TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Sawagurumi Archive

View 3 posts and 1,347 comments by Sawagurumi on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
594

Men's RightsSawagurumi/r/TheRedPill07/05/16 09:25 AM
51

Off TopicSawagurumi/r/TheRedPill03/12/16 05:30 PM
8

Sawagurumi/r/MarriedRedPill09/10/15 08:02 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,347 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

No it wouldn't. Of course in JB was killed someone would take his place, and hence his code name, so you could have a female 007 after that. But it wouldn't be James Bond, it would be a new character - and still pandering to feminists.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/17 10:04 AM
1

Seconded. Also 'Mindfulness in Plain English' by Bhante Gunaratana, and an old book: 'How to Meditate' by Lawrence Le Shan. The latter is particularly good in giving an overview of different approaches to meditation; eg structured and unstructured meditations; meditations of the inner, middle and outer way; or as an alternative way of classifying them, meditations that follow the path of the intellect, the path of the emotions, of the body, or of action.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/17 11:29 AM
2

I applaud your skepticism, that is the attitude I try to apply to everything. So I looked into it, and there is indeed quite a large body of research now on the benefits of meditation, as 'New Age'-ey as it seems. A number of links here: http://liveanddare.com/benefits-of-meditation/
/r/TheRedPill10/07/17 11:24 AM
1

Well, I only partly agree. Rape culture, in the way defined by feminists (normalised, etc) does exist in the West. It exists, or at least did exist, don't know if it has since been cleaned up, in men's prisons in the US (don't know to what extent in other countries). It also now exists where there are groups of muslim immigrants, eg in the UK - 54 rape gangs now unearthed, well above a thousand girls raped by them. And that was covered up by the police and social services because otherwise it wo…
/r/TheRedPill10/07/17 10:29 AM
3

Stefan Molyneux talks extensively about the fall of Rome, and the parallels with today (which are many). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qh7rdCYCQ_U he also has several specifically about Sweden. The simple fact is that the West has become a Matriarchy, and Matriarchies are unstable and ripe for taking over by Patriarchies, which is what the muslim immigrants see. It is why they have no interest at all in assimilating and adopting Western values. Why would they, when they can see that they will …
/r/TheRedPill10/06/17 12:12 PM
9

Yeah, it used to be great, but then, like Facebook (and Reddit), they hired a feminazi into a high position and it went downhill. Then we had people complaining about open source projects discriminating against someone because they were a woman, or a trans, or whatever. Remember, you have a user name that you just make up, you have to say nothing whatever about your sex or sexual preferences, so how can they be discriminated against unless they were making a beef about it themselves? Open source…
/r/TheRedPill07/06/17 04:27 PM
1

separate communities Thanks for the links, that is very interesting.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/17 09:48 PM
5

Referring to Abraham Maslow's hierarchy of needs, probably. https://simplypsychology.org/maslow.html
/r/TheRedPill11/05/17 09:18 PM
2

Not all mammals either (so far as we know), in fact there are more species of rodents alone than the total number of species thought to have exhibited any kind of homosexual behaviour. I don't think this is the right argument to make. If I want to know the natural behaviour of a species I would observe it in the wild (not in captivity) and make a ethogram of all observed behaviours. If we then see it doing something different in captivity but never seen in the wild we might think this is aberran…
/r/RedPillWomen28/04/17 08:10 AM
1

well then why is it present in every sexual species? This isn't even remotely true. 'sexual species' means pretty much all multicelled animals, not to mention plants. Some suggest that there are individuals who show homosexual behaviours (but not long-term exclusive disposition except in a couple of species, like sheep) in 1,500 species. There are more than 300,000 species of beetles alone in the world.
/r/RedPillWomen27/04/17 09:07 PM
18

She was another sad case of brain damage. Not from the punch, but from going to a Californian university and being infected with feminist, SJW ideas. It totally destroyed her, as it has so many others. Now, she is just an ugly ho filled with hate. http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3544661/posts?page=161
/r/TheRedPill17/04/17 11:03 PM
30

Actually it is the preponderance of women in the education system, who determine that girl's behaviour is the norm, and boys need to be drugged into being girls. It is also because very often there is no father, bitch ass or otherwise, on the scene, because the woman has driven him out with the support of the State.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/17 09:41 AM
12

You and u/chaseemail have it absolutely correct. It is perfectly true that if you are able to get yourself into that top 20% (at least) and you just want easy pussy, feminism has been an ally - although it has ruined many women who would have been people you enjoyed spending time with, but are now just annoying, entitled skanks with no useful skills to offer in a relationship. BUT THIS IS A TEMPORARY CONDITION! Enjoy it while it lasts, because there is a war on men in the West, and feminism is a…
/r/TheRedPill15/04/17 09:06 AM
2

This is widely known. The most 'advanced' (ie rich) countries are the ones with the biggest difference in the types of jobs men and women go for. Those countries that are quite poor, the women are more likely to go for similar jobs, things like engineering. But note, these are not the jobs I was talking about, which was most of the jobs a century and more ago, before the rise of office work and IT. Women still avoid things like building roads or laying pipelines, or actually doing the building (…
/r/RedPillWomen14/04/17 07:37 AM
14

Not just modern feminism. It is too easy to forget that feminism has also arisen in the past, eg in Rome and in the Baghdad Caliphate. It can only arise when society is very stable and affluent, it never arises when the society is struggling to make ends meet. And always, it arises at the time of the decline of those societies, not during their rise, and contributes to that decline. Both those civilizations fell not so long after the rise of feminism, the writing is clearly on the wall for this …
/r/RedPillWomen13/04/17 11:17 AM
3

First, a couple of corrections. Their movement [feminism] has a very simple but broad thing they "fight" for: Equality. Feminism has never been interested in equality, that has always just been the cover story. This story has been belied both by prominent feminist writers, from the 60s on, and by the actions of feminists. Feminism is a female supremacist hate group. Both genders We are mammals, not nouns. We don't have a gender we have a sex. There are two sexes, determined by the presence of a …
/r/TheRedPill12/04/17 08:03 PM
2

One would be a mistake. Maybe read BlackDragon's thoughts on the matter. LTR is fine, as long as it is an MLTR. Once you have fully committed yourself to one only the balance of control changes. Marriage pretty much kills dread completely, but if you are fully committed and obviously so (ie have oneitis) it is largely gone.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/17 08:02 PM
6

Notice the same, looks like a lot of blue-pilled guys, feminists, and women (of either sex) generally have decided to try to derail. This seems to happen periodically.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/17 07:57 PM
2

Changing the argument, typical woman think. It was about domestic violence, and who started that violence. You have switched to who is a better fighter. But of course, since you insist on drinking the feminist Koolaid, you can't help with the lies, can you? The biggest cause of death for women is not domestic violence (which would come under homicide), not even remotely. https://www.cdc.gov/women/lcod/2014/race-ethnicity/index.htm
/r/TheRedPill05/04/17 08:25 AM
1

apparently these Marvel folks who are so interested in social justice & minority/female incorporation I think maybe there was something about the word 'minority' that they did not understand.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/17 07:07 PM
1

totally. I watch a lot of World cinema, and I read novels from different countries too. Totally fine with non-white heroes (not so fine with women whose characters are totally masculine but we pretend that women can do all the same things - like any movie with Scarlett Johansson). I don't read chick fiction, so can't comment on that, the plots just don't interest me. But yeah, it pisses me off when they take an existing and successful character, like Thor, and give it the SJW treatment. James Bo…
/r/TheRedPill04/04/17 07:00 PM
4

I just read my comment again to see where I was 'attacking facilities that help women' -- nope, must be all that feminist Koolaid you have been drinking, it addles the brain. I have said that feminist bullshit is hitting women's shelters. Try reading again. As for women's violence, nope, you are the deluded one. The official figure is that 40% is women (http://time.com/2921491/hope-solo-women-violence/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10989615), but that is certainly an underestimate. Erin Pi…
/r/TheRedPill04/04/17 06:09 PM
9

I think it is hilarious that feminists' tactics for claiming more privileges have started to bite them in the ass. All the 'intersectionality' bullshit about sacred 'minorities' (many of whom are actually majorities, eg women) is starting to backfire. We have black women attacking white feminists, like in the Women's March Against Democracy, and now we have transexuals (specifically men pretending to be women) grabbing some of the privileges that women have long enjoyed. Like the guy who took up…
/r/TheRedPill03/04/17 11:50 AM
2

They always look at differences that way, it can never be because 'men and women are different' and certainly not because 'men are better at this', so it must be 'sexism' and 'the patriarchy', even though there is no evidence that this is the case. I saw an article about the number of women coaches decreasing since Title IX came in. It is a competitive business, and they are out-competed, even with Title IX in their favour (and who denies that Title IX is inherently sexist in favour of women?), …
/r/TheRedPill01/04/17 11:32 AM
3

Ah, now we are arguing epistemology. Do you know how to breath? Do you know how to digest food? Do lions know how to kill prey? Not all knowledge is conscious. But even with that caveat, I think you underestimate how much learning about manipulation takes place when girls are growing up. Negging is something some men consciously learn from PUA, but most do not. It is effective precisely because most men do not learn it (or much else about female psychology).
/r/TheRedPill29/03/17 10:40 PM
0

Yes, I covered this 'equality' issue in my post a few months back about why we are against feminism. There is absolutely no a priori reason to expect a 50:50 sex ratio in any profession or activity (except sex, generally), unless you have swallowed the feminist mantra that 'gender is a social construct'; unless you have been hoodwinked into thinking that men and women are basically the same, with the same aptitudes, abilities, and ambitions. So 50% of judges aren't women? So what? So 50% of comp…
/r/TheRedPill29/03/17 08:33 PM
4

I think you all underestimate the Machiavellian mindset of women. Yes, they have a pussy, yes this gives them a powerful bargaining chip, but having an advantage in an interaction isn't the same as knowing how to gain the maximum benefit from it. Men have the advantage over women in a great many areas, but not in this. If it were not so, there would be no need for a red pill, there would be no feminism, the world would not be in the state it is in. Men are biased in favour of women, yes, but wom…
/r/TheRedPill29/03/17 08:27 PM
38

Disagree. They are far more knowledgeable about how to manipulate people (specifically, men). That is an art form that few men master.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/17 04:17 PM
24

In general, there is no Common Law marriage. Only a small minority of States have it, the UK doesn't, Australia effectively has, Europe doesn't, British Columbia has it bad (just a few months is enough).
/r/TheRedPill29/03/17 11:21 AM
52

No, this is expected. There have been surveys (questionaires) done across countries, and women are consistently less knowledgeable about politics (https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/07/02/study-wide-political-knowledge-gap-exists-between-men-and-women). Yet, the ones who understand it least are the ones with the biggest say. Is it any wonder that we are in a mess? Coupled with the fact that women naturally gravitate to the Left (to being taken care of by big daddy state, rather than stand…
/r/TheRedPill29/03/17 10:50 AM
8

I really don't understand how we got into a situation where the West treats muslims as a special protected class. I really don't. It is not even as if islamic countries did the same for us, so we were just reciprocating. Quite the opposite.
/r/TheRedPill28/03/17 04:58 PM
3

Or the UK. http://theasianpost.co.uk/british-pakistani-cricketer-spared-jail-for-beating-wife-with-bat/ Incidentally, Leicester Cricket Club say they had never offered him a contract and did not intend to. If the guy had been British he would be behind bars right now.
/r/TheRedPill28/03/17 04:31 PM
18

'Social Justice' is a euphemism, it does not mean justice. There is a whole Minitrue lexicon where words are used that are not what they appear to mean. Words like 'privilege' and 'racism' and 'sexism'. Those words do have actual meanings, of course, but that is not how they are used. Similarly 'equality' is generally used to mean the opposite (what used to be called 'privilege' which has now swapped meanings with 'equality'). 1984 is your guide, here.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/17 01:48 PM
3

The only real answer is to get women out of boys' education, and have boys and girls in separate schools again. That goes for university, too. Women have ruined the education system. I can hardly believe the stuff I read about it these days, with feminist bullshit being taught everywhere - even on university STEM courses, safe spaces, trigger warnings before lectures, silly little girls shouting at their lecturers that they are supposed to keep them 'safe' by not exposing them to any ideas they …
/r/TheRedPill19/03/17 03:49 PM
2

Dogs are stupider than men, but that does not mean any hatred of dogs (quite the opposite for many, including me), it means accepting the difference between dogs and men. We know for a fact that there is a difference in intelligence between men and women, something that psychology often tries to dodge since it is 'politically incorrect', but that doesn't change the fact. It explains why pretty much all the worthwhile advances made by humanity have been made by men, and not because women have bee…
/r/TheRedPill19/03/17 03:37 PM
0

Disagreeing with a feminist is 'sexism', making any kind of comment about women that they don't like is 'sexism', everything is 'sexism' unless women say it isn't. But in reality, sexism is bias against, or hatred of, someone because of their sex; just as racism is bias against, or hatred of, someone because of their race. Two things to note about that. First, bias means that it is not based on fact. If we say that, on average, women are less intelligent than men (though not by much), and more p…
/r/TheRedPill18/03/17 06:41 PM
1

Yeah, somehow I figured that bit out, but 'transexual female' could be someone who 'identifies' as female, or someone who actually is female but thinks they aren't (which is basically a RadFem). Made more difficult because these assholes have absolutely no understanding of biology. For example “The male is a biological accident: the Y (male) gene is an incomplete X (female) gene, that is, has an incomplete set of chromosomes. In other words, the male is an incomplete female, a walking abortion, …
/r/TheRedPill16/03/17 10:41 PM
1

Damn, I'm so confused. Help me out here, does a transexual female have a Y chromosome or not?
/r/TheRedPill16/03/17 08:23 PM
3

Read up about SJW tactics and how to 'respond'. Exactly, read Vox Day's SJWs always lie: Taking down the thought police. Apart from a lawyer and filing a counter complaint about being harrassed by someone you have never interacted with, the most important thing is never apologize. Even if she says something like 'you were walking behind me once and I thought you were stalking me', when in fact you were just going in the same direction and didn't even notice she was there, you don't apologize. Th…
/r/TheRedPill16/03/17 10:02 AM
3

you don't understand You know there is a feminist theory to cover this, right? And like all Marxist ideology, they attempt to cover up how stupid it is by using long words, hoping to confuse people. It is called Situational Epistemology. Unfortunately for them, it is men who invented philosophy. Epistemology is the branch of philosophy concerned with knowledge: how knowledge is gained, what does it mean to say 'I know x' as opposed to 'I believe x', etc. So they want to claim that you can't poss…
/r/TheRedPill15/03/17 11:21 PM
1

are you a fan of Sargon of Akkad? I can't claim that I am a 'fan' in that I only go to his channel occasionally, but he has certainly put up some good stuff, particularly his video on Brexit. I admire Richard Dawkins as a scientist, but politically he is foolish and naive.
/r/TheRedPill15/03/17 11:00 PM
6

That's hilarious, but feminists have a way of hoisting themselves with their own petard. The trouble with trying to get ever more privileges by claiming to be powerless and underprivileged is that people do eventually notice that you are none of those things. Rather than change tack, they got on board with intersectionality, which is basically a way of 'borrowing' other people's victim status. By putting them (gays, lesbians, transexuals, muslims, otherkin) under the banner of feminism they coul…
/r/TheRedPill15/03/17 07:41 PM
7

Tucker Carlson was talking with a feminist about the stupid 'Day without Feminists' debacle, and what the hell it was supposed to be about anyway. At one point he said that studies showed that in their 20s women now earn more than men (men pulling out of society, feminized education system failing boys, discriminatory practices, etc). Her response was that this was 'progress'. He didn't pull her up on this, but you notice that when men outearned women it is 'the evil patriarchy' but if women out…
/r/TheRedPill15/03/17 04:44 PM
13

and increasingly it is in women's hands. Even without the Merkels and the Mays and all the female politicians, the ruling classes have to pander to the Feminine Imperative, no matter how disastrous, in order to be elected. Which takes us back to straw huts. An increase in the influence of women in public life has often been associated with national decline. The later Romans complained that, although Rome ruled the world, women ruled Rome. In the tenth century, a similar tendency was observable i…
/r/TheRedPill15/03/17 03:38 PM
34

No irony at all, but to be expected. Feminism hurts women too, as they say. It doesn't sound like it is run by a 'pseudo-feminist' but an actual one. Feminism is a form of Cultural Marxism, and Marxism never works. Add to that that women are pretty useless as entrepreneurs, especially if their company is formed largely of women. The reference to a 'Feminist Utopia' is telling. We have heard that before. Lenin said he had achieved it in 1921. The country would have collapsed early if Stalin hadn'…
/r/TheRedPill15/03/17 09:52 AM
1

Never have a shared bank account. That is the path to ruin. Too many men do this, and they end up being given pocket money from their own salary, while she spends the rest (plus her own). This is why advertisers appeal to women, they get to spend their men's money. Women have a bad tendency to live in the moment and not look ahead. This is charming on some level, but disastrous when it comes to money, as you need to be investing in the future. Your future, whether she remains part of it or not.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/17 09:47 PM
2

Oh yeah, I forgot about that one. It is true, we are the privileged ones, we were born with a penis and a rational brain. Unfortunately, we were also born with a bias in favour of women, and women were born with an even stronger bias in favour of themselves. Women are privileged by society rather than biology. I still wouldn't want to be one, but I do think we need to start stripping that support away.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/17 07:38 PM
5

Argue it whatever way you want, but the women were not 'oppressed', not before the war, not during the war, and not since the war. They are, and always have been, the most privileged class in society. From the start of 1st wave feminism until after WWI the number of women in employment steadily decreased - and this was touted as a great victory by feminists. They wanted women out of the factories and mills where hours were long and the work hard. They wanted the cushy job of staying at home look…
/r/TheRedPill08/03/17 09:32 PM
7

On this planet it does. Feminism is the Lesbian Fuglies Union. Much of the point of it, at least initially, was to level the playing field for ugly women by getting beautiful women to shoot themselves in the foot, make themselves ugly, and hate men. So it is particularly stupid for beautiful women to associate themselves with feminism. They can get whatever they want from men, no need to turn into ugly bitches, that is counterproductive.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/17 08:35 PM
3

While I don't disagree with your premise about women on anti-depressants, your story here does nothing to support the idea. She was pissed that you didn't fuck her after she literally begged you to, thus hurting her self esteem. She would have felt the same whether on anti-depressants or not, I would imagine. She was a self-proclaimed feminist, another huge red flag, but again there was nothing in your story to suggest that it was problematic. The only actual thing she did that was out of line w…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/17 07:22 PM
11

Yes, the effect is real, it isn't just you. Evolutionary scientists propose that exaggerated secondary sexual characteristics are cues of genes that increase offspring viability or reproductive success. In six studies the hypothesis that muscularity is one such cue is tested. As predicted, women rate muscular men as sexier, more physically dominant and volatile, and less committed to their mates than nonmuscular men. Consistent with the inverted-U hypothesis of masculine traits, men with moderat…
/r/TheRedPill26/02/17 11:16 AM
1

check out http://peaktestosterone.com forum, and the articles there. The 'normal range' that doctors and labs use is pretty ridiculous. Studies show that average testosterone levels have been dropping since at least the 80s, and probably since WWII, so the mean is low. To take a range of plus or minus 2 standard deviations from that and call it 'normal', that is a huge range, and it means levels that definitely should be treated are not. Remember that there are a lot of serious long-term health …
/r/TheRedPill24/02/17 06:27 PM
9

It's not anybody's fault that they're ugly and fat and nobody wants to fuck them. I beg to differ http://www.returnofkings.com/114644/27-attractive-girls-who-became-ugly-freaks-because-of-feminism Although it is true that feminists tend to be fat and ugly, not all of them started that way before developing their disease, and even those that were that way initially tend to emphasise their ugliness. Or maybe they can't do otherwise, the ugliness of their personality just can't help coming to the s…
/r/TheRedPill24/02/17 01:08 AM
7

I agree with everything you said, except this Feminism has a smiley face out front That made me laugh! Is there any group more strident, hate-filled, obnoxious, and just plain ugly than feminists? But I know what you mean. Feminists are vile, but they hide under the cloak of 'equality' and 'poor oppressed women', and so succeed in manipulating men into supporting them. I am surprised, though, at how often I look at web pages about feminist activities, that anti-feminism is really gaining ground,…
/r/TheRedPill23/02/17 10:52 PM
9

Well, she is made out as a heroine (not a hero, she is not a man) because she has adopted the feminist cause. Imagine if a man had gruesomely tortured and murdered a woman, spent many years in prison because of it, but then came out as a strong advocate of Men's Rights. On the basis of this, Trump had invited him to speak on a podium with him. What would the SJWs and Feminists have made of that? Yet they see no issue with having this vile specimen of inhumanity at their rally. It shows that femi…
/r/TheRedPill23/02/17 10:11 PM
30

Allow me. http://www.wnd.com/2017/01/womens-march-speakera-kidnapper-murderer/ https://i.imgtc.com/vMYOqhf.png To be fair, she did spend a good few years in gaol, although the amount was regarded as 'lenient', but she lies about it, acting as if her time in prison was because she was persecuted because of the colour of her skin. That she was invited to speak at the Women's March Against Democracy tells you everything you need to know about the morality of feminists. And yes, we need to turn this…
/r/TheRedPill23/02/17 09:32 PM
1

Thanks for the Dugin pointer, I'll look him up. Islam would not be any threat at all if the West was in a good state. Can you imagine it being considered any sort of threat in the 18th or 19th centuries, even the beginning of the 20th? As you say, the problem is the Left in its various forms, from Cultural Marxism to Feminism to Social Justice. The whole thing is now insane (which is not to say that the Left was always so, there was a real point to it but now it is off the rails). So, the West i…
/r/TheRedPill16/02/17 11:29 PM
2

Yes, I know it will, that's why I said there would be civil war 'long before then'. We are already seeing a rise in the militant Left shutting down free speech and attempting to stop free elections (which is what the continuing trouble over a democratically elected president, like the continuing attempts to undermine a democratic Brexit vote amount to). I see a rise in militancy on the Right in response to that, just as there was in the 20s, when fascism and nazism arose in response to the commu…
/r/TheRedPill16/02/17 07:32 PM
7

I'm really not into conspiracy theories, but I admit this whole situation is pretty weird. We have known for a long time now about endocrine disruptors and xenoestrogens getting into everything, from the plastics that people drink out of and put food into, to pesticides that are sprayed on our food, to stuff in the shampoos and cleaning products we use. So much of this stuff, including urine from women on the pill, goes into our rivers that now we find male fish with eggs in their testes. There …
/r/TheRedPill15/02/17 04:21 PM
9

Roosh was just writing about this, and I think he has a point. Testosterone levels, at all age groups, has been declining for some decades now, due to diet, sedentary occupations, phthalates and other endocrine disruptors in the environment. I cringe whenever I see young guys drinking water out of plastic bottles that they carry everywhere with them. Politics and culture are less masculine because men are less masculine. As he says, if we can't fix that problem then movements like TRP and the ma…
/r/TheRedPill15/02/17 03:34 PM
1

See http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/comm/haselton/papers/downloads/sexlies.pdf
/r/TheRedPill11/02/17 01:24 AM
1

I see, yes I can agree with that.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/17 10:11 PM
3

It is a very rare event where I disagree with you about anything, but I disagree with this bit: In a culture of toxic femininity We don't have a culture of any sort of femininity. Feminism isn't about femininity but the exact opposite. Feminists value only masculinity - but only when displayed by women. When displayed by men it is 'toxic masculinity'. Women are shamed by feminists for being feminine, nurturing, and submissive. For a long time, they were shamed for wearing a dress, they were supp…
/r/TheRedPill09/02/17 08:38 PM
4

Same. After a winter storm we tend to get trees down across the roads out here. I'm out in my truck with a chainsaw, and I meet other guys doing the same. Never seen a woman out there.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/17 03:50 PM
1

and ends up like Charlotte Proudman, yeah, it seems to go that way.
/r/TheRedPill07/02/17 07:20 PM
1

Yeah, these women are nasty, hah. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ghVSZNYPXtw
/r/TheRedPill07/02/17 04:07 PM
1

Very nice, I enjoyed it. There is one thing, something I noticed on the RPW sub a couple of times. There seems to be this growing myth that feminism became poisonous with 3rd wave, and 2nd wave (60s and 70s) was just about this thing called 'equality'. It is true that feminism became seriously deranged and self contradictory in 3rd wave, once they got behind islam (while at the same time saying feminism was needed because there were still oppressed women somewhere in the world, like, oh I don't …
/r/TheRedPill07/02/17 09:50 AM
28

Do not date women lawyers, not even if you are a lawyer yourself, is the main lesson for the rest of us. Never heard a good word about them as women. Naturally adversarial, almost certainly feminist, but with the addition that they know the justice system is strongly biased in their favour and they know how to abuse it.
/r/TheRedPill07/02/17 09:32 AM
3

I understand that BPD is extreme exaggeration of female traits, and autism is the extreme exaggeration of male traits.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/17 01:10 PM
1

it's possibly to find a decent man and be a feminist because I've already found one. Found him, and willing to betray him. I don't expect anything else, you are a feminist, and thus not interested in fact or reason. It is a characteristic. But don't be so sure you have won. For a long time men were convinced that feminism was really all about 'equality' but now the information is available for all to find. They can see for themselves that it is actually a female supremacist movement founded on h…
/r/TheRedPill03/02/17 10:09 PM
9

for most people, no. Before the internet, before the manosphere and this place, men sharing their experiences and their thoughts, most men would not work out what was going on, would not see through the facade that women, society, and the press present. That is what got us in this situation in the first place. If it was obvious and anybody could just work it out for themselves, the red pill would not exist, because no 'awakening' would be necessary. So, given how valuable it is, some people, at …
/r/TheRedPill03/02/17 09:50 PM
1

You support an ideological hate group, a group that is founded on hatred of men. You can try to hamster that away all you want, but it still leaves you as a feminist, and therefore an enemy of men. More and more men are waking up to this, and if you actually looked at the words and actions of feminists (eg in those links I have provided under this post) and still support them then you are devoid either of rationality or of any moral sense whatsover. It is no good saying 'I'm a good Nazi, I don't…
/r/TheRedPill03/02/17 09:13 PM
1

People can support Trump and also oppose him, agreed. I don't like him, but I'm ok with a number of his policies, although not all. Since I am not American I regard most of it as internal politics and none of my business. However, it is perfectly clear who are the ones using violence and intimidation here, and it isn't the Trump supporters. It is feminists who hate facts, which is why they do so badly in debates. It is why feminism is now destroying higher education. Did you see the Women's Marc…
/r/TheRedPill03/02/17 08:54 PM
1

You want support for single fathers, yet you support feminists. You are aware that feminists have long been waging a war on men, right? You sound young and naive, and the far left (remember that feminism is a branch of Cultural Marxism - if you don't know that, you should read up on foundational texts of both) has a long history of exploiting the young. When you say you want boys to be able to be feminine, well of course, as a feminist you would. How about boys being masculine and allowed to gro…
/r/TheRedPill03/02/17 08:41 PM
2

No, they weren't paid by Trump, they were paid by those damn Martians. Everyone knows there is a Martian plot to destabilise the United States. Or was that Russians? Who cares, it sure wasn't Liberals, it was just somebody who doesn't disrupt liberals and left wingers, and only protests against conservatives. After all, it takes a clever conspiracy to make liberals look bad. (do I really need a /sarc? Looks like Archwinger did)
/r/TheRedPill02/02/17 09:58 PM
3

I agree with that sentiment completely. You should try talking like that to feminist SJWs and see how far you get. For all the talk about Trump being a 'nazi' (I'm not American, none of my business who americans have as president), what is clear is that it is the left who are against free speech. It is Antifa and BLM who are the fascist blackshirts, the nazi Sturmabteilung. Ironic, really. But really, everyone needs to read 1984 to understand the left. Nothing is what they say it is, and usually…
/r/TheRedPill02/02/17 08:59 PM
1

yup. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6dnNGF4NaKQ
/r/TheRedPill02/02/17 08:27 PM
2

Indeed. Feminists have a very bad reputation, and it is very well earned. Feminazi is not a random idea http://www.angryharry.com/esFeminismandNazism.htm Any woman with a decent bone in her body should be deeply ashamed to be associated with that movement. And it seems most are; in the UK those who identify as feminists are around 7-9%. Add 10% to that for the USA - and the number is falling. Not even most women can stomach feminism, much to the credit of women. With the advent of the internet, …
/r/TheRedPill02/02/17 08:23 PM
18

Women does something, I do it back, she calls the police or threatens to. It's pathetic. Like they start a fight and then get the police to end it. Which is exactly what Erin Pizzey described, as a result of which feminazis hounded her out of the country. When she set up the first women's refuge, she interviewed the women, and found that they themselves were violent, and had often started the fights which they then fled from. Of course, that doesn't suit 'the narrative' it is supposed to be men …
/r/TheRedPill01/02/17 08:34 PM
6

I'm not american, don't particularly like Trump as a man (although so far no particular problem with his policies). What I have noticed is that for all the left-wing press about Trump supporters being 'nazis' it is the left that are behaving like nazis. It is the left who sent in agitators to Trump rallies, just like the Sturmabteilung did in germany. It is the left who beat up people, standing around crying 'bleed, nazi, bleed', or kicking the shit out of a woman for wearing a bracelet with a s…
/r/TheRedPill01/02/17 04:46 PM
3

It is a phenomenon that signals how female-centric our society has become, which in good part, I think, can be traced to a lowering of testosterone levels, and in part to a concerted attack on masculinity by feminists for the last few decades, and an increasing number of men raised by single mothers. Think of it, SJWs are emotional thinkers who don't care about logic, rationality or reality; they want to be the victims to engender sympathy and special privileges; they are perfectly willing to li…
/r/TheRedPill01/02/17 04:36 PM
1

http://hubpages.com/politics/Why-So-Many-People-Are-Against-Feminism
/r/RedPillWomen29/01/17 01:08 PM
8

Naw, they get to divide the property fairly with each taking a half. He gets the outside half.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/17 12:44 AM
17

Yeah, like arranging to meet a feminazi like Marilyn French, "All men are rapists, and that's all they are." You could totally relax and have a good time with her, right?
/r/TheRedPill27/01/17 12:42 AM
20

While I agree that men need to be great again, it is important to realize why men are no longer great. The basic reason is that great men came before us, and they shaped their environment to make it comfortable and soft and forgiving. But then the men that grow up in comfortable, soft, and forgiving environments take on those qualities themselves. Feminism is stupid. That women could convince themselves that they are 'strong' and 'independent' and 'don't need no man' is ludicrous - except in a s…
/r/TheRedPill26/01/17 10:31 AM
12

And lesbianism has always been at the core of feminism. "Feminism is the theory, lesbianism is the practice". Ti-Grace Atkinson I don't have any issue with gay men, but lesbians have long been a major part of the enemy
/r/TheRedPill26/01/17 10:06 AM
1

700 ng/dl, while not amazing, is likely not going to make problems for you. Although, it really depends on what your 'natural', 'youthful' measurement was. However, you could have that amount and still feel like shit if the amount of free testosterone is low, because of your levels of SHBG. Given you are not overweight there is a good chance your aromatase (and hence estradiol) is not too high (testosterone:estradiol ratio matters as much as total testosterone), but you may not have a lot of fre…
/r/askTRP24/01/17 06:08 PM
1

I don't know which country you are in, and it would depend on the individual doctor, but mine was very reticent about telling me the results, he would just scan down and say, 'normal...normal'. I had to do my own research to find out what the heck 'normal' meant, and get an independent blood test (it can be done pretty cheaply. It can be arranged so you go into a private hospital to have a nurse take the blood, but it can be done by post too, they send you a kit with a lancet and a heparinised v…
/r/askTRP24/01/17 06:04 PM
1

Wait, what? As I said below, 'normal' means nothing, it is a purely statistical exercise where a lab takes the mean of all results and +- 2 standard deviations. This from an aging, overweight population exposed to xenoestrogens, where average testosterone levels have decreased markedly over the last 20years. 8.1 nMol/L is extremely low, lower than the average 100 yo man. When he says 'normal is 10' he is saying that this is the bottom of that range for that laboratory, where that range includes …
/r/askTRP24/01/17 05:41 PM
8

People like George Soros fund riots to cause chaos. For those who don't get the reference: http://nytlive.nytimes.com/womenintheworld/2017/01/20/billionaire-george-soros-has-ties-to-more-than-50-partners-of-the-womens-march-on-washington/
/r/TheRedPill24/01/17 03:53 PM
2

I assume that the second use of the word 'unique' is unintentional? It is misleading at it reads. Perhaps 'ubiquitous' or 'common' might be a better choice. Another thing that gets touted is that hunting is often unsuccessful, and most of the food is brought in by women. This is supposed to promote the idea that men hunting was a frivolous sideline. Of course, hunter-gatherers are pushed into marginal habitats generally now (in fact, the San are often mentioned who live in the Kalahari, FFS), an…
/r/TheRedPill24/01/17 02:06 PM
5

Given your culture, there is no reason to hate, or even dislike, women. Yes, they have failings, as do men, and you do need red pill knowledge to better navigate relationships, but that is all. In the West the culture is different. We do have feminism - rammed down our throats, constantly. We do have a war on men. I know what you are saying, and it isn't just in this sub. I have seen more generally that men are actually starting to hate women. I thought that was next to impossible, given the con…
/r/TheRedPill24/01/17 01:55 PM
10

It is pretty amazing, reading about this anti-democracy march (I seem to recall women did get the vote some time ago, something we will live to regret). Feminists are sniping at each other about it, because it was seen as a 'white woman' march, and they now find themselves low down in the victimhood totem pole. But I have heard people talk about the 'terrible things' that Trump said about women. I listened to the tapes, and frankly there was nothing particularly terrible at all. So, some women w…
/r/TheRedPill24/01/17 01:26 PM
1

Have you had testosterone levels checked? If your doctor won't do it (although he should) then it isn't too expensive to do it privately. You can request the blood test through pharmacy2u.co.uk, or if you are in a suitable city where you can go in, then try something like bloodtestlondon.com. Beware of doctors telling you it is 'normal'. Normal means nothing at all, it is nothing to do with health but is just statistical. The lab has a 'reference range' where they put together all the results fo…
/r/askTRP24/01/17 12:00 PM
3

Like the 'bubble meditation', a 'Structured meditation' of the Inner Way. You imagine yourself sitting at the bottom of a clear lake. When you get a thought or feeling, you simply observe it for 5-8s, imagining it as if it is a bubble going up to the calm surface. Then you wait for the next one. The bubble visualization has two purposes, first to help you concentrate on each thought for a fairly well defined period of time, and second to help you consider each one separately, without being drawn…
/r/TheRedPill24/01/17 10:41 AM
2

Totally agree with you, I have been warning men to stay clear of feminists (and SJWs, 'activists' of any sort) for a long time, but want to clarify the terminology. You use the term 'soft next'. As I understand it (and following BlackDragon's use, for example), 'hard next' means you simply ghost her; you don't see her again, but you don't do a whole 'break up' scene with her (never worth doing that, giving her 'closure' as they say). 'Soft next' is a technique to use with a woman that you are in…
/r/TheRedPill24/01/17 09:55 AM
4

That's because your right hand is more intelligent.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/17 12:58 PM
12

well, it does damage women much more than men. In past times when men took responsibility for women they took steps to prevent such damage. But women decided they wanted to be responsible for themselves and not wanting to defer to men. Therefore, it is not immoral for men to let them decide, and men decide their own actions from their own point of view.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/17 12:56 PM
7

I think maybe you should have put quote marks around that. People are misattributing, hence the downvotes.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/17 12:53 PM
1

Feminism is Briffault's Law at the society level. Men protected women and provided for them throughout the ages. Built everything you see around you. Individually cared for women, worked to build or buy houses, pay for food, etc. Having made work much easier and safer post industrialization, men invented the birth control pill so that women could also choose to spend their time outside the home in nice warm offices if they wished. Result: 'I'm a strong, independent womyn that don't need no man!'
/r/TheRedPill18/01/17 11:53 AM
1

Sure, but closer to us than normal women: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01011/full But closer doesn't cut it. It must be galling, wanting to feel all 'equal' if not 'superior', yet so obviously not. Women have never created a civilization, but they have destroyed them from within, as they are doing now. While men came up with the arts, philosophy, the sciences, engineering, medicine, etc, women came up with fashion and gender studies. Everything around you with more t…
/r/TheRedPill18/01/17 10:19 AM
3

Feminism: when penis envy joins power hungry.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/17 10:08 AM
3

Exactly the problem, these women are broken. And if it was just you and her, well she is only a girl, so no problem, but it isn't, it is you against her and the State. Women like this are very free and easy with their version of 'the truth', they don't even know what it means. What is feminism but a pack of lies and distortions? Don't think for a moment that she won't try to use social media and the State to destroy your ability to work when she is no longer pleased with you. If all men simply s…
/r/TheRedPill06/01/17 11:15 AM
1

OK, but 'you aren't allowed to say no' is an ambiguous statement, I'm not sure what you mean (and I don't see that statement in this thread or in OP's post). She is allowed to say no, but she can only say no for herself, she can't say no for you. If she doesn't want sex that is fair enough, her choice, but you should never put yourself into a situation where she can just deny a man's basic biological need whenever she wants to. We all know that there are times when this is both genuine and reaso…
/r/TheRedPill05/01/17 12:07 AM
2

The door opening thing is real and isn't new, feminists have been doing it for a long time, all men are aware of it. I always used to open doors for women but stopped a long time ago (except old women, who are invariably polite in response). Similarly I used to always give up my seat, but stopped doing that too as you can be accused of 'sexism' (politely helping someone is hating them - go figure). I still open doors for men, because I have never even heard of a man being bolshie about it, but w…
/r/RedPillWomen04/01/17 11:47 PM
3

There has been an awful lot of blue pill thinking recently, and you are full of it. Yes, you tell her that her pussy belongs to you, I did exactly the same and she loved it, feeling that she 'belongs' to you. Does that make it rape? Of course not, if she says no, then as OP says you just go out and find someone that doesn't, because she can say no for herself but not for you. That is the exact opposite of rape, you are respecting her decision but not allowing her to decide for you. You play roug…
/r/TheRedPill04/01/17 11:32 PM
3

Exactly this. A woman could have sex with anyone she wanted, she didn't need to get married to do that, just find some good-looking cad and have it away in the nearest hedge. It was frowned on because any children would grow up without the protection and resources of a father, and it threatened other women because men didn't have to marry them for sex if they could get it for free from the sluts, but she could do it. Getting married meant she gave her sex to the man in exchange for his labour, h…
/r/TheRedPill04/01/17 11:17 PM
7

Jesus, what the hell are you doing here? You are as blue pill as fuck. What is the difference between being dominant and rape? Just go and read the side-bar before commenting again, because at the moment you are completely out of it. If you are not dominant (= masculine) with your women, then you are her bitch and she will play you all the way down. Rape is non-consensual sex. Being dominant, rough even, is not non-consensual, it is what causes the tingles in the first place. You aren't being do…
/r/TheRedPill04/01/17 11:10 PM
1

The point, I think, is that it is temporarily good for you. Previously, before the internet, men hadn't awakened to what a shitty deal they were getting, so they went ahead and got married as their parents and grandparents did. Now, some men are aware, so they get to play the game and enjoy the spoils of being single and not tied down. How long do you think that lasts? Yes Means Yes and British Columbia's 'marriage if you share a house for a while', nobel laureates being driven out of a job if t…
/r/TheRedPill03/01/17 10:51 PM
5

Hadn't seen the article, but this is what I have been talking about on a few posts recently. The feminist idea that women should be able to do absolutely anything they want, go anywhere they want dressed as they want, and no consequences. If there are any consequences it is men's fault. Point out that the woman was stupid and contributed to the problem and you are 'blaming the victim'. Well, time we all, as a society, went back to blaming the victim (which is not the same as not blaming the perp…
/r/TheRedPill03/01/17 04:40 PM
1

It is the fastest way to get from here to here. When you are going nowhere in life that has to be a good thing, right? \sarc I feel the same about the exercise bikes with programmed pretend hills. WTF is wrong with an actual bike that gets you out into the country with real air?
/r/TheRedPill03/01/17 04:26 PM
2

Agreed. Feminism, as a reflection of the worst aspects of female nature, and a manifestation of Cultural Marxism, is perhaps the main threat to the continued survival of Western civilization at this point. I just recently read Vox Day's book 'SJWs always lie', which does point to ways in which SJWs can be defeated (and SJWs and feminists are pretty much one and the same in my book). One of the points being that their world view is not based on reality, but on lies and distortions. Truth and fact…
/r/TheRedPill03/01/17 03:10 PM
1

Yes I have, twice. In both cases with guys whose marriage had become intolerable by the shitty behaviour of their wives, so they were past seeing women as innocent angels. One of them is now aware of the red pill, the other I have not mentioned it by name, but dropped a number of the concepts on him (such as dread, hypergamy, what women are actually attracted to, that he needs to work on his own life rather than concentrate on her, etc) which he has been extremely receptive to. So you can introd…
/r/TheRedPill03/01/17 01:54 PM
2

Yes, there are studies about conviction rate, but we can't expect to see any genuine studies about the number of false accusations, for the reasons I gave. The conviction rate can be spun, as you said, to be anything other than that most of them are false accusations.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/17 01:50 PM
2

Yes, Kanin was most interested in why they did it, rather than the actual percentage, but nonetheless he gives us the best minimum value we have (he actually found it was 41%, but that was the ones where the woman herself admitted that she had lied, which of course most won't). In the Oxford student union case it was because she slept with the guy while her boyfriend was away, and when he came back her girlfriends blabbed. So to cover her ass and save her relationship she claimed she had been ra…
/r/TheRedPill03/01/17 01:02 PM
5

It is no longer possible in the current climate to publish any honest reports on this matter. Feminist SJWs can even get rid of nobel prize winners (Sir Tim Hunt, James Watson) and the president of Harvard on completely nonsensical 'offences', so anybody who accurately reports these matters would never work in science again. The last, and probably only, reasonable study we had was that of Professor Kanin, who was the darling of the left until he published his study. He wasn't actually interested…
/r/TheRedPill03/01/17 12:31 PM
1

'all other car drivers were criminals by default', by analogy, is the feminist position, where 'all other car drivers' stands for men. Not too difficult, although the analogy is getting a bit tortuous at this point. You claim to have been raped, which of course we are entitled to be skeptical about, given that most rape accusations are false. The question is, if getting blind drunk and falling asleep led to it, have you changed your behaviour? Do you still go out and get as drunk as that? If you…
/r/TheRedPill30/12/16 10:17 PM
0

but I don't see you going off on anyone for getting in cars. I would have, if people involved in car accidents (which I have, and never in a case where I was at fault - two cases several years apart where someone rear-ended me while I was stationary) made out that all other car drivers were criminals by default. I would have, if they claimed that they need hardly even look at the road because it was the job of other people to avoid them. I would have, if they drove while drunk and still pretende…
/r/TheRedPill30/12/16 01:58 PM
1

The resilient thing to do in this situation is to avoid living with a woman. The anti-fragile thing to do is to invest in rented properties for singles, because whenever a law like this comes in there will be high demand.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/16 03:01 PM
4

There would be changes, nothing stays the same, but given the known psychological differences between men and women, I think we can be confident that socialism and the degree of government interference in people's lives would be nowhere near the power it has now in society without the support of women. An example recently is that Trump would have won by a landslide if only men voted. It is a problem that afflicts societies as they become prosperous for too long that men become weak and women gai…
/r/TheRedPill28/12/16 01:02 PM
4

http://www.safs.ca/issuescases/lynched.html Yes, academia has been totally taken over by this insanity. I reluctantly came to the conclusion about a year ago that giving women the vote was a huge mistake, inspite of the good intentions. After that, spiralling government debt, ever more left-wing governments, and ever more government interference in people's lives became inevitable. More recently, reading about what is happening in universities now, I came to the conclusion that letting women int…
/r/TheRedPill23/12/16 03:07 PM
4

Relevant: http://www.city-journal.org/html/campus-rape-myth-13061.html
/r/TheRedPill23/12/16 03:02 PM
2

This keeps coming around, this idea perpetuated in the media that the means are the same but the variance is greater for men, so that more women are average, but more men are both smarter and dumber, in equal amounts. No, there are not more men below 85, there are more below 40, due to a genetic defect in the X chromosome (fragile X syndrome), and those numbers are very small. Actually, there are more women at all points of the curve below the mean except for that blip below 40, and there are mo…
/r/TheRedPill23/12/16 12:17 AM
3

Zsa Zsa Gabor was something of a pioneer in this, married 9 times, and died a couple of days ago. The difference between her and a man is that she gained from each one. A few of her sayings: "A man is incomplete until he is married. Then he is finished." "I am a marvelous housekeeper. Every time I get a divorce I keep his house." "There is nothing wrong with a woman encouraging a man's advances, as long as they are in cash." "How many husbands have I had? You mean apart from my own?" (Just tryin…
/r/TheRedPill22/12/16 08:20 PM
3

I agree that both are a problem, but also that false accusations are a problem for real rape. But I guess we agree on this and needn't belabor the point. Where we disagree is your statement that 100% of false accusers come forward. It depends on your definition, I guess, but I think that it is actually safer for accusers to not report to the police, but only to, eg college authorities or a peer group, or your manager. We have seen this many times, and the effect is pretty devasting even without …
/r/TheRedPill21/12/16 10:50 PM
3

I think I see what you are saying, but I would disagree that real victims get proxy power through third parties. At least, they may have done for a while, but because of high profile false rape cases, they are actively working against real victims now, since we legitimately are more sceptical of women who make accusations. Kanin found that over 40% of accusations brought to the police were false, but he had tight criteria - they actually had to admit that they lied. Most won't do that. Coupled w…
/r/TheRedPill21/12/16 09:42 PM
7

No no, I am not at any time saying that if someone actually commits rape that this is in any way excusable. I am not saying we should be soft on rapists, absolutely not. But because you put a rapist in jail and throw away the key does not mean that therefore you should just ignore the actions of the victim (and yes, we are talking about actual rape victims here, not regret rape). There is a difference between saying that someones actions are stupid, and that they are a criminal. A rape victim is…
/r/TheRedPill21/12/16 09:34 PM
3

Yes, that is a problem. But you talk about rape victims, but the problem is all the women who are not victims but pretend to be. Once you have those, then the problem is society's response to them, which is basically to enable them, to the detriment of real victims. But yeah, feminists, looking to make political capital from rape cases, are a problem for actual rape victims
/r/TheRedPill21/12/16 09:26 PM
15

No, your argument doesn't hold. Because while it is certainly true that men do risky things like mountain climbing or skydiving, you will never hear a man who is injured doing these things claiming to be a victim whom society should protect by making mountains safer or the ground less hard. And we do think that he has nobody to blame but himself. If a man gets liver problems because of heavy drinking, again we don't think that it isn't his fault, that he is just a helpless victim. He brought it …
/r/TheRedPill21/12/16 08:37 PM
8

Perhaps the best solution is for feminists to be willing to place some blame on women: for them to start shaming the false accusations, so that true rape victims feel safe to come forward, so that the justice system and public isn't so skeptical of real rape cases (allowing rapists to get justly charged), and so that society can better appreciate the true reach of rape and harm caused. This is the crux of it, the fact that women are perfectly willing to lie about being raped, supported to the hi…
/r/TheRedPill21/12/16 08:23 PM
15

Nobody says the attacker should be absolved in cases of genuine, non-consensual, rape (how crazy has it become that we have to qualify that sentence now?). But that doesn't mean that the victim should not be publicly called out as a complete and utter eejit for putting themselves into a situation where it was bloody obvious to a brain-dead caterpiller that they should have simply avoided the situation. It is called 'acting responsibly', and god forbid that we should demand that women do that. I'…
/r/TheRedPill21/12/16 08:15 PM
1

I don't see WaW here, but the standard assumption that any trait we see must have evolved for a reason (although that reason may no longer exist (exaptation) and every adaptation likely has a cost). So, if women lose part of their grey matter, they pose the question, what advantage would that have given them? We say that women are the most responsible teenagers in the house, which is to say that (many) women are not fully adults in the way that men are, but not really children either (this gets …
/r/TheRedPill21/12/16 10:57 AM
3

Obviously the title is click bait. It is not true that all women lie about rape. It is true that a lot of lies are told about rape. The, ahem, 'statistics' about one in four, or 5 out of 4, or whatever it is in the current year, are clearly lies. Nothing surprising there, because the statistics come from feminists. Official statistics say the rate is 0.7% (slightly lower in college populations) in the US, but bear in mind that this includes successful false rape accusations. It also includes 'ra…
/r/TheRedPill21/12/16 10:04 AM
1

While I agree with your basic premise, I'm going to have to take issue with your semantics (sorry). You don't want to be fearless, you want to be courageous, big difference. Feeling fear in a situation of danger is an evolved response put there for your survival. Courage, doing something that you know needs to be done in spite of your fear, is the mark of a man.
/r/TheRedPill20/12/16 07:37 PM
1

Yes, Kate Millett was very explicit about this. They planned to bring down Western society in order to bring about a Marxist utopia. The way to do that was to attack the foundation of society - the family. And the way to destroy the family was to destroy the rock that the family was built upon, the father. Hence all the bile heaped upon 'patriarchy', which means the 'Rule of the Fathers'. There was an account by Millett's younger sister, Mallory, of what was discussed at their house in NY, which…
/r/TheRedPill18/12/16 07:15 PM
4

On the planet where the USA is, the one with the very high prison population. And before you say, 'yes but no decent woman is interested in an ex-con anyway', consider than a) innocent people go to prison, and b) many men are there because they cannot afford the child support payments mandated by the courts. In some states this is a significant percentage of the prison population. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2449454/More-men-raped-US-women-including-prison-sexual-abuse.html. This is …
/r/RedPillWomen18/12/16 11:34 AM
2

While, obviously, rape happens exponentially more to women Actually, more men than women are raped in the US, so it is indeed an 'ungendered' question. And otherwise agree fully. People have a right to decide what kind of psychological baggage in potential partners they are willing to take on, for all that feminists may want to shame men for not complying with their wishes.
/r/RedPillWomen16/12/16 07:13 PM
2

Standing up for themselves? Maybe not (but bear in mind that this is a common demographic on TRP, so some get it). However, standing up for yourself and avoiding pain when it is common knowledge are two different things. That marriage is a really bad deal for men now is pretty common knowledge, I think, even in the mainstream. BC's incredibly anti-male co-habitation laws are hardly unknown there, and that must have a reaction. The manosphere is a reaction to the Feminine Imperative and feminism …
/r/TheRedPill14/12/16 07:12 PM
14

This is old news, and feminists (we all know where these laws come from) think they have won, but in fact it just makes it worse for women. Because inevitably men react to these things. Men would get married and support their families as a matter of course, but then they changed the law to introduce no-fault divorce and unfair family courts. Result: men stop marrying (marriage rates are in precipitous decline). Women cannot get the security they crave, but instead are increasingly used as plates…
/r/TheRedPill13/12/16 03:28 PM
4

Where are you getting that from? This is false information: there is not, and never has been, common law marriage in England and Wales. In Scotland there was 'irregular marriage by habit and repute' until it was abolished in 2006 - the last European country to have such a provision. http://www.oneplusone.org.uk/content_topic/married-or-not/married-civil-partnered-or-not-the-legal-differences/ Common law marriages are pretty uncommon, they exist in just a few US states, some parts of Canada, Aust…
/r/TheRedPill13/12/16 03:17 PM
1

I highly recommend Gordon Inkeles. eg https://www.amazon.co.uk/Sensual-Massage-Couples-Gordon-Inkeles-ebook/dp/B003F76X9M or https://www.amazon.co.uk/Art-Sensual-Massage-40th-Anniversary-ebook/dp/B0029LIBCM
/r/RedPillWomen13/12/16 01:45 PM
3

Women's psychology, men's psychology, and the dynamics of interactions between the two would be a good subject matter for 'gender studies' in a true sense. Of course, what we actually have under that rubric is something completely different, a completely useless and false rework of history and society through a Cultural Marxist lens, tainted with a thorough hatred of men and masculinity.
/r/TheRedPill12/12/16 12:05 AM
1

Totally. It was his decision to get involved with her, but you make a decision based on the evidence you have, including what the other person tells you. If she is lying to this new boyfriend, how is it his fault?
/r/TheRedPill11/12/16 09:50 AM
13

Well, the core of TRP is basically Women's Studies as well as Men's Studies. The subject itself is a worthy one, it only becomes worthless because the ideas propagated by its exponents are totally at odds with reality.
/r/TheRedPill11/12/16 09:44 AM
2

If you go to the original external thread on how-to-learn-any-language.com I seem to recall that was discussed. I think it doesn't work so well (and I'm learning Japanese) just because the writing system is so different, it is hard to just scan across to the other column when you want to note a word that stuck in your mind. So I prefer to get on with the Kanji using Heisig and Assimil for the grammar and vocabulary, (and remember you need Hiragana and Katakana too). But it could, I guess. There …
/r/TheRedPill06/12/16 07:12 PM
2

I agree that there is no way to recover a civilization once it makes such a huge mistake, but then all civilizations go through a cycle, and ours is now firmly on the decline phase. As individuals, however, yes I think there is a strategy. To carry it out, you have to be aware that women are not so sweet and innocent as they pretend, that they are not completely on your side (they are in some things, but always be aware that they are looking out for themselves first when there is any conflict), …
/r/TheRedPill05/12/16 10:27 PM
10

So long as Amy Pascal has any power there it will. http://www.breitbart.com/milo/2016/05/05/heres-left-desperate-defend-new-feminist-ghostbusters/ When will companies learn that putting feminists in a position of power is a huge mistake? Yahoo, github, Sony, who next?
/r/TheRedPill05/12/16 07:57 PM
5

In the sense that so long as you are single and don't have a child you can decide (aside from taxes) what to spend your own earnings on, where you want to live, whether to have a child or not. Once she is pregnant you don't. She decides whether to have the child or not, and the courts decide that you are going to spend money on her and the child, even if she did so fraudulently. If the family courts took a reasonable view on this, making men's rights equal to women's, if they did not award child…
/r/TheRedPill05/12/16 07:48 PM
6

Yes, there are Yahoo discussions of how to sabotage condoms. And you are perfectly correct, men lie too. The difference is that the man will be forced to accept the consequences. Once she is pregnant he cannot get out of being held financially responsible, but she can. that is the big difference
/r/TheRedPill05/12/16 07:28 PM
1

If you do that raw, then you have potential health problems. If you don't, the cautious man puts tabasco or bleach into the condom once he is finished with it, same as always. http://www.mommyish.com/2011/11/23/woman-steals-ex-boyfriends-sperm-has-twins-sues-for-child-support-836/ http://forums.corral.net/forums/lounge/1137490-woman-claims-have-harvested-sperm-unknowing-nba-all-stars.html and I recall a case which caused the NBA to advise its players to always use a condom and to be careful with…
/r/TheRedPill05/12/16 07:01 PM
2

Indeed, but it is possible to buy sets that look all correct, but in fact they are all placebos.
/r/TheRedPill05/12/16 03:05 PM
1

As for sex and gender, they are not the same thing. 'Sex' is male and female. There are two, and only two, sexes in mammals, and they don't change, and they are not something you can just decide on. 'Gender' is masculine, feminine, and (in some languages) neutral. Applied to people of course there is something of a sliding scale, because some men are more masculine than others, some women more feminine than others, and either sex can show some of the behaviours more typical of the other. This ma…
/r/TheRedPill05/12/16 02:57 PM
17

by 'they' remember that this is not exactly a common thing, and I doubt the vast majority of women even know such things exist. But that doesn't excuse you from being careful, because you are on the firing line.
/r/TheRedPill05/12/16 02:53 PM
1

It is kind of curious how things have gone full circle, in some ways. Originally, taxes were raised by parliament and the king had the final say how they were to be spent. Naturally, people objected when the king suspended parliament because it would not support the war he wanted. This lead to the English Civil War, where the key phrase was 'No taxation without representation' (representation being parliament, which had been suspended). A hundred years later, the same phrase was used by American…
/r/TheRedPill05/12/16 02:51 PM
58

There are also fake birth control pills available, so she can take them right in front of you and then 'Oops!', well, they never said it was 100% effective, right? Say goodbye to your rights. http://www.webmd.com/sex/birth-control/news/20040205/fake-contraceptive-patches-sold-on-internet#1 http://www.thaivisa.com/forum/topic/825061-fake-birth-control-pills/
/r/TheRedPill05/12/16 01:17 PM
1

Lysenkoism. Unfortunately it has become more common since Stalin's time, not less, because science has an effect on political decisions, and therefore politicians make political decisions about what is 'good' and what is 'bad' science, often through funding decisions. It has the biggest impact on psychology (since this is directly to do with humans and social programmes, and also not coincidentally where women have made the greatest inroads into a scientific subject), in health (eg dietary recom…
/r/TheRedPill05/12/16 12:55 PM
4

I think your last point has been brought up several times, including by me. This is behind the idea that women are naturally machiavellian. I don't think that women are 'equal' overall, but they are undoubtedly superior in general in social intelligence, in the ability to work out how to manipulate people (in particular, men). This was necessary because they needed men to supply them with both protection and the high-quality food sources that hunting brought in, to supplement the lower-quality (…
/r/TheRedPill05/12/16 12:33 PM
2

In the US. This is not the case elsewhere so that is not universal. In the UK the basic principle was that those who pay the taxes for the running of the country get a say in how those taxes are spent (by voting for parties with different spending priorities). Income tax was an invention during the Napoleonic War, so before that it was land-owners and rich merchants that paid taxes, so they were the ones that voted. In 1832 the amount of land you had to have was reduced to £10 value, but that wa…
/r/TheRedPill05/12/16 12:17 PM
1

Finnish? Jesus, you are ambitious! Excellent work, it is a great asset. I'm studying French and Japanese, but once I have a reasonable handle on French was thinking of laddering Italian. For those unaware, laddering is where you study a third language using your second as the intermediary (ie, study Italian using French language resources, rather than English ones), so you improve L2 while working on L3. Sound reasonable to you? Italian a) because I love Italy, b) because of the culture, and c) …
/r/TheRedPill04/12/16 10:17 PM
3

So you probably don't need to stop and do any word-by-word parts, as you will have enough to get something out of many sentences. The idea is to understand at the sentence level initially, rather than at the word level. It is like when a child first learns a language. There are all these sounds that their parents are making, but they have context, they know that they are having a spoon with food put in front of them, say, so the sounds are likely to be about food, taste, eating. On this is based…
/r/TheRedPill04/12/16 11:09 AM
5

Whoever the first commenter is, you seem to be shadow-banned.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/16 05:55 PM
2

Same here. Although I love physical books (and the walls of a couple of rooms in my house are lined with them), a Kindle is a great invention. You can carry hundreds of books around in your pocket. You can go out into the fresh air and read in full sunlight, just like a book. You can take it on a trip with you and not have to bother with charging, because it stays charged for weeks. It remembers where you got to in each book, if you have several on the go at once (as I always do); and the books …
/r/TheRedPill03/12/16 01:10 PM
8

and it's why he associates Red Pill theory Don't blame this nonsense on a man, it is written by a feminist. Abi Wilkinson is a freelance journalist based in London writing about politics, inequality, gender, popular culture, and anything else that takes her fancy Apparently, 'corrective rape' is something that takes her fancy. As for politics, I guess I'm closer to Classical Liberalism than anything, and I don't like Trump, although I certainly think he was the better choice than Hillary, and a …
/r/TheRedPill29/11/16 12:14 PM
5

That being said the reason why this reporter included the concept of corrective rape in her article is because she has rape fantasies. I think this must be true. I have been on here a couple of years now, and also follow IllimitableMan and Rollo, and this is the first time I have heard the term 'corrective rape'. Nor have I read anybody advocating rape. Just a straw man argument that she pulled out of her anus. Standard feminist fare.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/16 12:04 PM
8

Mainstream media is a lost cause, which is probably why they are in financial difficulties. The Telegraph was an exception for a while. Unlike the Grauniad's 'Komment macht frei' the Telegraph's comment section was pretty much uncensored, which meant men on there could call out feminists on their bullshit. And they had people writing in the men's section that were unashamedly giving men's point of view on things related to women, rather than parroting the feminist line (which is all you see in t…
/r/TheRedPill29/11/16 11:55 AM
1

That most females get to reproduce while only highest quality males do is the ancestral condition, partially put aside for a while by religiously-enforced monogamy ('partially' because of cuckoldry, but that was a dangerous game). The result of what you are saying is that there is greater selective pressure on males than females, ie that men evolve faster. This was long the case, and basically why women are not 'equal' to men. They aren't because of the choices of their own female ancestors. It …
/r/TheRedPill28/11/16 05:26 PM
2

Men have different criteria for non-committed sex and commitment. This is basic. Men generally will sleep with any woman they are not actively repulsed by, but have much higher standards about women they will commit to. This is because before modern society and child support etc, getting a woman pregnant was no cost at all, but committing to parental investment was a very big cost indeed. Women get confused about this. Because a 8/10 will sleep with them they assume they must be at least this go…
/r/TheRedPill28/11/16 12:00 PM
2

And to my bias, no woman is ashamed[2] for having a high N-count. You are confusing shame and guilt. I don't think women feel guilty about sleeping with many men, they are just following a biological imperative to a) harvest high-quality sperm and b) use sex as a way to get a man to commit to her. She is ashamed at the idea of this becoming common knowledge, or more specifically at it becoming known to men - especially a man she is looking for commitment from. That would compromise the success o…
/r/TheRedPill28/11/16 11:53 AM
5

The biological term is 'arms race'. These things can lead both parties to places neither of them would prefer to go, but they play the hand they are given or lose. The seeds are all here for an epic arms race. We are mammals with internal fertilization and a long gestation period, and a very long period of neonatal care. This is too much for a woman to handle on her own, so she needs resources and parental investment from a man. At the same time, she wants the highest quality sperm to increase t…
/r/TheRedPill28/11/16 11:30 AM
1

I see the point. This was the defining document of the EU, and the EU wants to make it a criminal offence to criticise feminism (along with many other things). People generally have no idea where the EU is heading, nor where it intended to head (which is not the same).
/r/TheRedPill24/11/16 10:35 AM
12

Women hate accepting the consequences of their actions. It may not make a dent in the amount of lying in general, but I think it would make a big dent in the number of false rape accusations if they know they could go to gaol for it and go on a sex offenders register for life. A woman in the UK recently had a rape case dismissed, which was the 18th she had brought, all false. She is still walking around.
/r/TheRedPill23/11/16 07:56 PM
3

Something like the Zoom H2n portable recorder. You want something voice actuated that you can keep in your pocket. The same thing is being used by men in Canadian companies, if something on the MGTOW channel is to be believed. This is after a guy was accused of 'saying something detrimental to all women' or some such bullshit, at his company. He had actually said very little, and nothing but normal chitchat, to this woman. He would have been sacked, but he had this thing in his pocket, so he imm…
/r/TheRedPill23/11/16 07:48 PM
23

This is correct, and why there needs to be a separate offence of 'making a false rape accusation', different from attempting to pervert the course of justice, or perjury (should it have gone to trial). This is because we hold rapists as being particularly vile, they serve long sentences and go on a sex offenders register, and should it come out later it is not regarded as something like burglary or car theft. Therefore, what the woman is attempting to do to an innocent man is equally vile, and m…
/r/TheRedPill23/11/16 07:41 PM
34

I agree, frightening that 75% are not being treated
/r/TheRedPill22/11/16 11:35 PM
3

Spot on, as if nobody could see this one coming. If a person is a member of a legitimate hate group, and you are a member of the group they hate, why expect them to treat you well? Thus, making 'friends' with a feminist (or an SJW if you are white, or KKK if you are black) is just stupid.
/r/TheRedPill21/11/16 12:49 PM
3

It is true even on trivial things. eg when a woman RSVPs to a Meetup group, about 40% won't turn up, with no comment that she can't come or change of the RSVP. This has happened with men too, but only 2 in over a year, but with women it is pretty much every week. So I realized that for men hitting that button is a commitment, but for a girl it is just a reflection of the way she felt at that moment, and has no bearing on how she will feel on the day of the meetup.
/r/TheRedPill21/11/16 12:47 PM
1

I understand. It is getting to the third stage in the game of power that takes some time, thinking, and experience. In the first stage, because women are biased in favour of women, have greater social intelligence, are naturally Machiavellian, and men are biased in their favour, women win the game of power and men flounder. In the second stage, men become aware of the nature of women's power, and also of where their weaknesses lie, get tired of being taken for a patsy, and take to using their ow…
/r/TheRedPill20/11/16 12:19 AM
1

I don't think it is entirely about feeling entitled to preferential treatment. Women have had preferential treatment forever, because men have been happy to give it to them. This is part of our innate psychology, that while women have a very strong own-sex bias, men do not, they are biased in favour of women. Now, there are indubitably many annoyances about being with a woman; the shit testing just gets old, and her over emotional way of thinking tiresome. It is annoying that women so naturally …
/r/TheRedPill19/11/16 06:50 PM
22

Interesting, isn't it. Red Pill men have a higher opinion of women than feminists do, but we are the misogynists. Feminists are thought police. It was inevitable once women gained suffrage that society would degenerate into one where everybody has to be careful to think and say what is approved by a left-wing committee. Because women in ancient tribes would be dead if they were no longer supported by the tribe, just lion food. So the idea of conforming to an approved ideology is part of their ps…
/r/TheRedPill19/11/16 02:17 PM
1

I'm going to half agree with you. It is true that in general I have found women much less interesting, on an intellectual level, than men. In part perhaps because most highly intelligent people are men (a discussion we have had before here a couple of times), and for this and other reasons, the intellectual accomplishments that push society on tend to be made by men. However, that does not mean that intelligent and interesting women do not exist, I have certainly met them (admittedly in one of t…
/r/TheRedPill19/11/16 01:38 PM
3

There is a wonderful Peter Sellers film called 'Being There' that I recommend in this context. Peter Sellers plays a simpleton who was employed for many years by a rich man as a gardener. He was called Chance (the gardener). The old man died, and he was left homeless and with almost nothing, but was given a nice suit and coat in the old man's will. He wanders the streets, and a car backs into him, knocking him over. The car is owned by a rich woman, who seeing his clothes assumes he is also weal…
/r/TheRedPill19/11/16 01:04 PM
2

Believe what you want, but the Marriage Strike is real. Women may not want to accept not being married (which is understandable, it is a great deal for them, nothing but upside), but many will never have the choice. With Millenials, only around 20% will ever get married. Men have woken up to what a shitty deal it is for them. Feminism killed the goose that laid the golden egg, as it always does. In the end, women want stable relationships. Sure, get a contract with the State that will pay her fo…
/r/TheRedPill19/11/16 12:24 AM
2

Incorrect, there is not and never has been Common Law Marriage in the UK. It is only in a few US states and British Columbia (not sure about the rest of Canada, but BC introduced 6 months.
/r/TheRedPill19/11/16 12:18 AM
1

I understand, but feminism acquired its power by people (ie men specifically) paying attention to it. Ignoring the silly bints would have been a perfectly viable reaction. Right now, it is pretty much the only reaction on a personal level. Anyway, while I stopped reading his posts and comments a couple of months ago, I also know that having mods listen to me about it is not something that is going to happen, so I just remove the annoyance from my life. I'm perfectly happy for him to have his con…
/r/TheRedPill16/11/16 02:01 PM
1

You do know you can set reddit to 'hide' a user's contributions, right? That's what I did in this case some time ago, so I read little of your post here because I didn't want to bother reading those comments in the first place, let alone rehashed. No point getting worked up about it when there is a simple solution available to you.
/r/TheRedPill16/11/16 01:08 PM
3

That's not what it means. Larry King has been divorced like 23 times. He's included in that statistic. Think about it harder. OK, I have thought about it. The divorce rate for first-time marriage is just short of 41%. That is the number of first-time marriages that subsequently divorce (US figures, very similar in the UK). It is around 65% for second marriages and north of 70% for third and subsequent marriages. The 41% figure is skewed by the higher statistic for non-college educated women. Col…
/r/TheRedPill16/11/16 11:34 AM
1

No need to hard next unless her worth to you is exceeded by the trouble she causes or there is just a much better offer on the table. However, this behaviour does call for a soft next, of around 5-7 days. http://www.blackdragonblog.com/2016/07/18/16297/
/r/TheRedPill16/11/16 11:21 AM
9

It is indicative of where the Overton Window is right now that 'right' is always called 'far-right', but left is rarely called 'far-left'. If you think your country belongs to the people of that country, and others come with their agreement, in numbers they agree with, and they have to conform to your society, rather than you having to conform to theirs, for the betterment of your society, you are 'far-right'. But only if it is a Western country. In fact, every country in the world defends their…
/r/TheRedPill16/11/16 10:28 AM
1

Feminism jumped the shark long ago. They have an uncanny ability to do things that are supposed to be for women (nobody really believes they are interested in 'equality'), but which actually are not. Which is why, since the beginning of 2nd wave, women, who used to be happier than men on average, are now less happy than us. Feminists infantilise women, here because they need a special hotline and someone to hold their hand because somebody explained something to them. The result, of course, is t…
/r/TheRedPill16/11/16 09:33 AM
1

Totally, in fact I remember a woman died a year or so ago because of a stupid radio host making a water drinking contest. This idea that 'if you are thirsty you are already dehydrated' is just stupid. We are a tropical species, evolved on savannahs and rainforests of Africa. If it was actually true that our thirst mechanism was so inefficient that it wouldn't tell us to drink until we were in serious trouble (and being dehydrated in the tropics, before canteens and water bottles, and possibly mi…
/r/TheRedPill10/11/16 01:02 PM
3

want to see their lives improve, they should take a cue from the great feminist strides women have made and start to embrace that progress Oh hell! I have slipped into an alternative universe where feminism has made women happy and fulfilled, and feminists would love men to be free. How do I get back? http://archive.is/62ZFN https://theumlaut.com/2013/11/05/is-feminism-making-women-less-happy/ http://www.angryharry.com/esFeminismandNazism.htm https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k939Lzq4V68 https://w…
/r/TheRedPill07/11/16 11:15 AM
2

Except people didn't die of old age at 45. The average lifespan may have been that at some periods, but that is because child mortality from disease was so very high, and lots of women died in childbirth or men died in wars or from malnutrition. But if you were in one of the settled periods (not general war), and had a farm and made it past childhood, you weren't looking to live much less than now. And that is during the agricultural period. During hunter-gather times people were healthier becau…
/r/TheRedPill07/11/16 11:02 AM
8

I love it. Even if you are fat-shame-shame-shaming
/r/TheRedPill04/11/16 07:34 PM
1

It is pretty terrible that he is manipulating them. Women are totally against manipulating the opposite sex. Right? Uh... Right?
/r/TheRedPill02/11/16 11:47 PM
16

Is that what we are doing? I thought we were pointing out the utter hypocrisy of feminists. Nothing new there, of course.
/r/TheRedPill02/11/16 09:22 PM
23

The only reason men want it is because they will get screwed over. Men cannot escape the consequences of a pregnancy, but a woman can. If the condom breaks, she can take a morning after pill. If she doesn't realise the next morning, she can get an abortion. If she doesn't want an abortion she can have the child and hand it over for adoption. If she wants to keep it, the state will support her and go after the father for child support (ie, support for her). Once she is impregnated, the man has no…
/r/TheRedPill02/11/16 09:17 PM
46

What a bunch of wusses. Now, if it had been a trial for women, and a woman had killed herself and others had their fertility affected, they would totally have sucked it up and never once complained. /s But, as OP says, it wasn't the men who called it off, it was WHO.
/r/TheRedPill02/11/16 09:10 PM
1

I know what you mean. Been a while since I was at uni too, and I don't recognise what I am reading. And unfortunately, even elite universities are not immune to the nonsense. http://www.spectator.co.uk/2015/06/oxfords-new-feminist-hit-squad/
/r/TheRedPill02/11/16 07:33 PM
3

Then I guess I don't either, because you come across as exactly this. I have tried to answer your questions directly. Clearly you are asking something that I am not seeing. You asked, and I quote, 'what if he breaks up'. I answered this clearly, in a number of comments here. As far as divorce is concerned it doesn't matter who breaks it up, the law favours the woman, and this is why men are increasingly avoiding marriage. I have said that by default I think each should take out what they put in.…
/r/RedPillWomen02/11/16 07:17 PM
3

I'm advocating a personal legal agreement between them, therefore the details of it will vary between couples according to what they think is fair. Divorce is not fair, people have an opportunity to make it fair if they do not let the State decide for them. By default, I would say that each takes away what they brought into the relationship, plus a proportion of what each brought in during the relationship. Further, once the assets are divided there should be no alimony (either way, although in …
/r/RedPillWomen02/11/16 06:47 PM
3

I seem to be unclear to you, but I don't see where the lack of clarity is, because I have already answered these questions. You pick a particular case where the man cheated. We could equally come up with many cases where the woman cheated, and many others were neither cheated. The divorce settlement is not predicated on who did what. If family courts actually took into account who behaved badly in the relationship, and weighted the settlement accordingly, I would be much more in favour of marria…
/r/RedPillWomen02/11/16 06:27 PM
1

same thing. Regardless of who files for divorce or who behaved badly, the system is set up to penalize him and reward her. Why is it difficult to understand that this is unjust? And why would you be so opposed to making a personalised agreement that you both agree is equitable, rather than leave it to the state when you know that they are biased in favour of women? Oh, right, obvious.
/r/RedPillWomen02/11/16 06:07 PM
1

I want BOTH of us to have legal protections Me too. Of course you want to build assets together, and of course you BOTH should be in a position to be treated fairly if it doesn't work out, which a very high percentage do not. Even the much touted lower figure for couples with a degree is still around 30%. A one in three chance is very poor odds. Now if you are correct that you BOTH should have those legal protections, why are you in favour of marriage? That is not an equitable contract. Is there…
/r/RedPillWomen02/11/16 06:02 PM
2

Both men and women cheat. They can either decide to end the relationship because of it, or work through it. The question is, what happens if the relationship is ended? If they are married that means a divorce. If there is a divorce, then almost always the man will lose out and the woman will be rewarded, because the division of assets and alimony is not much influenced by the behaviour. Unless you have evidence to the contrary? She could cheat, or he could cheat. She could be abusive or he could…
/r/RedPillWomen02/11/16 05:52 PM
3

OK, nice try at playing on the emotions. 'Walking away from the child' 'no responsibility'. Nice. In case you missed it, the government will hound a father, married or not, for child support; in fact, in many states, a good proportion (I recall 17% but would have to recheck) of prison inmates are there because they cannot pay child support - not will not, cannot. Perhaps there are stats on how many women are in prison for not paying child support? I haven't come across any. Regardless of any agr…
/r/RedPillWomen02/11/16 05:27 PM
4

Not at all, we are arguing past each other. It isn't a matter of blame, since no-fault divorce doesn't require anyone to be at fault. The fact of the matter is that 9 times out of 10 women bring about the breakup of a marriage. Whether that is the man's 'fault' or the woman's 'fault' is simply irrelevant (almost certainly both of them anyway), because either way it is not the man's decision. Even in those few percent of cases when the man initiates the divorce, it still proceeds to the unfair be…
/r/RedPillWomen02/11/16 04:32 PM
2

Personal, but not emotional. It is a rational response to the situation we have. People divorce, the rates are not trivial, and the reason does not have to involve anything bad that the man does, thus he has no control and limited influence. Which doesn't matter if it is relationship between two people. It matters if the state is involved and makes the breakup inequitable. What women will increasingly face, going forward, is exactly the one that OP faces, that men are no longer willing to accept…
/r/RedPillWomen02/11/16 03:56 PM
3

Of course they have influence, but influence is not control. He cannot decide not to be divorce-raped except by refusing to marry legally. 'Reasonable justification' does not have to involve his influence either, but be due largely to outside influences. 'Blame' is not the issue, since with no-fault divorce it doesn't matter who is 'to blame', divorce-rape happens regardless. This is kind of personal for me right now, in that two of my closest friends are in marriages where their wives are behav…
/r/RedPillWomen02/11/16 03:26 PM
4

Yes, I agree with that, if they are in fundamental disagreement about what the relationship should be, then they need to separate. What I want OP to think about is her definition of 'marriage'. If it means a wedding ceremony and ring, she can still have that. If it means living together, she can have that. If it means what reward she gets for breaking up with him, then they are fundamentally in disagreement. However, child support is not something you can make a contract about (unlike alimony an…
/r/RedPillWomen02/11/16 01:13 PM
5

Exactly, and you have to ask yourself the question: what is the difference between being married, and being in the relationship that OP is already in? Is it that they can live together? No, they can do that. Is it that they can have children? No, you don't need a license to have children. Is it to have a loving relationship, go on holidays together? No. Is it to have a ceremony marking the start of the relationship? No, you can still have a ceremony. There is no difference in the relationship, t…
/r/RedPillWomen02/11/16 12:37 PM
5

He is objectively correct not to trust her, even though she has 'done nothing to him', because by that point it would be too late. MsSadieDunham is absolutely correct, just about every couple started marriage with the man trusting the woman enough to marry her, and her not showing any signs that his trust is misplaced. Yet, in a shockingly high percentage of cases she changed her mind. This is the reality of the situation, and it is stupid to pretend it doesn't exist. We have to realise that the…
/r/RedPillWomen02/11/16 12:15 PM
3

it is about the attack on masculinity, and specifically the way that masculinity affected growing children via the father role. This past century has been about destroying 'the patriarchy', but patriarchy means 'rule of the fathers'. Now, the role of the father in the family is undermined, the media ridicule them, the woman is supposed to be his 'equal' (read: calling the shots), he is not allowed to discipline his children because that would be 'abuse', and very often he is totally absent, leav…
/r/TheRedPill02/11/16 11:37 AM
3

Seems that way. Listen to cupcake here screaming at a college professor: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3308422/Students-rage-professor-sent-email-telling-students-just-look-away-offended-Halloween-costumes.html He is supposed to make the university 'a place of comfort and home for the students'. No sweetie, that is called 'home', living with your parents. His job is to educate and ease you into dealing with the world, not coddle you and treat you like a 6 yo girl who is afraid of what …
/r/TheRedPill02/11/16 11:15 AM
4

Yes, exactly like that. Case in point: soccer player Ched Evans. For those not aware, the background is basically that a young woman slept with two professional soccer players, came out the next morning and texted her friends that she had 'scored big'. She went to the police to report that she had lost her purse, that is all. The police asked about the circumstances, and when it came out that she had slept with these two guys they asked whether she had consented. At this point her anti-slut defe…
/r/TheRedPill31/10/16 09:47 PM
12

Try treating women like they are their own person and see how far that gets you. That is the default blue pill position, we already know how far that gets us, and where it leads.
/r/TheRedPill30/10/16 01:23 PM
5

I am certain if I had different experiences socialising, and been pushed towards masculinity, I would never have come to question my gender identity, and developed normally into a guy. This is an interesting point. As you say, the old nature/nurture wars are really over, and we know that both play a part and interact. It isn't 50:50, but there is generally an interplay. Our culture now tends to punish men for, or inhibit men from, displaying masculine attitudes and behaviour. At the same time, i…
/r/TheRedPill30/10/16 01:14 PM
2

Very interesting, thank you. On your point 5, I recall reading this: The taboo also impacts women (and other men) by discouraging them from listening to the man’s emotional pain, his neediness or his dependency. In my years of working with couples in therapy I have very rarely seen a woman who routinely listened to the emotional pain of her male partner. Think purple polar bear. Very rare. Women do often claim that they want a man who is in touch with his feelings but if you scratch and sniff yo…
/r/TheRedPill30/10/16 12:59 PM
3

You will go far with that attitude.
/r/RedPillWomen26/10/16 06:27 PM
7

I feel like a silly little girl, but I'm really hurt and angry. Any advice? Am I blowing things out or proportion? Yes. Either you grow up, or he drops you. Pick one.
/r/RedPillWomen23/10/16 11:24 PM
2

I know exactly how you feel. The more I learn about women the less I like them, that's for sure. On the one hand we have a lot of spoiled, entitled bitches who actually do evil to men without a care (eg the false rape accusation epidemic, and feminists generally), and those don't really deserve any kind thoughts from us, anymore than a man behaving that way would. On the other hand, there is just basic women's psychology, as this book goes into. When I compare with male psychology, for all its f…
/r/TheRedPill21/10/16 02:52 PM
4

Yes I see that, but whenever I hear someone talk about 'sacrificing their career' and how the man should recompense her for that, I think they forget a couple of things. First, they are her children too, and she got to spend lots of time with them when he didn't. Second, he has already paid for that time. Unless it was somebody else that was paying for the house she lived in, the food she ate, the clothes she wore, the holidays she went on, etc. Money spent on her was not spent on himself, which…
/r/TheRedPill21/10/16 02:37 PM
3

If you want a good girl..... Get out there and earn it, one day at a time....before you know it, you'll be looking right at her and you'll know what to do. You heard it here first. Guys, there really is a unicorn out there waiting for you, you just have to make yourself good enough for her. And no need to read anything on how to handle her or the relationship, you can just trust her. </sarc>
/r/TheRedPill21/10/16 02:26 PM
3

Pure gold. Bought it straight away. Thanks for the steer! Interestingly, I wrote in a comment just a few days ago that women suck at relationships, even though they generally think they are good at them (and certainly better at them than men). This book brings out exactly why they suck, and why they can be so exasperating to deal with.
/r/TheRedPill21/10/16 12:26 PM
8

If she got to skip off working for a few years and spend time with her own children, that is not a sacrifice, that is a privilege. If she wants money from him for being his wife that is fine, but in return she has to act like a wife. Having a man pay to have a woman NOT be his wife is totally fucked up. If she leaves, she leaves. There should be no alimony and no child support. The divorce rates in the Western world are what they are because we incentivize women to break up families, instead of …
/r/TheRedPill21/10/16 12:04 PM
2

May I suggest reading OP's post again, because you are making the same mistake that he used to do. But this time it is worse, because you never bother arguing with feminazis, they are simply not worth your time or effort. Who cares whether she agrees with you or not? Who cares what distortions of words like 'abuse' she wants to use? Feminists are not well, but it isn't our job to fix them. Keep in mind a couple of things that we know about women. Women think they are the experts on relationships…
/r/TheRedPill18/10/16 08:38 AM
1

How on Earth can anyone possibly expect them to be grow up and become rational adults after this kind of exposure? Well, to be fair, the chances of this happening were always pretty slim.
/r/TheRedPill17/10/16 11:40 AM
6

In many ways, yes. It is declining in support amongst women, but it has not abated in its influence on politicians, company managers, the media, or university administrators. In some of those, at least, it is getting ever more extreme, and women are not exactly being vocal in their disagreement. Also, although a formal identification with radfems may be declining, feminist toxic ideas have affected women even when they say they are not feminists. To the extent that the general quality of women, …
/r/TheRedPill17/10/16 08:05 AM
1

and the biggest fans of 'I'm a victim, and it is all men's fault'. I stand by what I said, they don't deserve a relationship with a man, leave them to the lesbians, and they are a threat point to your liberty.
/r/TheRedPill17/10/16 07:30 AM
2

That's what I do, I put things like articles or the Ki Book Club summaries into the research section of a Scrivener doc, and write my own chapters that bring together the various insights. You could also do this is in something like Devonthink Pro, or use Notetaker to make hierarchical notes. I also put my summaries of some subjects (such as Stoicism) into collection pages in by bullet journal.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/16 10:46 PM
1

Not at all; feminism is a blue pill ideology, but you don't have to be a feminist to be blue pill. In fact, most women are not feminists (even though inevitably influenced by it in the West), and even men who have no regard for it at all nevertheless don't know how interactions between the sexes actually work. Just because a man doesn't believe in 'microaggressions' and 'wage gap' and 'patriarchy theory' or any of that bullshit doesn't mean he understands what women actually look for in men, or …
/r/TheRedPill16/10/16 09:57 PM
4

Well, that is feminism rather than bluepill, but I agree entirely, and have said so here on several occasions. First, no feminist deserves a relationship with a man anyway, having essentially declared herself an enemy of all men; second, you never know when they are going to pull some crazy-ass bullshit on you like this. And you just know people will believe her, no matter how crazy. Just not worth the hassle.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/16 03:24 PM
6

The Labour Party already has women-only selection lists. Yes, in some constituencies you cannot vote for a man to represent you. There was a big fight about this is South Wales a year or two back (Merthyr Tydfil, if I remember right), where the rank and file members would not accept this diktat from the party. There are no constituencies where you cannot vote for a woman, they can stand for any election. Well, feminists and their enablers have at least told me that sexism is perfectly fine. Sinc…
/r/TheRedPill14/10/16 09:57 PM
15

And because the Director of Public Prosecutions is a feminazi https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-TRPl2lQ1GA. Such people should not be allowed anywhere near the criminal justice system or the legislature. She has been actively pushing the police to bring more 'rape' cases to court, which basically means more false rape accusations taken seriously, since any claims that had credible evidence were already taken to court.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/16 09:44 PM
23

I don't get it, why on earth did he apologise? There was nothing to apologise for there, I was expecting loads more than that. And 'in case anyone is offended', what? Come on, let's stop this 'everybody has the right not to be offended' bullshit. This started in the '90s as a tactic by Muslims (in Britain at least). It was a way of controlling other people, and still is. Since islamic rules applied only to muslims, but they could pull the 'I'm offended' card to make other people comply with them…
/r/TheRedPill08/10/16 09:20 AM
12

I like how it is hosted by the 'men' in the Women's Center. That is plain speaking at least, because they sure ain't women.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/16 06:41 PM
14

Men are starting to push back: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3812787/Don-t-patronise-Freshers-university-s-sex-consent-class-stage-protest-walking-disgust.html
/r/TheRedPill03/10/16 05:32 PM
11

how long did her three degrees take? She should be paying alimony for that length of time, not just four years. Oh, you mean he pays?
/r/TheRedPill03/10/16 04:48 PM
6

Well, they couldn't make the misandry and left-wing feminazi roots more obvious. They are so confident that people will lie down and take this without protest that it just isn't worth being sneaky about it anymore. And certainly, what is optional now becomes compulsary tomorrow, like the 'rape education' classes that everybody is supposed to take. But markets speak. If it is publicised enough and enough men don't go to this university, they will be overpopulated with women taking bullshit soft c…
/r/TheRedPill03/10/16 03:59 PM
5

Yes, we have disagreed on things in the past, but this is a quality post with new material that I was not aware of. Nice, hope to hear more like this.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/16 11:06 AM
6

Ditto, this bullshit just wasn't a thing. I remember first hearing someone say 'but is that politicallly correct?' in the late '80s. We just laughed at them. 'What are you, the Politburo?'. The idea that we should constrain what we are allowed to say or think according to some left-wing idea of 'correctness' was just ludicrous. Now, people seem to actually take it seriously, since sometime around 2009 I think. I still find it hard to get my head around numbskulls who can claim to have PTSD from …
/r/TheRedPill02/10/16 09:08 AM
7

Oh, is that how it works! I always wondered what they meant when they talk about someone 'caught' cheating, it is like an STD. Got it now.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/16 12:05 AM
2

Correct, multiculturalism has historically been disastrous, a cause of much violence in society, and all too often the cause of their failure. Some are aware of this: http://archive.is/bNwzT it seems the EU project is coming apart at the seams in so many ways.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/16 12:03 AM
9

Respect his wishes. Exactly. Alternatively, go on a feminist sub, where they will tell her that her past choices don't count, and he is not allowed to have standards or choices anyway. 'Get him to see past this' means 'get him to drop his standards'. This is exactly why the ladies here advise against sleeping around, but waiting until you have some sign of commitment. You can't take it back, and yes, it does matter.
/r/RedPillWomen01/10/16 08:37 PM
3

Women will marry because it is a huge win for them. Men wake up to the fact that it is just state-sponsored theft and they can trust no woman to not make full use of it, so they stop marrying. Then, whether 'most girls are going to want to get married' or not is irrelevant, they don't have a choice. Only when it hurts women will the law change, as it needs to for the good of society. For reference, marriage rates are down over 40% in the UK since 1970 (start of 2nd wave feminism), and in the US …
/r/TheRedPill01/10/16 10:51 AM
1

The research says that women lie about how many partners they have had (understating it), and men also lie (overstating it). However, the degree of the lie is more for women. So a better one may be x3 for women and x0.5 - 0.75 for men. I think (but don't recall a source for this and may be wrong) that women are more likely to lie about it to men, and men are more likely to lie about it to men too.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/16 09:28 PM
1

I said that he wasn't a captain. I said that she should not take a view that she was stuck with him because she was 31. However, that decision is neither yours nor mine, and since she says she wants to stay with him, then if she does she needs a strategy for that too. However, I have a feeling that we have interacted before. I recall someone in this sub having zero reading comprehension and just making arguments for argument's sake, perhaps that was you. Easily remedied, I'm fortunate in not hav…
/r/RedPillWomen29/09/16 09:20 PM
2

So, I have advocated the idea that she should consider him a good captain? Funny, I thought I said the opposite. I said she should not bother going back on meds? Funny again, I don't remember saying that at all. Maybe you should address your concerns to her, rather than an imagined disagreement with me.
/r/RedPillWomen29/09/16 07:43 PM
2

So, do you think you are disagreeing with me? I said the same thing in my first comment to this post. In my second I encouraged OP to have a more abundance-mindset rather than thinking she is stuck with this man. But I am not in the business of telling people how to live their lives, I analyse and provide alternatives. If OP is determined to stay with him, as she says, then some insight into what brought about his change of attitude is necessary, and an idea of how to use that. I also don't thin…
/r/RedPillWomen29/09/16 06:14 PM
1

Whether you lose weight, gain weight, or stay the same, is simple. Calories in - calories out = calories added (or lost). The theory behind this is so simple. Although in theory there is no difference between theory and practice, in practice there is. If it was easy and simple to actually do it, we wouldn't have an obesity epidemic, because nobody likes being overweight. The percentage of people who fail at following weightloss diets makes depressing reading. You can't go through life eating let…
/r/RedPillWomen28/09/16 12:15 PM
9

I think I need to say something about this. Generally, TRP is not a good sub for women, it is for men, and men have different needs and responses. It can be pretty rough and cynical, but for guys that is fine, they need to have a fire lit to bring about the kind of changes they need, to break out of BP conditioning and the Women are Wonderful effect. Also, the ideal relationship for a man is not the same as the ideal relationship for a woman. RP theory still applies, but stay here to read about …
/r/RedPillWomen28/09/16 10:05 AM
1

So you think it might be a perceived trust and loyalty issue? That there may not have been any issue in the way you acted around him, but he perceives that there is an issue with the way you are acting around others, specifically in giving privileged information (that could cause big problems for him) to an outsider. Perhaps the medication per se isn't the issue, it is the therapy, and what you might divulge. That is why he wanted you to come to him with your problems rather than a therapist, he…
/r/RedPillWomen28/09/16 09:20 AM
10

Hearing the story from your side, it doesn't make sense. He urged you to see the doctor, he praised you for staying on top of your medication, then suddenly switched and said you were lying around popping pills all day. Something happened between the second and third state that we are not hearing. We have heard about how you felt so much better, but how were you acting (not so much at work, but with him)? But regardless, you call a man 'your captain' because you trust him to look out for you. So…
/r/RedPillWomen28/09/16 08:48 AM
1

Given what we know about how disastrous it is for children to be born to single mothers, I don't understand why we are supporting this, rather than discouraging it by placing such children with foster parents. Anyway, on the thought crime front, and the way we are going with 'social justice' and so on, I have just started reading Friedrich Hayek. I'll read The Road to Serfdom next, but right now I have started reading The Essential Hayek by Donald J Boureaux. Thought provoking so far. Being a co…
/r/TheRedPill27/09/16 07:30 PM
1

You might get the impression that this is a silly, socially programmed 'stiff upper lip' that is actually unnecessary. You might think that men would do so much better if they just opened up with their emotions and talked to women the way women do when they are upset, but this isn't so. There are good reasons bred into men for not doing this. http://menaregood.com/wordpress/the-invisible-blue-taboo-the-burden-of-boys-and-men/ The author here thinks this is 'conditioning' that can be 'dismantled'…
/r/RedPillWomen23/09/16 11:27 PM
3

They have huge penises too. I assume you are referring to wrestlers. Gorillas have small penises 1.5", smaller than us (I hope!). Sperm competition is a powerful thing.
/r/TheRedPill23/09/16 06:18 PM
4

and what is wrong with making sure you tell me before you kill my baby Had a discussion in the comments for a newspaper article once (they have stopped allowing comments, too many people trashing feminists as the hate group it is - not what the advertisers wanted to see). This women told me how it was totally true that women had been oppressed all through history, because, she said, in Roman times a woman would give birth and had to bring the baby to her husband who would decide whether it lived…
/r/TheRedPill23/09/16 06:11 PM
8

Not only read people like her, but are people like her. Jesse Phillips, Harriet Harman, Yvette Cooper, and so on. There is a basic problem with the degree of women's bias towards women which makes them largely unsuited of positions of political power. Congrats on the endorsed tag, btw. Well deserved.
/r/TheRedPill23/09/16 06:04 PM
12

While I agree with all of this, there are two points that could be brought out more. The only reason women have any power at all is because men play along. Men allow them to have the illusion of power. Yes, but why do they play along? I think there are two parts. The first is that men are by nature biased in favour of women - almost as much as women are biased in favour of themselves. That is, men's bias in favour of women is not counterbalanced by women's bias in favour of men (which is not pre…
/r/TheRedPill21/09/16 06:16 PM
2

They are NEVER happy. True, but they were consistently happier than men. Since 1970, however, women's happiness has steadily decreased, so that now they are less happy than men, and huge numbers are on anti-depressants. Women have been sold a crock. They think that it is 'brave women fighting for their rights' but in fact it succeeds where it does because of support from government and big companies, looking to keep men down, and just using women as another way to do it. They also get to keep do…
/r/TheRedPill21/09/16 09:53 AM
1

Those at the head of feminism understand that the more that they make it impossible to have healthy relationships across the sexual divide, the more hearts and minds they will capture, It is true that destroying relationships between men and women has been a core concept of feminism from the beginning. Feminism is an outgrowth of cultural marxism (https://alettertothetimes.wordpress.com/2009/03/11/the-frankfurt-school-and-cultural-marxism-a-primer/), and if you read about Kate Millett and her 'c…
/r/TheRedPill21/09/16 09:37 AM
2

Thanks for the rational discussion. All too uncommon, even around here sometimes. It is pretty tragic that something so basic about humans is also something you can no longer investigate without committing career suicide. This has been going on for some time, but got much worse since the 90s. I'm a scientist, and I really don't like the direction that science is going in in some fields now. It used to be that you would get tenure specifically because people understood the need to give the invest…
/r/TheRedPill21/09/16 09:28 AM
17

What do you think of the red pill? Don't know, I'm pretty healthy. Last time I took some meds it was antibiotics, but I don't think they were red.
/r/TheRedPill19/09/16 09:46 PM
1

I'm surprised that that page, particularly the 'graph' (hand-drawn on a napkin) didn't raise alarm bells for you, because it just rings totally false. Looking at that, it appears that in fact women have higher average intelligence, and in fact are markedly more intelligent apart from a tiny number at the upper extreme. The article is drawn from two studies, one at the University of Edinburgh on IQ tests from middle of last century at 11yo (at the time of the 11-plus exams for selection for gramm…
/r/TheRedPill19/09/16 08:51 PM
3

there are women-only tournaments, but no men-only tournaments. Care to guess why? Because men are not at all fazed by the idea of competing against women, they can win anyway. As for the study, are you convinced by that? I certainly am not. It does point out that the top female player, Judit Polger, is an extreme outlier, and the only woman in the top 100. Remember, Polger was an experiment, brought up specifically to do well in chess, and she never made it passed 27th against men that did not b…
/r/TheRedPill18/09/16 06:54 PM
2

depends on what you call 'idiots'. It is put that way to deliberately confuse people, to make them think that although men's curve is above women's above the mean, it is also higher below the mean, whereas women have a higher curve at the mean. This isn't the case, see my answer above. If you mean, 'have a genetic defect' so that their IQ is below 40, yes men dominate here, but this is a very small proportion of the population and doesn't skew the statistics.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/16 06:32 PM
2

This one again. There are more male geniuses, but it isn't symmetrical because although men have a higher variance in intelligence, they also have a slightly higher mean. See the graph on this page https://rgambler.com/2014/05/02/why-do-more-students-get-more-first-class-degrees-at-oxford-university-than-female-students/ Also http://www.sciencevsfeminism.com/the-myth-of-equality/sex-differences-general-intelligence/
/r/TheRedPill18/09/16 06:30 PM
5

Yes, this attitude is becoming more common. but the real news is that the true cost of feminism, first born by men, and then by children, is now being passed on to women. As it should be, of course. https://voxday.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/the-bitter-harvest-of-feminism.html
/r/TheRedPill18/09/16 06:12 PM
5

Alan Garner and Patrick King are two authors who have written a fair amount about conversation, eg 'Conversationally speaking: what to say, when to say it, and how to never run out of things to say'. I agree with the guys that most girls are rather boring to talk to. There are two parts of that: solipsism, and subject matter. Women talk about things that interest them rather than what interests their conversation partner, and what interests them is too often banal. As in so many things, this is …
/r/RedPillWomen18/09/16 05:38 PM
1

no one really knows where it comes from No, we know precisely where it comes from, that was the point of my comment.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/16 04:30 PM
3

Incest avoidance mechanisms are common amongst animals, not just humans. The evolutionary reason is the greater likelihood of genetic defects showing up, thus reducing fitness (in the Darwinian sense). In animals that live in groups this often takes the form of one sex being driven out of the natal group as they approach maturity. For example, in lion prides, the females in a pride are closely related, but unrelated to the males. As the cubs grow up the females remain, but the males are driven o…
/r/TheRedPill18/09/16 10:51 AM
1

I would be very interested in your source for this. Quite tricky to pin down, given that women lie by lowering the number, and men lie (to a smaller extent) by increasing their number. I have heard it bandied about that there is a problem with oxytocin receptors, but I have failed to find any study that actually confirms this.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/16 10:24 PM
3

Want an LTR without a dead bedroom? then you know you need to work on your alpha traits, like being fit and dominant. It is the other way around, he said.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/16 07:52 PM
6

Then she isn't responsible for all that 'dirty' sex, things she couldn't admit to wanting. Of course, the 'rapist' in the fantasy is not some fat neckbeard creep, but someone tall, handsome and well-built who just desired he so much that he couldn't stop himself. I agree, it is domination masquerading as 'rape'. Especially in a feminist culture where submitting to a man is a huge no-no.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/16 08:47 PM
2

Well, I have long thought that, with the advent of feminism and the effect that that has had, the quality of Western women probably hasn't been this low for over a thousand years - in fact, probably not since late Roman times. In the interim, women needed men (directly, they still need them indirectly) too much to behave the way they do now, or look the way they do now. But when prostitutes are some of the highest quality women around in terms of looks and attitude, it really shows how low the b…
/r/TheRedPill14/09/16 12:44 PM
2

What I am trying to do is inform you that your writing gives an impression of you that does not work in your favour. We are all looking at our weaknesses and working on them, this is one of yours. Being in good shape is important, and probably more important than this for many women, but I can see this would hold you back, unnecessarily. Semicolons have become little-used, but apostrophes, commas, and periods have not, it is just high school stuff. Just replacing your ellipses with periods and t…
/r/TheRedPill03/09/16 07:26 AM
3

Some women can hold interesting conversations, I have certainly met them; most cannot. Then again, here we have a guy who seems to have main-lined e e cummings and uses 'like' and doesn't understand what an apostrophe is for, let alone a semicolon, so here is my thought: water finds its own level. Do yourself a favour, learn English grammar. By writing as if you don't know when to use capital letters, nor any punctuation other than the ellipsis, you make yourself look illiterate. That is not a g…
/r/TheRedPill02/09/16 09:16 PM
2

Yes, not really an issue. What degree people get is a rather poor indicator anyway. It used to be, in the UK, that a rather small (elite, if you will) proportion of people went to university and got degrees. Now, the world and his dog does, it means very little. For my first degree I was astonished at a couple of the students (girls, as it happens), who I thought were below average IQ, taking the course. They did ok, I think, because they worked hard at it. I didn't; never revised, never 'worked…
/r/RedPillWomen02/09/16 08:46 PM
3

I'm finding a Bullet Journal is a great way to track these things, both in advance so I know what I'm doing, and to give myself the satisfaction of seeing them ticked off, so I feel like I am making progress. Apart from adding the bullets in the daily pages, it means if I don't get to do it there is a mechanism called migration so it doesn't just get dropped, but rescheduled. Also, in the monthly, I like to make a table for habits I'm looking to develop (or stop), and again there is something co…
/r/TheRedPill01/09/16 02:39 PM
35

This is more like it. Practical, backed up by personal example but with a principal extracted from it. Not hating, just 'this is how women are, learn to deal with it'. Hope to hear more from you.
/r/TheRedPill01/09/16 09:54 AM
0

Your earliest comment was sensible enough, but get out of here with the neonazi bullshit. If anyone didn't want to be a part of the team, the Gestapo was there to lend a helping hand, right? Because it was such a loving community. You can keep the anti-semitism, too. This degrades TRP into utter garbage.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/16 07:46 PM
3

While certainly correct, in that feminism is an outgrowth of Cultural Marxism not fascism, this is horseshoe politics, I guess. Both ends show similar totalitarian themes, both involve the state controlling people's lives to a very high degree http://www.angryharry.com/esFeminismandNazism.htm. But there are other ways in which they are not the same, as you point out. If you have ever read some of the seminal 2nd wave works, like The Female Eunuch or Sexual Politics, the Marxist roots are abundan…
/r/TheRedPill31/08/16 06:17 PM
13

She is a modern, feminist woman. Oh, sorry, you already said that. It really does show that honour and justice are masculine concepts when you read something like this, where she freely puts her name to it. It is like the Guardian feminist journalist who was quite happy to write that men should be put into concentration camps.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/16 05:57 PM
16

Agree with every word. There is a problem if the population drops too quickly, because if the generation getting old is too much bigger than the younger ones still working there is a lot of needless suffering. At least, there is in a culture where we have demolished extended families. But if you combine it with porous borders you just hand over your country, and depending on who you hand it over to, that can be very bad news for everyone. But you are absolutely right about the quality of Western…
/r/TheRedPill31/08/16 05:54 PM
2

Religion is for old women - of either sex. Having said that, I am not anti-theist anymore (used to be). I can see now that religion played an important role in unifying a population and making it work together and repel outsiders. However, both Christianity and Islam are in a poor state now (Buddhism not so bad, not sure about Sikhism and Hinduism). Islam had a fairly brief period a thousand years ago when it helped compensate the loss of historical Greek knowledge that early Christianity squand…
/r/TheRedPill31/08/16 05:21 PM
64

There I was, all happy and content with things today, and you had to put that article in front of me and I read it! Jesus fucking Christ what an attitude that bitch has! We don't like men making unilateral decisions (read: I want to wear the pants). if women had to wait for men to become broody the birth rate would drop like a stone it has already dropped like a stone, and it is to do with feminism you idiot! Like, does anybody not know that the way to reduce the birth rate is to educate women? …
/r/TheRedPill31/08/16 03:20 PM
1

Absolutely right, it is the guiding influence of a strong male figure (may not even be the dad, could be an uncle or older brother) that matters. Of course, if she has rejected him in her mind then she isn't really being guided by him, strong figure or not.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/16 09:13 AM
2

I want to be respectable, more articulate and like myself more. Look into metta meditation. You need to not only like yourself but to love yourself. If you cannot, how can anyone else? As for being respectable, you are respected for your actions and speech, ie your behaviour. The difficulty I am facing is with the starting point. I feel like I get started and then worry that its not good enough when I don't see immediate results. Anything worth doing is worth doing badly at first. But it is a mi…
/r/RedPillWomen28/08/16 09:48 AM
72

As it turns out, Muslims in the middle east one day came up with the brilliant idea to use goat intestines as a suitable condom. It wasn't, however, until in 1827 when the British perfected the idea by taking the intestines out of the goat first.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/16 06:56 PM
17

Yes, apart from 'go find a single mother'. Frying pan into the fire.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/16 03:54 PM
7

Yes, women in marriages rapidly tend to forget that 'monogamy' involves some 'gamy'. If there is no sex, there is no relationship beyond maybe friends or housekeeper.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/16 03:40 PM
1

Yes, I agree. Guided meditations are good at the very beginning to get you started, and I find it really helps to track your sessions, but it seems a lot to pay for that. I do it in Insight Meditation app, but also in a Bullet Journal. There is a real feeling of pleasure seeing a continuous list of days that you meditate with no breaks, makes it easier to start a regular habit. I would recommend doing the free parts of Calm.com to get the idea, plus there are plenty of instructions and guided me…
/r/TheRedPill20/08/16 08:49 PM
1

'resolve'? that is an ambiguous word. That sounds like paying attention to it, doing something about it. Thought appear regardless, and we are not trying to block them out or suppress them, any more than we are trying to block out or suppress awareness of our surroundings. But what happens is you decide to pay attention to the meditation object, eg the breath. At some point you forget that was your intention, and sometime later (perhaps one second, perhaps several minutes) your subconscious lets…
/r/TheRedPill20/08/16 07:09 PM
5

One of the (many) false beliefs about meditation is that it is about stopping thinking. There are actually many different forms, but the most common in the West these days is Vipassana (from Buddhism, but you don't have to be a Buddhist to do it). Vipassana actually has two parts, the first being concentration, and the second being mindfulness, and you need both. A simple sitting form is to follow your breath. You aren't trying to control your breath, you aren't trying to do anything, you are ju…
/r/TheRedPill20/08/16 08:49 AM
4

In short, patriarchy, the rule of the fathers. Engels, and subsequently feminists, demonised this word as some sort of evil conspiracy to keep women underfoot. But fathers are not about keeping people down, but about raising strong and well-balanced children, about protecting their family. This does have implications beyond the family, because a person with this mindset, with the characteristics required of a good father, also benefits all the people to come into his life, but most especially wo…
/r/TheRedPill19/08/16 08:41 PM
1

How wonderful. So this alpha got in great physical shape without having to do anything. He is a leader, without actually having to do any leading. He is respected for his character, but didn't have to do anything to build that character, faced no adversity. He is dedicated to his mission, but doesn't actually do anything about it. He is not a broke down-and-out either, but he didn't have to work hard for that wealth. He just is, appreciated for the looks he was born with. This is nice to know.
/r/RedPillWomen18/08/16 08:52 PM
3

Evidence either way, I don't favour one law for men and one for women. You don't convict a man of rape unless there is clear evidence of his guilt. You don't rely on him confessing. You don't convict a woman of a false rape accusation unless there is clear evidence of her guilt. You don't rely on her confessing there either. If you have no evidence, you can't put either him or her in prison, they are presumed innocent.
/r/TheRedPill17/08/16 05:51 PM
3

Precisely. Feminism has always had 'daddy issues', it has always been about escaping from the direction and discipline of the father, and looking at the lives of feminists it is clear why fathers used to act that way. Unfortunately, men are biased in favour of women, for perfectly good evolutionary reasons, because they were essential for the success of the tribe, and for gene transmission, but they are weak and vulnerable. At the moment, in the stable West, they think they aren't vulnerable any…
/r/TheRedPill16/08/16 07:34 PM
3

The bigger picture is that women behave badly because they are rewarded for doing so if they succeed, and suffer no consequences if they do not (goes for divorce as well as false rape accusations). Nonetheless, not all women divorce rape, not all rape accusations are false (even those that cannot be proven). What is lacking here is justice. Reward for good behaviour, punishment for bad behaviour. Therefore, you should not have alimony or child support, if you give a vow to stay with someone, tha…
/r/TheRedPill16/08/16 07:21 PM
1

Because there are many similarities between feminism and nazism? http://www.angryharry.com/esFeminismandNazism.htm
/r/TheRedPill16/08/16 07:01 PM
1

Yes, exactly. It is 20 years old, but still the best available. However, that was before the false rape accusation epidemic in the last few years, so those figures would be too low now. It was 41% over a 9 year period. With the current state of college campuses, the figure is likely to be a much bigger percentage there (also in the military by anecdotal accounts). Nice hamstering, by the way. This investigation is essentially a case study of one police agency in a small metropolitan area (popula…
/r/TheRedPill16/08/16 06:39 PM
2

Yeah, women have got on board with the idea of using a rape accusation as a quick way to destroy a man. Although it must always have happened, I do think the last 25 years have seen a big increase. They get so much support, it is easy, her word against his, and people are always willing to believe a crying woman. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gbb03SnhHOM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=op4scME3Ym4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KgxwPU0W-Wg
/r/TheRedPill14/08/16 07:09 PM
1

for educated couples... divorce is 90% initiated by the woman. Perhaps so, but the divorce rate itself is down for college graduates, yes? From the source that OP gave in the comments (http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2013/article/marriage-and-divorce-patterns-by-gender-race-and-educational-attainment.htm) The probability of divorce for those with a college degree was lower compared with those without a college degree. College graduates were 10 percentage points less likely to divorce. (the above tal…
/r/TheRedPill14/08/16 05:08 PM
2

Almost, it was 90% (in the US). The female initiated rate was 70%, but a study (don't have to hand, will try to find it) found that a further 20%, although initiated by the man, was actually brought about by the woman, by nagging and bitching, by cheating, by abusive behaviour, etc. But then, women are rewarded for getting a divorce, no matter what they did, so why wouldn't they?
/r/TheRedPill14/08/16 04:45 PM
3

Feminists would say that, of course, and they also want to reverse the burden of proof, that a woman who claims to have been raped should just be believed (because women never lie, right?). Only decent study (Kanin) says 41%, but there has been an epidemic of false rape accusations in the last few years, so I would say considerably higher now. Funny how every case that feminists made a big thing of to try to convince people that there was a 'rape culture' in universities turned out to be a false…
/r/TheRedPill14/08/16 09:25 AM
2

Depends on the definition of 'rape' doesn't it? For actual rape, as the word originally meant, Kanin seems the most reliable (but I have seen other figures that put the false accusations clearly in the majority, I prefer to stick with the lower Kanin figure). Notice how much he was attacked after the publication, it would be pretty hard to get any real figures now. The number of real rapes is very low, this is a rare crime (around 0.6%). Of course, nowadays, 'rape' doesn't mean any more than 'ab…
/r/TheRedPill14/08/16 09:15 AM
12

Of course. She sees you getting stuff done, tries it herself, and finds it hard. It can't be because she isn't 'equal' to you, so you must have been given a free pass, right? Right?
/r/TheRedPill13/08/16 12:31 PM
1

and Filova, B., Ostatnikova, D., Celec, P., and Hodosy, J. (2013). The effect of testosterone on the formation of brain structures. Cells Tissues Organs, 197(3):169–177. It has been confirmed in several studies that testosterone can significantly affect brain development. Following metabolism of this hormone by 5alpha-reductase to dihydrotestosterone, testosterone may act via androgen receptors, or after conversion by aromatase to estradiol, it may act via estrogen receptors. The parts of the br…
/r/TheRedPill12/08/16 10:36 PM
30

"Check your privilege" I love that one. We did, bitch, guess who I found has the privileges?
/r/TheRedPill12/08/16 09:14 PM
5

I never have either. Can't stand these bitter hags; if they would just mind their own business I wouldn't mind, but they are the ultimate busybodies, always wanting to decide what other people should do, say, and think. If they get a foothold anywhere they are like a cancer. Still, her post shows, once more, the female feeling of entitlement. You note that she thought marriage was 'oppressive' because all those poor women would have to put up with betas - because, you know, each woman was so won…
/r/TheRedPill12/08/16 08:22 PM
16

Yes, agree with that entirely. And not just their own kind, either. Here we have 'women' who can look back at what men have done for women throughout history and turn around and spit in our faces, making up some bullshit about being 'oppressed'. I'm all in favour of feminists not being in any way dependent on men (although they are, of course), men should shun them completely. Fucking parasites. (that was not aimed at you, btw). They are certainly not welcome here. Anywhere that feminists go the…
/r/TheRedPill12/08/16 04:49 PM
6

To make matters worse, studying sex differences in the brain was for a long time distasteful to large swaths of academia.4 Regarding sex differences research, Gloria Steinem once said that it’s “anti-American, crazy thinking to do this kind of research.”5 Indeed, in about the year 2000, senior colleagues strongly advised me against studying sex differences because it would “kill” my career. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4087190/ Still, here are a few to be getting on with Nyborg, H…
/r/TheRedPill12/08/16 04:39 PM
4

I am a woman and a feminist Fuck off to dreamland then, with all your 'abuse' garbage. The supreme irony of a feminist talking about making people 'go against their nature' is quite something. Here is the feminist fairy story: Once upon a time, the Big Bad Menz kept all the cookies to themselves while oppressing the wymyn, who were kept in a kennel at the bottom of the garden. Then, one day in the 20th Century, some Very Brave Wymyn thought they would like some cookies too. So they stood up and …
/r/TheRedPill12/08/16 02:02 PM
11

Feminism has freed men from the burden of performance No, the burden of performance is still there. There is no pussy-pass for men, and men are still valued for what they do, not for who they are. It has simply changed the cost/benefit equation by increasing the costs and removing the most important benefits. When men shun committed relationships they do gain protection from divorce-rape and the kind of toxicity that feminism brings into modern relationships with so many women. So they cut the c…
/r/RedPillWomen12/08/16 12:22 PM
3

"Where are these girls fathers?" Very salient point. In some cases the 'father' was the State. They were very good at getting children out of care homes. In others, the parents did try to do something, but were themselves arrested, because you know, islamophobia, or something. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11057647/Rotherham-sex-abuse-scandal-1400-children-exploited-by-Asian-gangs-while-authorities-turned-a-blind-eye.html That is just Rotherham, it happened in a lot of other citie…
/r/RedPillWomen11/08/16 04:33 PM
4

But if there's no co-education, how are kids gonna learn how to deal with the opposite sex? You mean, men and women didn't know how to get along before the last couple of decades? Relations between the sexes have improved since we had co-ed? I must have missed that. Also, what do you think the world will look like when western civilization declines? Did you read the Glubb reference? It puts things into historical context. Also, Huntington's The Clash of Civilizations is worth a read. I think it …
/r/RedPillWomen11/08/16 11:15 AM
9

You'll notice that Swedish feminists are not saying much about the Middle Eastern and North African men who are coming to their country, and actually doing misogynistic shit like raping and oppressing women. Not just in Sweden, the Saudi Arabia of Feminism. In the UK, when it finally came out about the muslim rape gangs that were operating in Rochdale, Rotherham, Aylesbury, Oxford, etc, involving over 1,000 young girls, feminists were in complete denial. They refused to accept that it was immigr…
/r/RedPillWomen11/08/16 12:54 AM
6

I agree that TRP is just making the most of the decline, and does not actually solve the problem. The problem isn't just feminism either, although that is something that, when it arises, does so at the decline phase of a civilization, and hastens its end (http://people.uncw.edu/kozloffm/glubb.pdf). Feminism is in its own 'axis of evil' with Social Justice and Cultural Marxism. However, it is clear that government and big business are, and always have been, behind feminism. Without an outright re…
/r/RedPillWomen11/08/16 12:01 AM
2

Yes, I understand the duplicate names problem, but it seems to have become a habit even where there is unlikely to be a misunderstanding (how many 'Tucson's are there, and I have specifically heard that named with the state). Generally, the US primary and secondary education systems have a poor international reputation, unlike the university system, which has a stellar reputation. We always took it that the extra year in a US first degree course was to compensate for the poor secondary education…
/r/TheRedPill09/08/16 06:21 PM
1

Jesus, this place is going to the dogs. I swear it wasn't like this. Sure you can 'live a perfectly fine life without it', but why would you? It is a poorer life, so much will pass you by without understanding, because knowledge builds upon knowledge.
/r/TheRedPill09/08/16 06:12 PM
3

The last paragraph does astonish me. Where in the UK? presumably not in the SE, because people there are well aware of the channel tunnel and the Dover-Calais ferry, especially after all the trouble with the rapefugee camp in Sangatte, so they would certainly know where France is, and most likely been there. Otherwise, it may well be down to changes in the education system since I went; it has become increasingly feminised, and boys are checking out. When I went to high school it was still a boy…
/r/TheRedPill09/08/16 04:06 PM
0

Southern Rhodesia is the correct name. Northern Rhodesia is Zambia.
/r/TheRedPill09/08/16 02:32 PM
3

I feel like many of my friends could place all European countries, most American and a fair chunk of Africa and Asia. Yes, I think it would be the same for my school friends in the UK. Not sure what the situation is now, I must try a little test.
/r/TheRedPill09/08/16 02:26 PM
1

Although we did look at different parts of the World in geography lessons in school, we did not have to memorise them all, I did just because I was interested and loved travel stories. I was also dead keen on sailing and loved reading about people who went long distance cruising, so I learned a lot of sea routes and islands just so I could follow the stories. Even so, I don't think I was that atypical.
/r/TheRedPill09/08/16 01:54 PM
4

I'm European, and yes, I could confidently identify all those, except I might mix up Uruguay and Paraguay, plus all European countries (I've lived in four of them, and travelled to all Western ones, but only Hungary in the East). I would be very confident about African countries except some of the little ones around the Gulf of Benin and West of that (Togo to Guinea-Bissau). I could probably get all the Canadian provinces, but admit I couldn't get all the States, no more than about 30 of them, I…
/r/TheRedPill09/08/16 01:38 PM
1

extreme feminist You repeat yourself. If he is a feminist, he is an extremist, it is just that the Overton window has moved so far to the left that people no longer see how extreme it is. For the same reason, the media can no longer say the word 'right' without putting the word 'extreme' in front of it. Feminism is an aberration, something that can exist only under certain conditions, which, ironically, were created by men.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/16 05:41 PM
7

I agree with feminism, I thing all sexes should be treated fairly and right This is not what feminism is about, that is just the cover story. Look at what feminism actually does, not what it says it does. Saying you want both sexes treated fairly is an anti-feminist stance. See my post, 'why we are anti-feminist' in my history.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/16 09:58 AM
1

I see where you are coming from, but in order to draw a parallel you have to make sure that it is in fact parallel. We can easily be pulled into false analogies. We have a social system, but it has been argued that we are the only self-domesticated species. The environment we live in now is quite different from the environment we evolved in - as different as that of a caged bird from a wild bird. Naturally, this distorts our behaviour, and some of the things we do are far from optimal as a resul…
/r/TheRedPill06/08/16 09:50 AM
1

Which is why I said 'people like you' rather than 'you'. If the civil war in Europe happens, it would, of course, need to be European men in the affected countries that do the fighting, and there are men who are up to it, but too many are just soft and use women's logic to deny what is in front of their eyes.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/16 09:03 PM
2

Agreed, a war worth fighting, even if a dirty one. I'm glad we have people like you on our side, but Jesus, so many guys these days...
/r/TheRedPill05/08/16 08:41 PM
2

I agree with your second sentence completely (and pretty much the rest, too), but I wasn't saying that Europeans would be fighting each other, I was saying that the invasion that we are currently allowing to happen will end up in a civil war between native Europeans and the invading settlers. Prior to that, terrorist attacks will increase proportionally to the number of immigrants from the Middle East and North Africa we allow, until finally we get fed up with it and acknowledge that there is a …
/r/TheRedPill05/08/16 07:28 PM
2

I think you are talking outside your subject area. We are not 'mammals at heart', we are mammals. You are drawing parallels with other mammalian social orders, but in a rather cherry-picked way. Eg, we are not comparable with gorillas, or orang-utans, or gibbons, but more like chimpanzees (and to some extent bonobos) amongst the apes. They each have different social systems, and different amounts of sperm competition. You list things like Lions and Tigers, but again completely different. Tigers …
/r/TheRedPill05/08/16 07:23 PM
6

Sounds good if you are fighting a war between armies. That isn't what is happening, though. What we have is an unopposed invasion. Once the invaders become the majority in the country, what 'war' are you going to have, against people who don't like to fight against armies, they like to murder innocent men women and children? So you have a civil war. Those are the bloodiest of all. That is the future of Europe in the 21st century. In the end, it either collapses into barbarism (if you look around…
/r/TheRedPill05/08/16 07:09 PM
3

Not in combat units, they degrade the performance far too much. A Norwegian study showed that even one woman in a unit decreased its efficiency markedly. Both in the US and the UK there are pressures to lower standards to allow women to enter, but lowered standards are not what you want in an efficient fighting unit. The IDF found that mixed units were much less likely to fulfill their mission and casualties were higher; if any of the women in the unit got injured the men were too willing to aba…
/r/TheRedPill05/08/16 06:56 PM
2

OK there are two things here, is it a zero-sum game, and is Feminism true because it 'empirically works'. For the first, you have to consider what, from a biological point of view, the two sexual strategies are. That is, what behaviours produce the greatest number of offspring for each sex. For males, sperm is cheap and plentiful, and males (of any species of mammal) get to walk away afterwards. There is almost no limit to the number of offspring a male can father (record is over 800). The best …
/r/TheRedPill05/08/16 01:54 PM
4

I remember a girl I was studying with that I had severe oneitis for (embarrasses me to think of it now, I had forgotten all about it). Took to writing her a long letter telling her what I felt for her (oh Jesus! this is so pathetic). She was ever so sympathetic, but you know, 'her life was complicated right now', and 'she wouldn't be good for me'. Well, a step up from leading me on. I discovered a little while later that the 'complication' was that she was screwing a mutual friend and colleague …
/r/TheRedPill04/08/16 09:56 PM
3

The Cardinal Rule of Sexual Strategies: For one gender’s sexual strategy to succeed the other gender must compromise or abandon their own. - Rollo The Red Pill is not an ideology, it is a praxeology (unlike Feminism). It is empirically based, according to what works in interactions with women and what doesn't. Women can use the information to further their sexual strategy but TRP, and the manosphere in general, is about furthering male sexual strategy. There is no need to apologise for that, it …
/r/TheRedPill04/08/16 11:54 AM
6

On the contrary. Birth rates outside west are higher because they don't have a hookup culture, they don't spend their most fertile years dating around while on contraceptives. They marry young and push out babies during their fertile 20s (and late teens). It is the hookup culture that depresses birth rates by pushing back marriage and family life, and emphasising temporary sexual relations rather than breeding.
/r/TheRedPill04/08/16 10:08 AM
1

No, I don't think they overvalue it. This is the entire source of their power. If they are not able to choose who they have sex with (and what they get in return) then they have no power over men. A woman that has no power over men is a dead woman. A 'strong independent' dead woman, but a dead woman. Even fatties get stuff from men, because she is still a girl, and men are biased in favour of girls. Even now, in Western societies, women are totally dependent on men, they just can't see it becaus…
/r/TheRedPill03/08/16 08:00 PM
0

they can breed a living child, and we can not Rubbish, we don't have parthenogenesis. Women cannot breed a living child any more than men can, it takes both sexes. Unfortunately, under feminist influence, they are generally not doing their part, and laws have been changed to discourage men from doing their part, hence society in decline.
/r/TheRedPill03/08/16 05:20 PM
7

Another is meditation, because it allows you to get a distance between your thoughts and feelings when they arise. You don't impulsively act on them, you can observe them for what they are. 'Ah, I'm feeling angry', and you can then decide whether or not to follow that feeling or let it fade away. http://liveanddare.com/benefits-of-meditation/ And of course Stoicism is all about not being governed by your emotions, and thus being able to think clearly.
/r/TheRedPill03/08/16 02:15 PM
2

Not correct, there is no common law marriage in the UK - nor many other places. Even in the US there are only a handful of States that have them https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common-law_marriage 'Living Together as Husband and Wife' is not about rights after separation, but purely about means-tested Social Security payments if you are unemployed while together. eg if OP is unemployed (say, an SAHM) but living with the man, she cannot claim social security benefits because it is considered that h…
/r/RedPillWomen03/08/16 01:11 PM
3

There is not, and never has been, common law marriage in the UK (but in Scotland there are some limited rights, since 2006). http://www.familylives.org.uk/advice/your-family/relationship-advice/common-law-marriage/ Child support is payable whether married or not. You can enter a legal agreement about disposal of income earned during an informal partnership (not strictly a 'pre-nup' since there is no 'nuptual'), but in England and Wales that could only be to OP's advantage, since legally he is no…
/r/RedPillWomen03/08/16 10:25 AM
1

I agree, but then I am not talking to women. And you say that women aren't prone to intellectual truth-discovery (which is partially true, I have certainly met exceptions), and I agree with that too, but it isn't the truth part that they respond to, it is not being a pushover that they respond to. Too many men either say nothing when being told bullshit, or actually go along with it (look at 'male feminists'), so that women are not used to having their stupider notions challenged. It is the chal…
/r/TheRedPill02/08/16 02:31 PM
7

I'm already better. And challenging falsehoods is something we should do.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/16 01:11 PM
11

Interesting, almost all of that list showing 'women's superiority' are in fact false. Men are actually more intelligent than women, both in mean and in the upper tail. Women are not calmer under fire, they are not better computer programmers, as police they need to be armed because they cannot physically subdue a man who doesn't want to come (hence more likely to use their firearms), they are only better at handling pain during childbirth when they are flooded with hormones, they are not better …
/r/TheRedPill02/08/16 09:18 AM
5

The amount of delusion involved with feminism is pretty astonishing, actually, with the 'social construct', 'patriarchy theory' and 'rape culture' delusions being top of the list. World's strongest woman: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MF-YeWnIJfU http://www.sciencevsfeminism.com/the-myth-of-equality/sex-differences-physical-ability/
/r/TheRedPill02/08/16 09:05 AM
1

Fair enough. It is about self improvement, but that is because doing so is a viable sexual strategy, agreed. Of course, it has benefits regardless of women, even if you are hard-core MGTOW. But yes, game is part of it too, understanding women's psychology is (a major) part of it. I can see that 'focussing on yourself' without paying attention to what aspects of yourself have an effect on women, and then hoping that you get sexual success at the end regardless is pointless. Your self improvement …
/r/TheRedPill31/07/16 05:19 PM
3

Agreed, but a sexual strategy that involves just focussing on the woman is the BP idea that we were all fed so long, right? The counter-intuitive part is that for your strategy to succeed, you do NOT focus on the woman, but on yourself, and hence you get the women. And what exactly is 'a positive identity for men' if it is 'about women'? If your progress and success is judged entirely by how women respond, then you are firmly in the women's frame, yes? He isn't saying this isn't a sexual strateg…
/r/TheRedPill31/07/16 04:58 PM
1

Troll post #2? We are doing well this week. Yeah, man, we are all psychos that just manipulate women and don't give a fuck who we hurt. You don't give a fuck about bettering yourself, why the hell should we?
/r/TheRedPill30/07/16 05:02 PM
1

Kind of. You note that I put us in the situation of returning to barbarism (like Rome), not overrun by another civilization (like Byzantium or Babylon). There is no other civilization around to take over the West, unfortunately, there is only barbarism. In the past, at the time of the Baghdad Caliphate, there was an Islamic civilization, a true empire, that was more advanced than in the rest of Europe (which was in the Dark Ages, and forgot most of what Greece and Rome knew). This is not the cas…
/r/TheRedPill30/07/16 10:53 AM
4

Yes, feminism is only ever temporary, it is not a stable state. Unfortunately, women being what they are (strong own-sex bias combined with an exaggerated opinion of their own capabilities), and men being what they are (also biased in favour of women), there is no going back until the society collapses from the effects of feminism. So long as society is in the 'rich,stable' phase that men previously created, women can delude themselves that they are 'equal', that they can 'have it all', and that…
/r/TheRedPill29/07/16 07:47 PM
4

It pisses me off, actually. Whenever someone identifies as a woman in comments, you see several guys going into supplicating behaviour. 'what do you think of the redpill?' and bullshit like that. Seeking validation from mommy.
/r/TheRedPill29/07/16 09:42 AM
2

Agreed, they can be vicious, you know. Women, I mean.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/16 07:07 PM
1

Everyone and his dog. Don't forget the dog.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/16 01:27 PM
1

It still contains the phytoestrogens, particularly genistein. For this reason, it is often recommended for women going through menopause. It is also recommended for wives to give to their husbands if they find them too, um, ardent.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/16 01:06 PM
2

Yes, understood and agreed. I'm well aware that Sharia has crept in under the radar (which I object to). But again, the discussion is 'Can we talk about prenups?', which pretty much excludes discussion of Sharia, does it not? We are talking about Western legal marriages here. The reference to 'muslim background' was a red herring, intended to deflect us from the divorce statistics. Anyway, I have nothing more to add to this discussion.
/r/RedPillWomen25/07/16 12:43 PM
3

I accept all that you say, but the discussion is about pre-nups. That applies if it is a state-sanctioned legal marriage, not an unregistered, unofficial marriage.
/r/RedPillWomen25/07/16 12:05 PM
2

True, in that posters here are generally (almost, but not quite, universally) from Western countries. However, you say 'muslim background' but then you say '401(k)', so you are in America. Therefore, any divorce is dealt with under American law, not Sharia law. The law is still strongly biased in your favour in case of divorce. And, are they her children or are they not? It does not 'clarify that she was married'. If she wants to be a full-time mother, that is a life choice, let's not pretend th…
/r/RedPillWomen24/07/16 07:45 PM
2

I applaud your sensitivity to the matter, but I notice that you give the amount in sterling. My understanding is that prenups are essentially worthless in UK law (http://www.terry.co.uk/pre-nuptial.html) and some recent notorious cases make marriage a very risky undertaking in the UK. Single mothers have a very bad reputation amongst men, for precisely the reasons you give, so it is understandable that you want to allay worries. The thing is this: prenups, even in countries where they are worth …
/r/RedPillWomen24/07/16 07:23 PM
3

Naïveté in part. Women think, 'oh these poor refugees, we have to help them!', whereas men are more likely (from long evolutionary experience) to think that this bodes ill for their tribe. I believe in Sweden crime statistics never mention race or religion, but in Norway they do, and 70% of rapes in Oslo are done by muslim immigrants, are they not? Those that do come in contact with these people, who destroyed their own society and now come to yours with the same culture and attitude, wake up fa…
/r/TheRedPill24/07/16 05:24 PM
10

Bias is interesting, psychologically. There is a lot in this post. to accommodate her husband's children So, they aren't her children then? You are talking about a situation where the woman marries a man with children from a previous marriage? Or are you talking about a situation where she gets to give up work and spend time with her own children (which her husband does not) while he basically pays her living expenses? in the case that that he divorces her? Are you aware that in the US 70% of ma…
/r/RedPillWomen24/07/16 04:53 PM
4

This was a Stoic technique, too. In fact, Meditations was never meant to be published or written for anyone else. It was Marcus Aurelius' personal journal. Pythagoreans practised reviewing the events of the day to improve their memory. Stoics did it as an ethical and therapeutic self-analysis. Epictetus' advice was to assess what you did well, what you did badly, what you omitted doing even though you should have done (adopted from the Pythagoreans). Seneca recommended spending time in the eveni…
/r/TheRedPill23/07/16 12:59 PM
1

Muslims have an absolute right to have their own culture and to reject ours. That is fine, and there are plenty of islamic countries around for them to live, no problem. But while they have a right to their own culture, so do we. That part they have a problem with. If you go to live in another country and benefit thereby, you owe your first allegiance to that country. What we see in these terrorist attacks (largely by muslim citizens of those countries) is that they do not owe allegiance to thei…
/r/TheRedPill21/07/16 11:50 AM
1

Full agreement, Greece and Italy will take the Euro down, and I think it shows how civilized the Greeks are that they haven't descended into total chaos and anarchy. They voted twice to reject the austerity measures that are crippling them, and still got hammered with it to satisfy their creditors. They should have left the Euro and defaulted. Russia and Argentina have both done it, and it wasn't the end of the world for them, but it would have meant primarily German and French investors lost mo…
/r/TheRedPill21/07/16 11:22 AM
1

I'd sign up into a heartbeat to an economical union with europe, but not a cultural one A Common Market (but without enforced free movement), yes, me too. There are huge economic troubles in Europe because of the failed Euro experiment (which I foresaw when they announced it back in the late 90s), which means it isn't the golden economic egg that it previously was. The EU thinks we are so stupid that it can stab us in the back and nobody will notice. You might recall when Osborne came back from …
/r/TheRedPill21/07/16 10:51 AM
2

Same here, the hysteria was astonishing. In fact, unemployment figures are better than for years with no sign of an issue as yet, FTSE 100 is within 2% of its peak earlier in the year, the world and its dog is knocking on our door asking for trade agreements (which can't be signed until we throw off the EU yoke, but can be negotiated in advance). IMF has lowered their growth forecast for the UK, but it is still higher than Germany, France and Italy. I figured there would be short-term economic p…
/r/TheRedPill21/07/16 10:32 AM
2

Sort of. Another way of putting it is about the default mode of thinking. There is no doubt that (many) women are perfectly capable of thinking clearly and rationally, and many men are capable of being irrational and emotional, but rational thinking is the default mode of men unless thinking is perturbed (eg by interaction with women), and emotional thinking is the default mode of women. That does mean the frequency is different, as you say, but it also means that it is very easy to get women ou…
/r/TheRedPill14/07/16 06:49 PM
2

Sure they will. "I love you long time!"
/r/TheRedPill14/07/16 04:44 PM
2

Yes, I think that is pretty much right. In tests, men are either almost as biased in favour of women as women are (ie, very) or egalitarian, but they are not biased in favour of themselves. I guess this is why men have given in so much to feminine thinking, all the men who thing that political correctness is a thing, or that you are sexist if you point out a woman's flaws or ask for actual equal treatment. When there is a strong bias you don't get clear thinking. And much of what we see as going…
/r/TheRedPill14/07/16 12:01 PM
1

Sometimes I think men are so much better than women, more responsible, more rational. Bias is an interesting phenomenon that I have been looking into recently, and of course it is well established that while women have a very strong own-sex bias, men do not (they are generally biased in favour of women). So I take account of that. Even so, sometimes, I just have to say, 'What the fuck! Wake up you idiot!' I despair of men sometimes. If they really were as rational as I sometimes tell myself, soc…
/r/TheRedPill14/07/16 10:38 AM
7

Projection is an interesting thing. They are concerned about 'hate crimes', but what is feminism if not a hate group? The biggest sexists in society are feminists, and the biggest racists are SJWs. Always worth looking at what people are vehemently against, as they are so often guilty of it themselves. And Sue Fish shows, once again, that Schopenhauer was right about women having an underdeveloped sense of justice. Which implies that we should be much more careful than we are about letting women…
/r/TheRedPill14/07/16 08:10 AM
1

Disagree. Superstimuli are about emphasizing natural differences. One of the natural differences is that men are taller than women. Making women taller is a side effect, but not a good one on the whole, except in that it makes the legs longer. It is long legs that are attractive in tall women, not the height as such. One effect of this is that naturally tall women generally avoid wearing high heels, because it then makes them taller than men.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/16 09:54 PM
2

women are indeed deceptive and manipulative, and that is the basis of 'femininity' - acting in such a way as to get the attention and resources of men. That is inherent in the evolutionary history of our species, that men evolved to extract value from the environment, and women evolved to extract value from men. In spite of the manipulation, this separation of gender roles has actually served our species well, because it ensured survival of offspring during the extremely long development period …
/r/TheRedPill13/07/16 08:00 PM
3

I leave it to Juvenal http://www.poetryintranslation.com/PITBR/Latin/JuvenalSatires6.htm
/r/TheRedPill13/07/16 06:53 PM
16

It would seem that Sue Fish and Melanie Jeffs, as well as (not surprisingly) Nottingham Women's Centre, are guilty of hate crime. Or at least they would be if the law was equal. Since they are talking about harrassing and intimidating men for behaviour which they would turn a blind eye to if it were a woman. We also have to remember that Theresa May was behind the sexist laws about domestic abuse being extended to a man withdrawing his resources, even if the woman was throwing their money away h…
/r/TheRedPill13/07/16 06:44 PM
1

I would not say that this would be the case for every single woman, nor for every man for a given woman, but only that it is quite common. Women are kept in check by social opinion, they want to guard their reputation, and when travelling alone overseas nobody would know, as another poster here said. But more than than, my point is that their situation is more like the ancestral condition. Within our society women are protected a lot, they are comfortable and secure. When travelling alone in a f…
/r/TheRedPill12/07/16 06:27 AM
2

Yes, this is correct, of course. It is a curious thing, but if anything, women enjoy the act of sex even more than men, yet it drives them less. Adam Leonas makes this point in The Empress is Naked, that it is women's lower sex drive that has allowed them to use it as a bargaining chip. It difficult for men to do so (in a monogamous relationship), because depriving the woman of sex is depriving themselves of something they want even more. It is this lower drive that means they can ration it, and…
/r/TheRedPill11/07/16 10:49 PM
2

It's as if you are in willful ignorance of the fact that we are not talking about social constructs. We are not talking about blank slates. We are not pretending that people do not have evolved behaviours. It's as if you are in willful ignorance of the fact that from 1960 to present is a barest blink in the eye of human history, and for much of that time women absolutely needed men's resources, and they can't turn off that need just because they work in an office. Women can tell themselves that …
/r/TheRedPill11/07/16 10:14 PM
2

Why do they need us for resources? Because they are women. Women didn't just spring into the world this instant, they have an evolutionary history, and for the millions of years of that history life was not safe, and human children needed years of careful tending. Your view on this is very limited. Try reading the sidebar, and some evolutionary psychology and behavioural ecology texts, it will be illuminating. If none of that were the case, women would not be predictable, and the red pill would …
/r/TheRedPill11/07/16 09:42 PM
2

Not quite. It is a continuum. At the short end, prostitutes give sex in exchange for cash up front. Simple, direct, honest. At the other end, wives give sex, but in exchange you give full commitment and an unlimited amount of resources. It is the same at one level, because women are the same, sex for resources. This isn't evil, it is how the human race survived. There are sound evolutionary reasons which have served us well. In the current climate, with laws being what they are, it doesn't serve…
/r/TheRedPill11/07/16 09:20 PM
8

Taking the red pill is about facing reality and making it work for you. Primarily, about the reality of sexual dynamics. Women want resources from men, and men want sex from women, that is the way it is, and the way it has always been. Acting hurt, and 'I'm jumping through hoops' doesn't change the dynamic. You can play, or you can just forget about women and get on with other things in your life. What you can't do is change the inherent nature of women (or men, for that matter). Learn what game…
/r/TheRedPill11/07/16 08:05 PM
4

No, you have cleared that up, thank you. I get suspicious when people leave out important information. I also find it curious that you post here asking advice on whether to carry on with the marriage or give up and divorce, and did not seem to consider the fact that you are pregnant to be relevant to the decision. If we look at your life, from what you have said here, you make a series of poor decisions regarding relationships. I'm not saying this to denigrate you, but to make you very cautious …
/r/RedPillWomen11/07/16 12:02 PM
21

My sincere apologies to any trout reading this post.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/16 10:18 PM
14

I should also add, confidence is especially attractive if the woman is in a situation where she lacks it. A classic case is women travelling alone in a foreign country, especially a third world country where she may get unwelcome attention from the locals (Western women are generally seen as easy lays so get hit on a lot). It is very easy for a woman to attach herself to a confident western man in such circumstances. In the case I mention above, I had just crossed over from Singapore to Malaysia…
/r/TheRedPill10/07/16 09:15 PM
25

Feminist SJWs want to take power from white males, but 'minorities' are a useful weapon for them in this regard, and they don't want to lose that weapon. There was a tv programme in the UK after the horrific series of rapes (over 1000 young girls) by muslim rape gangs in Rochdale, Rotherham, and several other cities. On one occasion, when one of the young girls would not do what they wanted, they nailed her tongue to a table. Absolutely barbaric. Anyway, James Delingpole was one of the panel in …
/r/TheRedPill10/07/16 08:00 PM
2

Something isn't adding up. You say that you have fun together and you have an amazing life. You also say that you are repulsed by him and find him boring, and you didn't look forward to seeing him after being away. You say here that he has low sperm count but won't do anything about it, but on another sub you say you are pregnant. Is it his?
/r/RedPillWomen10/07/16 07:02 PM
9

The rape bubble is already bursting. It isn't entirely clear where the term Rape Culture originated, but a very early reference was to male prisons in the US (yes, male prisons). Feminists took this up and have ever since pretended that society in general is a rape culture, which is arrant nonsense. The idea of rape culture is not simply a culture where rapes occur (by that definition we have a murder culture, since murders do occur), but one which actually condones it. In the male prisons, it w…
/r/TheRedPill10/07/16 05:45 PM
17

All very good points, thank you. Confidence is very important. Where I am from people still shake hands (usually with other men, but sometimes women, too). I have had several people (both sexes) remark on my firm handshake, because it shows exactly this. Note that it should be firm, but not trying to crush the other person's fingers in some kind of juvenile dominance display. A number of men and nearly all women have a very limp and weak handshake, like shaking hands with a trout. I was with my …
/r/TheRedPill10/07/16 05:37 PM
5

This is much more positive, maybe it isn't too late. I think there are three things you can work on. Responsibility & Control You have to carefully distinguish between what is in your control and what isn't. Your husband's behaviour (and your MIL's) is not in your control, but your behaviour is. Although you have influence over him, ultimately it is his responsibility to be a good husband, to be your captain in RPW terms. Whether the marriage succeeds is partly under your control, but not entire…
/r/RedPillWomen10/07/16 04:26 PM
16

I'm having to chose my words carefully here, because reading this made me so angry. If my woman talked to me like this I would have torn her a new one; there is no way you should have gotten away with it. If he had come on AskTRP he would have been told to divorce this harridan and go MGTOW until he had developed his own strength, learned to recognise good women, and how to interact with them. You are killing this man. But it isn't him, and I still want to be constructive. In spite of the terrib…
/r/RedPillWomen10/07/16 11:43 AM
6

Of course. If feminists didn't have double standards, they would have no standards at all (forget who said that one).
/r/TheRedPill10/07/16 10:18 AM
5

Yes, they had boyfriends, although that didn't necessarily imply PIV sex. But WWII is still an extremely short time ago for our instinctual behaviour. The real game-changer was contraception, not feminism, and the reason for slut shaming was because of the extreme danger of unsupported single-mothers (before marriage), or cuckoldry (after it). When you take conception out, then it changes the game enormously. We saw the same thing in the Roman empire, the women used a contraceptive too (to such …
/r/TheRedPill10/07/16 09:58 AM
81

Revenge fantasies are a waste of time. Yes, they lose their looks, but there are plenty of thirsty guys around to pick them up if they don't wait too long. Maybe they then regret not being able to lock down someone of the calibre they used to attract when they were riding the CC, but what is that to you? You concentrate on making your own life great, let women deal with theirs.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/16 08:52 AM
2

The structure of society generally kept women's hypergamy in check. Having an SAHM now is not the same as it was in previous centuries. First, divorce was not an option for a woman, she did not have daddy government to step in and reward her for her bad behaviour. Second, a cheating woman was pilloried by society generally (men and women), she was a slut and this was no little thing. Now, all women are sluts, it has no practical consequences. Third, when she was at home still other men may visit…
/r/TheRedPill08/07/16 11:08 AM
3

On the AF side, which you show as being 'not LTR material' then again this is well supported, and the basis of the AF/BB dynamic. For example Because ancestral women faced trade-offs in choosing mates, they may have evolved to pursue a dual-mating strategy in which they secured investment through one partner and obtained good genes through others. The dual-mating theory predicts that women will display greater interest in extra-pair sex near ovulation, especially if they are mated to a primary m…
/r/TheRedPill08/07/16 09:19 AM
5

Yes. It is a bit of a stretch to talk about there being no connection (or a poor connection) between women's mind and body. It is more accurate to say women's conscious mind. We could take the 'mind' and 'body' axes as 'love' and 'lust', and see how that plays out. Across human societies, people form long-term romantic bonds that can last a lifetime. Many theorists have proposed that the emotion love plays a causal role in maintaining these bonds, but no work to date has tested this hypothesis d…
/r/TheRedPill08/07/16 09:11 AM
2

Insightful. I think this could be tied with Athol Kay's ideas about LTRs, in that he thinks for a successful one there needs to be some 'beta' behaviours mixed in with the alpha behaviours that keep her tingly. The word 'beta' has entirely negative connotations on this sub, but I see it in the larger alpha/beta/delta/sigma domain as being good in some circumstances and bad in others. For getting sex from lots of women it is generally negative, but small amounts in LTRs help stabilize them. So yo…
/r/TheRedPill08/07/16 09:04 AM
1

Hmm, no 9s or 10s (or even 8s) in sight there, make-up or no make-up. I laughed at the 'Veruca' though. I heard only a short time ago that Americans had called their daughters this, apparently not knowing what the word means. Must be a real bummer when they find out.
/r/TheRedPill07/07/16 11:19 PM
5

OK, let's keep this simple and focussed. There are apps out there for subscription services, like Headspace or Calm, but I would strongly advise downloading 'Insight Timer' https://insighttimer.com. This is free (there is some paid content for extra ambient sounds or other bells, but those also are extremely cheap, like a couple of dollars, and you don't need to spend anything to get full use of the app), and is an excellent timer, everything you need. But it is much more than that. It also has …
/r/TheRedPill05/07/16 06:35 PM
3

This has been argued out recently, the disingenuous part is 'retard' which is getting confused with 'below average'. It is true that there are more retards who are male, between 2x and 4x more in fact, which appears to be due to a genetic defect on the X chromosome (Fragile X Syndrome, so, like colour blindness, women are less likely to suffer because they have two copies, but can still get it). Here was one of my posts from a month ago when we discussed the research I think that needs to be ref…
/r/TheRedPill03/07/16 10:02 AM
2

When you say 'meditate' most people think of Eastern (Buddhist, Taoist, etc) approaches, which are certainly valuable and I do it myself. Stoics also talk about meditation, but it isn't the same thing. This is actually a thinking process, rather than a mindfulness process. In praemeditatio malorum, what you are doing is trying to imagine 'bad' things or situations. We tend to run away from such ideas. For example, there may be an underlying fear of losing our job, and with it our house, our car,…
/r/TheRedPill02/07/16 06:56 PM
3

Switzerland is in the European Free Trade Area. It has some 'access' to the single market, but has to accept a lot of bullshit in return, including free movement of people. Switzerland decided they no longer wanted that, and the EU has agreed in principle, although it hasn't been implemented yet. Norway is in the European Economic Area. When they had a referendum about joining the EU proper in 1994 the same scaremongering was used as in the Brexit campaign, that all the companies would leave, th…
/r/TheRedPill29/06/16 06:14 PM
2

That would be good to see. The Common Market was a very good idea, but the behemoth it evolved into post Maastricht, and especially the disaster of the Euro, was not. Italy, Greece and Spain are still economically very weak, are not allowed to take necessary steps to grow, and have massive unemployment. I would like to see a North Atlantic Common Market. We could start by setting that up with UK, Iceland, Norway, and Canada. I can imagine Denmark, The Netherlands, Sweden and perhaps the Baltic s…
/r/TheRedPill29/06/16 05:57 PM
8

I have worked with Germans a lot, and generally found them sensible and pragmatic people. This doesn't surprise me at all.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/16 07:14 PM
2

In some respects, but probably not the cultural marxist-feminist angle. It can still go two ways. Either the UK parliament decides to ignore the referendum (it isn't legally binding, and most MPs want 'in'), or they go ahead. If they stay in, you can't deny the will of more than half the populace without throwing them a bone. Juncker won't budge, he is a federalist ideologue who bears grudges (Cameron tried to stop him being elected president of the Commission, rightly as it turned out), but he …
/r/TheRedPill28/06/16 07:06 PM
2

Long-term relationship. However, the guys above has a monogamous mindset, and that is far from ideal. There have been some excellent posts on kinds of relationships, and also I recommend Black Dragon's blog where he talks a lot about them, going from one-night stands, plates (booty calls), friends with benefits (so you do things other than fuck together), multiple LTR (MLTR), open LTR (one girlfriend to whom you give commitment, but you can have plates or ONSes on the side - but no-one else you …
/r/TheRedPill27/06/16 04:58 PM
6

You know the Patrice O'Neal bit where he asks the women in the audience how they would keep their men loyal if they somehow lost the use of their vagina. So he listened for a bit as they shouted out that they would give blowjobs or offer anal. Then he said, 'you see, I gave you a chance to define yourself as something other than a series of holes, but...'
/r/TheRedPill26/06/16 04:24 PM
71

So a woman gets off on public sex, but to 'legitimize' it she calls it 'performance art'. It is the usual feminist 'empowerment' bullshit, here about choosing when she can be touched and by whom. Like, that isn't what women do all the time? And she does it by not choosing, letting whoever happens to be standing around at the time choose whether to touch her or not? Because standing in public letting strangers feel their cock is what men do, and she is equal, right? Fit bird though, looks like sh…
/r/TheRedPill25/06/16 03:44 PM
2

'provider' means beta. Often used here to mean a sort of nice guy loser, but it really means provider. Women have a dual-mating strategy, she was collecting seed. If she succeeds, it doesn't matter whether you are naturally a provider, she has the power of the state to extort it from you. I presume you did not go raw. Also, is she late 20s? You might like to read 'Human Sperm Competition'.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/16 09:17 AM
1

I want to add something about shaving here. I used electric shavers for a very long time, and only recently rediscovered doing it the 'old way'. That is, not with an electric shaver, and not with a wet razor and foam that comes out of a can. I use a badger hair brush with real shaving cream that you foam up, and it makes shaving a real pleasure. For those in the UK, I really like the stuff from Taylor of Old Bond St (http://www.tayloroldbondst.co.uk/acatalog/Jermyn-Street-Collection-Shaving-Crea…
/r/TheRedPill24/06/16 07:12 PM
4

I went to a life drawing group recently - the first and only one. The 'model' was grossly obese, even though I guess she was in her early 20s. I don't recall ever seeing anyone that obese other than a couple of women on a train in St Louis when I visited the States some years ago, and fortunately I didn't have to see them naked. The thing was, not only was she accepted as a model, but the woman next to me said, 'I love drawing X, she is so beautiful!'. I heard the twilight zone music in my head …
/r/RedPillWomen23/06/16 04:56 PM
3

Aside from the others mentioned here, and the standard ones (The Rational Male, 48 laws of Power, Stoic texts) Deep work. Cal Newport Power: Why some people have it- and others don't. Jeffrey Pfeffer Rationality: From AI to Zombie. Eliezer Yudkowsky Ikigai. Sebastian Marshall Human Sperm Competition: Copulation, masturbation and infidelity Robin Baker & Mark Bellis. Cyropaedia. Xenophon So good they can't ignore you Cal Newport The Empress is naked Adam Leonas Make money, live wealthy Austin Net…
/r/TheRedPill23/06/16 03:52 PM
4

Environments always change, there is no end point in evolution. Further, unless you get rid of genetic diversity altogether there will always be some more optimal than others, that is what evolution acts upon. However, so long as things like amount of grey matter in brains, reaction times, height, intelligence, etc (basically, what women select for in a mate) have a genetic component, then it is pretty much inevitable that men will increasingly have those traits. That is what sexual selection me…
/r/TheRedPill23/06/16 03:22 PM
4

More than that. When you look at history, and still today, if you put away the feminist brainwashing it is pretty clear that men and women are not equal, that in most things men are superior to women. Bigger, stronger, faster, quicker reactions, more decisive, better at navigating, at maths and sciences, at engineering, at the arts, and so on. Here is the kicker: we have women's hypergamy to thank for that. Throughout the history of our species, sexual selection has acted by women being very cho…
/r/TheRedPill23/06/16 01:39 PM
15

This is the bullshit of divorce. Now in this case, to be fair, he left her rather than the other way around. However, the idea that the wife is worth half the assets because 'they were accrued during the marriage' is still preposterous. How much of that did she actually have a hand in getting? And I don't mean a blow job. She gained a tremendous amount already by living in luxury for decades, which I bet she could not have achieved on her own. Having said that, if he leaves her then she should n…
/r/TheRedPill21/06/16 01:09 PM
6

Marxism is the political basis of feminism. It grew initially out of women's envy of the achievements of men throughout history, coupled with the natural propensity to push the boundaries demanding that men set those boundaries for them. But after the rise of Marxism, the game changed. The beginning of the end was giving women the vote, around the time of the first world war for many countries. At that point, politicians have to play for the minds of women, and thus politics itself becomes femin…
/r/TheRedPill21/06/16 08:34 AM
15

not because he is not man enough but because she is not woman enough. A prime directive of feminism has been to destroy the difference between the sexes and make people androgynous. Make women more masculine, and feminize men, thus destroying the polar attraction of opposites. This sits well with a good many of the core movers in feminism. As Ti-Grace Atkinson said back in the 60s, 'feminism is the theory, lesbianism is the practice'. Feminism has made women unhappy (other than the aforementione…
/r/TheRedPill21/06/16 08:18 AM
1

Let me encourage you to write that post, it is something that does need working out better than what we have. I think pulling apart alpha traits is a useful one. It has seemed to me that there are two loosely related parts, too. One, as you say, is an alpha amongst men, a leader; the other is a 'lady's man', one who knows how to lead women, basically. The two have some connection in that it is easier to lead women if women see that you lead men (social status); the reverse isn't really true. Men…
/r/TheRedPill20/06/16 06:36 PM
4

It is because you are new here that you think we don't give it attention. The posts tend to go in waves. We have periods where the accent is on physical fitness, periods where it is about meditation and stoicism, periods when it is about finance and goals, and of course lots of periods about dealing with women. TRP is pretty broad in its coverage. For myself, meditation and Stoicism, along with the physical side, is always core. And there is a lot of overlap between Stoicism and Buddhist /Taoist…
/r/TheRedPill20/06/16 06:29 PM
1

Yes, and I know that marriage rates in the UK are down more than 40% since 1970 (start of 2nd wave), anybody know about the US, Canada, Australia and New Zealand? I think outside the anglosphere divorce rape isn't such an issue, but in those places it certainly is.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/16 06:23 PM
3

If he wants to keep other people 'in the dark' then he knows what 'the light' is, otherwise he could not steer them away from it. If he has no idea how things work (blue pill) then he can't do much to prevent other people finding out how things work. Therefore he is red pill, he understands the dynamics and deliberately fogs the view of his competitors to give himself an advantage in the SMP. That would be RP Alpha Sith. Red/Blue pill is about awareness. As a result of that awareness you can mak…
/r/TheRedPill19/06/16 10:50 AM
4

By 'access' I assume you mean 'assess'. Yes, this is a good thing to keep in mind. There is selection first, though. Women do differ in their natural aptitude to be feminine, and some will resist becoming feminine. There was a study of feminists, for example, which showed that they had more prenatal testosterone coursing around than normal women: The feminist movement purports to improve conditions for women, and yet only a minority of women in modern societies self-identify as feminists. This i…
/r/TheRedPill17/06/16 06:21 AM
2

as one of my personal beliefs is that a man is the sum of the people they associate with, and women even moreso. I'm fully on board with choosing your friends carefully. We progress by making good alliances. But I had never considered it from the female angle, and you are right, it would be even moreso, because women will change their attitudes to fit in with what they see as socially acceptable, whereas a man is more likely to hold to his own opinion in spite of opposition (unless he sees merit…
/r/TheRedPill14/06/16 06:38 PM
2

Previous studies in animals and humans show that genes in the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) influence individual odours and that females often prefer odour of MHC-dissimilar males, perhaps to increase offspring heterozygosity or reduce inbreeding. Women using oral hormonal contraceptives have been reported to have the opposite preference, raising the possibility that oral contraceptives alter female preference towards MHC similarity, with possible fertility costs. Here we test directly …
/r/RedPillWomen13/06/16 09:08 PM
9

I can't remember who said it, but it was suggested that social media to women are what porn is to men. Men look for sex, and porn is a way of convincing your brain that you a fucking really hot women, getting that dopamine rush, but without actually working on yourself and going out and interacting with women. Women look for social validation, and instead of going and interacting with people (especially men) and actually putting some work into building real life fulfilling relationships, they ge…
/r/TheRedPill13/06/16 06:22 PM
1

Got it, missed that link, thought I read all three. OK, it is clearer now. She made a claim for 1.9M, but the high court awarded her 300k. He then appealed, because it was frankly ludicrious, and won. She then took it to the Supreme Court (on his dollar), who overruled the appeal court. Which means she has won 300k, but given that she now has money, I guess that means he doesn't have to pay all her expenses (not clear on that). Given that he won the appeal, it is certainly reasonable that he cha…
/r/TheRedPill12/06/16 06:48 PM
1

Brilliant take on Briffault's Law that puts it in a new light. Thank you!
/r/TheRedPill12/06/16 05:06 PM
1

In the UK there is not, and never has been, Common Law Marriage, you have to sign that contract. In Scotland, if there are no children under 16, and you have lived separately for one year, and both agree to the divorce, then you can get one, otherwise if one partner refused consent you have to live apart for 2 years. They prefer a clean break with division of assets, no alimony unless it leaves one partner (no prizes for guessing which one) in difficulties, in which case there may be a provision…
/r/TheRedPill12/06/16 04:37 PM
2

I would say ETFs are the way to go now. Get the benefits of an Index Fund, but very flexible and the 'fees' are baked in, since that is part of the share price. Warren Buffet was talking before ETFs took off, and would probably recommend those now. Putting a relatively small amount in shares directly is a higher potential payoff (I made 230% over a 3 year period, where I invested just before the big crash), but you have to be prepared to lose it, and to sit tight, not keep trading, because the b…
/r/TheRedPill12/06/16 11:12 AM
3

except they really don't have better health care. Well, that part doesn't stand up to facts. The US consistently comes low in health care rankings, but is the most expensive. http://www.businessinsider.com/us-health-lags-the-developed-world-2013-1?IR=T In fact, it was ranked 31st in the world https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Health_Organization_ranking_of_health_systems_in_2000 in spite of being the most expensive. Now, you can (and many have) criticised the criteria, but to claim that the US…
/r/TheRedPill12/06/16 09:48 AM
3

He spent money fighting the case because it was wrong, I would have done the same. You don't just hand over 1.9mil because some cunt smells money. Where does it say he settled? I am missing that part. "This whole legal action has been designed to force a payment from me and I think that the principle is completely wrong. And principles are worth fighting for." Doesn't sound like he 'just settled'. Mr Vince was not required to pay maintenance because it was agreed he had no money. Remember, this …
/r/TheRedPill12/06/16 09:26 AM
3

Exactly, since he is now worth millions, he has paid far more in taxes than the general population, and far more than the State stumped up in child support for the 14 years.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/16 09:13 AM
3

You mean England, I think. Scotland has a different legal system, and divorce issues are devolved. For example in England they have alimony, but in Scotland the preference is for a clean break. If there are no children under 16, you have lived apart for a year, and both agree to the divorce, then you can get a divorce straightforwardly. If one party doesn't agree, then you need to be apart for 2 years. If there is no disagreement about wealth distribution then you don't even need to go to court.…
/r/TheRedPill12/06/16 09:11 AM
4

there was no alimony (divorce settlement) when they divorced, because both knew that neither had any money. For the same reason he was not pursued by the authorities to pay child support at the time, nor in the three years after their divorce. The Child Support Agency is very keen to get fathers to pay up, so if he actually had a job they would have taken it. Later, he started the company that became successful, and the son went to live with him. He says that he gave her lots of support when he …
/r/TheRedPill12/06/16 08:59 AM
3

She sued him for back child support now that he has money. GBP1.9M for 'back child support' in the mid '80s? To pay back money that she never stumped up in the first place because she was on benefits anyway? Hardly, she is a useless pile of shit who saw that the man she let go because he was useless to her was now loaded, and she wanted to get a piece of the pie. The rest, about him having a job that paid more than a subsistence, is pure conjecture. New Age travellers don't earn loads of money. …
/r/TheRedPill12/06/16 08:45 AM
3

It sounds like they just sort of parted ways No, they separated after a couple of years in the mid '80s and got legally divorced in 1992. There was no divorce settlement since they were both penniless. The child was looked after by her (sorry, 'looked after' by her) but at the State's expense of course. It doesn't cost that much. Later, when he started the business, his son went and lived with him, and still does.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/16 07:30 PM
5

Canada is the rabbit those dogs are chasing
/r/TheRedPill11/06/16 07:22 PM
8

"Teach men not to white-knight", could be a slogan
/r/TheRedPill11/06/16 07:20 PM
9

This case is certainly an adject lesson, a new cultural low, the very idea that an ex-wife can take something from you that was gained years after you broke up with her. On prenups, it is not the same everywhere. I think in some places in Europe they have a long history and are pretty solid; in the US they are of some use but limited; they don't really exist in the UK. Something like this needs to be written in stone and obviously fair, not biased towards the woman, or marriage as an institution…
/r/TheRedPill11/06/16 07:14 PM
114

I heard about this when it first came up last year, but never imagined that the system was so totally fucked up that she would actually win. I mean, WHAT THE FUCK! How is that in any sense a system of justice? It isn't even as if the one child they share is being looked after by her, or that there was any overlap whatsoever between the time they were together and the time he started his successful company. Then she has the gall to talk about 'woman power' when she has been a useless bag of shit …
/r/TheRedPill11/06/16 12:39 PM
2

Well, I agree with you entirely, but it doesn't look like you actually disagreed with me. I'm not saying that they are 'evil' to extract resources from men (over the history of our species, that is, I'm not talking specifically about now). I think it was actually essential given the sex-specific roles that were adopted, and those were successful roles, making us one of the dominant species on the planet. We are inherently a species that lives in small tribal groups in a hostile environment. It d…
/r/TheRedPill11/06/16 08:57 AM
1

On the one hand, I hate feminism as much as I hate all the other fascist movements that arose in the 20th century. However, I'm also aware that, contrary to what they intended, they did a great service for men, and a great disservice to women. I'm reminded of what Pook said about this: -The liberation of women is only resulting in the liberation of men. Men are free to shrug off the old family chains and responsibilities since there is no pressure to marry. Men can have sex with any woman almost…
/r/TheRedPill10/06/16 10:25 PM
10

When I adopted Stoicism as my life philosophy I read up about praemeditatio malorum, I started by contemplating the day I would lose my truck, my house, stuff like that. But I like to go hard-core, so pretty soon started contemplating my own death, that last breath. It was pretty hard at first, although strangely not depressing. After a while, along with vipassana meditation, it had the affect of making me notice and appreciate things much more. I was driving back the other evening, and was tota…
/r/TheRedPill10/06/16 10:15 PM
7

As I said before, men evolved to extract value from their environment; women evolved to extract value from men. How do you extract value from men? By deception, by knowing how to manipulate people's feelings and get the tribe on your side to back you up. But if you are a man in a hunting party or war party, this has no place. You are either there at the kill or you are not, you can't pretend. People either rely on you, or they pretty soon find out that you cannot be relied on. Jack Donovan wrote…
/r/TheRedPill10/06/16 07:53 PM
1

Heart of the problem, right there. Because you know, lots of women aren't totally selfish, untrustworthy, manipulative scumbags. We hear lots about women that are, but many women are not. The problem is, how the hell do you know? They are such good liers, I'm sure men who got taken for a ride (let's say, a certain Mr Depp) never imagined that his woman was like that, she was sweet and loving and attentive and butter wouldn't melt it her mouth. So what do you do? You just can't trust any of them,…
/r/TheRedPill10/06/16 07:49 PM
12

It doesn't even have to come from the woman. In the UK we have a feminist Director of Public Prosecutions who pressures the police to bring more rape convictions (because, you know, 'rape culture'). In the Ched Evans case, the woman had a few drinks (and therefore the goto excuse these days, 'she couldn't remember') and he was found guilty of rape and sent to prison. However, in the morning she had sent texts to friends claiming to have 'scored big' by sleeping with two professional footballers,…
/r/TheRedPill10/06/16 07:45 PM
12

You can also buy fake birth control pills on the internet, so she can take it right in front of you for that extra bit of convincing. 'You don't need a condom, honey! See, I just took my pill!". Women are Machiavellian by instinct.
/r/TheRedPill10/06/16 07:36 PM
28

This is why (or part of why) feminists were so determined to break in to gentlemen's clubs. They were convinced that the men in there were plotting with each other to keep the opposite sex down. They thought that because that is what women would do - and in fact were doing. The other part of it is because rather than build up their own companies and social structures, it was much easier and more fruitful to parasitize the companies, organizations and social structures built by men. Which actuall…
/r/TheRedPill10/06/16 07:34 PM
23

They do. There are groups where they discuss how to sabotage condoms, for example, and women are quite free with 'advice on how to lock him down'. There is no honour here. Some classics are where the NBA issued a warning to their players in 2004 to dispose of condoms down the loo, not just in the trash, after a rash of cases where women had fished them out of the trash and impregnated themselves. Naturally, the cuck femcentric judges decided that the players were still on the hook for child supp…
/r/TheRedPill10/06/16 07:29 PM
2

Exactly, we have two women in this post desperate to distract attention away from the clear conclusion, that women will behave exactly as you say. They either try to blame the man (you must be doing something, accept responsibility! like having a brain tumour or a parent dying are his fault), or say this behaviour is just about people, and you should draw no conclusions to guide you in your future interactions with women (which was the response to the manosphere early on, that there were no clea…
/r/TheRedPill09/06/16 07:29 PM
2

You are amusing, getting your knickers in a twist about this. So, it is the guy's fault? OK, from a woman that makes total sense. And indeed that much I agree with, it was a mistake to assume that the women involved had loyalty and honour. There are loads of examples of women getting supported by their boyfriend while they finish their degree and then dump him the moment they graduate, loads of examples of women leaving a man at the worst possible moment (such as just as his finals are starting)…
/r/TheRedPill09/06/16 04:53 PM
3

Precisely, glad someone understands. There is a lot of garbage written around here about women in love, in spite of it being spelled out perfectly clearly in the sidebar (which perfectly matches my experience). People confuse love-the-feeling (which women certainly have, even obssess over), and love-the-commitment, which is a male thing. The romantic idea of undying love is not something that women can readily achieve (note, did not say that no woman, nowhere, no how, ever achieved it), although…
/r/TheRedPill09/06/16 04:33 PM
2

Quite possibly, I don't have enough data to say. On the other hand, women and horses - now there is a love affair
/r/TheRedPill09/06/16 04:27 PM
2

Thanks for the update. If he actually made a promise to her to support her financially, then fair enough, he can't cry foul if he is asked to keep his promises. It is where there is no such promise, or only so long as you are together, but are nonetheless stung for money beyond that that I object to.
/r/TheRedPill08/06/16 07:18 PM
-1

Stop asking random people on the internet, and start asking him. If he is redpill, he is aware that he needs to be a leader. Therefore, you need to follow, to support. Asking other people's advice is not following. If you must ask, ask the RPWs, not us.
/r/askTRP08/06/16 06:50 PM
1

This applies to California, not generally in the States (and certainly not elsewhere) I presume. So what happened with Lee? Always liked the guy. Women are not gold-diggers right? Right. Did he win? Did he actually make an oral contract with her in front of witnesses, or is this just her story? And exactly what would they consider an 'implied' contract?
/r/TheRedPill08/06/16 06:24 PM
1

Bandler and Grinder. The classic starter was 'Frogs into Princes', but what we are talking about here is more in the realm of 'The Structure of Magic' vols I and II. Some of it is pure bullshit, but some of it certainly isn't, and I have used it to good effect. 'Reframing' is a pretty good book that you can use to your advantage. When I went to university, I was very closed off, very withdrawn and shy. In my last year of my first degree we each had to give a talk on our research project to the w…
/r/TheRedPill08/06/16 05:32 PM
3

she values her sex – or rather she thinks you should value sex with her - more than she values your sex (and more than she thinks you should think she values having sex with you) she thinks she values... no, she values that you think, wait... she thinks she values more than you value what she thinks.. fuck, I need a drink
/r/TheRedPill08/06/16 05:02 PM
2

Your pledge becomes your "common law marriage" in many states. Actually in only 7 states out of 50 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common-law_marriage_in_the_United_States No common law marriage in most of the world, including Europe (doesn't exist in the UK), but something pretty similar in Australia and Canada, so be careful there.
/r/TheRedPill08/06/16 04:53 PM
1

Most places don't have common law (most States don't have it, UK doesn't have it). The State only fairly recently took over the marriage business, and has totally messed it up. Before that, it was the job of churches, and they reinforced it by producing a social stigma against divorcees that women were loathe to confront. With the State in charge, there is nothing behind the marriage contract in your favour, it is purely an agreement that you will pay her for leaving you, that is all. There is n…
/r/TheRedPill08/06/16 04:44 PM
5

A wife without a ring is looking to branch swing. Be careful out there, you are in her line of fire.
/r/TheRedPill08/06/16 04:37 PM
2

Machiavellianism, to a man, is an art form; to a woman, an instinct. That is why you think this behaviour is obvious, you just think that way. Men need to learn from their own (or preferably from other's) experience that women are like this, because this is not how men generally think. Men tend to say what they mean and mean what they say, and if they make a commitment it actually means something, and you don't kick someone you claim to 'love' when they are down. They have to learn that women ar…
/r/TheRedPill08/06/16 02:57 PM
2

but it's a hell of a lesson learned Agreed. Dont let it make you think of women in a low light And you immediately try to deflect him away from learning that lesson. He thought that women have loyalty and honour, that he could treat her as he would a man, but he learned that he could not. You would like him to swallow that blue pill again and believe that NAWALT, but we have more examples than we can throw a stick at. Right now, he is invulnerable, because he knows what to expect.
/r/TheRedPill08/06/16 02:34 PM
4

Right. both 'lydella' and 'kryptokate' batting for Team Woman on this post, trying to convince everyone that NAWALT. But I have hung around here nearly 2 years now, and the sheer number of examples of such shitty behaviour by women is pretty convincing that this isn't a once-off. Loyalty and honour are not common traits amongst women, as the divorce statistics (great majority brought about by women, ALL of whom gave a solemn vow that they would stick with the man) and litany of false rape accusa…
/r/TheRedPill08/06/16 02:23 PM
3

Hear what she and other women are saying? Ignore your experience, ignore the experience of other men (plenty of examples in this post). No, just trust women, they are really here for you. Just open yourself up, be vulnerable (= able to be damaged). You learn and grow. This doesn't 'fuck you up' it just removes the veil of delusion from your eyes, and let's you see the world as it is. Once you see things as you are you are able to act appropriately and in your own best interest, rather than in th…
/r/TheRedPill08/06/16 01:48 PM
2

It is important for men to understand the ways that women operate, particularly around relationships (well, why else are you involved with women?). This is why we are here, and this is why women have a great need to invade male spaces. It is why they hate the idea of gentlemen's clubs, it is why there are a number of women in this thread saying that women generally are not this way, they are only thinking about what is best for you, honest! When men get together, without the tone-policing of wom…
/r/TheRedPill08/06/16 01:44 PM
5

Buy a kettlebell, probably 16kg to start. That one investment saves you a couple of years gym fees. Or Buy a copy of You Are Your Own Gym (paperback or ebook), or the ipad app of same, or a copy of Convict Conditioning. You can do it with no equipment at all.
/r/TheRedPill08/06/16 11:32 AM
1

I think the Women are Wonderful idea has worn pretty thin. Far too many examples where it is done just when it is most harmful, like when a parent dies or is diagnosed with cancer, when he loses his job, just as he starts taking his final exams, etc etc. I have no doubt whatever that women tell themselves that they are the good guys even when they are being the shittiest human beings imaginable, but that doesn't mean they are.
/r/TheRedPill08/06/16 11:17 AM
3

It is very firmly established that you cannot rely on women to give you support if you hit a low point. Women will abandon you if you lose your job, and if you become depressed they will abandon you because 'you are no longer the man I fell in love with'. The same is not true the other way around, men will tend to support women who lose their job or become depressed. You rely on yourself and your good friends, but never rely on women.
/r/TheRedPill08/06/16 10:52 AM
3

Absolutely right, even with decent women (some of the women here really sound like nutcases). I had one who used to tell me how petty her husband was (this generally happened in a cosy talk after sex). I listened and sympathized. As I got to know her better, guess who I found to be the most petty-minded person I have ever met? You know in the first Bourne film when he found out he was an assassin, and he said that everything he had found out about himself he wished he could forget? One day, I th…
/r/TheRedPill08/06/16 10:16 AM
2

very annoying, because I had just that. Not 'the opposite' but that there was no effect on number of previous partners of men and the likelihood of divorce. Having trouble finding it now, but I know I cited it in a comment here some months back. When I find it I'll post. Men and women are not the same, so I don't find that part so surprising. What I am a bit skeptical of is the idea, which I have read quite often here, that number of partners 'damages' the ability to pair-bond, with the implicat…
/r/TheRedPill08/06/16 08:51 AM
3

No, why would I? Men and women are different in a number of ways (and of course the same in others), but this is one of the differences, the difference between evolved polygamy and evolved hypergamy as sexual strategies, and the psychological effects of each. Women having a number of prior sexual partners has a deleterious effect on the likelihood of a new LTR/marriage succeeding https://www.jstor.org/stable/3600089?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents https://i.imgur.com/ogM4enk.jpg http://socialpathol…
/r/TheRedPill06/06/16 11:09 PM
2

I always think it is great when there is a post elsewhere about how 'evil' and 'misogynist' TRP is. Then lots of people come here to scoff and laugh at these useless ne'er-do-wells, and a good number find themselves agreeing with what they read. This is how awareness spreads through society. Streisand Effect
/r/TheRedPill06/06/16 07:10 PM
2

Feminism is an ideology, TRP is a praxeology. Big difference. Your are spot on.
/r/TheRedPill06/06/16 07:08 PM
2

Spot on. Women enjoying sex is something I can appreciate. The question is, enjoying with how many? Somebody put it well recently, that it isn't enjoying sex that makes a woman a slut, it is lack of self control that does it. I really liked the story of a guy in a diner (american restaurant) with a couple of girls, as I recall it was his sister and her feminist friend. The friend was making out that a woman having lots of sex did not degrade her. He said that if a woman has sex with 1000 men in …
/r/TheRedPill06/06/16 06:57 PM
1

You can only be divorce raped if you get divorced, and you can't get divorced if you never married. We have to get away from this idea that you need a licence from the government in order to have a family. It is still possible to have a family that does not fall apart, but you have to minimize the cost if it does, which means you don't marry her and you don't let her stop working. Men are, rightfully, holding back on their commitment to women, and this is a great cost to women (for all the prete…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/16 11:24 AM
3

Agreed, but judgement also is based on context. If a woman is a slut, that is absolutely fine if what you are looking for is a slut (ie, someone just for sex). Well, nothing wrong with sex, and having a good supply of easy women in the world makes that possible. From that point of view, feminism has been a boon. On the other hand, if you actually want an LTR, if you are thinking of investing in a relationship, of giving your commitment, then it bloody well does matter whether she can keep her le…
/r/TheRedPill04/06/16 10:27 PM
5

Never heard of her, had to look her up. She was pretty? Doesn't look it, and she seems to have been in lots of things but not one I have seen. For a moment I thought it was Rose McGiver (now, she is pretty), but no, some post-wall bitch. Who cares? Why on Earth are people listening to this whining?
/r/TheRedPill04/06/16 06:59 PM
6

Do you think that NATO is really incapable of securing a few kilometers of sea and land? Or even the EU, as incompetant as they are. It was pretty transparent, actually. They have sea patrols on the main migration routes, but what do the warships do when they intercept a boat full of migrants? They help them into Europe! Not take them back to where they came from, not blockade the ports where they set off from, help them across. And then Merkel, who bears a very large responsibility for the mess…
/r/TheRedPill04/06/16 04:55 PM
32

Humans cannot consciously multi-task (ie cannot do more than one thing at once that requires conscious attention). We can multi-task once a task can be relegated to the subconscious, like driving while having a conversation once you get used to driving. When people talk about multi-tasking they are really talking about context-switching. Women tend to be better at this, for the very good reason that they commonly have less context to switch. For example, if you are deep into a complicated progra…
/r/TheRedPill03/06/16 09:45 PM
17

Agreed, the HB system is way too skewed. 'average' is 5. above 5 we are definitely into pretty, and by 7.5 into beautiful. A lot of guys put 6 as 'not fat or ugly' which is giving way too much credit. Probably better to use a 3-point system that is clearer. definitely fuck any port in a storm wouldn't touch with somebody else's dick
/r/TheRedPill03/06/16 09:32 PM
2

Do you happen to have a link? You mean like this? https://womenformen.org/2014/09/03/mallory-millet-sister-of-feminist-kate-millett-exposes-the-damage-left-in-feminisms-wake/ 2nd wave was built on Marx and Engels, look at the language in Redstockings Manifesto http://www.redstockings.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=76&Itemid=59 which follows from what Greer did in The Female Eunuch. She took Marx' ideas on historical class struggle, and just substituted 'women' for 'proletariat'…
/r/TheRedPill03/06/16 06:53 PM
2

Yes, women's hypergamy has always been at odds with the advancements of civilization. Men build civilizations, not women. Some women, such as Paglia and Hoff-Sommers, would argue that feminism started as a righteous and just cause, but went astray in the late '60s with the rise of second wave (The Feminine Mystique, The Female Eunuch, Sexual Politics), when it became man-hating and grossly unjust. I disagree, that was there from the beginning (as anyone who looks into the Pankhursts would see). …
/r/TheRedPill03/06/16 08:40 AM
2

This isn't surprising, is it? First, they are aware that they are reducing their value by riding the CC (if they weren't aware, there wouldn't be an ASD). 'Value' in terms of getting the LTR/marriage with the high value man they are fantasizing about. When that guy comes on the scene they are going to be competing with one another, so better make sure everyone is dragged down to the same level. And this (slut shaming) isn't some 'social construct', but basic to any animal where the male provides…
/r/TheRedPill03/06/16 08:24 AM
5

I fully understand men wanting children. Your problem is social indoctrination telling you that this means you have to sign a one-sided contract with the government. This is NEVER in your best interest, whether you want children or not. A long-term relationship is the best way to have healthy kids, fully agree (we all know what a total disaster single mothers are, and if there isn't a relationship the chances are the woman will get to spend most or all of the parenting). But having a marriage ce…
/r/TheRedPill02/06/16 08:45 PM
4

I largely agree (and I have a child myself), but you don't need a legal marriage contract to do it. That is where the original RPW sub fell down. You are still on the hook for child support if it goes south, but still better off than signing a contract, which is essentialy cutting your balls off and handing them to her. It is also not good to try to have monogamous relationships in such a climate, as that just feeds in to giving power to the woman, and women handle power badly. Having the abilit…
/r/TheRedPill02/06/16 07:47 PM
1

Pussy pass^ [edit] You can certainly view feminism as a society-wide shit test which we have failed. However, seeing men's failure is not the same as excusing women's failure. We are where we are because men gave women the vote. In hindsight this can be seen as a new experiment, and one that has failed. But at the time, people did not have the experiments that showed how much women are biased in favour of women, and while people like Schopenhauer wrote that women have an underdeveloped sense of …
/r/TheRedPill02/06/16 07:15 PM
20

the one woman he does want to keep in his life I think we are past that point. Monogamy built civilization, but in its decline phase it is no longer really viable (certainly not optimal as a goal for men). You can't put the genie back into the bottle; you can't stop women voting, and thus making laws and government policy ever more biased towards women; you can't stop society breaking down. You are right, of course, that without relationships that produce children, the society dies, and the root…
/r/TheRedPill02/06/16 07:03 PM
1

People start from different places, have different strengths and weaknesses, different wrong ideas, so it can't be definite. Personally, I would read The Rational Male (the book), IllimitableMan's website, The book of Pook in the sidebar, and Black Dragon's blog if you are interested in the mechanics of relationships. Whether books like No More Mr Nice Guy is helpful depends on whether it addresses a problem you have (it didn't for me, but other people swear by it).
/r/TheRedPill01/06/16 11:13 PM
3

Good to hear about that tipping point. Sometimes it is hard to face up to change, but you really need it. This relationship you describe is the shits and you need to end it. This is not what male/female relationships should be like, need to be like, or work at all for any length of time. And they make you (and her, but that is by-the-by) miserable because it takes away your self respect. Get rid of the oneitis. You say she was 'reluctant to go exclusive', this is ass-backwards. Your job is to ge…
/r/TheRedPill01/06/16 07:13 PM
1

This could be the weakest thing I've read on this sub. You have read the sidebar right? Maybe read The Book of Pook again. First, you are the rock, you absolutely don't show weakness to a woman. Saying you are stressed is saying you have difficulties coping with your life. She can feel weak and emotionally overwhelmed and come to you for support, you provide the security and strength she is looking for. She does not need another child she needs to support, by giving sex or anything else. You don…
/r/TheRedPill24/05/16 08:29 AM
4

Very good, the sort of post I come here for. Thoughtful, analytic, yet practical. We are all subject to that chemical maelstrom at the most unexpected times, and it can make us weak and stupid, so understanding it is very useful, both to have better control over ourselves, and to understand how it gives us power over others (ie women). I remember my deep need for sex and affection when I was young, exacerbated by my school experiences leading me to cut myself off from people, which took years to…
/r/TheRedPill21/05/16 09:56 PM
5

When these studies talk about how much money women 'earn' they take a very narrow definition of 'earn'. The first part is just the academic fields that women prefer, and the sort of jobs they take (ie, generally the easier ones in both cases). Fair enough, they earn less due to their choice of subject/job. This is their own shitty choices. The second part is where women give up 'earning' money because they get married in order to have children. This is not blameworthy, having children is what th…
/r/TheRedPill21/05/16 08:45 PM
3

Why is this in any sense surprising. Feminism is the most influential form of Cultural Marxism, it grew directly out of it, so of course they would argue for the State to run everything and 'share' people's money (ie, give men's money to women). The early 2nd wavers directly quote Marx and Engels. Hell, the term 'patriarchy', as in Patriarchy Theory, was taken by Greer from a book by Freidrich Engels.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/16 08:29 PM
1

Great advice, someone that I work with comes to mind instantly. Not forgetting kettlebell swings to work up your whole posterior chain. If you can't get to a gym, kettlebells are cheaper than buying a lot of equipment like benches and barbells, if money (or space) is tight.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/16 09:35 AM
2

Well, the outcome of the great Nature/Nurture debate of the early/mid 20th century was 'both', and it is really hard to separate them sometimes. For AWALT, yes that propensity to cheat and harvest good genes from elsewhere and cover that up, it is an evolved trait; but the extent to which it is acted out in a person's life is very much influenced by society, what girls are taught in growing up, the consequences of being caught out, etc. TRP is very much based on evolutionary psychology, because …
/r/TheRedPill19/05/16 07:13 PM
1

She doesn't have to, but that doesn't mean she can't. Well, you are not to be persuaded, but people here generally have experience of women that they can draw upon, I'll let them draw their own conclusions. However, I point out that 'women are incapable of love' is not exactly a central RP finding, the sidebar and much of the central figures in the manosphere would disagree, and so would I. As I said, the danger is thinking that women love the way men do, expecting it to be constant, that it wou…
/r/TheRedPill19/05/16 07:03 PM
2

You say this every time, and you show black and white thinking, and in doing so throw away your biggest weapon. Of course women can love (it says so right there in the side bar, and if you haven't been on the receiving end, well you have a ways to go). But you confuse 'love' with 'loyalty', because for men these are intricately linked. For women, they are not, they are living in the moment, their emotions are changeable like the wind. You could say that what women call 'love' should have a diffe…
/r/TheRedPill19/05/16 05:59 PM
1

I have two reasons for listening to music: to listen to music, and to not listen to music. If I am listening to music, it is my downtime. I switch off everything else and breathe in those good vibrations. Good music makes life worth living. If I listen to music to not listen to music, it is to shut out everything else and concentrate. If I am writing some code and there is distracting conversation going on, or just noise generally, or my concentration isn't that great, I put on headphones. It sh…
/r/TheRedPill19/05/16 05:03 PM
6

I've found, quite often, that women don't have the stomach to stick with a man through a hard time such as that. Particularly younger women who've never had to deal with anything difficult in their lives yet and simply don't know how. I think this is true, and I also am not bothered by it - not anymore, anyway. Since I value loyalty to one's friends, and bluepill me thought your woman was also your 'closest friend' it used to piss me off, but I no longer see women as valuable friends. They are t…
/r/TheRedPill19/05/16 12:27 PM
1

Not sure that I have seen the stuff you are talking about (which I guess is about the spiritual side that some people talk about with relation to meditation - attaining Satori and so on) on this forum. If you are saying that meditation does nothing other that makes you calm for a short time afterwards, though, that impression is easily corrected: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Research_on_meditation As you see, there has been (and continues to be) quite a lot of research on the effects of (partic…
/r/TheRedPill19/05/16 09:27 AM
1

If there is one thing that men are definitely better than women at, it is letting women get away with everything and everything. Fixed that for you.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/16 10:44 PM
1

cough Marissa Mayer cough Also, David Cameron's Quota Babes (eg Nicky Morgan)
/r/TheRedPill17/05/16 10:42 PM
8

This I agree with, it is the cause of much difficulties in a society where men are regarded at the enemy, rather than closest ally. Traditionally, the queen could be very valuable to the king by being his source of information on the feelings and attitudes of the people around him. Now, women look out for themselves and are of little value to men, as feminism has conditioned them to exploit rather than support.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/16 10:39 PM
6

The average woman is not smarter than the average man, in fact the average man is a little over three IQ points higher than the average woman. Further, there are more women with below average IQ, and more men with above average IQ. We already had this discussion, with the studies, recently. No need to rehash it. Desperation to show that women are equal to men but different is just blue-pill conditioning. As for fine motor control, that is not as straightforward as some here suggest. http://www.s…
/r/TheRedPill17/05/16 10:31 PM
1

You lost me, what is he 'buying'? For $1000 per month he could get very decent hookers, and stop the payment plan whenever he wanted. Jeesh, we think women are dumb, but really I wonder which are dumber sometimes.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/16 07:36 PM
1

Another difference between men and women. If the sexes had been reversed, we would have heard about how 'oppressed' women were, and how Daddy Government must step in to protect them from nasty men stealing from them. She is a strong independent poor helpless woman! But it is a man, and we all say, 'what a useless pile of shit! Get your act together you dumb cuck!'. We hold men to much higher standards, and I'm all for that.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/16 07:32 PM
2

Nail, meet head. If he had said, 'yeah, it sucks, but that is the law, I'm not going to allow myself to get bitter about it, I can still be happy with what I have. She is gone and forgotten, I'm getting on with my life', then lots of respect. But to frame it as 'I was raised to respect women. I'm a proud feminist. See, she used feminist laws to steal from me, isn't it wonderful!' is a fucking cuck.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/16 07:27 PM
2

Divorce rape is theft, pure and simple. There is nothing remotely honourable about it (sorry to bring up the word, it still means something to me). Looking after your family, both while alive and after you are gone, is not theft, it is your choice. The divorcing wife takes the money using the strong-arm of the State. The parents give the money freely to their children. Why is that hard to distinguish?
/r/TheRedPill17/05/16 07:23 PM
5

Because you want to be wealthy, but you want to be able to look people in the eye and tell them how you did it. Kudos.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/16 07:19 PM
2

Many of us do understand the situation, which is one of the the points (not the only one) driving the debate around Brexit right now (cheers for Obama's input, by the way). The Remain crowd, heavily funded because some people make a lot of money from unrestricted immigration keeping wages low, make up all kinds of stupid stuff (world war III if we leave, would you believe), and I think people generally may be stupid enough to believe the propaganda. Not that in makes any difference in the long r…
/r/TheRedPill17/05/16 07:12 PM
1

Although not the same, the standard in Scotland is to make a 'clean break' too. If there are no children under 16, then all it takes is 1 year separation. If you can both agree on the financial division, you don't even need a court appearence, just get a solicitor to work out the details. They try to avoid ongoing commitments like alimony, just divide and go your own way. Now, there is still that division, and women marry up, so it isn't really a fair one, but at least alimony isn't in it (the i…
/r/TheRedPill17/05/16 07:06 PM
3

The call for 'women role models' does say something about the herd mentality of women, though. 'I can't do it, because other women aren't doing it'.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/16 06:51 PM
3

Keep watching the EU, they want to bring it in 'across the board', so to speak.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/16 06:48 PM
3

Well, based on this one data point (considering the study results as 'a data point'), yes. However, we have other evidence about the business acumen of women, namely http://archive.is/dv5y5 So here we have one set of data which shows well established businesses that do worse when women are brought en masse onto the boards. Reasonable objection is that there weren't very many suitably qualified women around (because they didn't take proper degrees back in the day/were excluded from getting the ex…
/r/TheRedPill17/05/16 06:43 PM
3

Polar bears affect women more - because it's 2016, it's just true. Think of the poor women, kill the polar bears!
/r/TheRedPill16/05/16 05:59 PM
2

Same. I get that people are lonely, in fact I've seen loneliness called the great scourge of our age, yet I don't believe I have ever experienced it. Never. I enjoy being with people, at least often times (sometimes people are pretty boring, shallow, stupid), and I enjoy being alone. When I am alone, I am never bored, never without something to do or think about. But if I'm doing something or thinking about something, what room is there for loneliness, since I don't feel that I lack anything? I …
/r/TheRedPill14/05/16 03:55 PM
2

Men are the guardians of commitment, women are the guardians of sex. If a man has had lots of partners, it says that his SMV is high (otherwise the women would not have opened their legs to him). So he has been successful in his sexual strategy. If a woman has had lots of sexual partners but not achieved long-term stable relationships, then it says nothing about her SMV (any woman can get sex just by going into a bar and pointing to her crotch, it means nothing), but failing to get a man to comm…
/r/TheRedPill13/05/16 10:00 PM
16

I guaranty that neither of these pregnancies were planned for. Oh, they were planned all right, they just didn't let the man in on the plans.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/16 09:49 PM
1

I understand the feeling, and it comes from looking for external validation. You want life to be fulfilling as a result of the actions of another - a loving, faithful, intelligent, unicorn. The actions of others are always outside your control, and it is foolish to rely on them. Enjoyment of life comes from within, not from without. Well - I'm not the final word on this, Mr. Croker, but what [the ancient Stoic teacher Epictetus is] saying, it seems to me, he's saying that the only real possessio…
/r/TheRedPill13/05/16 09:33 PM
2

You know that feminists always love to talk about 'Stepford wives' if a woman is demure, attentive and submissive to her man? I always wonder if it ever strikes them that the robots in that film made better companions, better women, than modern women do? You would think that would give them pause, that women couldn't outcompete a robot at being a woman, but I guess not.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/16 06:13 PM
2

In the UK, marriage rates are down more than 40% since the start of 2nd wave (1970). It is still far too common, but awareness is spreading. You don't go for very long before reading about another divorce rape in the newspapers.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/16 10:38 PM
-1

Exactly. I find it particularly bizarre that Red Pill guys fall for this shaming trick. Remember, you are here to make the most of your life, which includes being a financial success, which means that you need to be savvy with finances, but it also means you will pay more taxes than those who are financially hopeless. You will pay to support the financially hopeless, you will pay to support all the single mothers and the drug addicts and the criminals who spend years at the State's expense. This…
/r/TheRedPill11/05/16 08:52 PM
0

Fully agree. There has been a campaign (started by Gordon Brown in the UK) which tries to confuse people about what 'tax avoidance' means. People think it means tax evasion. It does not, it means ordering your affairs, perfectly legally, to minimize your tax burden according to the rules set by parliament. The politicians made the rules, and these people are playing by them. There is nothing immoral about not paying more taxes than you are legally required to do. Having offshore accounts to take…
/r/TheRedPill11/05/16 06:30 PM
2

Now that is very interesting. I had never heard of BPD associated with men, so wondered about that (it has come up many times about women). I was aware that men are more likely to be autistic, and associated it with masculinity. That, pushed to an extreme, feminine brains become disfunctional through too much emotion, and masculine brains before disfunctionaly through too little is rather neat, actually.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/16 04:57 PM
2

Of course he is. I can feel this dick's charisma just oozing out of the screen, or something is.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/16 04:54 PM
9

Whats the main difference? The religion of immigrants? Yes, religion and culture. If Poles want to come to the UK, so what? They assimilate, and before you know it they are as British as the rest. If Norwegians go to live in Sweden, even less difference. But when people from an alien culture that is incompatible with your own and a religion that breeds intolerance and violence comes (if you are not part of the Umma and considered an 'infidel'), then the society must either kick them out or fall …
/r/TheRedPill10/05/16 03:59 PM
2

Well, I certainly don't trust women, but that is because, as you say, I recognise they they have an agenda in life just as I do, and it may to a greater or lesser extent be at odds with my own. For WaF, they show some signs of understanding, even if ultimately it is to further their own goals. I don't diss people for trying to advance their goals, only the methods they might use to do so. So, given that, whatever their limitations, they are not as shitty as feminists, and given that society (rea…
/r/TheRedPill10/05/16 01:04 PM
28

Until feminism and feminist attitudes, and SJWs, and all the PC bullshit is dealt with, is the culture worth fighting for?
/r/TheRedPill10/05/16 12:42 PM
2

http://www.kappit.com/img/109158/feminism-strong-smart-and-independent-until-things-get-a-little-bit-difficult/
/r/TheRedPill10/05/16 12:40 PM
1

I used to see that a lot. If she did something wrong and I point it out, she immediately went into attack mode looking for something that I did wrong to deflect criticism. It comes from the inability to see themselves as anything but in the right. It is the same thinking behind regret rape.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/16 09:47 AM
2

I have heard many times about BPD in women, which I have not encountered but sounds horrific. Is it something particularly associated with women, or do men get it equally?
/r/TheRedPill10/05/16 09:36 AM
9

She is annoying as fuck, I couldn't stand 10 minutes with her. He is clearly an expert driver who knows the track like the back of his hand, and she just couldn't stop telling him how to drive ("Don't drive on the curb, Ninho!"). Jesus, women can be annoying sometimes. These girls are much more fun to watch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfZNy9RBzys
/r/TheRedPill09/05/16 09:13 PM
1

That's interesting (and hilarious. "academic textbook' sounding i.e. 'world war II'"). I think, in general, that you are right (unfortunately, I enjoy an intellectual discussion). But consider this: Haselton, M. G. and Miller, G. F. (2006). Women’s fertility across the cycle increases the short-term attractiveness of creative intelligence. Human Nature, 17(1):50–73. Male provisioning ability may have evolved as a "good dad" indicator through sexual selection, whereas male creativity may have evo…
/r/TheRedPill09/05/16 06:12 PM
2

what this means is that at both ends, the ultra-smart, as well as the ultra-stupid, men outnumber women Covered this in my comment above. What the paper referred to by OP is showing is precisely that the mean is not the same for both men and women, but that men's mean is around 3.8 points higher, and further that the difference caused by greater variance is not shown equally either side of the mean for this very reason. Go ahead and take a look at fig.1 in the paper. The paper here looks at remo…
/r/TheRedPill09/05/16 03:01 PM
1

I think that needs to be refined a bit. What the data show is: 1) Those above the mean intelligence are proportionately more likely to be male. The further above the mean you go, the greater the disproportion in favour of males. 2) Those at or below the mean are proportionately more likely to be female. 3) At the extreme low end of genetic disorders (IQ below 40) more men are likely to suffer the defect than women. Around 1 in 4000 men to 1 in 8000 women. So taking the difference, that means 0.0…
/r/TheRedPill09/05/16 02:42 PM
2

Well said, there is a great deal of hamstering going on in this thread, which is ironic because I was accused of hamstering by simply saying that I have no horse in this race, I just would like to know what is correct. For those who don't know, hamstering means rationalizing away an inconvenient behaviour or fact. The classic example is a woman behaving like a slut, but hamstering that 'it didn't count' because she took it in the ass/was drunk/I can't remember therefore it was rape/etc. In this …
/r/TheRedPill09/05/16 11:46 AM
1

This article You link just goes to the Science section in general, rather than a specific article. Could you make an archive perhaps? Also bear in mind this is the Guardian, hardly unbiased when it comes to sexual politics (as we ourselves saw recently). However, there is much in what you say anyway. My understanding, and I think this was also in The Empress is Naked by Adam Leonas (reviewed some while back in this sub, and I would recommend it), is that we are not naturally monogamous. Back in …
/r/TheRedPill09/05/16 09:11 AM
1

You are confusing matters by talking about mental retardation. The graphs are in the paper itself and what it shows is that men predominate at the upper part of the graph, above the mean, and women predominate at the lower tail of the graph, at the mean and below. By bringing in 'mental retardation' you are inviting people to think this means 'below average' but actually this is an extreme case, with IQ below 40. So technically, as I say below (with references) you are correct that there are mor…
/r/TheRedPill09/05/16 08:36 AM
2

I agree, although we need to define what 'retard' means, because it can be used rather loosely to mean someone with below average intelligence (which would not be supported by the evidence). In fact we are looking at people with IQs of 40 and below. This study shows that mental retardation occurs at a ration of 15/9 (male/female) in Turkey, and this study looks at Fragile X Syndrome as a cause of at least some of these, with incidence of 1 in 4000 for males (but may be as high as 1 in 2000) and …
/r/TheRedPill09/05/16 08:30 AM
9

Assertion without evidence. In fact, we are discussing a paper which shows the opposite (fig 1 in the paper, which you can also see here). This shows that the difference in the mean of 3.8 (larger for males) is sufficient to make all the difference due to greater variance (of males) show itself at the upper tail of the curve. I don't have any emotional investment in that. It certainly makes sense, given history, that there are more male geniuses than female, otherwise you would never get the hug…
/r/TheRedPill08/05/16 09:39 PM
2

Agreed, I saw it as clinging to the 'equality' meme, but as you say, they don't cancel out.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/16 06:42 PM
6

Better to learn from other people's mistakes than your own. If it is on point, I'm fine with it.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/16 06:40 PM
11

Beta males are for resources so don't hint any issue with that. Women are not good at handling bad stuff so shield them from it. Men are to provide a rock for her emotional roller-coaster so be sure not to display too much emotion. Stoicism is good, for you, and for your women.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/16 06:39 PM
10

Very good find, thanks for that. I have had arguments before with people who seem to accept that there is a larger variance in male IQ scores, but refuse to accept that there is any difference in the mean, and thus cling to the idea that while there may be more male geniuses, there are more male imbeciles too. This does not seem to be the case. For the average (by definition) guy or gal you meet this makes no difference, but looking at societies through history it makes a very great difference. …
/r/TheRedPill08/05/16 06:12 PM
3

I have no intention of trying to 'define' feminism, because even feminists can't do that. This is how they get away with the no true scotsman fallacy so much (the second-favourite response of feminists, after the usual shaming tactics). We can, I think, isolate a few core principles that you probably have to accept to be reasonably called a feminist, eg Patriarchy Theory, Rape Culture, the Wage Gap Myth are pretty core. After that it is all up in the air. But it doesn't matter, because when push…
/r/TheRedPill08/05/16 05:53 PM
3

I cover specific policies in the link provided from definition #1. Feminists claim that they want equal rights, but in fact actively oppose equal rights, including all the Duluth model bullshit.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/16 05:45 PM
2

Well that's what I said. That I agree with definitions 1 and 2, but not 3 and 4. Saying that 'they are our equals' in that very simplistic way is definition 4, which is what is really meant, but the bait and switch is to substitute definitions 1 and 2 if you ever challange it. Social engineering comes primarily from definition 3.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/16 05:44 PM
3

It has done one bit of good, (good for men that is, it has done almost no good for women). Remember, much of what feminism claims as 'victories' were not due to feminism at all. The 'sex positive' section of feminism (there is also an anti-sex section, or more specifically, anti-sex-with-men) and the breaking of marriage has meant that those men who like to sleep with lots of women have a much freer rein than they used to have. I certainly acknowledge that. You can openly fuck lots of girls and …
/r/TheRedPill08/05/16 08:33 AM
6

Correct. MRA is the male equivalent of feminism, in that it wants to change the way society is run. TRP is a praxeology that guides men in getting the most out of life and relationships, given whatever circumstances you are in, based on observations of human behaviour. However, MRA isn't the same as feminism in that the MRA's (from what I have read, I am not one) actually want equality, they are not trying to gain superior privileges, unlike feminism. Anyway, whether we like it or not, we will e…
/r/TheRedPill07/05/16 07:19 PM
9

That's just unfair, that is REAL injustice, and if they were talking about that, how women are treated in some crazy South-American or African tribes, or in the Middle-East, I'd fucking call myself a feminist. I'll just reply to this part. From what I have read, this is NOT something forced by husbands, but carried out and enforced by older women. It is about reducing female sexual response, thus raising the price of pussy (if women gave it away for free, as Western women often do, the price goe…
/r/TheRedPill07/05/16 07:10 PM
26

On a society level, yes that is correct. However, the point of my post is what response do you have if you meet a feminist who then gives you a dictionary definition, attempts to take the moral high ground, and tries to shame you into saying that you, also, are a feminist? And this all revolves around the definition of 'equality', which plays a central role in the (totally misleading) dictionary definition they love so much. I was asked below to 'define' feminism, but that is totally beside the …
/r/TheRedPill07/05/16 04:28 PM
5

Exactly, feminism is the Feminine Imperative writ large, it is entirely about making everything go to women's advantage. Since we are consciously adopting a male sexual strategy (after acknowledging that there are two sexual strategies), one of the main characteristics of feminism is that it tries to do it from a male perspective. Because feminists want to be men, and are intensely jealous of the achievements of men. So traditionally, feminine sexual strategy involved working subtly behind the s…
/r/TheRedPill07/05/16 03:15 PM
9

Absolutely, as I recall the number of women in the UK who self-identify as feminists is 7-9%. In the US it was somewhere around 17% (and falling steadily). Feminism has associated itself with all the false rape accusation bullshit in universities, and political correctness (which everybody hates). You don't get the full extent of it generally, because while it still has power (and it certainly does) people play by Law 38 even if they have never heard of it. 150k people in this reddit alone and t…
/r/TheRedPill06/05/16 11:31 PM
5

But governments do need to be popular, or they are no longer the government. This is why feminists are so scared about the advent of the manosphere (and also why they are so scathing in their attacks on Women Against Feminism), because if they are very unpopular they can no longer impose their will on everyone else.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/16 09:00 PM
45

On the other side of the coin, feminism has made itself extremely unpopular. 'Feminist' was voted the most hated word in the Time poll (before they removed the option under pressure from feminists), and wherever there is open discussion free from censorship you find people despise feminism. They make them selves more and more abnoxious every year, and the whole 'but we just want equality' excuse gets thinner and thinner. Only total retards believe it at this point. So as these acknowledged fasci…
/r/TheRedPill06/05/16 07:49 PM
4

Is this true? Hard to imagine. 'Trigger warning: rational thought and facts ahead', is that how it goes?
/r/TheRedPill06/05/16 05:53 PM
5

frankly punch above our weight and NEVER get acknowledged for it Don't know about that. I'm from the UK, have an interest in military history, and have a high opinion of Canadian forces when the chips are down (same for Aussies and Kiwis). I don't think I'm alone in that over here.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/16 05:43 PM
2

Foolish or not in the great scheme of things, it is an honourable thing to have done. Let nobody tell you otherwise.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/16 05:39 PM
2

Hah! But this is why feminists started talking about 'gender' isn't it. Because sex is biologically determined, and there are precisely two of them (in mammals and birds, anyway). But feminists are desperate to be men, so they started using the term 'gender' because languages can have more than two genders (eg German). Since 'gender' is undefined when it comes to humans (it only has meaning in grammar) they could go ahead and define it any way they wished, and thus thoroughly muddy the waters. G…
/r/TheRedPill06/05/16 05:34 PM
2

You would have to be in a position of power and independence. Many men aren't, they have a job and need to earn a living. According to one Sandman Youtube vid I watched some time ago, it can be pretty bad in Canada even without you saying anything. The story was that men there were starting to carry a voice-activated recorder in their pocket to record all conversations they have during the day, because women had taken to complaining to management that the man had 'said something against women'. …
/r/TheRedPill06/05/16 10:20 AM
26

MY WHOLE GENDER I am not a noun, I am a mammal. Mammals have a sex, they do not have a 'gender'. There are precisely two sexes, no more, no less. You can tell which one by looking at the chromosomes (if external genitalia don't tell you the story). As for being a sexist, I used to be one, and I still am, and I intend to continue being one. It means that I treat the two sexes differently in some situations - because they are fucking different!
/r/TheRedPill05/05/16 10:35 PM
2

I see, ok I agree with that.
/r/TheRedPill05/05/16 10:25 PM
10

Yes, I argued this in the comments section of a national newspaper (before they basically shut down comments because too many people were anti-feminist in their views, which needs to be hidden from the masses, of course). To make marriage viable again, and thus get the birth rate back up to at least replacement levels, would need 1) No alimony. There is absolutely no reason for a man to support a woman who is not his wife - especially when it was her idea not to be. The excuse that she was not w…
/r/TheRedPill05/05/16 10:17 PM
16

Depends on what exactly you mean by 'own', but the relationships that were the smoothest and where the woman seemed happiest were those where there was no question about how was leading the relationship (me). I dominated (not in a brutal way, I took care of them, but they did what I told them), they followed, and no ifs or buts. When it was more 'equal' (read, I went beta), there was more drama, neither of us was happy. 'Persuasion' I am not keen on. Verbal gymnastics are women's sphere of influ…
/r/TheRedPill05/05/16 10:00 PM
11

I may be wrong, but I get the feeling a recent comment of mine triggered this, in which case I am very glad it did. Women are most definitely capable of love, but it has a different basis from a man's love, and the big mistake we make is thinking it is the same. This is why the feminist-inspired 'equal partnership' is such a disaster. Women truly believe they want this, but as in so many things, they have no idea what they really want. If she can't respect you, if she can't admire you, if she ca…
/r/TheRedPill05/05/16 09:54 PM
3

Look forward to reading it. The great insight from Rollo's rule was not that women are worthless, or that they cannot love at all, but finally realizing what it is that women fall in love with. That whole men>women>children>pets thing. A man may think that a woman is a hopeless dork, not understanding much, not in any sense his equal, yet love her anyway, just as parents love young children even though they are far less in abilities both mental and physical. That doesn't work for women at all, h…
/r/TheRedPill05/05/16 08:44 AM
10

Fully with you. I'm fine with guys here expressing anger at women and society (and often their past selves). God knows, I have written enough angry words myself. To me though, I draw the line at exchanging one fantasy for another. The Red Pill analogy is waking up to see the world as it really is, not diving into something equally divorced from reality. Case in point is guys saying that women are 'evil' or 'incapable of feeling love'. I don't hold women in high regard anymore, I have much higher…
/r/TheRedPill04/05/16 09:50 PM
2

And that censorship is likely to increase. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/libe/dv/11_revframework_statute_/11_revframework_statute_en.pdf see section 2(e)
/r/TheRedPill04/05/16 09:23 PM
2

The Bear Grylls one we discussed on this sub before. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL_j-IKbSGRK_9xk-ZBJaTpCrOzu0VIjfm Dutch survivor I think was this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqfAt7TshLw
/r/TheRedPill04/05/16 03:51 PM
6

Your first sentence is quite possibly true, but does not excuse the second one. A decision not to marry is rational, it does not need hamstering. Signing a one-way contract with the government that is purely optional, in exchange for nothing that you couldn't get without said contract, is just stupid. That does not mean that every marriage will end up with the woman looking to divorce-rape you, but odds of around 1-in-2 for half of everything you have ever worked for is simply insane. There is n…
/r/TheRedPill04/05/16 01:01 PM
3

This brings to mind two things. First is that we now have dishwashers, laundry machines and dryers, vacuum cleaners, plus online grocery shopping with home delivery (generally all invented by men) and women still bitch that men don't do enough chores around the house. That is a brilliant observation! Thanks for that perspective. It is indeed the dynamic OP was talking about. For the survivor thing, may not be the one you were thinking of, but there was a Dutch survivor where some women went to t…
/r/TheRedPill04/05/16 11:24 AM
4

Exactly how I see it. I dislike him almost as much (well, ok, not as much, but pretty much) as I dislike the regressive left. However, I would still want him to win in order to 'balance the force'. The Overton window needs to be shifted right, it has drifted into crazy territory, to a mode of thinking that will bring down this civilization.
/r/TheRedPill04/05/16 11:12 AM
1

True, but not sure there is an objective assessment anywhere in the media. Breitbart perhaps? I think someone needed to stand up to SJW/Feminist 'narratives' and end this suicidal self-loathing that the west has adopted. So (I'm from UK) I would vote for Trump given the option, but I wouldn't like it. I think he is pretty obnoxious and don't trust him at all, and just wish there was someone better to front that rebellion. As for Obama, he was pretty popular early on, but much less so now. When h…
/r/TheRedPill04/05/16 11:07 AM
13

When a woman complains about something, they usually just want to vent and have someone validate their anger/frustration/unhappiness rather than to solve their problems or create a plan for how they can solve the problems themselves. Men are more the other way: they want assistance or someone to bounce ideas off of to figure out a solution to a problem. You have basically summed up why it is that men create civilizations (and maintain them), rather than women. This has happened all through histo…
/r/TheRedPill04/05/16 10:06 AM
2

we are not that far apart, in that there are some stupid things said recently which conform neither to reality nor red pill theory generally, and it helps nobody. However, taking the red pill is about facing reality, whether it is popular, approved by women, liked by us, whatever. Because to be effective in a situation it helps to have a clear and accurate understanding. If we say that men and women are 'equal', not just in a political or legal sense, but in all senses, this is just delusional. …
/r/TheRedPill04/05/16 09:29 AM
3

Chauvinism: 1) exaggerated or aggressive patriotism, 2) excessive or prejudiced support for one's own cause, group, or sex. If in fact we can point to many (as in the majority) of traits where men are objectively better, is it still 'excessive or prejudiced' or simply stating a fact? Feminists are, and always have been, chauvinists by this definition, with little to no justification, yet they call us (and in fact all men) chauvinists. Pot, meet kettle. Personally, I don't care if they call me a …
/r/TheRedPill03/05/16 09:34 PM
2

Not just 'here', I don't think they were standing there logically calculating her body mass, they just didn't react. Meanwhile, the guys immediately jumped in. You say 'the men were handling it', but I think the point is the men went in to handle it. In that same moment the women could have too, but that was not their instinctive reaction. The woman to her right did try to grab her (ineffectually), but other than the black guy to her left all the people closest to her were women, yet it was men …
/r/TheRedPill03/05/16 09:27 PM
1

Understood, I felt the same (and have a daughter). And I agree completely about two parent household, but you don't need a licence to have children. If I knew back then what I know now, I wouldn't have gotten married, even though it hasn't been the disaster for me that it has been for so many.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/16 02:10 PM
1

OK, doesn't sound like we actually disagree. 'woman can be as good at entrepreneurship as men' - that is a general statement, to the effect that, on average, women are as good. That is untrue. If you want to say that you mean, 'there exist some (small number of) women that are as good at it as men' then sure, we can agree about that.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/16 11:11 PM
4

OK, but you spend 'a few thousand' and these additional steps, and there is going to be cost in that 'the other side needs to be ok' part, but as OP says, for what benefit? You got nothing you didn't have before this process, only additional risk.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/16 11:06 PM
1

Yes, I get that you are still anger phase, but don't delude yourself. It is less constant, less dependable, not produced in response to the same cues, but objectively women do love. Love is not something spiritual, it is a psychological response to certain neurochemicals, and women get them too.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/16 08:03 PM
4

I agree with you, but some women at least (you sound like one of them) have realized that marriage is now a totally shitty deal for men and are less than willing to push someone they love into such a situation. A lot of women (the majority, I would say) are not like you. In spite of the tone you may see here sometimes, there is nothing evil in a woman wanting to follow an AF/BB sexual strategy, anymore than it is evil for a man to follow a strategy of having multiple non-exclusive sexual relatio…
/r/TheRedPill01/05/16 05:46 PM
1

If they succeed they make themselves unhappy, that is true enough. I said a long time ago that men evolved to extract value from their environment, women evolved to extract value from men. They have survived by manipulating men. If you look at society now, it is clear that they are good at it (look at the recent post about the talk at Amherst given by Milo et al, the feminists had guys white knighting for them, to their great shame). If they were not good at it, the feminists would have gotten n…
/r/TheRedPill01/05/16 11:39 AM
2

I'm not sure I see it as a curse - and yes, I have definitely seen what you are talking about in every relationship with a woman I have had. My interests become her interests, my political opinions become hers, etc. You can call it fake if you like, but really it is because women take the shape of their container, they are 'pleasers' by nature, herd animals. If you are leading a relationship, then the mere act of following means she will conform to you. That makes for a smoother relationship wit…
/r/TheRedPill30/04/16 11:21 PM
3

totally agree, but I think OP means that women are more Machiavellian in interpersonal relationships. One area where women are definitely superior (on average) is on picking up subtle communication. A good woman can really clue you in one what other people really think. When combined with the ruthless, ego-centric Machiavellianism, then in means you always have to be on your guard in a relationship. This is not the same as IQ. [Edit] corrected typo - women are more Machiavellian.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/16 11:17 PM
1

I think it is correct that there is a lot of anger at Western European and American (USA and Canada) women, and for good reason. They have been brought up from birth to be entitled bitches with feminist attitudes (even those who don't profess to be feminist, which is the majority). It is about attitudes towards men and family, loyalty, gratitude, submissiveness, femininity, all of which they are lacking. They can be physically beautiful (if not overweight) yes, but in character? Russian, Eastern…
/r/TheRedPill30/04/16 11:04 PM
3

There are a few misconceptions or, shall we say, glossing over differences, it is true. I think he believes that humanism means the same as atheism, but in fact you can be religious and humanist. Also, the way he uses the term 'material reality' implies that communists are Physicalists, which is not necessarily the case at all, although they could reasonably be said to be Naturalists. Finally, to say that atheists and humanists 'despise the idea of Natural Law' is a huge stretch, given that the …
/r/TheRedPill30/04/16 10:46 PM
5

True, we in the UK are seeking our own 'independence day' at the moment - no thanks to Obama. Did you know that the EU wants to make it illegal to criticise feminism?
/r/TheRedPill30/04/16 10:34 PM
2

So you are saying, what, that they are an exaptation? That is very unlikely. They still require processing power, and the brain is a very expensive organ. Further, emotions can be valuable, even now. They can motivate you for one. Others have mentioned 'gut feelings' which can be pretty accurate and keep you out of danger or warn you about what other people are up to. Remember, rationality is a conscious process, and works well if the premises are reasonably full and correct. Very often this is …
/r/TheRedPill30/04/16 10:21 PM
3

There is a reason that we evolved to feel emotions, long before rationality, and that is because they gave an evolutionary advantage. If they did not, we would not have them. However, it was also an advantage to evolve the ability to temper those emotions with reason. Your rationality can be informed by your emotional reaction, even if (and here you are quite right) it is not overruled by them.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/16 06:32 PM
1

I think you underestimate women. They can not only kill companies, they can kill entire societies. It's building them that they have trouble with, that is still the job of men.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/16 04:28 PM
79

Not to mention, this feminazi, claiming to be 'equal to men' and a 'strong, independent womyn' no doubt, says that she suffers from panic equivalent to PTSD if she so much as hears someone say something she disagrees with. How weak and pathetic can she be? So not equal to men, because it take a war zone, and traumatic experiences like holding your best buddies guts in with your hands to make a man have PTSD and be 'triggered', but she gets it from nothing at all. I don't think even a poor bastar…
/r/TheRedPill28/04/16 05:52 PM
366

Let me get this straight. There is a event that was to be a reasoned debate about whether political correctness and SJW antics have gotten out of hand. This debate is disrupted by SJWs because the people there were not being politically correct, and did not allow a debate or free speech. I would say the meeting was a raging success and proved the point admirably. And to cap it, an SJW demands to know whether you understand what a trigger event is (something from the context of PTSD), demonstrati…
/r/TheRedPill28/04/16 11:27 AM
1

Look around, nearly all Muslim countries are violent shitholes. Not a coincidence.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/16 06:51 AM
2

To say nothing about all women. You know that this one goes to the top of the pile of those lists of posts and comments they like to make whenever TRP is discussed outside this sub. 'See, they are rape apologists!', and they'll quietly push under the carpet the bit about the word 'rape' now being meaningless. However, it is certainly why the word 'misogynist' has lost all its sting. It is completely meaningless, other than 'anybody, male or female, who disagrees in any way with a feminist'. I ca…
/r/TheRedPill26/04/16 10:21 PM
2

the 1.22 vs 0.18 was not a measure of the absolute number of errors, but the ratio of positive to negative errors. Men were less likely to be wrong about it, but when they were wrong it was much more likely to be in the direction of a false positive. Women's errors, while greater in number, were fairly evenly balanced (ie only slightly more likely to think their partner had cheated when he hadn't, than to think he had not when he had). So men don't trust women as much as women trust men. That ma…
/r/TheRedPill26/04/16 08:40 PM
4

The 80% ish non-dualistic mating strategy is because men are not stupid. Andrews, P. W., Gangestad, S. W., Miller, G. F., Haselton, M. G., Thornhill, R., and Neale, M. C. (2008). Sex differences in detecting sexual infidelity. Human Nature. Despite the importance of extrapair copulation (EPC) in human evolution, almost nothing is known about the design features of EPC detection mechanisms. We tested for sex differences in EPC inference-making mechanisms in a sample of 203 young couples. Men made…
/r/TheRedPill26/04/16 07:18 PM
5

Very true statement. Women don't know what they want, so they rely on other women to validate their desires!?! Such Intelligence /s Oh, I don't hold that against them. That is the other side of the feminists saying that men are 'shallow' because they are only interested in tits, bums and legs. Neither is a valid criticism. Men and women are the descendents of a long line of men and women who made the right choices, resulting in viable offspring that carried on their line. For men, they did best …
/r/TheRedPill25/04/16 10:57 PM
33

How many of these suicides are men categorised as 'dead beat dads', hounded and forced into poverty for children they never wanted and can never see? How many of them have been divorced, through 'no fault' of their own, and screwed over by the family courts? How many are incels, young men who have no clue how to get a woman into bed because they have been sold a pack of lies, find that one of their basic needs (at the base of the Maslow pyramid) is not met year after year, and see themselves as …
/r/TheRedPill25/04/16 09:45 PM
2

Feminism has left you with a pool of women who are truly insane. Fuck Em Better yet, don't. Don't stick your dick in crazy.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/16 09:40 PM
1

Briffault's Law applies not just to individual women, but to The Feminine Imperative as a whole. What is feminism but Briffault's Law writ large? For thousands of years men protected and provided for women, fought for them, worked for them, died for them. Then, as soon as we built up civilization with machines to do the heavy lifting opening up a lot of 'soft' employment, it was all "Women have been oppressed throughout history! Look, you won't let us into the Golf Club, you won't let us be tria…
/r/TheRedPill25/04/16 12:10 PM
1

Precisely. We say enjoy the decline, but really it is just going by the Stoic principle that you have to distinguish between what is within your control and what is not, and not concern yourself with what is not in your control. We can't save Western society, I highly doubt that it is saveable at this point. So, we do what we must, and master the skills and attitudes that allow us to do well personally even in such times. It is still a decline, though. When barbarians overrun civilizations so mu…
/r/TheRedPill20/04/16 11:10 PM
4

Not irrelevant since it is the very assertion that is made on the basis of Judit. That assertion is not supported by the evidence to date.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/16 01:21 PM
7

Polgar showed that early and consistent training can make a huge difference in a skill like chess. He did not show that women could be equal to men, because no boys were raised in the same way. Given that Judit never became world champion competing against men who did not benefit from her upbringing (highest ranking was 8), and given that the two strongest Polgar sisters were so far ahead of the rest of women's chess that we have little doubt the upbringing was a huge advantage to them, I think …
/r/TheRedPill20/04/16 12:39 PM
1

Excellent post. Just a couple of points resulting from common language used here closing off our thinking. Commitment. Yes, but commitment to what? Posts in this sub often assume a false dichotomy: non-committed non-exclusive relationships (aka plates), and committed exclusive relationships (LTRs). A better taxonomy would be plate non-exclusive relationship purely for sex. FWB non-exclusive relationship for sex and also social activities. MLTR more committed long-term non-exclusive relationship.…
/r/TheRedPill20/04/16 11:20 AM
52

Yes, all agreed, and some useful facts to have in your pocket if you ever find your self in a 'discussion' with a feminist, although why bother doing that? But the post belongs in Mens Rights rather than TRP, because Men's Rights is about trying to change society, whereas TRP says, this is what we have, what do we do to win in life given this situation? None of that post helps any man to actually improve his life, it is more a call to feel like a victim. Don't get me wrong, I think the Men's Rig…
/r/TheRedPill19/04/16 10:03 PM
3

It did come across as feminist-influenced. The Great Lie of feminism is that women were 'oppressed' by having an extended family around them, raising children, rather than working out in the mines or the fields or going out to the battlefields. As you say, female happiness has been declining since the 1970s, the beginning of 2nd wave, and is now lower than men's. Also, women are on much higher rates of anti-depressants. Women have been sold a crock. However, that does not mean that AF/BB was not…
/r/TheRedPill19/04/16 09:45 PM
2

Thanks, I saw the Telegraph had an opinion piece urging this change today, and in their poll 100% supported it, but it didn't mention the petition, and comments are off (too many people critical of feminism to allow comments). Of course, the change that is really needed is to start handing down sentences to false rape accusers equivalent to what their victim would have received. Until then the cases will continue. The article decries the low conviction rate, and points out it is because of the l…
/r/TheRedPill18/04/16 01:21 PM
1

Yes it varies. for a wider perspective, in the UK there is no such thing as Common Law marriage, and never has been (even though a lot of people seem to think it exists). However, changing your name is simple and easy, because your name is whatever you can persuade people to call you. In Germany I don't believe they have Common Law marriages, but changing your name is impossible. In australia they don't have 'Common Law' marriages, but they have the same thing by a different name ('de facto' mar…
/r/TheRedPill17/04/16 10:29 PM
1

he is being careful about feminist backlash, but it is factually false to say 'women can be as good at entrepreneurship as men', which is why he had to be careful about backlash. If they were as good, he could fearlessly state that as fact and be done with it. If women were better, he could be even more confident about simply stating it as fact, knowing he would be applauded. Instead, the facts said, Across all economic sectors, new businesses led by women perform worse on almost every performan…
/r/TheRedPill17/04/16 10:05 PM
1

Common Law marriage is indeed a farce, but we should be clear that this does not apply generally. There are only a few States that have it, the UK does not have it, and I don't think it is usual in Europe generally. I think they do have it in BC, not sure about the rest of Canada or Australia/NZ. In general, yes, Western society has concentrated these last few decades on finding more ways to transfer wealth from men to women. This goes hand-in-hand with the growth of consumer society, because wo…
/r/TheRedPill17/04/16 11:46 AM
1

That courts can throw out a legal agreement freely signed between two parties because 'circumstances changed' or because 'it doesn't benefit one of the parties enough' is one of biggest fuckups of our society. Do they apply such rules to any other legal contract? Prenups had the promise of saving marriages - and with it the birth rate of the Western world and hence its survival, but courts threw it out. Just knowing that courts do overturn them is enough for men not to trust them, and so not mar…
/r/TheRedPill17/04/16 11:02 AM
20

And if they are of a feminist persuasion, they may be tempted to hire only women (although how they get away with that I don't know). We all know how that works out: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1168182/Catfights-handbags-tears-toilets-When-producer-launched-women-TV-company-thought-shed-kissed-goodbye-conflict-.html The Norwegian 'experiment' (forcing public companies to take a high percentage of women directors) showed that the companies did less well.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/16 12:16 AM
6

She thinks that she is a unicorn, even though she admits to riding the Cock Carousel; thinks that anything anybody says is about her, because the world revolves around her; thinks that she is totally deserving of an LTR with a good man. So, typical unaware young slut. Nothing new there, but boring as fuck to listen to.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/16 12:08 AM
1

Yes, incredible stuff. I like this guy too https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbTDXDBHApa_cvcOx86yJOA for great information, if you don't want to go all the way back to the stone age
/r/TheRedPill15/04/16 09:40 PM
1

They were not oppressed, and there have been few periods in history when they were (more than men, that is). They were controlled, yes, but is controlling children to stop them fucking up 'oppressing' them? It was the same with women. Right now, they are kind of getting away with it because of the amount of support they get from male society in spite of their foolishness, but given that they are bringing about the collapse of said society, with the severe decline in living standards that will go…
/r/TheRedPill14/04/16 09:19 PM
5

Maybe the Guardian article about TRP has brought loads of BPers and women here to check it out. Talking frankly about women in less than flattering terms is a big shock to much of the Western world's population.
/r/TheRedPill14/04/16 08:57 PM
4

Agreed, avoid a contract - explicit or implicit. It is cheating if you say you are monogamous and you are not. Being explicitly polygamous,not telling the girl that you are exclusive to her when you are not, is not dishonourable. Banging several women when you explicitly say you are not in an exclusive relationship is perfectly honourable. Also, banging a married woman is not dishonourable (you have made no commitment to the husband or the wife), something I have changed my mind about.
/r/TheRedPill14/04/16 08:53 PM
5

If comments were on, you would quickly be banned if you criticize the Feminine Imperative or anything about women. That is why I stopped reading the Grauniad long before I encountered TRP. I could not stand the censorship. I went to the Telegraph, which had a lively and honest comments section (which was refreshingly Red Pill, the commenters took no shit from feminists), but it was obviously too much for advertisers and feminazis, so they basically closed down the comments. They do still have de…
/r/TheRedPill14/04/16 07:27 PM
8

Meetup is SJW-scared. I believe some guys here tried to start something about game, and were prevented by Meetup (disrepectful towards women, or some such garbage). I did a search in my area a couple of months ago for meetups containing the words 'man', 'men', 'woman', 'women'. I found exactly 2 that were for men, and one of those was for gay men. The rest of the search results were from things like 'fundamental' and 'complementary'. For women and woman, I found nearly 30, and in fact there were…
/r/TheRedPill14/04/16 03:36 PM
60

The Guardian isn't a tabloid, it is a broadsheet, but the most left-wing, retarded of them. I'm surprised there was anything acknowledging the existence of the red pill in there, and certainly wouldn't expect anything unbiased (it is very biased towards feminism). But, it does mean that the term gets in front of more people, and so some will come to check out what it says for themselves, which is a good thing. However, the Guardian demographic is the very last one I would expect much from (outsi…
/r/TheRedPill14/04/16 03:29 PM
8

Civilization collapse in the making, and it has happened fairly rapidly, I agree. But the seeds were all there ready and waiting. 1) Men are biased in favour of women. Without White Knights then feminists could do nothing. 2) Penis envy. Women are extremely jealous of the achievements of men, always have been, always will be. 3) Industrialization, and the concommittent increase in 'safe, non-physical' jobs like office work, which meant that women could go out and do work outside the home, which …
/r/TheRedPill14/04/16 12:56 PM
8

Two of yours think the same way, anyway ;)
/r/TheRedPill14/04/16 12:31 PM
6

You cannot afford to do it with work colleagues, unless you know them really well outside of work, and even then it is risky unless they have shown some awareness by themselves. Sad, but never underestimate feminist-dominated HR depts to fuck you over.
/r/TheRedPill14/04/16 12:29 PM
5

i'll walk no questions asked and she knows it. Dread can be very effective, but don't think you can just ease up and relax now. Lots of guys make that mistake when they get married, and so they get cheated on because he has removed the possibility of dread, and has stopped giving tingles. You always have to game her. Also, obviously, don't sign any binding contracts with her, like marriage, shared ownership of a house, etc. Do that, and you will find her behaviour much more likely to change. You…
/r/TheRedPill14/04/16 12:20 PM
11

You would have cheating, but remember that women take the shape of the container. It was not acceptable, either socially, legally, or within a personal relationship, for women to be total sluts like they are encouraged to be now. The type of 'finding herself sexually' experimenting, disloyalty to her marriage oaths, and belittling of the men who cared for her, would have been unthinkable. She would be seen as a trashy woman who needed to be put back in her place, rather than lionised as a 'stron…
/r/TheRedPill14/04/16 12:07 PM
2

Excellent idea, a women-only city. Then they get not only women taxi drivers, but women police, women garbage collectors, women electrictians, plumbers, builders. Women digging up the roads to lay electricity and gas conduits. No men allowed to work there at all. Surely, for all those womyn that don't need no man, they should be pressing for this? After all, they still get to benefit from all the things men created in the surrounding society, it isn't as if they are having to build a civilizatio…
/r/TheRedPill12/04/16 04:54 PM
2

Yes, having no 'Team Guy' is a huge problem. Odd in a way, in that working together as a team is something that men do much better than women on the whole. But we had this discussion before in the context of The Way of Men, that men's group loyalty tends to be strong with very small groups, like fire teams, or platoons, and gets weaker the larger the group. Women are the opposite; they work together badly in small groups with lots of cattiness and petty jealousy, but can readily get behind 'Team…
/r/TheRedPill12/04/16 10:10 AM
16

And, since the countries most of us live in are democracies, how do you maintain control in one of those? It seems that ideally you: use propoganda as a weapon to stop people figuring out what power they have Use fear of outsiders, or failing outsiders, another group within your society (eg women being afraid of their men) control access to firearms, as it is easier to control unarmed mobs assume your period in obvious power is limited, so carry on stashing away cash for the inevitable end the '…
/r/TheRedPill12/04/16 09:52 AM
1

Depends on which country. Are there women-only gyms in your country? In the UK I think private clubs are allowed. There is still one men-only gentlemen's club in London, and of course there is the Freemasons. There are lots of women-only things, such as gyms.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/16 09:45 AM
1

Equality was never a feminist thing. Pay attention to what they do, not what they say.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/16 09:40 AM
1

Spandex (Lycra) is used for exercise outfit, amongst other things, but it is the material, not the outfit, and that is how I was using it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spandex
/r/TheRedPill10/04/16 05:20 PM
-1

No, Spanx is a brand name of a clothing company. Spandex is also known as Lycra, a very stretchy fabric used to make clothes.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/16 10:44 PM
3

Yes, it is a quote from Hitchhiker's guide, which I thought was an amusing take on the idea that things were better in the past. Nothing deep, I was just amused by the quote. Hitchhiker's guide was originally a radio show, which became a book, and later a television series. Douglas was a great character, I met him once several decades ago, and he was a great friend of Richard Dawkins. He didn't write science fiction in the normal vein, but as comedy. Another quote from Hitchhiker's Guide is, The…
/r/TheRedPill09/04/16 06:11 PM
3

With your grasp of history, you no doubt recall Douglas Adams, then.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/16 05:44 PM
5

"In those days spirits were brave, the stakes were high, men were real men, women were real women and small furry creatures from Alpha Centauri were real small furry creatures from Alpha Centauri."
/r/TheRedPill09/04/16 03:35 PM
1

What they want is men to put them in their place, to prove that men are indeed men. I'm sure feminists think they want female superiority, but since when did women know what they actually want?
/r/TheRedPill08/04/16 06:34 PM
0

What, you never heard of spandex?
/r/TheRedPill07/04/16 11:15 PM
1

Idiot, womyn's studies degree? I don't care what hair black women have, now or in the past. You have never been under a law about your hair, so stop playing the idiot victim. This isn't self pride, this is being a victim, and all your posts reek of it. Me, I'm not keen on frizzy hair, I think black women look better when they straighten it, but that is my preference. I don't care whether they do or not. I think long straight black hair is beautiful, so it is a shame when japanese or chinese wome…
/r/TheRedPill07/04/16 09:57 PM
1

If you think there is a 'politics' of hair, then you need to grow up. It isn't about them 'embracing' their natural hair, it is them playing victim politics with it. So yes, fuck off with your SJW bullshit. This civilization will be better off without you. Leave the computer behind, invented by white folks, and you think people shouldn't use anything from another 'culture'.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/16 09:24 PM
2

I think you would enjoy reading Chimpanzee Politics by Frans de Waal
/r/TheRedPill07/04/16 08:15 PM
12

Some are just obnoxious mentally, and revel in how disgusting they are, but many are not. There is a serious obesity problem, and people generally don't know what to do about it. I went to a Life Drawing event recently, where they have two models give a series of poses for people to draw them. There were two models, both female this week (sometimes it is mixed). The first was just grossly obese, repulsive to look at. Flat tits hanging down to her belly button almost, enormous wrinkled thighs suc…
/r/TheRedPill07/04/16 02:30 PM
1

The Rational Male - Preventative Medicine. Rollo Tomassi. The first rational mal book is a red pill foundational text. Preventative Medicine, the new one is what I think you are asking for. Available as kindle books as well as paperback
/r/TheRedPill04/04/16 07:01 AM
1

You mean like Rollo's second book?
/r/TheRedPill03/04/16 08:00 PM
2

absolutely right. Having women 'say' they are anti-feminist and NAWALT means nothing. So long as the legal situation is in place to exploit the situation as they do, they will make use of it, regardless of what they promise. Why wouldn't they? Honour is not a feminine thing, it is something that was imposed on them. Telling the truth is not a feminine thing either, as feminism amply proves. So once the law changes to get rid of no-fault divorces, alimony, and child support, marriage becomes viab…
/r/TheRedPill03/04/16 10:11 AM
1

I had a look for it, but it is too far back in my history to find easily. I remember it was in a proper ring with a large audience, televised. The woman was at her prime, the guy was overweight and out of training. He generally did little against her, but at one point he just tossed her 'like a rag doll' and of course the commentators (and audience) were aghast that he would do anything, it was so wrong! The called her the winner, but you could tell that he just held back. Same with this one: ht…
/r/TheRedPill03/04/16 09:56 AM
20

So, let me get this straight. You are asking a girl to be honest, even when doing so is to her disadvantage; to show honour; to be responsible for her actions. What kind of a sexist misogynist are you anyway? She just wants to do what is right. If something makes her feel bad, then it isn't right. That isn't hard to understand, right? If only Kant had been a woman, we wouldn't be in this ethical mess we are in now.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/16 09:50 PM
5

Tie.Her.Up. Agreed. Bondage isn't really my thing, but it seems surprisingly common amongst women, so I'm willing to oblige. Good sources are to search for 'Two Knotty Boys' on Youtube. For a gently introduction (I think I picked this up from Daniel Rose, can't remember), you have her bring you one of her silk or satin headscarves. Have her hold up one hand, put one end of the scarf into it and tell her to hold it. Then she hold up the other hand alongside, and you do a couple of figure-of-eight…
/r/TheRedPill01/04/16 09:02 PM
1

That is actually the problem. Thinking about the MMA fight, the guy was clearly pulling his punches like crazy, yet still the crowd booed everytime he made contact, while cheering her every move. Nobody plays well when getting that kind of reception, so the male team would tone it down to 'give the girls a chance'. Still thrash them, but they would try not to make it too painful. It is because men are biased in favour of women, which is our downfall.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/16 07:02 PM
1

Until they started with the silly grunts, I agreed. Now, not so sure. But let's face it, I wasn't watching them for the tennis. I just thought Sharapova was fit. The game itself is lightyears behind the men's game, as someone said recently.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/16 06:55 PM
0

But... you are a misogynist! (Def: anyone, male or female, who disagrees with a feminist).
/r/TheRedPill01/04/16 06:53 PM
1

There is a whole community of natural hair blogs that have been talking about the politics of Black hair styles for many years, especially in the workplace. Grow up. Your posts are full of bullshit femicunt victim mentality. All this 'cultural appropriation' garbage is always one way, and one way only. But the fact is that all other cultures have shamelessly 'appropriated' just about everything from the West (which we are just fine with), while we still hear nothing but how we 'oppressed' everyo…
/r/TheRedPill01/04/16 06:42 PM
2

She is asking you to lead, to be in charge. If you consistently show you are not capable of command, she will lose respect and find someone that can. As OP says, this is a very positive sign that the relationship is in a good state - unless you screw it up.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/16 12:05 PM
1

I went to check, and found someone had stolen it.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/16 05:08 PM
2

Yes, not much thinking involved, is there. I was listening to some youths being interviewed in Scotland about Brexit just this morning. One was talking about the EU funding some local rural transport and so on. Why is it hard to understand that as the second biggest net contributor that is our money being spent, not EU money? And it is bizarre that the scots would rather be subsumed in a failing centralist European superstate run by our historical enemies than be part of a union that has been on…
/r/TheRedPill31/03/16 07:26 AM
3

I agree with everything you say here, but to reinforce shitlordvoldermort's point, it is a historical fact that when you have very different cultures in close proximity you get violence. This is why multiculturalism is so retarded, it isn't as if we didn't have a historical precedent. This is particularly the case with Islam at this point in time (and in fact, pretty much for its whole existence), it has a long history of violence against other cultures which we see again pretty much every day. …
/r/TheRedPill30/03/16 10:38 PM
3

If you read the central section of OP's post, I think he is pretty clear that women have not earned being treated with respect because of feminism, which even non-feminists have been only too happy to cash in on. Women generally are now (finally) paying the cost of feminism http://voxday.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/the-bitter-harvest-of-feminism.html During this last century, it is unquestionable that women have set themselves up as the enemies of men, and have done all in their power to destroy masc…
/r/TheRedPill30/03/16 07:28 PM
3

Far from new, as you say. This is the essence of male-female interaction, that men extract resources from the environment, and women extract resources from men. We love women for their beauty, and 'innocence' and sense of fun and so on, but none of those things happened by accident. They evolved in women because these features were most successful in manipulating men into giving them resources. Now, many of them prefer to get it via the tax system or the family court, but they are still doing th…
/r/TheRedPill30/03/16 06:44 PM
5

Black dragon recently had a couple of blog entries about women over 33. That they take much more time, money and work to get into bed, and a number of other disadvantages. What really came out for me is, why bother? http://www.blackdragonblog.com
/r/TheRedPill30/03/16 06:40 PM
20

Of course it is. Whatever the 'narrative' may be, society - and women - know full well that women are not fully responsible adults.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/16 06:24 PM
2

It always comes down to the 'reverse the sexes' tactic. If the way she is being treated would be considered unfair if she had been a man and the uber driver a woman, then she is being treated unfairly. In other words, you wanted equality, here it is bitch.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/16 05:59 PM
2

My point really being about whether it is reasonable to be 'offended' if someone not Mexican wears a poncho, for example. I don't get offended if there are factories in other parts of the world, just because the industrial revolution started here with the invention of the steam engine. I don't get offended if an African guy or a Chinese guy wears a Savile Row suit, why on earth should I? 'taking offense' is just another way of trying to control people, it is something that feminists learned from…
/r/TheRedPill30/03/16 05:26 PM
11

It is all about thought control, they are true fascists, wanting to control what people are 'allowed' to think and say. They all need to read 1984. When they say that something isn't 'politically correct' do they even hear what they are saying? politically correct? What, I said something not sanctioned by the Politburo, and they are the Stasi? What kind of twisted, dystopian world are they trying to bring about?
/r/TheRedPill30/03/16 05:04 PM
7

why would you get angry or complain even if you did grow up in that culture? Language is the central stone in a culture, but I am not angry that you speak English, I'm delighted. I would like to add Spanish to my languages, and in fact just yesterday I had a paella, does that make you angry? Even if you grew up in Africa and lived within African culture, you have no right to get angry or complain, but you are right, it generally isn't those people who complain, it is clueless dipshit western tee…
/r/TheRedPill30/03/16 04:59 PM
37

I love this 'cultural appropriation' bullshit (which I have encountered personally). What kind of a world do these idiots live in? Before we do anything, we should send these dumbos to non-Western countries. They should explain to the people there that they can't have cars or airplanes (invented in Germany and America, respectively) or trains (invented in Britain), or tarmac on their roads (invented by a Scotsman), or Western medicine, or radio or television, or computers, or in fact any kind of…
/r/TheRedPill30/03/16 02:02 PM
2

I can't say I entirely blame her, in the sense that pretty much any woman would do the same. She certainly comes across as a gold-digger. I mean, marrying someone for 2 years, walking off with 4 million, then going back for more. In fact, so far as I can see, in the present state of laws, marriage is purely to support gold-diggers. If she was just interested in the man, having a binding contract like that, entirely for her benefit and to his detriment, wouldn't be a goal. You don't need a marria…
/r/TheRedPill29/03/16 06:15 PM
3

Didn't take as much as she could, or took everything allowed under the pre-nup and went back for second helpings, this time making sure there was no pre-nup? We will see.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/16 03:11 PM
2

How do you know when a feminist is lying? Her lips are moving. - me.
/r/TheRedPill26/03/16 05:11 PM
2

I agree, I think there has been an agreement amongst some women or BP males to infiltrate and tone police. There has been a recent uptick of comments claiming NAWALT or that women make good friends, that the way to seduce a woman is to befriend her first, etc. This doesn't ring true. As we know, when men first swallow the pill their reaction is anger at being lied to by society, the media, and women. Later comes the realisation that you can still thrive under the real rules that society and wome…
/r/TheRedPill25/03/16 11:19 AM
1

The amount of hamstering around the issue in the media is astounding. Even with Belgium, and the prime minister saying 'we are at war' they still don't accept what that means. They are still determined to say 'it is all our fault so we should lie down and accept what happens.' They forget that the primary duty of a government is to protect its people, instead they look at the Middle East and North Africa and act like their primary responsibility is to those people.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/16 10:51 AM
1

Feminists are afraid, you are threatening their self-validating world view, which they can spin as 'the patriarchy trying to oppress them', not to mention the potential loss of all the special privileges they have gained. Blue pill men are going to support them because men are naturally biased in favour of women, and besides it takes courage to accept that you are responsible for your position in life, and that the universe owes you nothing. The powers that be are afraid because men waking up ar…
/r/TheRedPill24/03/16 10:45 AM
1

Someone wrote software that tracks posters in this sub and gives a warning flair when the post elsewhere, so the don't even need to look at your history. Someone posted the list they had a couple of months back. I'm on it, so will you be.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/16 10:19 AM
3

What you call men's 'weakness' is based on their inherent bias in favour of women (contrary to the ludicrous patriarchy theory). We have that because it gave an evolutionary advantage, but has become an exaptation when a positive feedback mechanism kicks in, making that bias reach levels that bring down society as a whole. SJWs seem to increasingly vote on the sub though, I notice.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/16 10:00 AM
1

This is the irony. Feminist SJWs insist that there is a lot of sexism and racism in society, and they are right. The only bit the don't understand is that most of it comes from feminist SJWs. They don't see it because as far as they are concerned hating Caucasians is legitimate, as is hating men.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/16 09:22 AM
1

I think there are loads of women commenting and downvoting anyone who says anything truthful about women being poor friends. It doesn't make them feel good about themselves, and makes it harder for them to make useful orbiters.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/16 08:25 AM
2

You still believe what women say, rather than looking at what they do. Read the sidebar, there are things about women's psychology that you still hold delusions about. I have the feeling that a number of comments here are either by women, or blue-pillers trying to divert us off course, back to a comfortable blue-pill coccoon.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/16 08:20 AM
2

Some people really need to read the sidebar, or Rollo. Getting categorised in her mind as a nice safe 'friend' is the best way of being kept out of her pants. No tingles, this is just the garbage that women tell you they want, but in fact don't. I think some people here are definitely still plugged in, and under the influence of the 'women are wonderful' effect, including you.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/16 08:15 AM
1

You are right, that sentence is ambiguous. My apologies. However, the remark is by Williams: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZyelGL5Udc at 1:08
/r/TheRedPill21/03/16 10:32 PM
-1

they get paid the same amount (although men play more games and bring in more ticket sales) at the majors, the big opens. At other events women get less money, because the events attract less money.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/16 10:25 PM
13

1500m freestyle. Men's world record: 14.31, women: 15:25. More than a minute is quite a difference.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/16 10:19 PM
6

And discus, until you discover that women's discus weighs 1kg and men's 2kg. Men: 243ft, women: 251ft.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/16 10:16 PM
1

Reading difficulties? World number one Serena Williams said Moore's statement was "offensive", calling it "mistaken and very, very, very inaccurate". They are being paid more than they are worth, both in terms of how much tennis is played, and in terms of how much revenue they actually bring in. They are demanding that continue to be paid the same in the majors.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/16 10:06 PM
2

They are not complaining about what they are currently paid, they are objecting to being paid what they are worth, and complaining that someone points out how much they ride on the coat-tails of the men's sport (which is the case for pretty much all sports).
/r/TheRedPill21/03/16 10:03 PM
8

Serena and Venus, against someone seeded 204: https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1298&dat=19980127&id=kqJjAAAAIBAJ&sjid=mggGAAAAIBAJ&pg=3506,5011601
/r/TheRedPill21/03/16 07:59 PM
13

Sue them. Learn from the other cases where this bullshit has been done. Investigate ways to punish her, too. Women should not get away without consequences for making false accusations.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/16 09:13 AM
1

And pictures of each position, with her smiling. Only way to guarantee. We need an app for that.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/16 08:32 AM
2

I wonder if we'll eventually see a trend where reported rape drops significantly but rape accusations on social media go up like crazy. Then people will attribute this mismatch in reporting to women being afraid to come forward. You haven't been paying attention, that is exactly what has happened.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/16 08:26 AM
0

Applies to the everything feminists accuse men of. Men don't discriminate against women, they are biased in favour of them, but since we will be accused of running a 'patriarchy' anyway we might as well do so.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/16 08:19 AM
8

But she did draw them from something - her ass. How do you know when a feminist is lying? Her lips are moving.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/16 08:12 AM
2

Well, that is exactly what we had, and you see what has happened in making those colleges co-ed. So now I support single-sex education, just to ensure that, first, boys/men get an education, and second that it can be in a form best suited to male learning modes. I see no justification whatsoever in universities trying people for genuine criminal acts such as rape, not using proper legal process. It isn't the same as them doing so for having a microwave in the dorm, as in the example given in the…
/r/TheRedPill18/03/16 08:03 AM
64

Combine it with 'Yes means Yes' and you have something, because we all know that that measure was nothing but a bald-faced attempt to hand complete power over relationships to women. Anybody who looks for a yes at each step, and multiple times during intercourse, will never have sex with a woman because he is a complete turn-off. Feminists know this, they know that men have to ignore the 'yes' business because women demand it. But once he does so, as far as the college is concerned he has actual…
/r/TheRedPill17/03/16 07:30 PM
1

No, he has talked about the number of rapes reported, I am talking about the percentage reported that are false accusations. He has not contradicted what I said at all. The 40-60% figure comes from studies, although these are strongly discouraged now, of course. They don't fit the 'narrative'. Same thing with DV, whenever a study is done that shows that women are just as violent (if not more so) than men, the people carrying out the study are attacked by feminists and the media, find grants dry …
/r/TheRedPill16/03/16 11:55 PM
2

False premises, you have swallowed the feminist 'false accusations are extremely rare' trope. It isn't 5% or anything likes it. Between 40% and 60% would be a better estimate (in both colleges and the military), and these kangaroo courts, and the lack of any action against false accusers, are fueling it. When false accusers start getting long prison sentences, which their intended victims would have had if the bitch had succeeded, then you will see the number of accusations drop enormously. Long…
/r/TheRedPill16/03/16 11:45 AM
3

We think that when we open our eyes we are simply seeing all that is in front of us, but in fact our brain does all kinds of filtering to zoom our attention on to what is important. For 'important ' read 'had survival value'. For example, when shown photographs of a scene, men are much faster than women spotting weapons placed inconspicuously in it.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/16 02:29 PM
1

Gold skirts is good. In UK politics they are known as 'quota babes', barely competent women given cabinet positions to appease women voters.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/16 11:52 AM
1

Women did not 'fight' for anything, they bitched and whined and men gave them what they asked for - even when it was against the best interests of men. A lot of men actually fought for democracy, justice, freedom from nazism, freedom from Islamist dictats, and much else. Let's not confuse what men did and do with what feminists do.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/16 11:50 AM
5

He means Norway. https://c4mb.wordpress.com/improving-gender-diversity-on-boards-leads-to-a-decline-in-corporate-performance-the-evidence/
/r/TheRedPill11/03/16 11:35 AM
2

We are all here on Earth to help others. What on Earth the others are here for, I don't know. W.H. Auden
/r/TheRedPill08/03/16 05:47 PM
1

I'm sure that isn't what OP had in mind. He was talking about the reality of what men look for, as opposed to the hamster about empowered 'Cougars', who have so much to offer. Feminists love to believe that men can simply be trained to like older, fat, ugly women (like most feminists), and so men should be shamed if a guy in his 30's or 40's takes up with a 20yo. My point is that these preferences are not arbitrary, and women have been sold a crock of shite. The attitudes that the article talks …
/r/TheRedPill08/03/16 03:11 PM
5

These attitudes are rooted in biology. If she is over 30 then she is largely 'used up' because her reproductive life is largely over. She has a fixed number of eggs, most of them are now flushed away, and any of the remainder are more likely to be defective. Women may try to shame men for being attracted to young women, but that is like shaming someone for preferring water to drink rather than battery acid. Biology is biology
/r/TheRedPill08/03/16 11:13 AM
3

They are recognising that feminism hurts women. It didn't (much) for a long time, it harmed men and children, but now that men are starting to react against it, they try to distance themselves.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/16 02:26 PM
2

I'll say straight away that I have no respect at all for Gates. I remember all too well the kind of semi-legal (and sometimes outright illegal) antics that M$ got up to to stifle competition. To my mind, M$ held back computing for a generation with second-rate copy-cat rip-offs. However, as a business man/marketer, he was superb. What we hear now is nothing about that, instead we hear about what a 'philanthropist' he is. This is out of character, and I put that down to her. It is no accident tha…
/r/TheRedPill04/03/16 09:11 PM
10

I think you are both a bit too willing to take women at face value. If they grew up actually believing in 'equality' and fairness and logic, then feminism could never have arisen in the first place. Remember, Machiavelianism, for men, is an art form; for women, an instinct. Women are seeing just how much men despize feminists, and recognise that in order to manipulate them for their own ends better they need to play a different tune. Given how much social standing matters to women, it wouldn't d…
/r/TheRedPill04/03/16 08:07 PM
2

The term is 'sneaky fuckers'. It was used in one of the chapters in Krebs and Davies (1978), Behavioural Ecology: an Evolutionary Approach (1st edition). I thought it hilarious at the time that they could sneak that term into a serious science textbook. The strategy is pretty well attested, particularly in things like some wrasse and Lake Malawi cichlids.
/r/TheRedPill02/03/16 12:06 AM
1

You mean the Euro was created by... They understood from the beginning that you couldn't have a single currency unless you had a common fiscal policy, and you couldn't have that unless you had a political union. It was an attempt to push that agenda further forward. I realized back in the late '90s that the Euro, sans those things, was doomed to fail. What surprised me was how long it kept going. Of course, national politicians now see which side their bread is buttered on, and many support the …
/r/TheRedPill01/03/16 11:46 PM
38

totally. He has material knowledge that an employee is defrauding the company, and he is sitting on it and saying nothing. That makes him an accomplice after the fact.
/r/TheRedPill29/02/16 07:19 PM
1

They are ramping up the big scare campaign in the UK now, to try to frighten us into staying in that cesspool (and keep paying the net GBP35 million a day for the privilege, naturally). 'but we will be all alone in the Big Bad World without the EU!', except most of the world is outside of the EU, trades with the EU, and is doing better than the EU. 'it will take 10 years of uncertainty to make trade agreements with the EU if we leave'. No it won't. The EU won't do anything for us as members, it …
/r/TheRedPill29/02/16 07:07 PM
1

http://rgambler.com/2014/05/02/why-do-more-students-get-more-first-class-degrees-at-oxford-university-than-female-students/ For those who like to argue 'we are different but equal' remember that it is the higher intelligence people who take civilization forward, not the bog-average or dunces.
/r/TheRedPill29/02/16 06:56 PM
10

'inappropriate' is a vaginal word - Patrice. You are tone policing now.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/16 08:40 PM
1

Not correct, but it depends on the demographic. There are men here that want LTRs, there are men that only want plates. There is a general consensus of avoiding oneitis, that is commitment solely to one woman. This is again handing power to the woman, to the detriment of the relationship. If you head over to the BlackDragon blog I linked to, there is a lot about sustaining LTRs, but of course without legal entanglements, and generally avoiding commiting to one only. As for this sub, these are no…
/r/TheRedPill21/02/16 05:31 PM
5

Men still fall in love, but we have learned (and this is a very bitter pill to swallow) that 'love' means something completely different for men and women. We have had to accept that women will never love men the way that men love women, they should be two separate words. We cannot expect loyalty and honour from women, these are masculine traits, and so, whether we like it or not, whether we want children or not, marriage has been a losing proposition. Prenups? Can be overturned at the whim of a…
/r/TheRedPill21/02/16 05:16 PM
5

I don't think you get the nature of it. You cannot operate in isolation. Many men would love to have a stable, loving relationship with children, but it is clear that this is not really an option, so you do what is best under the circumstances. Men want sex (this is a primary drive, not some little thing that is just optional), and as long as marriage was needed to obtain it, then marry men will. Now, that is not the case, and women have made it not the case. Now, if you want to have sex it is b…
/r/TheRedPill21/02/16 01:03 PM
6

So give them a pussy pass, huh? Because yes they were traitors and betrayed our civilization, but it is our fault for letting them, that it? Neither sex comes out well in this (if either did, the civilization would continue), but yes, you definitely can and should hold women accountable for their actions. Either that, or they are not responsible, and as such cannot have the vote or hold positions of power. But they wanted that, and they get the accountability that goes with it.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/16 12:54 PM
4

Basically, yes, but not yours in particular. We don't operate in isolation, we operate in a game-theoretic way taking account of the society we are in. In a stable society, where women don't get to simply get a no-fault divorce because they're 'not haaapppyyy' and take half the man's possessions, plus stealing his children and expecting him to pay her for the privilege, then you are of course a good bet, and what you ask for perfectly reasonable. But we don't live in a stable society, we live in…
/r/TheRedPill21/02/16 10:59 AM
7

From the lion page: "Once upon a time coats of arms containing lions without genitalia were given to those who betrayed the Crown." Sounds about right. No wonder Putin has a smile on his face, a country not aligned with NATO on his doorstep has become a pushover, giving good ports on the Baltic. What's not to like?
/r/TheRedPill16/02/16 06:48 PM
2

I'm not going to give it another page view, but that is interesting. When I viewed it, there were a lot of negative comments along the lines of 'you are letting the side down'. It would be ironic if this was our doing. We know feminists and manginas read this sub (TBP is dedicated to it), so if they picked up the comments here about the comments there, and basically went back to her and told her to delete any negative comments because it was confirming the way feminists oppress women, well that …
/r/TheRedPill16/02/16 06:34 PM
16

Very good. It reminds me of when somebody asked the Chinese foreign minister, Chou En-Lai, about the impact of the French Revolution on Western Civilization. He said it was too early to tell. Sometimes we have to take the long view. But I think you are right. If Glubb's view of the history of empires is anywhere near correct, then the seeds of the destruction of an empire/civilization is in the very success of men's activity. It brings about the rise of the merchant classes, and everybody's life…
/r/TheRedPill15/02/16 11:01 PM
39

Own group preference is a powerful thing If only. The general finding is that women have very strong own-group preference, but men do not (although, I think given enough experiences they can learn it). eg, you video a social interaction, some sort of disagreement, between a man and a woman. You video it both ways, ie with the man and woman exchanging roles. You take a group of men and a group of women, and play the videos, but each person only gets to see a particular interaction one-way (eg, ma…
/r/TheRedPill15/02/16 09:44 PM
15

Ah yes, the 'afraid of empowered womyn' attack. When actually you are just disgusted with her and think she is an entitled piece of shit. The astonishing thing is that the guy could talk like that and everybody didn't just groan and say, 'shut the fuck up, you idiot mangina!'. It is coming, I see terms like 'mangina' and 'beta' appearing all over the place now.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/16 07:45 PM
17

The trouble with the whole beta bux dynamic, is that the woman has to give something in return. That can't be right, she is entitled to have fun, not contribute to a relationship by actually doing what men want (and unlike with women, men are easy to please: belly full and balls empty sums it up). So, get the bux via Daddy Government means she is entitled to that money, while giving back nothing. What's not to like?
/r/TheRedPill15/02/16 07:41 PM
33

Comments are pretty amazing - ok, not that surprising after all we read here. She was asked, very pointedly, to give experiences of men who harrassed her. She wasn't able to oblige (so sorry), and in fact showed that it was women who had been the problem. The comments, many of them, could be summarized as, "You aren't following the narrative, bitch! You were supposed to say something about evil patriarchal shitlords, I mean, what is wrong with you anyway!" Poor girl, had to add an addendum point…
/r/TheRedPill15/02/16 07:22 PM
4

All agreed, but slightly ironic. post-feminist societies lack a positive model of masculinity for men. And then 95% of the post talks about women, rather than a positive model of masculinity. But fair enough, this sub does talk about women too much.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/16 05:08 PM
33

Maybe it is just me, but I can't help laughing inside whenever someone puts the word 'empowered' in a sentence about women. It must be all the times I see women talking about being 'empowered' when it is perfectly clear that they are not, they are just shitty people demanding special treatment. Because somebody (like Daddy Government) can't 'empower' you, you either have power or you don't. If you have been 'empowered' it means someone who actually has power is standing behind you pulling the st…
/r/TheRedPill15/02/16 04:57 PM
1

It says something about how far feminist thought has penetrated our culture that men really get uptight if they are called 'misogynist' or 'sexist'. Obviously, for a woman a misogynist is not a good thing, but why is it not for a man? I doubt if any feminist, indeed most women in all likelihood, feel any real problem about being misandrist. Why would a man consider it an insult, rather than a simple statement? Because a) as many psychological studies have shown, men are almost as strongly biased…
/r/TheRedPill15/02/16 04:37 PM
3

Let's be very serious here: a false rape accusation is an attempt by a woman to deprive an innocent man of many years of his life, and quite possibly put him in a situation where he gets raped himself. It should receive the same sentencing as a rapist. It is definitely not a 'misdemeanor'. Only when women are put in prison on long sentences for for doing it will this nonsense stop. Note, we are talking about proven false accusations, not a case where rape was claimed and not enough evidence to p…
/r/TheRedPill15/02/16 09:35 AM
1

I see the footnote, have you tried to track it down? I looked through CDC reports, so far found nothing like these graphs. I see tables like 'number of women 15-44 years of age and percent distribution by number of male sexual partners in lifetime'. This gives percentage of them currently married, never married, and formerly married, which is the closest. the percent married is highest at 1 partner (which would be their spouse), and decreases very rapidly after that, slightly increasing again at…
/r/TheRedPill14/02/16 11:17 PM
2

The US, Eastern Europe, and Russia, are the West's hope. Western Europe, once central to that civilization, looks fucked at this point. It wouldn't be except for the totally suicidal mindset which is still incredibly common.
/r/TheRedPill14/02/16 02:26 PM
1

Interesting. I don't believe any accusations until I see good evidence. Innocent until proven guilty. This is still largely the case, except when feminism gets involved.
/r/TheRedPill12/02/16 12:35 PM
1

'probably'? In any sensible universe (not that one exists) there is no probably. It would be crystal clear at the time and forever after. If there was doubt about it, it wasn't.
/r/TheRedPill12/02/16 12:30 PM
1

Because the Director of Public Prosecutions is a self-admitted feminist? You can bet she puts pressure of her department to take this nonsense seriously.
/r/TheRedPill12/02/16 10:55 AM
1

This ties in with a recent Black Dragon blog, where he points out that, in Maslow's pyramid of needs, sex is one of the basic needs, and in fact there are a number of health issues with abstaining. Which makes it all the more wrong when a woman marries, giving sex freely, and then proceeds to shut it down. However, I question whether it is a basic need in the same way for women. If it was, they could not use it as a bargaining chip in the way that they do. But completely agree, it is not somethi…
/r/TheRedPill09/02/16 11:55 AM
2

I'm really talking about Europe here, with its unbelievable attitude of favouring everyone except the men who build Europe. The political power of women will be lost, of course, because feminism, in one form or another, has arisen more than once in the past, and always the society then collapsed and women suddenly remembered that they depended on men after all. But it doesn't happen under peace and tranquil conditions, it happens in turmoil.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/16 08:48 PM
2

Three steps to the end of Western society: women's suffrage, the pill, and no-fault divorce. Once you have those, there is no way back for a society. Women will never willingly give up the power they got, the 'freedom' to not have children, the power to force politicians to make more and more of a nanny state and push to the Left. Inevitably, this leads to a decline in birth-rate, and unless you hold strong borders (the Japanese are at least doing that, and will survive), then a takeover by othe…
/r/TheRedPill08/02/16 08:11 PM
8

Something on UK TV just today. They were talking about how damaging to children a divorce was. The solution, naturally, was that Daddy Government should DO SOMETHING! Provide counseling for the children, stuff like that. Typically female way of thinking. Most divorces are brought about by women, because they aren't haaaappppyy. So the answer is for women to get their shit together, acknowledge that when you marry someone and have children, you honour the vow you gave and make it work - at least …
/r/TheRedPill08/02/16 08:07 PM
0

Nobody multitasks with their conscious brains, we context switch. Nobody is good at this, in fact those who considered themselves good at it were actually the worst. If you context switch a lot, you fill out less context, that is, you don't think so deeply. This fits the evolutionary demands of looking after small children, of course. Those little beggars seem to have a death wish, and you always have to keep half an eye on them, but it precludes deep work. Which in part explains why women have …
/r/TheRedPill03/02/16 12:23 AM
2

Incorrect, but seems to have become a common belief. Both sd and mean are higher for men. In both cases the difference is not great, but the difference in mean is enough to makes all the difference show at the upper end of the curve. ie the is little difference on average, but far more male geniuses, as history shows. Having said that, the differences may be bigger than reported. It appears that questions which show a strong sex bias are d clouded from tests.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/16 07:59 AM
4

Less about stealing, more about getting on board to smuggle across to ,England. They have become increasingly violent towards lorry drivers. The left has taken to giving them radios and wire cutters to help them storm the fences at Calais. At least ,,Eastern Europe seems to be awake. The Slovenians say Junckers idea to forcing quotas on countries is suicide. The EU is trying to blackmail the Uk into accepting quotas at the moment. But people are coming to understand you can't just have no border…
/r/TheRedPill28/01/16 11:33 AM
1

No, it is knocking the special snowflake mentality. If they were good women they would not be wondering where the good men were at their age.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/16 06:36 PM
25

Simpler: 'Where have all the good men gone?' 'They are with the good women'
/r/TheRedPill23/01/16 09:10 PM
2

I would 't care, but more to the point you could say lots of things about me that are true, and I wouldn't mind because I accept they are true. I am not a great athlete, I am not a great musician, etc, and I am inferior to a good many people in the world in these matters. The things I point out about women are simply true, and wouldn't be controversy through most of history for that reason. And men didn't love women any less because of it. But we have had 'equality' bullshit rammed down our thro…
/r/TheRedPill21/01/16 05:41 PM
12

Women should have equal rights under the law (which currently means either their rights need to be curtailed a bit, or men's rights augmented), but in which universe are women intrinsically equal? I mean, I know everybody is supposed to believe this, but on what basis? They are physically weaker and slower; mentally both average IQ and variance are lower - not a lot, but the two act in concert to mean far fewer women geniuses; they are deficient in loyalty and honour; too driven by their feels; …
/r/TheRedPill20/01/16 07:08 PM
3

She should have had more sense than to get so drunk and wander through the inner city at 3am. 'That is victim shaming ' If she had an ounce of common sense, she wouldn't be a fucking victim!
/r/TheRedPill19/01/16 05:52 PM
10

Garbage. The reason they are leaving their countries of origin is because Islam is totally fucked up, with divisions between Shia and Sunni, and traditionalists vs secularists. There is violence all across the Islamic world. You can say it isn't religion if you like, but it sure is culture, and that culture is largely incompatible with the West. Somalia, Yemen, North Africa, Chad, Nigeria, Afghanistan, etc are shitholes because of the culture of the people living there. Allow them to move en mas…
/r/TheRedPill14/01/16 11:43 PM
6

33 strategies of war. The result is likely to be bloody, but can be effective. Also inevitable, see Harrington, The Clash of Civilizations.
/r/TheRedPill14/01/16 04:12 PM
3

Yes, after spending 50 years trying to destroy men and masculinity, it is a bit much for them to turn around and say, "help me, Obi Wan Kenobie, you are our only hope!", especially for a problem they themselves brought about. May be better to leave them to the immigrants and Western men to look elsewhere for women.
/r/TheRedPill14/01/16 04:09 PM
7

Yes, it is just an excuse to make their behaviour ok, but an excuse likely to figure. The mob harassment is something copied from Egypt though, I'll look up the name if you wish. As you say, they should just rub one out.
/r/TheRedPill14/01/16 10:27 AM
10

I agree with most of what you say, with two caveats. First, in the country you live in, the women would be Muslim women, not infidels, and I'm sure that makes big difference in the attitude. Second, the kind of mass harassment of women we saw is something known in Egypt, but new to Europe. However, I think your main point is that Western men have become so feminised that they will not take mass retribution in response, and I agree. Also, it isn't just that they see these women as infidels, but a…
/r/TheRedPill14/01/16 09:56 AM
1

Very happy for you, thanks for the FR. One little thing, yin is the passive, negative, feminine energy in Taoism. Yang is the active, assertive, positive masculine energy. A beta male shows too much yin for a man, a feminazi too much yang for a woman. We are developing more masculine, yang attributes, which I guess is what you meant.
/r/TheRedPill11/01/16 11:14 PM
20

Animal Farm and 1984 are both required reading for any man wanting to make sense of modern feminism and the cultural Marxism that underpins it.
/r/TheRedPill11/01/16 01:32 PM
3

There aren't as many women in STEM courses as men. But who gives a fuck? Not me.
/r/TheRedPill11/01/16 12:00 AM
28

Rare, and they get a slap on the wrist. I forget the exact details, but in 2013 a girl had made something like 18 false rape allegations. On that 18th the judge finally had enough and sent her to prison for a few months. The reason he gave was - naturally - that her false rape allegations were making it more difficult for real rape victims. No mention of the lifes of the 18 innocent men that she tried to send ruin. In a fair society, the first time it was proved that her allegation was false, sh…
/r/TheRedPill10/01/16 05:40 PM
3

for them, sex = rape For feminazis, it is. Where have you been? https://witchwind.wordpress.com/2013/12/15/piv-is-always-rape-ok/ Who was it who said, 'feminism is the theory, lesbianism is the practice'? 1970s feminist, I forget who
/r/TheRedPill10/01/16 01:39 PM
1

Fear. Until the Salman Rushdie affair, I don't think any of us (including politicians) saw the clash of civilizations to come, and by that time there were already so many muslims in the west. They have been flailing around trying to solve the problem ever since. I think America, in particular, looked back at the success of rebuilding Germany and Japan after WWII and expected to achieve similar goals with Iraq and Afghanistan. Give them democracy and they will thrive. But actually, culture plays …
/r/TheRedPill07/01/16 07:32 AM
1

Corporations are just as vulnerable to public opinion as governments. Look at the backpedalling by Coca-cola over Crimea recently. They do a lot to try to keep a good reputation, or they profits fall. When profits fall, management gets replaced. Companies generally do best when things are stable and prosperous, because people have money to spend and don't feel they have to stash so much away for emergencies. A Europe in flames does not benefit corporations.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/16 07:27 AM
2

Look around, wherever there is a large population of muslims in close proximity to another culture there is conflict. Look at Nigeria, look at Sudan, look at Lebanon, or Philippines. There comes a point when even SJWs can't stick their heads in the sand anymore, and even if they could, the general population could not. They will only stand so many Colognes, Parises and Rotherhams.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/16 07:25 AM
1

Corporations are not all powerful. When people fear for their survival, governments and corporations lose the final say. However, I think that once this gets sufficiently out of hand with the number of terror attacks by 'home-grown' terrorists, along with things like Rotherham and Cologne, the need for society to continue functioning to produce profits will be the final motivator for governments.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/16 07:26 AM
0

Perhaps. There are two possibilities: that an elite is deliberately using feminists, and then muslims (knowing that a relatively small but significant proportion of the latter will be highly disruptive in the way that buddhists, jews, Jains, Sikhs etc will not) to keep the lower classes down; the other is that politicians are people too, and just as liable to blind themselves to what is in front of them because of their ideological bias as the next man. Maybe a mix of both.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/16 07:24 AM
8

Exactly, it is baffling how stupid the politians have been. Places like Syria, Iraq, Somalia, Chad, etc are not shitholes because of the geography, or genetics, or the food, but because of the culture of the people living there. So, if you let them move somewhere that is peaceful and civilized, like Sweden, but say 'bring your culture with you, we are multicultural now', what the hell did they think would happen? If they instead had said, 'sure, come on in, but you have to leave your culture and…
/r/TheRedPill05/01/16 11:17 PM
46

I put it sixth on the list. The defining war of this century will again be centered in Europe, but this time a civil war, between native populations and the muslim immigrants, because wherever you look in the world Islam does not mix with other cultures without violence. Top of the list I put The Netherlands, simply because they are reaching the stage where the majority of pupils going through school in cities like Rotterdam are Muslim now, and any politician who speaks up needs 24h guard agains…
/r/TheRedPill05/01/16 11:13 PM
4

http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/juvenal_satires_06.htm Women in late Rome and women today are eerily similar (they were not always so in the intervening years. Yes, AWALT, but women are constained by what is acceptable by society to behave better than they do).
/r/TheRedPill03/01/16 08:33 PM
4

Spot on. Rape is about sex for the rapist; for women, it is about power. Sex has always been a woman's main source of power, but not a man's main source of power.
/r/TheRedPill31/12/15 05:27 PM
11

Precisely. They place a very high value on commitment - just not their own.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/15 06:38 PM
6

I'm with the Stoics on this, negative visualization is far more valuable. It does a couple of things. First, it makes you fully aware that everything is transient. This means that while you have it you truly value it, because it will not last (hence, an antidote to hedonic adaptation). Second, when bad things happen, they are often not as bad as what you had prepared yourself for. Third, even in the worst case (and the worst I guess is conditioning yourself to accept your own death) it is not so…
/r/TheRedPill28/12/15 11:15 PM
18

Yes, and justifiably, I think. He did not say that teaching religion is child abuse, he thinks it should be taught. But being taught it uncritically, telling a child that he is a 'muslim child' or a 'christian child', basically by virtue of what the parents believe, is abuse. It is abuse on the grounds of the kind of emotional torment it can inflict. For example, by making a child believe that a friend will roast in hell for all eternity because they are not the same religion. However, he is ful…
/r/TheRedPill28/12/15 07:04 PM
11

I applaud your thinking. These are questions that men have struggled with for millennia. First, I would say that the idea that immortality would give life meaning is baseless, if you think about it. In fact, it is the opposite, if it just kept going, for eons (we are not talking about mere thousands or millions of years here, eternity is beyond comprehension), then you would go insane and begging for it to end after a few thousand years at most. It is the very briefness of life that gives it its…
/r/TheRedPill28/12/15 06:52 PM
1

22 is definitely out. Haven't you heard enough about not sticking your dick in crazy? 18, she is boring to be around, but ok as a plate. 14 is a no-no, her attitude to her father will carry on to you. She learned how to interact with men through her father. 2 comes under 22, stay away. I'm fine with 9 and 13, though. For the rest, agree with you.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/15 06:24 PM
2

I don't know about common, but named after a bank robbery in Stockholm where bank staff were held hostage for 6 days, and became emotionally attached to their captors. I would be interested to know about sex differences in the likelihood of it occurring. If the idea about it being adaptive for ancient (hunter-gatherer) warfare, the general idea seems to be that men were likely to be killed rather than captured, so I might expect it to be more likely in women. I don't know if that is the case, ho…
/r/TheRedPill25/12/15 10:33 PM
2

Agreed. Stockholm as the rape capital of Europe is something I have come across, but across the entire world? Hyperbole, methinks. There is some assumption here (although almost certainly justified). It is assumed that rape is so common in Sweden now because of muslim immigrants (especially as so many come from places like Somalia and Iraq), but in fact the Swedes avoid publishing any information about the race or religion of the rapists. However, the Norwegians do publish it, and the vast major…
/r/TheRedPill23/12/15 10:10 PM
1

It sounds crazy but, its as if theredpill truth isn't a secret to getting women, but how unimportant and overglorified it is. Yes. Life is precious, and success with women is good for your happiness, but life is far more than that. Lately I have been using the Stoic practice of praemeditatio malorum. You previsualize losing something you have - your job, your car, your health, whatever. When you have spent a few minutes really imagining this, you then come to realize that right now you still hav…
/r/TheRedPill23/12/15 10:58 AM
1

It has indeed, and as before, there is as yet no evidence to support the conclusion that oxytocin levels decrease with partner count. It seems to have become a TRP myth (one that I subscribed to myself until I went searching in the literature). The discussion here shows that. No studies.
/r/TheRedPill21/12/15 06:51 PM
1

No, I meant that we have gone beyond trying to appease feminists, or define masculinity in such a way that it is entirely acceptable to women. What men learned in the 80s and 90s, I think, is that such appeasement is not possible. If I remember right, Ian Ironwood talks about the 'Iron John' phase of men trying to rediscover masculinity in a gynocentric society, in 'The Manosphere: A new hope for masculinity'.
/r/TheRedPill14/12/15 11:27 PM
9

I read Iron John many years ago. He correctly identified that men were no longer masculine, and had lost their essential wildness. However, what he proposes is pretty watered-down to make acceptable to feminist society. It was one of the last attempts, I think, to redefine masculinity in a way that would be acceptable to, and pander to, feminists. We are beyond that, now.
/r/TheRedPill13/12/15 07:43 PM
2

Push up bras don't work anyway. I bought one: still could only do the same number as before.
/r/TheRedPill12/12/15 03:06 PM
3

It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife. However little known the feelings or views of such a man may be on his first entering a neighbourhood, this truth is so well fixed in the minds of the surrounding families, that he is considered the rightful property of some one or other of their daughters. -- Jane Austen. Some things never change.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/15 07:31 PM
3

Feminism shows it pretty clearly, being based on lies and half-truths (patriarchy theory, rape culture, wage gap). I said to a feminist that it was now axiomatic that men should not marry, because feminist divorce laws had made it a losing deal for men. She countered that surveys had found that married men were happier than single men. Of course, the surveys did not count all those who had been married but were divorced under the 'married' category. It also ignores that single men tend to be you…
/r/TheRedPill26/11/15 11:15 AM
42

Already happened in the UK. Girls can join the Boy Scouts, or they can go with girl guides if they prefer single sex. Naturally, boys no longer have that option because it would be sexist
/r/TheRedPill23/11/15 12:27 PM
1

Agree strongly with that. Machiavelli is well worth reading, but there is much he didn't understand, and far better models out there. Working on a post on that very subject.
/r/TheRedPill22/11/15 11:15 AM
2

This is expected. When the Rotherham affair broke in the UK press I thought the feminists would make a meal of it. After all, here they finally had a 'rape culture' to complain about. So I monitored all the feminist sites I could think of - jezebel, huffpostwomen, the atlantic, feministing, blogher, etc, for a couple of weeks afterwards. Not a peep, it might never have happened. It was condemned vociferously by some sites in the manosphere, but not feminist sites. It was then that I realized tha…
/r/TheRedPill21/11/15 09:29 PM
1

Is it required to be a personal power (ie a deity of some form), or can it be something formless and vague, like the Tao?
/r/TheRedPill17/11/15 02:19 PM
1

I don't think we are much in disagreement. My 'blaming someone else' is the usual charge that 'if only' we hadn't gone into Afghanistan or Iraq there would be no attacks on the West, so violence in the muslim world, both against itself and against other cultures, is the fault of the West. Islam is a 'religion of peace' and has no connection with violence or extremism. Obviously, this is not the case. It is this refusal to even look at the culture itself by muslims that I am commenting on, not an…
/r/TheRedPill16/11/15 04:32 PM
1

Yes, I get that, but that isn't how it went down, by the sounds of it. The wife had no intention of going above 10% as she wanted to keep it all, and the whole thing very nearly collapsed.
/r/TheRedPill16/11/15 02:52 PM
1

The Taliban are, and it is the same thing. Boko Haram, Al Qaeda, Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, Taliban, Moro Islamic Liberation Front, Al Shabab, etc etc, same thing, different subgroups, same agenda. I agree that the 'arab spring' was entirely misguided (as was the invasion of Iraq), in that it appears, contrary to the general opinion in the West that democracy is all the world needs, that actually at the current state of development, those countries NEEDED a dictator to keep lid on things…
/r/TheRedPill16/11/15 02:09 PM
3

Which you can get, right? What is banned is doing it privately, in secret, not via the court. But you ask for one and you get one.
/r/TheRedPill16/11/15 12:56 PM
3

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_Armed_Forces_casualties_in_Afghanistan This is like feminism, it is always someone else's fault. ISIS is because of the war in Iraq, but ISIS is just a follow on of Al Qaeda, the activities of which preceded and causes the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. There is violence in pretty much all muslim countries, whether they border other cultures or not, but especially if they do. Next, Boko Haram will be our fault, too. This is because of two old conflicts wi…
/r/TheRedPill16/11/15 12:24 PM
1

There is a podcast called 'StartUp Podcast' about a guy and his attempts to start up a business, find an angel investor, and so on. In episode #3, he decides he needs a business partner, so he finds one and they have a good discussion. All looks good. The question is, if he brings this guy onboard as a partner, how many shares should he give him (remember, the company doesn't really exist yet). He discusses it with his wife, who persuades him to screw the guy and offer 10%. The whole thing nearl…
/r/TheRedPill16/11/15 11:59 AM
6

There was a court case in the UK recently, where two women overturned the original divorce settlement (which set them up with lots of money) because they found out that their husbands were worth a lot more than they said. And I mean a lot more. Well they lied to the court, but the real point is that the women had no idea how much the husband was actually worth. For that to be the case, they had to have played no part in actually building that wealth. Yet, they still felt they deserved a very lar…
/r/TheRedPill16/11/15 11:46 AM
24

This is a real problem, isn't it? Because a lot of guys here would actually love to have a stable family and children, I'm sure, but if you do sign up, you get fucked over badly (50% chance of divorce from first marriage, those odds are insane). So yes, we are in a dilemma. If you have worked on yourself and developed the physical and psychological qualities that your great grandfathers had, you are absolutely the people who should be breeding and bringing up strong sons and non-slutty daughters…
/r/TheRedPill15/11/15 05:58 PM
14

That is an excuse. Plenty of poor countries in the world, the terrorism business is almost uniquely associated with Islam. IRA, yes that was based on religious differences too, that is after all why two groups of people considered themselves two groups, rather than one. And Saudi Arabia is being a great deal of this, which is hardly a poor country.
/r/TheRedPill15/11/15 05:53 PM
6

Agreed that it is far too big a problem for the countries immediately around Syria to handle, but the point is that once they move out of that area (for which I don't blame them) they could go to other islamic countries. There are enough of them in the world. But instead they go to Europe. In numbers that is a full-on invasion, if the idiot politicians could but see it. And even though the great majority of those people are themselves peaceful and victims of circumstances beyond their control, t…
/r/TheRedPill15/11/15 05:49 PM
1

Thanks for the considered reply. I was not aware that feminism had intruded that much into islamic culture, although I did hear that many women insist on going to university, but then waste that education later by doing nothing with it.
/r/TheRedPill15/11/15 04:22 PM
5

I'm afraid that won't wash. Pretty well everywhere that Islam is, there is violence, All though Africa, both North and in the centre, in the middle east, russian borders, Pakistan/India, Philippines, you name it. It doesn't help to ignore this and just blame 'the west', that is like feminists blaming patriarchy. I fully agree, though, that most muslims don't support what these idiots are doing. I would be quite happy for these ISIL jokers to meet the sharp end of a Hellfire missile (as Jihadi Jo…
/r/TheRedPill15/11/15 02:23 PM
6

no two powers or cultures can exist in the same geographical space without conflict or full on war. Hit the nail on the head, this is the problem. When two cultures mix you have problems, but the severity of those problems depends on the cultures. Not all such conflicts result in violence, but when one of the cultures is Islam, it does. Although we have Hindus, Jains, Buddhists, Jews, Zoroastrians, and goodness knows what in the West, the violence always seems to involve Islam. And it isn't only…
/r/TheRedPill15/11/15 01:34 PM
1

Exactly, along with numerous studies to show that both men and women are biased in favour of women. For perfectly good biological reasons, ancestrally. It does show how stupid Patriarchy Theory is, because it depends on the exact opposite, that men are biased in favour of their own sex, just as women are. There is some discussion about exactyl why men are not biased in favour of men, but they certainly aren't.
/r/TheRedPill12/11/15 12:30 AM
1

Oh I think objectively they are fine, but that isn't how it works, is it? When they did less well at school, the education system had to be changed. When they did less well entering STEM subjects, or getting on to company boards, quotas needed to be introduced. The fact that they were, relative to ability, doing fine was neither here nor there, they had to be doing better than men. They are not doing better than men in terms of happiness anymore, which is a national emergency. Fuck equal minded.…
/r/TheRedPill11/11/15 09:45 PM
1

Are they fine? http://www.nber.org/papers/w14969 Feminism, driven by masculine women and favouring only masculine traits, does not serve women well. They have been persuaded that entering the rat race and getting a 'career' is fulfilling, but they are women, not men. Where have all the good men gone? http://web.archive.org/web/20070526071146/www.lewrockwell.com/orig/fiori3.html well, not with these women, that's for sure. So, they are 'fine' in that there is a glass floor for women, but not fine…
/r/TheRedPill10/11/15 06:14 PM
7

Yes, women don't need to be good at PR. If they were, then applying the exact same tactic would work for men too, but it doesn't. The difference is not the tactic but the sex. They are totally reliant on the well-known psychological phenomenon that not only are women strongly biased in favour of women, but men are almost as biased in favour of them too. There is no 'team men', as shown by the 'bro-knighting' comments on here. You attack an enemy by pitting your strengths against their weaknesses…
/r/TheRedPill10/11/15 10:46 AM
2

Well, there was a study there about estradiol concentration making women more attracted to high-test men, but remember that feminists tend to be high-testosterone women. Which possibly explains several things: feminists are not feminine, are competitive and have other masculine traits, and likely to be lesbian. Feminist activist women are masculinized in terms of digit-ratio and social dominance: a possible explanation for the feminist paradox G. Madison and U. Aasa and J. Wallert and M. A. Wood…
/r/TheRedPill09/11/15 09:15 PM
3

Came up before in comments. The media love the idea of course. Here is a recent review: As humans are mammals, it is possible, perhaps even probable, that we have pheromones. However, there is no robust bioassay-led evidence for the widely published claims that four steroid molecules are human pheromones: androstenone, androstenol, androstadienone and estratetraenol. In the absence of sound reasons to test the molecules, positive results in studies need to be treated with scepticism as these are…
/r/TheRedPill06/11/15 10:33 PM
1

This is not a cause, you are confusing TRP with MRA. You are in the wrong place. I think you are genuine, but really you should hang out at RPW, not TRP (although even there if you come out with the 'women were oppressed through history' bullshit you will get shot down). Hunting unicorns is a fool's game. Nobody cares about 'educating' deluded feminists. They have poisoned the waters between men and women, but that does not mean that individual men and women cannot make a good life for themselve…
/r/TheRedPill06/11/15 09:16 PM
2

Many women are increasingly more derogatory towards men because of the actions of a man(or men) who have mistreated her in times when men were overwhelmingly more powerful than her. Patriarchy Theory bullshit. Women were not oppressed historically, that is ' Herstory'. Few women alive today have even lived in a non-gynocentric society. These are just pathetic excuses, along the same lines as 'the international Jewish conspiracy' was for the national socialists. Feminists are to gender relations …
/r/TheRedPill06/11/15 04:00 PM
1

Beloved of feminists. Poor thing.
/r/TheRedPill02/11/15 09:13 PM
2

Well, it is perfectly correct (and deeply ironic) that feminism overvalues masculinity and despises femininity. As to how we get women to want to be feminine, there are two aspects. I think that a large part of women becoming more masculine is that they were sensing a void after the second world war, that men had stepped away from masculinity. Women sense a need for it, and since it wasn't there they stepped in to fill the gap. In the same way that a woman alone will do the traditional men's job…
/r/TheRedPill02/11/15 05:40 PM
2

While I agree entirely with your general view, I'm not sure it is correct that people on this board perpetuate the problem. Women are often criticised here, but never, that I recall, for being feminine, for being loyal wives, mothers and home-makers, or for taking jobs in nurturing professions like nursing. They are criticised, roundly and often, for being disloyal and bitchy, for being sluts, for destroying relationships or failing to form them in the first place when they needed to, for choosi…
/r/TheRedPill02/11/15 02:47 PM
4

As I mentioned previously, there are some 'women' fiction writers who are actually men (as I recall, I think the figure was 7-10%). They use a woman's name because otherwise they could not get published, because publishing editors tend to be predominantly women, and often feminist. Bizarrely, you nonetheless have a special prize only for women writers because 'it is so much more difficult for them', although precisely how is unclear. For myself, I haven't read any fiction written by a woman for …
/r/TheRedPill02/11/15 11:22 AM
1

Sorry, I'm doing other stuff while popping back here from time to time; didn't notice that the user name changed. Yes, I entirely agree with what you say here.
/r/TheRedPill01/11/15 06:47 PM
1

You're basically saying that women are unable to do anything better than the worst guy can muster up. No, I am not saying that at all. Incidentally, you seemed to take great umbrage to my talking about your 'feminist upbringing'. That actually wasn't an insult, it would be amazing if you reached adulthood in the West these days and NOT have been subject to feminist propoganda. If not from parents, then very likely from schoolteachers, and most certainly from the media (constantly). Hence your es…
/r/TheRedPill01/11/15 05:43 PM
3

Show me some studies that men are more intelligent than women. Sure. These posts have references. http://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/sexdifferences.aspx http://rgambler.com/2014/05/02/why-do-more-students-get-more-first-class-degrees-at-oxford-university-than-female-students/ This is really nothing new, but it is a dirty secret these days. And all your other stuff, have you forgotten about the pussy-pass? Exists all over the place. Did you know that between 7-10% of women fiction writers are actual…
/r/TheRedPill01/11/15 04:26 PM
1

You are deluded by feminist upbringing. Before the last century nobody in their right minds thought that women could do anything a man could do, because they can't. They can do many things, yes, but there are many differences, both mental and physical. Differences start occuring even in the womb. Yes there are tons of women who are good at arguing (lawyers) and other verbal skills (writing and journalism), but it is no accident that pretty much all the great scientists, artists, philosophers, en…
/r/TheRedPill01/11/15 03:08 PM
3

Certainly women's behaviour changes during the peak fertility phase of their cycle. For example, they dress more revealingly (Durante, K. M., Li, N. P., and Haselton, M. G. (2008)) Although each data source supported the prediction, the authors found the most dramatic changes in clothing choice in the illustrations. Ovulatory shifts in clothing choice were moderated by sociosexuality, attractiveness, relationship status, and relationship satisfaction. Sexually unrestricted women, for example, sh…
/r/TheRedPill31/10/15 12:26 PM
2

Great addition to the corpus. I haven't read him as yet, but now certainly will. Rome is a good role model for us, although not a unique one. People have many times rediscovered the nature of the feminine, but then apparently go blind to it again. I recently wrote about what I see as a masculine/feminine cycle in the rise and fall of empires, referencing Sir John Glubb's analysis (he sees it more as a service/selfish cycle, with increasing wealth as the root of the problem) http://people.uncw.ed…
/r/TheRedPill31/10/15 12:03 PM
1

OK, first the internet pretty much provides this already, and will do more so with the maturation of data mining techniques. Women can't help telling their friends about their exploits, and so much goes online. If it is online, it is available for reference later. There is a battle of the sexes, feminists decided they wanted it, and they have it. It is a battle, curiously, where if one side (men) win, then men, women, and society in general all win. A strong, stable society with strong, stable r…
/r/TheRedPill30/10/15 08:03 PM
2

First, it is not the death of the species, but of a particular society. It has happened many times before, this is nothing new. Read Glubb on The Fate of Empires (mentioned in the sidebar, as I recall, or otherwise http://people.uncw.edu/kozloffm/glubb.pdf). There has always been this tug of war between men and women. Although Glubb himself doesn't put it that way, it can be seen as masculine/feminine cycle or yang/yin. In the early stages, you get the sudden rise of a people, who may attack and…
/r/TheRedPill30/10/15 12:56 PM
12

Careful about surface impressions. GirlWritesWhat spoke about this in one of her videos. China is not male-biased, quite the opposite. In China, sons are legally obliged to look after their parents - they can be taken to court for neglecting this duty. Daughters are under no legal financial obligation. So society, as it generally does, favours women and gives them a privileged position. But what happens when you have a society with inadequate state care for the elderly and a one-child policy? Th…
/r/TheRedPill28/10/15 08:39 PM
1

OK, we are not as far apart as I initially thought, so thanks for clearing that up. There are still differences though. "Exception that proves the rule". I think you misunderstand this saying. Like 'The proof of the pudding is in the eating' it uses the old meaning of 'prove' meaning 'to test'. It makes no sense to say that the exception 'proves' a rule except with this meaning. A counterexample is indeed a test of a rule - but only if the rule uses the universal qualifier (all). Saying that wom…
/r/TheRedPill27/10/15 09:57 PM
2

No, you do it because you are worth it. Recognising that sex is a need is not the same as pedestalizing the women that provide the sex. I need protein, so I buy a steak. I don't put that steak on a pedestal and worship it, it's only a steak. I throw that sucker on the grill and enjoy it. Plenty of steaks out there. So with women. No need to worship at their feet, but no need to avoid them either. Enjoy them for what they are good for (sex, but some women are good for more than that), enjoy your …
/r/TheRedPill27/10/15 12:20 PM
1

Depends. The great games of strategy, such as Go, Chess, and Shogi, are worth playing. Teaches you to think ahead and consider the consequences of your actions and what others may do in response; to always have a plan, a direction; to think clearly when under stress, etc. Also, I seem to recall that tests on youngsters who played video games had developed faster reactions than earlier generations that grew up without them. But they can also make you spend too much time away from progressing with…
/r/TheRedPill26/10/15 10:55 AM
2

Badly worded then. I did not intend to imply that Norway was in the EU. Good for them - but then they mess it up by introducing company board quotas even more extreme than those of the EU itself.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/15 08:28 PM
1

The company board quota comes from the EU. It is already enacted in some countries. They did the same in Norway, to the detriment of the businesses concerned.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/15 04:21 PM
2

Can't seem to link to a comment without the bot removing it. Here are two links from my comment, anyway http://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/sexdifferences.aspx http://rgambler.com/2014/05/02/why-do-more-students-get-more-first-class-degrees-at-oxford-university-than-female-students/ Both link to papers, but there are others. Also note that the difference may be greater than shown, because of the tendency (policy?) to remove questions that show a marked sex difference during development of tests, suc…
/r/TheRedPill25/10/15 04:19 PM
4

Philosophy is the only part of the humanities not dominated by women, it is still very much male-biased. That should tell you something. You may think you can just 'make stuff up', but logic and argument are extremely rigorous. This isn't sociology. If you think otherwise, try Wittgenstein, or a course in symbolic logic.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/15 02:02 PM
1

Not true, there are not more male retards. See my recent post history.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/15 01:59 PM
2

In short, Quota Babes. We see the same in politics. In the current Cabinet, it was all about how many women Cameron appointed, nothing about how well qualified they were relative to other contenders. Same thing with the Shadow Cabinet, the press was all on how many women were chosen by Corbyn, a simple numbers game, as if there is some universal law that women would make up 50% ceteris paribus. In fact, this is the main plank of the new UK feminist party propoganda machine. Just count the number…
/r/TheRedPill25/10/15 01:13 PM
3

Fights don't come out of nowhere. Fights should always be on your terms, for something that you prize (or to protect something that you prize), not on their terms. Much work has been done on how to manage that, for which I recommend Left of Bang which is the work the USMC have been doing, and also Joe Navarro's work on reading body language.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/15 12:34 PM
3

They vote for what benefits them, regardless of consequences (because being aware of consequences is being responsible, and women are all about not being responsible for anything - viz feminism). If the old guy favours a redistribution of wealth from men to women (eg a large welfare system) he is worth voting for. If it bankrupts the country, well that is someone else's problem, some time in the future. http://i.imgbox.com/HeWohQOA.png
/r/TheRedPill25/10/15 12:12 PM
3

No need to imagine http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1168182/Catfights-handbags-tears-toilets-When-producer-launched-women-TV-company-thought-shed-kissed-goodbye-conflict-.html As for co-ed, this was one of the biggest disasters to befall our culture. It means that once you have both together, it then gets skewed to favour the female way of learning, and boys and young men are suppressed from showing any masculinity. We are all familiar with the stories of what happens in schools these d…
/r/TheRedPill25/10/15 11:38 AM
1

Are you sure about that? It seems to be becoming known that men have a bigger variance, but it is assumed this means there are more idiots as well as more geniuses. Actually, the difference in both mean and variance isn't that great, but the difference in mean is enough to offset the variance on the lower tail, while accentuating it on the upper tail. Most people, as you rightly say, are in the big heap of the bell curve, and a difference of 4 points or so makes not a wit of difference. However,…
/r/TheRedPill23/10/15 06:03 PM
1

Another one. Larson, C. M., Pillsworth, E. G., and Haselton, M. G. (2012). Ovulatory shifts in women’s attractions to primary partners and other men: further evidence of the importance of primary partner sexual attractiveness. PLoS One, 7(9):e44456. That one is on PLoS One, so easy to get for everybody. Edit: I have only just noticed that nearly all those papers include Martie Haselton as a co-author. In which case many are in PDF form on one page http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/comm/haselton/papers/
/r/TheRedPill22/10/15 09:40 PM
1

Yes, fair point. I'm not entirely clear in my mind about the ancestral mating conditions anyway, I need to look into it more (if you have any resources, I would be interested). Another possibility is that the 'beta' part was provided by the tribe as a whole, you know, the 'it takes a village to raise a child' kind of idea. It may be that we did not form these long-term bonds, after all other primates close to us don't. Even so, she should be expected to be very choosy about what sperm she allows…
/r/TheRedPill22/10/15 09:16 PM
1

Yes, I really would too. It would have to be a long-term study, because just measuring oxytocin/dopamine/vasopressin levels while asking them how promiscuous they have been doesn't distinguish cause and effect. It could equally be that those women who are deficient in oxytocin have difficulty pair bonding, and so (not surprisingly) sleep with lots of men. It would not prove that oxytocin levels declined with number of partners. Like you, I find the argument intuitively reasonable. I see it like …
/r/TheRedPill22/10/15 06:23 PM
2

You seem to have a knack for entirely missing the point. OP stated that women blame 'The Patriarchy' as an excuse for not being as successful as men. RedPharoahRising contended that there was some justification for them because, after all, they were not allowed to do men's jobs until fairly recently. I pointed out that this idea (from Patriarchy Theory) is hogwash, that women were not 'oppressed' in getting to do child rearing and housework, they were protected and privileged. The jobs at the ti…
/r/TheRedPill22/10/15 06:12 PM
3

the link is not to a study, but to a religious blog that rather vaguely talks of studies. The oxytocin idea does make intuitive sense to me, yet when I went looking for the studies to back it up, I couldn't find any. There are lots of studies on the effect of oxytocin in pair-bonding (mostly in voles), but nothing that says casual sex causes it to become less effective. I found one religious author who has claimed this based on a study, which the studies authors say is taking it completely incor…
/r/TheRedPill21/10/15 10:48 PM
2

How exactly? Exception to what? That there weren't earlier phases of feminism, in the final stages of empires? that viking women built roads, worked in quarries? I assume you are talking about shield maidens, with the idea that some women, at least, took up sword and spear, but although these appear in folklore and myth, their actual existence is disputed. If they occurred, it must have been very rare, and in spite of what TV shows may say, not very good at it. Even today, where modern weapons e…
/r/TheRedPill21/10/15 09:46 PM
5

Not true. First, feminism is not a new thing, it has happened at other times in history, always just before an empire collapses. It happened in Rome post Marcus Aurelius ('Rome rules the World, but women rule Rome' was the complaint then), and towards the end of the Arab empire based in Baghdad there was a very similar complaint about women moving into men's traditional roles, and shortly after that empire collapsed too. It has happened again now, and once more at the time when western civilizat…
/r/TheRedPill20/10/15 10:33 PM
9

Larson, C. M., Haselton, M. G., Gildersleeve, K. A., and Pillsworth, E. G. (2013). Changes in women’s feelings about their romantic relationships across the ovulatory cycle. Horm Behav, 63(1):128–135. Galperin, A., Haselton, M. G., Frederick, D. A., Poore, J., von Hippel, W., Buss, D. M., and Gonzaga, G. C. (2013). Sexual regret: evidence for evolved sex differences. Arch Sex Behav, 42(7):1145–1161. Haselton, M. G., Buss, D. M., Oubaid, V., and Angleitner, A. (2005). Sex, lies, and strategic int…
/r/TheRedPill20/10/15 10:14 PM
2

Thanks for that background info, I understand now. I have only on rare occasions gone to AVfM and didn't know they ever used the term Red Pill. I hope she does change it, though.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/15 06:17 PM
4

Well, that is a point, tits or GTFO. However, in this case she was not claiming NAWALT or anything like that, so I saw no reason for it to be downvoted.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/15 07:43 PM
1

Pardon? That was totally unrelated to what I said. I never said that the sd was in any way correlated with the mean. The point was that many people have heard that the variance is greater for men, but assume from this that it means there are more men in both tails. However, according to that data, this is not the case. It would be mitigated in any case when the means are different, but it appears that in this case it is enough to totally offset the greater variance at the low end. That is, there…
/r/TheRedPill13/10/15 07:37 PM
12

I saw this on JudgyBitch site. It seems to be about MRAs, yet is called The Red Pill. Not a good start if she doesn't know the difference. And it says she is a long-time feminist. I would not trust any feminist not to lie and distort the facts, no matter what a carefully edited trailer shows. And any film that has an interview with Big Red and doesn't call her out for the piece of subhuman trash she is doesn't get much credit from me.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/15 06:50 PM
2

Could be that some people, not necessarily actual subscribers of this sub, feel threatened by this, no?
/r/TheRedPill13/10/15 06:47 PM
3

Interesting that you are downvoted, which suggests the blue pill/feminist retards are having fun. Hi guys!
/r/TheRedPill13/10/15 06:45 PM
5

Hopefully, you will learn what 'equality' in a relationship with a woman actually means before you are raked over the coals too much. If it happens when she is just a girlfriend you may get off with just a lesson learned. If you have been dumb enough to sign a legal contract first, expect to lose a great deal more. Because the relationship will turn sour. Depend on it.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/15 06:41 PM
1

I agree that it isn't a social movement, and any idea that these groups would constitute such a movement is not going to get very far. However, that doesn't mean that it is every man for himself. We get something from anonymous online communities, but there is a lot more that could be done face to face. One of the characteristics of men is that they are very loyal to a small group of known individuals (their friends/comrades-in-arms) but not loyal to men as a whole. Women are kind of the opposit…
/r/TheRedPill12/10/15 08:26 PM
1

College Lane. It is called Barber Barber.
/r/TheRedPill12/10/15 08:18 PM
1

Agreed. There are men's groups needed, mentoring groups. Now such groups could be based on many red pill ideas and strategies, but it would be a big mistake to make it an obvious association. There is a huge amount of valuable information for young men in this sub, but people's ideas of it are clouded by all the negative stuff (all the AWALT posts, the reports of having affairs with married women, disparaging women generally). That kind of clouds the good stuff most people would be fine with. So…
/r/TheRedPill12/10/15 08:09 PM
6

And it backfired. The original shop was in Liverpool, but after the feminazis tried to invade it became nationally known and a queue around the block. The owner refused to submit, and as a result is now opening branches in other cities. Same with the Protein World ads. Feminists don't have such complete control of the public as people think.
/r/TheRedPill12/10/15 10:13 AM
2

There is a lot of evidence that women and men have similar average intelligences, but that women are more distributed whereas men are concentrated at either extreme No, it is approximately normally distributed in both cases, not 'concentrated at either extreme'. The standard deviation is greater in men, which might lead people to assume that there are therefore proportionally greater number at both tails of the distribution than women (I assume this is what you meant), but this isn't the case, b…
/r/TheRedPill11/10/15 10:34 PM
1

Yes, there is that innate difference which makes it more difficult for most women (but not all, certainly). It isn't just Stoicism, philosophy has always been something that men did. How many female philosophers of note can you name? The standard feminist answer would be that they were 'oppressed', but this is garbage. Women enjoyed the wealth of their husbands, but with more free time if they were in a wealthy family. Philosophy took a brain, and the ability to write (not even the last two if y…
/r/MarriedRedPill10/10/15 10:46 PM
1

Never forget that men are almost as biased towards women as women are. So for most men, any criticism of women is 'misogyny', whereas they are happy to overlook any criticism of men. That is just how it is. There is a lot of blue pill thinking and pedestalizing there, but that isn't my concern. Their opinions are not under my control, and are irrelevant to me. Nor are they able to say what is Stoic and what is not, or who is allowed to be Stoic and who is not. I also think that TRP itself tends …
/r/MarriedRedPill10/10/15 07:22 PM
3

Male dominance is a requirement in a healthy relationship, I would say. And behaviour is controlled by reward and punishment. The important thing is that the man being dominant has worked on himself, and has made himself worthy of that role. That is, he needs to actually be capable of making good decisions for the two of them, and if he is responsible for her, then he does actually care about what is good for her, not only what is good for him (but also taking care of himself, obviously, not pan…
/r/TheRedPill10/10/15 01:34 PM
1

As I posted over on MRP, there is a new Stoic Week starting early November for those interested. It is run by Donald Robertson, author of Stoicism and the art of happiness. It is free. Create an account and enroll at http://modernstoicism.com/course/view.php?id=7 using the enrolement code 'Marcus' (without the quotes). Promises to be interesting.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/15 08:22 PM
2

That is exactly right. It is deep seated envy of the achievements of men throughout history. So they made up this 'history is the history of women's oppression' garbage to excuse their lack of contribution. So men gave them equal opportunities in the man's world of work and politics once men had also invented the pill (and mechanization and computers, to make a lot of work easy and comfortable). They then expected to do exactly as well as men, but surprise surprise they didn't. So then the story…
/r/TheRedPill09/10/15 06:53 PM
1

*I disagree. Both the civil rights movement and unions were needed early on, because there was genuine oppression. Women were never oppressed in this way, they were protected. Psychology consistently shows that both men and women are biased towards women (to almost the same extent), and from an evolutionary point of view, the lower reproductive rate of females makes them the limiting resource, and hence the need to keep them away from danger. So throughout history it was men who took on the diff…
/r/TheRedPill09/10/15 09:04 AM
3

This is the one that stuck for me too. feminism doesn't argue that men and women are inherently different, it argues the opposite, that the genders are nothing but social constructs. Men are just girls in boy masks. This is why they make such a fuss about children's toys and 'role models'. They believe that anything a man can do a woman can do as well, because they are fundamentally the same. The reason that the 'patriarchy' exists is not because men are more powerful, but because they have been…
/r/TheRedPill08/10/15 08:03 PM
8

Judism failed because it lacked a devil. You have said this several times now, and it still makes no sense. What does 'failed' mean? Does it mean not grown to the extent that Christianity and Islam did? Well obviously, because the latter two are proselytising religions and Judaism isn't. It can't fail to have won a race it never entered in the first place. Does it mean that followers of Judaism have failed to make their way in the world? Obviously that is false. So I have no idea what it is supp…
/r/TheRedPill08/10/15 07:58 PM
2

Yes and no. First, being proud of her husband's achievements is one thing, taking credit for them is something else. And it is true that we should not criticize women for making a successful marriage/LTR, this really is the pinnacle of women's achievements. But the problem is when they think it is just getting married, not making a success of that marriage, that is the real trick. This is what RPWs concentrate on, and I do applaud them for that.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/15 11:00 AM
6

Classic female manipulation right here. This is how it always starts, The Siren's Song. 'Not All Women Are Like That! Some of us are sweet, and caring, and loving, and loyal - oh yes, and oppressed! You can't say nasty things like that about women, because we are NICE' Then we buy (literally) into it, and we find out just how far that sweetness and loyalty goes. Female psychology is the same everywhere, how much of it is expressed, and how, depends on the culture. Women take the shape of their c…
/r/TheRedPill05/10/15 06:19 AM
2

And thus can't complain if they don't get one, yes
/r/TheRedPill03/10/15 10:46 AM
9

Then feminists complain because men consider young women as 'sex objects'. What the hell else are they? There are some women who actually have personality and are interesting in their own right, but jeesh they are few and far between. This isn't men's fault, nobody is forcing them to be such empty shells. Well, I say that, but there is pandering to this nonsense. I went to the Commonwealth Games, and they were publicly asking spectators to tweet their selfies from the games, and then displaying …
/r/TheRedPill02/10/15 12:21 PM
5

Because, as Rollo said, in order for one sex's strategy to succeed, the other's must be curtailed. If feminism succeeds, it is at the expense of men's best interests, as should be obvious from seeing what it does.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/15 11:34 AM
1

the worse it becomes for young men. They don't even stand a chance. This kind of bullshit has been mainstream for some decades now, but actually young men now stand a better chance than their elders, because of the internet. It is places like this, and blogs like Rollo's, Ironwoods, IllimitableMen, BlackDragon, and on and on, that means men are able to arm themselves. There is a resurgence of masculinity, in spite of what the mainstream media would have us believe, because there is now an altern…
/r/TheRedPill01/10/15 11:52 AM
1

maybe check out http://www.theeroticreview.com
/r/TheRedPill01/10/15 11:06 AM
1

It's code. When a woman says she wants him to be open with his feelings, she actually means she wants him to be open to her feelings. On the surface of her mind, she may actually believe she wants him to be open with his feelings, but she really doesn't. http://menaregood.com/wordpress/the-invisible-blue-taboo-the-burden-of-boys-and-men/
/r/MarriedRedPill30/09/15 08:29 PM
5

That's exactly the problem. They want to make Thor a woman. I certainly hope that crashes and burns. If they made a film about a goddess, maybe Pallas Athena, I would be fine with it. If they want to make a film about a black female leprechaun spy, that's fine, but let it stand on its own two feet and leave the white male heroes alone. But of course it is less about making a female / gay / whatever hero, and more about removing strong white male heroes. In Thunderball, when Bond walks in to her …
/r/TheRedPill30/09/15 11:28 AM
1

An example he gives, as I recall, is a tennis match. You do have some control over this, in that you can play badly (and almost certainly lose) or you can play at your best. But even if you play at your best you may not win, because you are not the only person involved. However, this not the same as something over which you have no control at all, such as a plane crash (or in fact, most things in life). The distinction is useful, because if it is No Control, then you understand this and don't ba…
/r/MarriedRedPill29/09/15 06:34 PM
2

Good grief. And I suppose the moon landings were fake, because it is really made of cheese. We keep capturing some of these characters, there is no doubt what their beliefs are. But neven mind, it is all 'zionists' and muslim fundamentalists are all our friends. Sure.
/r/TheRedPill28/09/15 04:18 PM
3

a stunning lack of emotional discipline. That certainly seems to be a problem. For me, it isn't Islam itself so much, as a recognition that it is the main external force that threatens my civilization, and I think it is one worth preserving. I would feel the same if it was threatened by Hinduism or Buddhism, but it isn't. Islam is at a very bad stage in its history right now, one marked by a deep split between Sunni and Shia, and violence both within its borders and (particularly) at its borders…
/r/TheRedPill27/09/15 10:11 PM
3

this is the old story we keep hearing, 'we are victims, it isn't us'. The big migration is because of the aftermath of the Arab Spring, where people attempted to overthrow dictators, but in Syria it didn't work. What we have found is that there was a good reason for there being dictators, it simply isn't the case that democracy is a good system for everybody at every stage of their development. Assad is not our doing, and actually neither is the centuries-old conflict between Sunni and Shia, whi…
/r/TheRedPill27/09/15 05:46 PM
2

One out of two. They are weaker at controlling some urges, they also have a weaker sex drive. Sleeping with Chad is not because they have a stronger sex drive. They are using sex to try to get Chad tied down - and once they do they can then dial back on the sex. This is just so common it is a truism. If they really had a stronger sex drive and were weaker at controlling it, men would control the sexual market place. It is the fact that they have a weaker sex drive that gave women power in the fi…
/r/TheRedPill27/09/15 04:11 PM
3

Equality is one of those weasel words. 'how can you not believe in equality?' they say. But what does it mean? The moral argument that compels people to agree is the idea of equal rights under the law, which I think we all agree with (but feminists don't, they want, and get, greater rights). But hidden behind it, once you agree, is the idea that men and women are essentially the same, the difference is just a social construct. So women could have achieved all the things that men did throughout h…
/r/TheRedPill27/09/15 11:43 AM
4

refused to marry so as to not have to share power. A bit more clever than that. England (Scotland was still a separate country then) at that time was not the world beater it later became, it was weaker than the great European superpowers of the time: France and Spain. By not marrying, she kept both countries thinking that she would marry one or the other at some point, and so kept them disunited and not willing to attack (since they thought they could have hegemony over England by marriage). For…
/r/TheRedPill27/09/15 10:27 AM
12

I'm sure they hope so. That barber is doing fantastic business as a result of standing up to the SJWs. He is opening more branches to cope with demand. It isn't just us who are sick of this feminazi bullshit.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/15 01:08 PM
6

Great to hear that, and I look forward to the audio. It is one of the shames of our society that such an event needs to be kept secret because of socially-endorsed terrorists, however. But hey, we are the privileged oppressors.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/15 06:39 PM
6

If women blew their load like guys do every time they have sex, they would also partake in sex for sex's sake. Adam Leonas talks about this in his book. The reason that women got the upper hand in sexual politics is simply that they have a lower sex drive. Similar to the idea that the one who cares the least in a relationship has the power. It is how women can use sex to manipulate, since they can freely withhold it. Men would rarely think of withholding it, since they would just be punishing th…
/r/TheRedPill16/09/15 06:36 PM
2

Yeah, I admit that occasionally I envy gay men. Fancy being attracted to someone that doesn't give you all that emotional crap and can actually hold an intelligent conversation. There must be downsides, but it looks pretty good from over here. I just can't get my head pointed in that direction, though.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/15 06:33 PM
2

Over a couple of decades my bp was consistently around 140/96. Then for other reasons I cut my carb intake to below 80g per day (made up calorie deficit primarily from fats). Within weeks it went down to 112/73. After a couple of months I added carbs back and my bp went up again to 125/80 (not as much carbs as original diet). This is n=1 so I don't make big claims, but worth a try for someone struggling with high blood pressure.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/15 09:19 AM
4

At all levels, co-education is a failed experiment. Boys did better than girls, so the strategy was to combine the schools then make the co-ed school provide girl-friendly tuition. Surprise surprise they then start to do better, while the boys are treated like defective girls and drugged if they show normal boyish boisterousness. Start talking about how the boys are 'failing' and the girls are better. Then we added women's colleges to universities. But they wanted them mixed. So then we start ad…
/r/TheRedPill16/09/15 08:47 AM
1

The domain is about first intelligence, and second about the building, maintaining and defending a civilization. 1) Men have higher mean intelligence and greater variance (hence more geniuses, but also more morons). You disagreed that the means were different, I showed that they were, and the IQ test questions had to be modified to remove the difference. You then say that this admits you are correct. No, it shows that the mean intelligence is different, with men's being higher, otherwise there i…
/r/TheRedPill15/09/15 06:39 PM
1

Do you have some other unbiased way to measure intelligence, and results to back your point up? It's called the history of civilization. Take a look into it. You are the one being incoherent. If two things are not identical, then one can be superior, once you define the domain of that superiority. We are talking about civilization, the building, maintaining and defending of civilization. And yet, men and women have different qualities, strengths and weaknesses (whatever feminism may claim), and …
/r/TheRedPill15/09/15 05:44 PM
3

This is absolutely false. Men and women have the same mean intelligence as measured by g. No, the tests are constructed that way, to mask the difference. Most IQ tests are constructed so that there are no overall score differences between females and males.[106][107] Popular IQ batteries such as the WAIS and the WISC-R are also constructed in order to eliminate sex differences.[108] In a paper presented at the International Society for Intelligence Research in 2002, it was pointed out that becau…
/r/TheRedPill15/09/15 05:05 PM
3

It is one of the Stoic practices, no previsualize your own death. This kind of previsualization is done on many things, losing your beloved parent or child, losing your job, losing your health, losing your home. By previsualizing it, really imagining it, you kind of innoculate yourself to it, because as you say, denying it by pushing it out of your mind just means you are totally unprepared if it does happen, and you are really living in a state of suppressed fear. It also makes you appreciate h…
/r/TheRedPill15/09/15 03:23 PM
1

First, as far as intelligence goes, men have greater mean as well as greater variance (and hence more geniuses). Second, civilization is advanced by more than genius, but by other qualities too, such as exploration. Again, it is men who have always done this. And civilizations, if they are to flourish, need to be defended from outsiders - again a male task. Given that nature of roles of men and women, because of their biology, it inevitably means that men are the ones that build, maintain, and d…
/r/TheRedPill15/09/15 01:44 PM
1

True, but which group advances civilization? The morons (mostly men), the average, or the exceptionally bright (men)?
/r/TheRedPill14/09/15 10:26 PM
1

Oh, so it was a post in r/relationships which is satirically called r/hamsters? OK, partially explains it. I never look at these subs, as you can tell.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/15 06:19 AM
2

Well, she was 'raped' the last time, when Chad broke it off with her and she couldn't persuade him to come back. All the other times it was just a mistake. Everyone is allowed to make a mistake or three, right? Right?
/r/TheRedPill13/09/15 12:19 PM
5

OK, I understand why the wife isn't giving him what he wants. I understand why this frustrates him and he wants it to change. I understand him going on the internet to find out. But what I don't understand, for all that is holy, is why the fuck he posts it to r/hamsters? Why does anyone? I mean, does he honestly expect them to tell him the truth? I mean, it even says 'hamsters' right there in the title. Does he need it written down on paper wrapped around a sledgehammer or what?
/r/TheRedPill13/09/15 12:17 PM
2

The interesting thing to me was this bit: Despite this, police who interviewed her suggested that the sex was consensual, with one officer telling her, "Maybe you're a party girl. You know regrettable sex is not the same as rape." There are two possibilities. 1) a policeman did say that, so they are catching on about the regret-rape thing, in spite of feminists constantly pushing the police to 'just believe' rape 'victims' because they never lie about such a thing https://www.youtube.com/watch?v…
/r/TheRedPill13/09/15 11:20 AM
3

Seconded. There are amazing places in Northern India, but you will get harrassed the whole time, and loads of people trying to rip you off. In Southern India it was much more relaxed and people were more genuinely friendly without trying to rip you off.
/r/TheRedPill13/09/15 10:50 AM
3

They have the Caracals (60% women), which are allowed since 2000 I gather. In 2012 there was an attack on a border post with Egypt they were manning, and three attackers and 1 Israeli were killed. It is claimed that one of the attackers was killed by a woman soldier. They made a big fuss about one of the women who fought it out, then it turned out that another one, initially thought to have been captured by the attackers, had cowered under a bush for an hour.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/15 06:16 PM
2

No, but the photograph is (by LinkedIn standards). She is not above 'objectifying' men herself http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3229951/Ooh-la-la-hot-stuff-s-prim-barrister-centre-sexism-storm-said-men-ogled-web.html She is trying to make out that what he said (compliment the quality of her photograph) because LinkedIn is supposed to be about jobs, at least in a roundabout way. But who decided that it was 'inappropriate' to compliment people (women) in a work environment? Feminists, that'…
/r/TheRedPill11/09/15 06:23 AM
2

Completely agree. Right now it is so crazy that one picture of the tragic death of a child is apparently enough to determine the immigration policy of the whole of Europe. WTF? They are not thinking strategically about this at all, otherwise they would be asking why the local states are not taking the refugees. But the feminists are exactly the same. When people say it 'isn't appropriate' to compliment someone in a 'professional' setting, who made up that rule? Because it certainly wasn't that w…
/r/TheRedPill10/09/15 09:35 PM
6

She said that him saying her photograph was 'stunning' was misogyny. Misogyny is hatred of women, so telling someone you really like their photograph means you hate them. Go figure.
/r/TheRedPill10/09/15 08:06 PM
7

'creepy' is femspeak. We have a problem, at least in Europe, that muslims try to make non-muslims obey their rules. They are apparently not allowed to make visual representations of their prophet, but that rule is not something for non-muslims, anymore than not eating pork is. This is exactly the same. Not complimenting someone on their appearance is a feminist rule that they try to impose on others, and like with pictures/cartoons, non-feminists should strike back and refuse to obey their rules…
/r/TheRedPill10/09/15 08:01 PM
11

Here are her views in more detail http://leftfootforward.org/2015/02/why-i-want-feminism-and-not-equality-and-why-they-are-not-the-same-thing/ The equalist debate is one way of preserving patriarchy, whereas feminism seeks to give power to women on their own terms – not mens. This is why I am a feminist, not an equalist. definite feminazi of the supremely toxic kind. His big mistake was not googling her name first. Then, he would have been wise not to respond at all (not reject, she would kick u…
/r/TheRedPill10/09/15 07:18 PM
4

You know what? That was probably one of the best things that can happen to you in your life, because it caused you to open your eyes. Women, and our culture, would have us believe that women are a mystery, you can't understand them, and therefore you have no control. Things like this hurt because they seem out of the blue, the way you thought things were was just a lie. We have all been there. But actually women are predictable. In a little while you will know enough to understand why it happene…
/r/TheRedPill08/09/15 09:32 AM
1

Sorry I didn't get back sooner. It was in comment by an Israeli guy. I think it was on here, or may have been on the Telegraph, but can't find it right now.
/r/TheRedPill06/09/15 09:22 AM
1

She was defending, and you are correct that Galtieri's junta was in trouble at home and needed a diversion, but that isn't the point. The point is that she defended militarily, not by going through some UN diplomatic path. Which is exactly what a man would have done in her position too, ie there was no 'women are pacifists' rule.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/15 10:32 PM
1

I believe that the more violence by women applies within 2 parent families too (I'll need to check, but I seem to recall that). However, your argument would apply to wars, that they didn't start as many wars because they were seldom in the position to start them. Thatcher didn't hold back, Elizabeth I was involved in a number of wars (and made the decision to invade Ireland), Catherine the Great invaded the Crimea, and fought two wars against Turkey and one against Poland.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/15 10:07 PM
2

That is why men cannot multitask. Nobody can consciously multitask, only subconcious processes can be multitasked. What people call multitasking is actually context switching. Women tend to be better at this, but that is because they have less context to switch (ie they do not concentrate so deeply). The work they (Clifford Nass et al) did at Stanford showed that people who claim to be good at multitasking however are actually very poor at it. So then they looked to see what these people who thi…
/r/TheRedPill05/09/15 09:41 PM
2

Yes, and they like to go on about domestic violence, carefully avoiding the fact that the commonest victims are not women but children - and the commonest perpetrators of violence against children are women. The business about women actually doing the discoveries and inventions is obvious horse shit, but the wars is also interesting. It is not that women gain anything from winning a war, of course, they never took part in the 'spoils of war', right? They just avoided having to fight for it. And …
/r/TheRedPill05/09/15 09:34 PM
3

Yep. I spent a week there one night.
/r/TheRedPill04/09/15 06:55 PM
1

This is something that I have changed drastically in this last 6 months. I was always very casual, but now I aim always to be just a bit better dressed than whoever I am with. Not over the top, but just be noticeably better dressed than the 'competition'.
/r/MarriedRedPill01/09/15 07:57 PM
1

Not fully comparable. Reporting rates may be similar, but the rate of false reports is far higher than anything except maybe insurance claims. 40-50% at least.
/r/TheRedPill01/09/15 12:51 PM
1

Wow, hidden in plain sight. I just assumed that feminists and their allies would have erased any discussion of it there. Thanks.
/r/TheRedPill01/09/15 10:13 AM
4

But I still encourge girls to do sport since a healthy lifestyle is better for men as for women. So do I, both sexes should be encouraged to play sports, both physical and mental. So don't really see any reason to make fun of it. There is very good reason to make fun of it. Because of the reality distortion that so saturates our media, fueled by feminism. If it wasn't for that, I doubt that anyone would be making fun of women in sport, they are after all the best of women. It would be like makin…
/r/TheRedPill31/08/15 07:36 PM
3

I watched the gymnastics at the Commonwealth Games last year. After a while, I got fed up with the women's events, and looked forward to the mens. They just got on with it, beautiful skill, genuine strength and flexibility. The women spent so much time being 'arty', just silly waving of their hands while standing on the beam and such -like. Who cares? We only put them up there to do somersaults and the like, why bother with all that crap? It really looked like they were padding it out to give th…
/r/TheRedPill31/08/15 07:22 PM
7

Another commenter did say that in the Israeli Defense Force they do have some mixed companies. Those have casualty rates 7x higher than men-only companies. Now in both UK and US there is pressure (from politicians, and feminists who swallow the Hollywood bullshit) to take women into the front-line. Naturally, the military are under pressure to reduce standards to allow this, just as the police and fire services had to. I only hope they have the sense to have separate companies for women, not mix…
/r/TheRedPill31/08/15 07:18 PM
7

Incredibly biased commentators, but what do we expect? Every time the girl decided to throw a punch they praised her, but he was knocking her around all over the place, even though he generally looked like he was holding back. Yet he was much older and well out of shape.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/15 07:14 PM
11

Already, criticism is mounting, both from MMA fighters and the greater public at large. Mixed martial arts champ, Ronda Rousey, has refused to fight Fox over her “unfair advantage.” And yet they still managed to make out that Ronda wouldn't fight an actual man because 'it would give a bad example for people seeing a man beat up a woman on television', while still not refuting the idea that she could take on the men. Yeah, right.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/15 07:00 PM
2

I have heard the same thing, and that in normalizing the scores for IQ tests even now, any question that shows a marked gender difference in score is thrown out. However, while I have heard this, I don't have a definitive source, do you?
/r/TheRedPill31/08/15 06:52 PM
13

not so. There are difference is brain development even before birth due to different hormone levels. Even with very young babies, girls pay attention to people and expressions, boy babies tend to ignore people and are attracted to things. This continues as they get older, so it is no accident that the main STEM fields that attract women are medicine and psychology - because both involve interacting with people. Similarly, the one field in the humanities that is dominated by men is philosophy, be…
/r/TheRedPill31/08/15 06:49 PM
17

Vastly more men and boys are playing chess than women and girls, so the pool of talent is much larger. Indeed, but then why is that? You seem to be implying that if the same number of women played then there would be an equal number of grandmasters, but that isn't so. People are drawn to what they can be good at, and women are not drawn to chess, even though the national chess federations do all they can to encourage women/girls to participate. Same with FIDE, they make a special 'Woman Grand Ma…
/r/TheRedPill31/08/15 06:42 PM
3

Law 40 talks about money and advises to be generous, as it is a sign of, and magnet for, power. But it also warns against being an indiscriminate giver; rather, it is something to be used strategically. It seems to me that in general there is a difference between being generous to women and being generous to other men. Men, if you are being wise in your choice of fellows, have a sense of honour (a masculine virtue). When you are generous with men they are sensible of it, and feel obliged to pay …
/r/TheRedPill31/08/15 11:19 AM
13

Someone on this sub put it very well a few months ago. Think of potential mates as a pyramid, where the higher up the pyramid you go the more educated/wealthy/high status you get. You have a level on this pyramid too. The higher you go, the more become available to you because men will be satisfied with those at the same level or below. Because of hypergamy, women only look above, so the more educated/higher status they get, the smaller their pool of partners. Sucks to be a woman sometimes. Well…
/r/TheRedPill27/08/15 07:50 PM
5

There are degrees, and then there are degrees. When I started my first degree I was astonished at some of the people* there. I had this idea in my head that people who went to university were a) intelligent and b) really fascinated by the subject they chose to study. *by people, I really mean girls. The guys were fine. Same when I started reading for my doctorate. Quite a few women around, but none of the high flyers. You might like http://rgambler.com/2014/05/02/why-do-more-students-get-more-fi…
/r/TheRedPill27/08/15 07:46 PM
3

Adding tabasco or bleach is a pretty good safeguard. If you are just going out the door and you see your girl running past you down the street naked and yelling, it should give you a clue.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/15 05:31 PM
68

They had to, or flush them down the toilet. Because some women fished the condoms out of the trash and impregnated themselves, and the courts still made the men pay CS. The NBA had to put out a letter to all their players about it.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/15 05:13 PM
5

I have a pretty good opinion of prostitutes, it is an honest interaction.The founder of Athenian democracy, Solon, filled Athens with good and cheap brothels. It worked remarkably well, and Athenian men were very productive. We know that the social development of men has two crucial phases, early childhood, and sexual experiences when first going through puberty - and the latter is more important. If I had a son, I would take him to a prostitute as soon as he was of legal age. Young men, especia…
/r/TheRedPill25/08/15 02:39 PM
2

Good spot. People should use a different user account for posting in non-redpill subs. Admins will just use it as an excuse otherwise.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/15 02:28 PM
9

The more spent on the wedding, the more likely the divorce. Many women today think about getting married, but not being married.http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2501480
/r/TheRedPill25/08/15 02:23 PM
4

Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you ;) It pays to be cautious, at least on things that are very high cost. And children cost a lot. As someone said on TRP: Machiavellianism, to men, is an artform; to women, an instinct. I recall in 2004 the NBA had to send out a circular to their players telling them to be sure to flush the condom down the toilet afterwards. There had been a number of cases where the woman had fished it out of the trash when the player had left a…
/r/MarriedRedPill25/08/15 08:10 AM
1

Telling you what is obvious, I guess, but it is hard to know what other people know, sometimes. I do find it interesting the different levels on which we influence each other. Men pass testosterone to their woman, increasing their sex drive: women cry, and decrease men's testosterone.
/r/askMRP24/08/15 08:39 PM
2

It's the smell. A woman can have baby thoughts tucked securely away at the back of her mind, but then she picks up a baby, smells its head, and suddenly there is nothing in life more worth having. You can see it happening, with some women.
/r/askMRP24/08/15 07:17 PM
1

Dread for sure, but on it continuing, bear in mind the effect of hormones, too. Sex drive is determined by testosterone in both sexes, but of course testosterone levels are much higher (12x-17x commonly) in men. However, your semen is also rich in testosterone, and it is absorbed by the woman through the squamous epithelia of the vaginal wall (also if swallowed). The result tends to be that more frequent sex leads to more frequent sex.
/r/askMRP24/08/15 07:03 PM
5

Yep, I have said it before, you can never trust women with contraception. It may be subconscious, or it may be deliberate, depending on the woman. It can go as far as making a show of taking the pill in front of you - because she bought fake pills on the internet. when women would be held responsible for having a child without the man's consent, she was damn careful about it. Now, the cost is put on the man, so he has to take responsibility.
/r/MarriedRedPill24/08/15 06:47 PM
3

It is in the Telegraph. Expect the commenters to tear this drivel to pieces. Feminist nonsense gets short shrift there, because comments are not heavily moderated to conform to the paper's policy.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/15 06:39 PM
1

Whoopi Goldberg talking about a similar situation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2ntfQ3u2Mo Actually, she is the only human being on that panel, the feminists are just unbelievable. A man should never hit a woman, fair enough, but a woman hit a man? They have no problem with that. This is the vilest form of bullying, when you know that the other person can't fight back.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/15 06:29 PM
2

OK, first let me say that my disagreement may no longer be relevant. The last time I spoke with Amotz must have been in the early 90s, but it was his position then, and I seem to recall it was his position in his book, that all signals have a handicap (ie a cost) built in. I'm fully in agreement that many do, and Alan Grafen showed how this was mathematically sound. My point is that signals need a cost to prove that the signaller is not 'cheating', eg that a stag advertising to rival males that …
/r/TheRedPill24/08/15 05:52 PM
1

I have trouble extracting meaning from that verbiage. I think you said Men do not strive for greatness because it affects the way women see them Women don't notice anyway Or in other words, sexual selection (of males by females) does not exist and hypergamy does not exist. Well, I know where I stand on those points, but I'll leave it to people to decide for themselves.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/15 02:25 PM
2

Exactly. The point about it is that what is being signalled is genuine, which is what TRP is all about. This is not just 'learn game', that is just a part of it, but if that is all you do then people will see through it. Here we say that you should actually become a better man, more masculine, more confident, more successful - and that comes through, whether you want it too or not. I don't actually agree with Zahavi that all communication involves a handicap (but that is another discussion), but…
/r/TheRedPill23/08/15 05:22 PM
0

I'm sad to admit this but it seems clear to me that men are 'losing the war'. In the battle of the sexes, when men lose, everybody loses. Women lose directly, because they cannot get a satisfying relationship with a man they can respect (and women's love is built on respect). Longer term, society fails, because civilization is built and maintained by men, not women. Women's 'work' outside the home is a vanity project that only rich societies can afford. When civilizations fall, women suffer too.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/15 05:00 PM
1

I would really question why you would marry. I can understand wanting an LTR, sure, but why bring the State into your relationship? The only reason I can see for putting a ring on it now is for children, and even then I'm not sure it is relevant anymore.
/r/MarriedRedPill23/08/15 09:21 AM
30

Be aware of paradigm shifts, we are going through one at the moment. I started programming when the shift to OO really got underway in the 80s. Before that it was all Pascal, C, FORTRAN and COBOL. Then we had 25 years of OO domination of the industry, with C++, Smalltalk (fastest growing language in the 90s, until the vendors fucked it up), Java, Python and Ruby (those last two being the best to start with, I would say). OO solved, or at least mitigated, the problem that programs were becoming l…
/r/TheRedPill23/08/15 08:49 AM
0

Interesting. civilization itself is profit. profit made by men, kept by fathers, for their sons, and sons alone. history shows it doesn't last when wasted on meaningless productiveless peakcocking for whores. Civilization itself is a peacock's tail. Men build civilizations, but why? There is a view that men push themselves so much to create great works of art, philosophy, science, etc in order to impress women. We pretty much acknowledge that ourselves; we say that a man needs to get his financi…
/r/TheRedPill23/08/15 08:23 AM
10

although whereas Darwin rather interpreted the peacock's feathers as being attractive to the peahen analogously to humans finding things beautiful, the modern sociobiologists perhaps rather interprets them as being attractive because they are indicative of the fact that the males are fit and that the female's male offspring will, in turn, be attractive. That is, R.A. Fisher's Sexy Son hypothesis. Fisher's idea was that things like peacock's tails and all the dazzling plumage of birds of paradise…
/r/TheRedPill22/08/15 09:54 PM
0

Not the way I remember it. The country was known as the sick man of Europe because we were crippled by the Unions. The 1970s were pretty austere. The Thatcher really churned things up, curbed the unions, and things gradually improved. Last Labour government, we ended up in massive debt, lucky we didn't need a bailout ourselves. We started out the 20th century as probably the #1 world power, and ended it barely able to afford a 3rd rate navy. What happened in the 20th century? Two major wars were…
/r/TheRedPill22/08/15 12:19 PM
20

Always. Patriarchy Theory is bullshit from beginning to end. Women weren't 'allowed' to be miners, or working in the quarries (before they had dynamite and trucks, remember), or building cities and roads, or fighting in the army, or sailing ships when there were pirates and no detailed charts, let alone chronometers and GPS? Yeah right. They were so oppressed being allowed to do light work at home and look after the children. How on Earth did anyone fall for that crap?
/r/TheRedPill22/08/15 12:09 PM
2

None of which support your statement, "Cortisol is responsible for emotional bonding and feelings of love and intimacy." The second one says that neither testosterone nor cortisol are affected by having sexual thoughts (but cortisol is raised in women having sexual thoughts, I had already read that pair of papers), and the third that being stressed (and hence higher cortisol levels) can lead to erectile dysfunction. Again, I think this is well known. I guess you are referring to the first, but i…
/r/TheRedPill22/08/15 08:33 AM
2

Cortisol? This is produced by the adrenal glands, it is a stress hormone (like adrenaline and norepinephrine). Oxytocin is antagonistic with cortisols and builds trust circuits and romantic-love circuits. It plays a major role in a father's bonding with his infants. Vasopressin also does a lot of the things that Oxytocin does for females to males.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/15 06:38 PM
8

Oh god my friends ex was a perfect example. Untrained little shit. High energy, breathing fast, ran around constantly then would piss a little on the couch. I can see why he left her. Once she starts pissing on the couch I'm out of there.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/15 12:04 PM
3

Women aren't getting paid as much as more than men, so feminists try to change that. Fixed that for you.
/r/TheRedPill19/08/15 06:38 PM
1

Relationships (including becoming a parent) affects the man's testosterone levels too. Farrelly, D., Owens, R., Elliott, H., Walden, H., and Wetherell, M. (2015). The effects of being in a ”new relationship” on levels of testosterone in men. Evol Psychol, 13(1):250–61. In light of previous research showing that different types of relationships affect levels of testosterone in men, this study examined whether categorizing relationship types according to relationship length can shed further light …
/r/MarriedRedPill19/08/15 05:49 PM
1

female sexual selection is the more powerful force in most species. more powerful than natural selection? Than sexual selection of females by males? I assume the latter. The males having to get tarted up like peacocks at risk of getting more easily noticed by predators or otherwise wasting resources on things like extremely elaborate nests, are ways that manifests. This is not a male/female thing so much as who invests most, something that TRP is very familiar with. Whoever invests the most has …
/r/TheRedPill19/08/15 03:25 PM
1

What will women rationalize for themselves when they realize their monster has become too much? Probably that 'good women' were the victims of those nasty feminists that they supported, and the feminists were victims of government and big business. There has always been a mutual collaboration between women and the political elites. Eventually, the common men, who are the losers in all this, get too pissed off with their lot and revolt. That does look increasingly on the cards once again, as you …
/r/MarriedRedPill19/08/15 10:01 AM
8

Honour, loyalty, courage, justice, these are masculine virtues, it is foolish to expect women to have them. Women are conformists and if society expected and demand these things they would at least outwardly show them. But it doesn't so you just have to be aware and act accordingly. Doesn't mean you should hide your anger and contempt when you encounter it, of course.
/r/TheRedPill17/08/15 12:53 PM
3

Be very careful if she wants to put it on you because it is 'sexier that way' so she gets to remove the wrapper coming to bed. If you can check carefully then fine. I know about fake pills, not heard about being able to buy fake condoms, just read stuff about using nail scissors so they 'accidentally' tear, or perforating with a needle. Women can be pretty desparate.
/r/TheRedPill16/08/15 08:24 PM
12

and tell her to bring plenty of condoms Except this. Never let the woman control contraception. You use condoms that you supply, she uses the pill/IUD/Dutch Cap+gel, or whatever. If you rely on her being on the pill, well she can 'forget', or if she does it in front of you, she probably knows there are fake pills for sale on the internet. If you let her have access to the condoms when alone, she goes on Yahoo and learns how to sabotage them with nail scissors. Getting you hooked by becoming preg…
/r/TheRedPill16/08/15 08:07 PM
1

She is the standing joke on that paper. There are other feminists there, Claire Cohen for example, but they tend to get confined to the Women's section these days. They used to spew their garbage all over the men's section, but the commenters kept tearing them to pieces (and still do, even in the women's section), so they have largely withdrawn from the men's section. The odd feminazi comments in support, but generally it is men (and a few women) pulling their arguments to pieces, and no serious…
/r/TheRedPill15/08/15 08:02 PM
3

Student victims (12%) were more likely than nonstudent victims (5%) to state that the incident was not important enough to report. http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/rsavcaf9513.pdf
/r/TheRedPill15/08/15 06:04 PM
2

In particular, to distinguish between a 'mission' and 'goals'. For example, missions tend to be much broader in scope, kind of generic, and goals are decided within that. Your mission may be something thought of at the level of these: http://www.unlimitedchoice.org/blog/empowerment/21-outstanding-mission-statements-for-your-life/ Whereas a goal would be 'complete my PhD' or 'travel to many countries'.
/r/TheRedPill15/08/15 10:50 AM
7

Men, in general, are less masculine This. There is the whole career thing, which is a male-oriented activity, that feminism made women think was for them. That is because feminism, ironically, only values masculine traits, so tries to make women act and feel like men. Of course, they make piss-poor men, so along with that they have to make men less like men. But women's happiness also depends on men; women are very reactive, their happiness depends on their environment, particularly the quality …
/r/TheRedPill15/08/15 10:12 AM
2

I didn't say it was false, I said I could find no evidence. There is no evidence for the existence of unicorns either, which does not prove that there are no unicorns. However, making crucial life choices assuming they do exist would be foolish. Nor can it easily be inferred. The only evidence I found was this, but it is not the same thing at all. It gives no evidence for neurobiological change, and is correlational rather than causal. This means that there may be such change, yes, but equally i…
/r/RedPillWomen14/08/15 06:03 PM
3

Unfortunately, I can't rely on bar graphs made from data that is, by the author's admission, "not available anywhere in the published literature" http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nsfg/nsfg_2006_2010_puf.htm
/r/RedPillWomen13/08/15 04:41 PM
1

Fair enough. I post here too much, and in spite of reading the 'Male participation in this sub' several times to check what I am posting is ok, I always feel a bit leery about it. Think it is time for me to go dark.
/r/RedPillWomen13/08/15 01:49 PM
17

Slow and steady. Feminism is a religion, it is not based on reality. You generally can't convince people to give up a religion, not matter how crazy, in one easy step, because they are ego-invested in it. It is like a supertanker, it needs time to change its course. I have found before that people (women particularly) will absolutely close their minds to what I said, but nonetheless it did plant that seed, they go away and chew on it, then come back (sometimes weeks later) and ask a little quest…
/r/TheRedPill12/08/15 01:07 PM
3

Rape culture is real enough. It occurs in US male prisons (and probably male prisons elsewhere too). Rape culture is not just the idea that rape occurs, but that it is condoned, that the powers-that-be turn a blind eye to it. It is obvious to the meanest intelligence (ie, not feminists and dumb-asses) that society generally is far from this.
/r/TheRedPill12/08/15 01:01 PM
2

True, but feminism is the perceived orthodoxy.
/r/TheRedPill12/08/15 12:51 PM
2

Especially ironic when you know about how strong women's own-sex bias is (especially feminists), and that men also tend to be biased in favour of women or else egalitarian. Men tend not to be biased in favour of men, which is often apparent in this sub (don't go out of your way to save a bro, don't worry about sleeping with another man's wife, etc). The most sexist people in society are feminists.
/r/TheRedPill12/08/15 12:49 PM
10

Though you share a similar name to RedPill, I don't think you have the same goals and they seem like two totally different ballgames. Red Pill is a view of reality. It considers that the world is not the way we were brought up to believe it was (the Blue Pill way), particularly about the nature of men and women and the relationships between them. Having the same view of reality doesn't mean everyone wants the same things within that reality. Since you mention ballgames, baseball players and rugb…
/r/RedPillWomen12/08/15 12:13 PM
5

That is all very good to hear. On first seeing this post, I was pretty unhopeful for you, but seeing the talk about neurochemical changes with number of partners (something that I myself had written about previously, based on what I read elsewhere in the TRP sub) I decided to find the source material, and as I say, I couldn't find it. Now, this doesn't mean there isn't something going on here, psychological rather than neurobiological, because of this data http://socialpathology.blogspot.co.uk/2…
/r/RedPillWomen12/08/15 09:05 AM
4

Sure. I have this: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.06.014 about the important of oxytocin in pair-bonding, followed up by this one: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120650 which says that prolactin is important for pair-bonding, not just oxytocin. As I mentioned, much of the earlier work was on prairie voles, and there is reason no be cautious about applying it uncritically to humans. I am more swayed by primate studies, as these are. Here is a review of the vole work http://dx.doi…
/r/RedPillWomen11/08/15 05:41 PM
5

Yes, I will, here or somewhere, since it is a common meme on TRP and RPW. However, it so far all seems to tie back to catholic websites and Eric Keroack. There is work on vasopressin and promiscuity in men. And this study http://www.psyneuen-journal.com/article/S0306-4530(12)00260-0/abstract suggests that we may need to be cautious taking results on voles as applicable to humans. Oxytocin levels are lower in the obese, and in those with type I diabetes, but so far I haven't found anything about …
/r/RedPillWomen11/08/15 11:39 AM
10

Taking the red pill is about facing the truth about the world, no matter how painful, or how much it conflicts with our ideas. We should never stop doing that. I have seen many times the information about multiple partners damaging the ability to pair-bond, but recently I started trying to track down the actual studies that show this. So far, no luck. What I have are articles by a certain Bush administration guy called Keroack who is anti family planning, and he made a review which claimed this.…
/r/RedPillWomen11/08/15 08:11 AM
8

Yes, they have lower sex drives, and that sex drive is more responsive rather than initiating. That is, if the right guy comes and gives them tingles, she wants sex, but it is driven from external circumstances rather than internally. Testosterone drives sex drive in both sexes, and it is 12-17x higher in men. This is of evolutionary importance, since sex itself is enjoyed by both sexes (actually, often more by the woman), but having a higher sex drive means that men have to pay something extra …
/r/TheRedPill10/08/15 10:01 PM
2

I would start with the latest edition of the Buss handbook. The are PDFs on the web, a link was posted a few days ago. He covers mating strategies more than the others
/r/TheRedPill01/08/15 10:57 AM
4

Well, there are two sides to this. On the one hand, Baker's idea that deformed sperm are functionally different, that there are 'killer sperm' and 'blocker sperm' aside from those that just go for the egg, is controversial. Tim Birkhead did an experiment to see if mixing two men's sperm showed any sign of them killing each other off, and didn't find any. However, sperm competition in the sense of just "it's a race" when there are two ejaculates present is really not controversial. I think it is …
/r/TheRedPill01/08/15 08:38 AM
0

I don't agree with your basic conclusion that women deliberately try to break men to gain control, which causes them to lose attraction. That is not an evolutionarily stable strategy. Women needed strong men, her breaking a strong one and then leaving would leave her in a dangerously exposed state. No, the test is meant to be passed. So why isn't it being passed? A couple of things. One is society norms; in a gynocentric society men are actively penalized for taking firm control of a relationshi…
/r/TheRedPill31/07/15 08:49 PM
1

I agree on the second two, not sure about the Tao Te Ching, but then I practised Wutan-style T'ai Chi Ch'uan for some decades, so may just take that for granted, I guess.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/15 02:58 PM
3

I came to the same conclusion some time ago. Not just at university level, but at all levels. One problem we have at high school level is that teaching has become dominated by women, and with it has come a gynocentric attitude to everything, for example that competition is bad, there are no 'winners'; but boys love to compete, it is what drives them. Also, not enough physical exercise, which is fine for girls but boys find it hard to stay still for so long. It is not surprising that girls are no…
/r/TheRedPill31/07/15 11:14 AM
6

This was covered in another comment some time ago. It is illegal to get a personal paternity test, without a court order. However, if you apply for one you will get one. It is about not secretly taking DNA material and using it however you want, it isn't specifically about paternity testing. The mother would have to be informed, but her consent is not required if the man can give reasons for wanting the test. That is my understanding, anyway.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/15 11:05 AM
3

Of course they can't consent. Did you never take Feminism 101? You see, women need to be helped to become 'Strong, Independent Children Womyn'
/r/TheRedPill31/07/15 10:54 AM
1

As I said in another post, the point of feminism was never to help women, the point was to control men. This is why it got so much traction from governments so quickly. Yes, I know, feminists think they had to 'fight for their rights' but they actually got a great deal of support from the powers that be. Unfortunately, it has gotten out of control, and is now seriously weakening our society. Women have a lot of power, and always did, but it used to be covert power, now it is more overt. Yet even…
/r/TheRedPill31/07/15 10:28 AM
2

Thanks, I haven't read that, I will now. Also, Miyamoto Musashi's The Book of Five Rings.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/15 09:44 AM
1

I just can't control those deeply held misogynistic impulses! ;)
/r/TheRedPill31/07/15 09:42 AM
8

I wasn't going to read any more, but now I'm dying to find out exactly how one controls breasts while swimming topless.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/15 11:45 PM
1

I think I just lost my lunch. I really didn't need to read that linked article, it was pure propoganda from the Feminine Imperative. Does any man actually fall for it? OK, fuck that!
/r/TheRedPill30/07/15 11:43 PM
57

Excellent stuff. You can't go wrong with Epictetus or Marcus Aurelius. There are no better men for RP guys to read, and 'read' is one of the edicts of TRP. There are some great modern books that should be on every man's reading list: Jack Donovan's The way of men; Robert Greene's The 48 Laws of Power and Mastery; Rollo Thomassi's The Rational Male; Ian Ironwood's The Manosphere: A New Hope for Masculinity; Robert Glover's No More Mister Nice Guy; Adam Leonas' The Empress is Naked (new, not finis…
/r/TheRedPill30/07/15 09:30 PM
3

Not quite. millipede and Cleggy both gave in readily and wore the t-shirt. Cameron, for all his faults (which are many) refused, even though in an interview they tried to pressure him into it several times. I thought the campaign was a good one even before they found the t-shirts were made by women in sweatshops in Mauritius. Ever wondered what a feminist looks like? She looks like Ed Milliband. Classic.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/15 06:30 PM
12

Do you think this will just happen again in a few decades when women get too comfortable? The reasons why feminism started (comfortable domestic life requiring little to no effort in the 50s) have not gone, in fact, a domestic partner is less viable than ever before. I didn't really answer this. My opinion, feel free to shoot me down. The reasons feminism started had nothing to do with domestic life being comfortable. Let's tease apart the reasons. The nature of work changed. Prior to the 20th c…
/r/TheRedPill29/07/15 10:32 PM
2

Yes, all that. It is just insane that a man is supposed to financially support a woman who isn't his wife. She doesn't have a job? Then she is in the same position as everyone else who doesn't she has to get one. But since most divorces happen because of the woman, there is no excuse, because she knows what is coming and should have got a job before she set about destroying it. I understand in Scandinavia CS is set according to age of the child, not the salary of the husband. However, a second p…
/r/TheRedPill29/07/15 10:00 PM
11

I don't think I would disagree with any of that. Women act in their own best interests, but then so do we. It is just that in the past those interests coincided rather more than they do now. A lot of women now have heard about 'players' and 'MGTOW' and even 'Red Pill', and are also aware that this is happening as a reaction to feminism. I'm not giving these women marks for being biased in favour of men, although, let's be fair and admit that there are women around who genuinely like men and admi…
/r/TheRedPill29/07/15 09:51 PM
15

Yes and no. A lot of women hate feminists - after all, Western women's reputation is absolutely trashed because of them, and those that have always wanted to get married find it so much harder because of it. As I recall, a MumsNet survey in the UK found that 7 out of 8 did not self-identify as feminists. If you go to any mainstream website that is not heavily modded (eg telegraph.co.uk), then articles about feminism raise an absolute shitstorm, and I don't think women can be ignorant of this. So…
/r/TheRedPill29/07/15 09:32 PM
5

Precisely. Men are biased towards women, or they are egalitarian, but they are not biased towards men. But that is men as a sex, men can be extremely biased towards individual men, towards their own group (or gang, in Donovan's terms). It isn't strong here because it is 123,000 strong and everyone is anonymous, but if it was a group of close friends, or a small army unit, it would be a very different story.
/r/TheRedPill29/07/15 07:33 PM
16

No, that would be what women did before. Mothers told their daughters to marry as a virgin (and in some parts of the world older women force younger women to have FGM) specifically to force the price up. Men have to pay with commitment to get sex. Feminists are the last people you could call intelligent, they don't know what the fuck they are doing, just useful fools. It stems from penis envy, which is why feminism only values masculine virtues and decries feminine ones. You have to be a 'Strong…
/r/TheRedPill29/07/15 06:53 PM
1

Taking the piss? Sending it up? Taking the Mick? Mocking the idea? I don't really speak American, sorry.
/r/TheRedPill29/07/15 06:43 PM
1

Hmm, that is standing outside the Radcliffe Camera (university library) in Oxford, surrounded by colleges. Although, I'm not sure how to read that, it could be a piss-take.
/r/TheRedPill29/07/15 06:32 PM
2

Internalized misogyny. They are not allowed to be submissive or please men, but they have been mislead by the evil patriarchy and need to be sent to a re-education facility. They are victims, can't you tell?
/r/TheRedPill29/07/15 06:28 PM
2

That's interesting, could I ask where the 85% figure comes from? I'm aware of the graph about the increasing change of a relationship failing with number of prior partners (starting after the first one), but I recall it was a graph, not actual data I could download and crunch, so would appreciate another bite at it. And yes, given virginity at marriage, the removal of the need for a prenup (whatever is your before is yours after just by default, no argument), the removal of alimony, the removal …
/r/TheRedPill29/07/15 06:10 PM
1

You are not wrong. If I posted this somewhere else, I guarantee everyone would think it was posted by a man. Actually, it is pretty much from the Feminist Party Manifesto, the 'I'm a Strong, Independent Woman(TM)' meme. From a man, I would take it as someone very competitive, and I would watch my back. From a woman, I would watch my back and ensure there was a third person present at all times. Are you aware that it comes across that way, OP? I'm not trying to be cruel, I'm letting you know what…
/r/RedPillWomen29/07/15 05:47 PM
1

Already are. http://voxday.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/the-bitter-harvest-of-feminism.html I note a few feminists and white knights commenting on this post, btw. Not sure what attracted the idiots. I take issue with some members here who have plated feminists. To my mind, Never Fuck a Feminist is up there with Don't Put Your Dick in Crazy. Same thing, really.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/15 11:15 PM
9

Also, there is a big difference between the rape statistics (0.61% for students, 0.76% for college-age non-students, 0.15% for older women) and divorce statistics (from 40-50% for 1st time, over 70% for third marriages). That makes a huge difference to how justified the word 'all' is.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/15 09:34 PM
3

Yes. Also, AWALT is not talking about criminal behaviour. Immoral, perhaps, but actually endorsed and supported by society. But the primary point is exactly as Kid_Crimson says. If feminists actually used YesAllMen to simply teach reasonable caution to women I would not have any objections to it at all. But it isn't, it is used, amongst other things, to try to reverse the burden of proof.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/15 09:29 PM
6

Depends where you are. Recent figures for the UK are just over 40% of first time marriages end in divorce, and in 65% of those it was destroyed by the woman. In the US, 41%-50% end in divorce, of which 70% are destroyed by the woman directly. However, other studies showed that a further 20% were destroyed by the woman indirectly. That is, the man divorced her, but because of her behaviour (infidelity, nagging, etc). However, those are figures for first marriages. They are much worse for 2nd and …
/r/TheRedPill28/07/15 09:23 PM
2

totally agree. It is why I'm fully onboard with the 'lift' injunction
/r/TheRedPill27/07/15 09:24 PM
15

I wrote about this transformation recently elsewhere, so if you will forgive the repetition... Be careful of this word 'equality', it is a favoured weapon of feminists. 'I can't believe there are people in the 21st century who don't believe in equality!'. Yeah, right. But what does it mean? Equal rights under the law. I believe in this, and therefore I'm anti-feminist, because feminists demonstrably do not. Women have greater rights, and feminists have always opposed any equalization. Equal oppo…
/r/RedPillWomen27/07/15 05:32 PM
12

Not so much disgust as lack of respect. A man with a high count must be someone out of the ordinary, a real alpha, because getting women into bed takes effort. For a woman, she just has to go into a bar and point at her crotch, even if she is a 4, so it tells you nothing about her quality, but on the contrary says she has no standards, no sense, no self respect, and absolutely no idea of what a successful women's mating strategy is. But, because someone has a high count, does that mean you would…
/r/TheRedPill27/07/15 04:26 PM
2

It is much more a female thing than a male thing. For women, it has made complete sense because in the sexual market place women giving it away for free drives down the price (and the price was life-long commitment to raising her children). For men, it is much more nuanced. For short-term mating strategy, sluts are basically what you want - women who give it up and ask little in return. They are great, you aren't going for them for their smarts. However, if you start talking about long-term mati…
/r/askTRP27/07/15 04:14 PM
19

I was recently told by a close friend of mine who's staunchly "feminist" that I was holding women back This is true. Since the beginning of 2nd-wave feminism, women's happiness has declined both in absolute terms, and relative to men (they are now more unhappy than men, the reverse of the way it was) http://www.nber.org/papers/w14969.pdf Women are now on anti-depressants at rates three times higher than men. You don't seem to be blaming men for this. Please report to the nearest re-education fac…
/r/RedPillWomen27/07/15 03:42 PM
1

They didn't fake testosterone, that was the whole point. The faked the outward marker of higher testosterone. So the question then is, can you fake it? Would having the larger bib (indicator of testosterone) cause you to have higher success? The answer was, no, the other males tested them and found them wanting (aka beat the shit of of them).
/r/TheRedPill27/07/15 03:20 PM
8

Not like feminists (like you) then? Fuck off
/r/TheRedPill27/07/15 11:20 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter