Female Value Acquisition Theory

TL;DR Women attribute imaginary SMV points to themselves via sexual relations with specific males and their peak socioeconomic status. Women's hypergamy can no longer be satisfied and turn towards the legal system to artificially change the social climate to their advantage at the male's expense (read here).The current setup of our society allows this component of their nature to spread chaos. There's a better way...

Purpose

The artificial rise of female station in society via gender quotas, affirmative action, feminist plights, and lowering of physical standards in job positions have been detrimental to the sexual market and many other sectors of society. In this post, I attempt to identify and explain this process.

Evidence

Here (TheRationalMale post) TL;DW Women don't know where all the good men have gone. They've increased their socioeconomic status and men 'below' them become invisible.

The Female Value Acquisition Theory

Terms

• Objective Value = Physical attractiveness + femininity

• Vicarious Value = The positive increase in SMV a female believes to have acquired through having had sexual relations with a man.

• Perceived Value = Objective value + Vicarious Value

• SMV Superiority Differential: The positive difference between the male's SMV and the female's SMV (Male SMV - Female SMV > 0)

Theory

Corollary 1: Vicarious) All females perceive themselves to acquire SMV in addition to their objective value by living vicariously through the males they have sexual relations with, depending on the seriousness of said relationship.

• Casual Sexual Relationship: when a female has a casual sexual relationship with a male she perceives to be of higher SMV than herself, whether it be a one night stand or a fuck-buddy, she acquires the SMV Superiority Differential (SSD) at the time of the sexual act.

• If a female has sexual relations with a male whose SMV is much higher than the female could ever hope to achieve in the future, she is deemed an 'alpha widow', a permanent price floor for her pussy is set. In her mind, from that point on, any sexual relationship she enters is considered settling.

• ex) Jack's SMV = 9, Sally's SMV = 7. Jack has sex with Sally ==> Sally's Perceived SMV = Sally's Objective SMV + (Jack's SMV - Sally's Objective SMV) ==> 7 + (9-7) = 7+2 = 9.

• Committed Sexual Relationship: if at any point in time during a committed sexual relationship, should there be an SMV Superiority Differential (SSD) present, regardless of the male's SMV history, the male unknowingly acts as the female's agent, allowing the female to acquire the SSD during or outside the moment of a sexual act with the male simply by association because by being her agent, the male is thought to have acquired the boost of SMV on her behalf.

• ex) Jack and Sally are in a relationship. Sally's SMV = 6, Jack's SMV = 7. Jack becomes famous, a 9. Sally now becomes a perceived 9 by association.

Corollary 2: Economics): The female's perceived SMV is a price floor. Once set, her sexuality can never be sold at a lower price, regardless of her current objective SMV. Hypergamy makes her entitled to a man above her highest held station.

Females are unaware of the fact they can never acquire more value than what their physical attractiveness and femininity provides. Due to false projection and/or indoctrination, reinforced by solipsism, females perceive themselves to have acquired a rise in SMV in addition to their objective value when they have an increase of socioeconomic status, including, but not limited to by means of: fame, social proof , pre-selection, positions of power, income and/or masculine traits including but not limited to: promiscuity, field reports, being 'one of the guys', challenging/confrontational, and/or having tattoos. This sets the precedent for everything that follows below.

• ex Projection) Women want a hot, powerful, rich, famous, bad boy that other girls want and isn't afraid of confrontation. They project this view onto men, thinking that men would also find these traits attractive in women. In actuality, other than aesthetics, the value men place on those traits range from neutral to repulsive when had by a woman. All other things equal, the female lead singer of a famous band is as attractive as if she worked as a barista at Starbucks. On top of that, women are indoctrinated from the second they start watching media. Be an 'independent' woman. You don't need no man. Be a career woman and ascend the social ladder of money, power, and might through education and corporate perseverance. This mindset takes hold and raises the average woman's station, along with the delusional perceived value of herself.

• ex 2 Corporate Climbing) She used to be a 6, and was entitled to males 7-10. Then was promoted at work as an executive, thinking she's an 8, and now entitled to males 9,10. Later, she becomes a stay at home mom, yet her highest perceived value, 8, determined based on her past position she no longer holds, is retained, along with its previous entitlement of males 9-10.

• ex 3 Perpetual Peak) She was a 9 in high school and college, feeling entitled to males 9-10. All the attention she gets in life and online makes her think she's a 10. Then she got married, and let herself go. She's now a 6, yet her perceived value as a 10 is still retained, and entitled to other 10's.

Conclusion

Strictly in terms of the sexual market, men and women would be better off if women were prevented from entering the workplace, however, I believe this to be unnecessary; there's a more effective alternative. The more gender equal a nation void of feminism is, the more women lean towards positions that fit their gender roles (lower power and difficulty, more people oriented) on their own volition , here (Time = 29:20). Therefore, if society promoted equal opportunity, instead of equal outcome, many of the problems we face today partly due to the phenomenon described above would cease to exist.

The takeaway here is not to change women's nature because this psychological attribute is not a bug, it's a feature. When we can clearly understand and predict what was once an elusive nature (by design), we can restructure our society with this in mind, making both men and women happier as a result.