that's just you trying to move the goalposts. . .too.

If you don't want to be the higher status guy whose standards she has to exert herself to meet, that's fine, but don't pretend here in TRP that descending to the squalid prole level is acceptable because "the culture has changed".

Yes, it's changed, but that isn't synonymous with improved. In this case, it's the opposite -- debased and degraded.

That wannabe combat badassery that I perceive as giving me a challenge.

Yah, I don't have that. The only challenges I find attractive are the ones I set myself in terms of personal achievement and self-improvement. Using other people as challenges like that isn't autonomous enough for me. It's too dependent; it weakens me.

I reckon the half your age thing really wigs me out at the moment, because technically that would be illegal for me to do. Haha. I'd be chasing 12 and 13 year olds. Not happening.

Except, of course, for how I said "DOWN TO LEGAL" ITFP.

Why do you keep ignoring what I actually write?

It could also be that, where I live, the "elite" social classes are either diplomats or blue collar families that really hit it with their construction business or music company and married a nurse. In fact, one of those examples was the most vulgar white-trashy person I've ever met. TBH, the husband was extremely BP. Anyway, I digress.

No, actually, you explain: your standards are location-dependent; mine aren't. When I talk about the elite social classes and top models, I don't mean just either of our tiny little local podunk ponds. Why do you limit yourself that way? I don't.

Women have culturally extensively modified their bodies throughout history.

Women have done a lot of extraordinarily stupid things throughout history, so that does nothing to justify doing stupid things today.

Look up neck rings, foot binding, and corsetry as examples of things the women in the upper echelons of society did to unnaturally modify their bodies.

What makes you think I'm not familiar with them already? Bound feet look disgusting, like animal feet; women without neck rings look like mutants because they don't actually extend the neck; the compress the shoulders. And corsets aren't BM; if they end up modifying the body permanently, they're doing it wrong.

Another culturally specific BM is tooth sharpening. That's considered attractive in...I htink the culture is South American.

[shrug] So what? If you don't think cultural relativity is bullshit, WTF are you doing in TRP?

My point is that no matter which way you look at it. Body modification is culturally relevant.

Oh, I agree with that. It's very relevant; it always has been. It's a signal of squalid prole self-devaluation. "Relevant" is just PC weasel wording; there's no sensible argument behind it.

You'r not going to see and agree with my side, I'm not going to see and agree with yours. Not that either is wrong, just that we've had different experiences and exist under different social expectations.

No; you're wrong and I'm right. Just because your POV is different doesn't mean it's valid. BPer have had different experiences and exist under different social expectations; are they just as right as we are?

Fuck no and you fucking well know it. You're just spouting Politically Correct bullshit because you can't come up with a sensible counterargument.

EDIT: http://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/2b4vu9/things_we_do_to_signal_where_we_stand_in_the/cj1v0nw

If you can't or won't recognize the objective -- i.e., non-"cultural" -- relevance, then I've already done all I can at this point within your limits; further self-improvement is up to you.

[–]Hughtub 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]Acksiom[S] 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]Hughtub 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]Acksiom[S] 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It is and it isn't. There's always hope, but hope is a good metric for oneitis.

Almost everybody can be changed; being able to adapt to others is a survival necessity. But I think you already realize on some level what the critical determining factor is: you said

any group of girls with feminist beliefs

and that's what I find to be the make or break point -- what her social circle is like.

Jim Rohn is correct that we're the summary of the five people we spend the most time with. The more feminist/SATC/whatever that the people a girl spends the most of her time with are, the harder it will be for you to improve her, because they'll be pushing and pulling her level right back down into their comfy social septic tank again as soon as she's with them instead of you.

To counteract that you need to have such massive inherent value to her that she'll blow off their shit tests in your favor, and that usually means more work than she's worth. . .to say nothing of all the extra shit you'll have to take from them because you're competition for their usage of her for their own purposes.

[–]Hughtub 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]allcapsisyelling 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Acksiom[S] -1 points0 points1 point 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Title	6 RULES TO TOUCH MY PENIS
Author	Acksiom
Upvotes	0
Comments	20
Date	July 4, 2014 8:01 PM UTC (12 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/29uml7/6_rules_to_touch_my_penis/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/6-rules-to-touch-my-penis.17518 https://theredarchive.com/post/17518

Comments