A thought came to my mind while reading the last part of /r/TheRedPill/comments/1zrcs3/on_the_implications_of_powertalk_and_other/ :

Feminism is powertalk. Example: Not only does no not always mean no, "No means no" doesn't mean "no means no". It doesn't mean "All men must ask permission before mating". "No mean no" means "If you can't both discern the difference between no that means no, and no that means yes, AND you can't discern that 'no means no' doesn't apply to everyone, then we want YOU to be in the group of men that asks permission before mating. Because your lack of powertalk skills is unattractive, and we want to make sure that you don't try to sex us without first giving us an escape valve that we can use without looking mean."

It might have already been said, but... This use of powertalk seems like natural selection. We are in an intellectual society. We don't only need physical strenght to survive, we need minds. In a way, by filtering the betas unable to understand gametalk / to use powertalk, isn't feminism filtering their genes, allowing more intellectual alphas to reproduce, thus improving human genes pool ?