TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Justice for Men and Boys
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Mensactivism
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

Another possible reason for why 50 shades is popular among women.

[deleted]

March 16, 2015
2 upvotes
/r/TheRedPill
Archived from /r/TheRedPill

r/TheRedPill is a subreddit for discussion of sexual strategy in a culture increasingly lacking a positive identity for men.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/TheRedPill archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Another possible reason for why 50 shades is popular among women.
Author

[deleted]

Upvotes 2
Comments 5
Date March 16, 2015 1:11 PM UTC
(11 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/2z88kf/another_possible_reason_for_why_50_shades_is/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/another-possible-reason-for-why-50-shades-is.30272
https://theredarchive.com/post/30272
Red Pill terms in post
the red pill

Comments

[–]AlbatrossJohannson6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

It's one of the greatest selling books of all time. All women I talk to say it is stupid and badly written, and yet they've bought and read all three books+happily paid to go and see the movie. If I read a book and though it was badly written and sucked, I wouldn't buy and read the sequels and pay for a cinema ticket to watch the film adaptation. I'm sure most of you are the same. Trust their actions more than their words.

It's not very socially acceptable to say "I love this soft-porn movie about a golddigging bondage slut who turns herself in to a sex slave to get with a billionaire". It's socially acceptable to say "it is so awful, I only read it for the lawls"

If they didn't like it, it wouldn't have sold over 100 million copies, and the movie would not be such a financial success despite the reviews that completely destroy it.

I think the popularity of the story has everything to do with the traditional swept-away princess fantasy it portrays. A 1% alpha male billionaire becomes obsessed with a completely average college girl. Eventually the girl changes the man. They fall in love, get married and have children. The woman gains access to his fortune and cushy lifestyle he provides. She changes him and gets rid of his love of kinky and rough sex. The end. Nothing really different or revolutionary about it from what I can tell. It's a traditional gold-digger princess fantasy marketed as an erotic twilight for adults, to all the girls who grew up obsessed with Twilight. Herd mentality certainly helps sales but they wouldn't buy all the sequels+pay to see the movie if they didn't enjoy it.

[–]iliketurdles123 2 points2 points2 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

this is the classical interpretation, and I agree with it, along with many progressive female debaters in the media. It's a female sexual fantasy/ femporn. I'm just proposing another possible interpretation, that doesn't necessarily exclude the dominant one, pun intended.

[–]AlbatrossJohannson0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago [recovered] (0 children) | Copy Link

The romance novel genre has been a bestseller in places like Walmart and Target for a long time. 50 Shades is just a traditional romance novel marketed and packaged with very high quality IMO. I don't think there's really more to it than that, and it doesn't need to be overthought.

[–]SawtoothSliver2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It doesn't seem to be particularly popular among women, relative to how vigorously it's been marketed to them. They went along with reading it because of their herd mentality (they were convinced that other women were reading it, so many of them followed suit), but it doesn't seem to have resonated with them much at all. I only ever hear them say how stupid it was.

[–]iliketurdles1232 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

well of course, they have to say that since NAWALT :)

not saying that you aren't right, but that may also be an explanation at least. And you can't get around those sales numbers. Or the psychology student's bar at my university, 70% female dominated study, who held a fifty shades of grey bar two months ago, advertising it as a place girls could come and be dominated, and where the dresscode for guys was suits (I realize it's just an anecdote).

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter